Congress
Senate Commerce pushes AI markup plan to August
Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is postponing his highly anticipated artificial intelligence and kids online safety markup, with a tentative plan to hold it the week of Aug. 3, a committee aide confirmed Wednesday.
Cruz had earlier been eyeing July 29 for the markup. Cruz said earlier Wednesday the markup schedule was “still in flux” as the agenda comes together. In recent weeks, he has been soliciting input from committee members on what legislation should be included.
Republican senators are rushing to advance AI legislation before the August recess. Per Senate rules, an advisory with the list of bills has to be published a week in advance.
Congress
Lisa Murkowski is undecided on Blanche’s confirmation. Her state is getting a windfall from DOJ.
The Justice Department has been lavishing nine-figure policy wins on Alaska — and openly touting what a “huge” time it’s been for the state — as attorney general nominee Todd Blanche is scrambling to lock down support for his confirmation from its senior senator, Republican Lisa Murkowski.
A July 7 settlementover the federal government’s unfinished work on the port of Alaska resulted in a $180 million payout to Anchorage — an announcementBlanche, who is currently the acting attorney general, made personally during a two-day visit. The Justice Department shared news around the same time it had dropped Biden-era lawsuits related to Alaska’s energy production.
Then on Tuesday, the administration inked a $400 million settlementwith a group that administers health care programs for American Indians and Alaska natives.
“The wins keep coming for the American people in Alaska,” Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward declared last week, after announcing yet another win for the state: a $6.1 million award to tribal governments to combat violent crime.
Those developments all coincide with Blanche’s effort to court Republican senators to vote for his nomination as he deals with blowback over the botched release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, which he oversaw as deputy attorney general, followed by the launch of a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization fund” — which he has since said is dead.
President Donald Trump formally nominated Blanche for the top job at the Justice Department on June 8, and Blanche has been meeting with senators ever since. Those meetings have included at least two with Murkowski — one in June and one earlier this week.
Right before Blanche’s confirmation hearing last week, Murkowski said she was hopeful for “specific follow-ups” from the nominee. She noted that she had some concerns about Blanche serving previously as Trump’s personal attorney and that she was interested to hear how Blanche’s visit to Alaska went.
“So I’ve got some follow-ons that I want to visit with him about. He was able to get out to one of our smaller, isolated … villages where there’s very limited public safety. [I] want to gain his impressions,” Murkowski told reporters at the time.
She acknowledged Tuesday that she was continuing to have conversations with Blanche. But the moderate lawmaker and frequent Trump critic did not tip her hand about how she might vote — a warning sign for GOP leaders who currently can’t afford more than two defections on their side of the aisle, assuming all Democrats vote “no.”
In the Senate Judiciary Committee, just a single GOP vote against Blanche would stop him from advancing to the floor if every Democrat on the panel opposes him. And right now there are two Republican senators — John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tills of North Carolina — who have not committed to voting ‘yes.”
Blanche has already shown a willingness to jump through hoops to shore up support for his confirmation. Shortly after Tillis said he wouldn’t vote for Blanche until he met with Epstein’s victims face-to-face, the acting attorney general followed through.
He has also been working draft legislative language declaring the “anti-weaponization fund” officially dead in a bid to satisfy Tillis as well as Cornyn, who both said they need this guarantee in writing.
While Justice Department officials have been eager to tout the big Alaska policy breakthroughs, they haven’t explicitly disclosed any connection to wooing Murkowski’s vote. They also note that their work on Alaskan priorities has stretched back well before Blanche’s nomination, that senior DOJ officials frequently travel to offices around the country and that the Alaska trip had been scheduled earlier and then rebooked for July.
“The Department has been litigating these cases for years,” a DOJ spokesperson said in a statement. “Unlike under the Biden administration, this Department will always choose results over costly and inefficient litigation. The Acting Attorney General enjoyed his trip to Alaska earlier this month where he learned about the unique challenges facing those communities.”
In a statement Wednesday, Murkowski’s spokesperson, Joe Plesha, said that if Blanche is reported out of the Judiciary Committee, the senator “will evaluate [him] in the same way she evaluates every nominee: by reviewing his hearing and determining whether he has the appropriate qualifications, experience, temperament, and independence necessary for this important role.”
Murkowski is one of the few genuine swing votes in the Senate with a history of leveraging her vote across presidencies to win big time policy concessions and victories for her constituents.
In 2023, she was instrumental in pushing the Biden administration to move forward with a massive ConocoPhillips enterprise in Alaska estimated to produce 180,000 barrels of oil a day and generate billions in new revenue to the state. Murkowski attributed the administration’s concession to her yearslong strategy of breaking with her party to vote for key Biden nominees and legislative priorities.
As recently as last year, she was persuaded to vote for the GOP’s massive tax and spending megabill and its deep cuts to social safety net programs in part because the final package mandated new lease sales for drilling across the state and extra funding for Alaska’s rural hospitals.
And when she was helping hold up an appropriations bill in committee in a dispute over the location of FBI headquarters, one Republican senator — granted anonymity to speak candidly — joked they had considered offering an amendment to move the agency’s main building to Alaska to see if that got her to cooperate.
Plesha, in his statement, said Murkowski “appreciates Mr. Blanche’s recent trip to Alaska and his willingness to take up her request to travel beyond the road system to understand the public safety challenges that rural communities face. She also welcomes recent settlements with the Department of Justice to resolve longstanding federal deficiencies, come into compliance with Supreme Court precedent, and improve Alaskans’ quality of life.”
“These actions would all be appropriate no matter who is Attorney General,” Plesha added.
Jordain Carney contributed to this report.
Congress
House adopts budget framework for $95B party-line package
House Republicans managed to overcome internal disagreements and approve a budget framework Wednesday — a key step toward unlocking the power to skirt the Senate filibuster and pass a $95 billion package.
The vote succeeded 216-214 after Republican leaders were able to quell frustration among members that the blueprint does not include new spending offsets. House GOP leaders hope to enact a final package that pushes fresh cash to the military, intelligence programs, farm aid and election security.
Both the House and Senate need to adopt the same budget framework in order to begin the process of drafting, then passing, the third reconciliation bill of the 119th Congress. That means the onus is now on Senate Republican leaders to build support for the party-line plan Trump administration officials want the GOP to clear before the midterms.
The White House and Pentagon’s central pitch is that the military urgently needs a cash infusion amid the Iran war — and Democrats won’t provide the votes to make that money available through the regular-order process.
“We have immediate needs within the department, some bills we’ve got to pay. This conflict costs money,” Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), a top appropriator, said in an interview this week following meetings with senior Trump administration officials. “This we have to do.”
The House’s budget resolution also would allow $10 billion to go toward election security in the form of state grants to incentivize strict voter-ID laws — a fig leaf to President Donald Trump and the many Republicans on Capitol Hill who continue to demand passage of a separate partisan election security measure that is Trump’s top legislative priority.
Senate Republican leaders are already hearing from farm-state senators and defense hawks who want to increase the amount of funding the final package would provide for the military and agriculture assistance. Fiscal hawks on that side of the Capitol are also demanding Republican leaders find offsets to blunt the deficit impact of the massive bill.
“There’s a lot of people with a lot of ideas,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), the newly seated chair of the Senate Budget Committee, said in an interview. “The good news is the White House is definitely leading on this, which is going to be really important. I think most Republicans are interested in helping President Trump succeed in his agenda.”
That would require approving the budget resolution in the Senate, however, and then punting the measure back to the House for another vote — where another favorable outcome is not guaranteed.
In the House, fiscal conservatives lost a hard-fought battle over offsetting the new spending. “I’m obviously displeased about pay-fors and lack thereof,” Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas said Monday evening, before ultimately voting “yes” two days later.
To win over the skeptics, House GOP leaders made a familiar promise: that Republicans will pursue yet another party-line package that would help shrink the deficit. Speaker Mike Johnson made a personal commitment to Republicans on the House Rules Committee that he would work to advance a fourth reconciliation bill after the midterms to target fraud, waste and abuse in federal programs.
Many Republicans aren’t convinced that this outcome will ultimately come to pass.
Democrats, meanwhile, are prepared to hammer Republicans over their efforts through the upcoming summer recess.
“Republicans are putting forward a nearly $100 billion budget bill. But get this: not a single dollar, not one, will go toward lowering the costs that people face,” House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar of California said this week. “Instead, Republicans plan to spend tens of billions of dollars on Trump’s failed war in Iran.”
Jordain Carney and Riley Rogerson contributed to this report.
Congress
NASA’s Isaacman isn’t asking the GOP for more money
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman spoke to an influential group of House Republicans on Wednesday — but he didn’t make a pitch for more money when he walked through his agency’s ambitious plans for space.
“I’m not here asking for money,” Isaacman told GOP members during the weekly Republican Study Committee lunch, according to five people who were in the room. RSC Chair August Pfluger (R-Texas) also confirmed Isaacman’s comments while leaving the meeting Wednesday.
Isaacman’s reassurances come as NASA juggles a number of high-profile missions in the next few years, including returning humans to the moon, building a new Mars spacecraft and a lunar outpost. The NASA administrator had been set to speak to the group earlier in the year, but that meeting was canceled because of scheduling issues.
Isaacman has said in the past that the agency “does not have a topline problem” — pointing to the nearly $25 billion Congress gave the agency in 2026, plus $10 billion in the reconciliation package passed last year. He pointed to the GOP megabill as helping NASA boost its space exploration endeavors, according to three members in the room, who, like others, were granted anonymity to discuss the internal meeting.
The White House proposed a 25 percent cut to NASA’s budget in its 2027 request, but House appropriators have already released a draft bill that would restore the agency’s topline to its current level.
The Republican Study Committee, the biggest coalition in the GOP conference, has fielded previous pitches from Trump administration officials for additional funds. Rep. Brad Knott (R-N.C.), who was at the meeting, said he believed Isaacman is “the only member that came before us that has ever said we do not need any more money.”
Isaacman also gave updates on several of the upcoming NASA projects, including the Artemis program, which aims to land U.S. astronauts on the moon in 2028.
“He’s got such a vision for how to achieve space dominance, to compete with adversarial nations and the Chinese Communist Party, to bring American pride into the space race and to do it at a cost that is reasonable,” Pfluger said in an interview after the meeting.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a long time advocate for space exploration, also attended the lunch. Pfluger added that Gingrich gave credit to Isaacman and President Donald Trump for leading the charge into space.
-
Politics1 year agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
The Josh Fourrier Show2 years agoDOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics1 year agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
Uncategorized2 years ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Politics1 year agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship11 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words

