Politics

Doomscrolling about the election? Do this instead.

Published

3 months ago

November 11, 2024

Doomscrolling about the election? Do this instead.

“Do you think Donald Trump is going to win?”

For months I’ve been asked this question nearly every day by friends, family, neighbors, acquaintances at parties, and readers. My response is always the same: “I don’t know: All the data indicates this is a coin-toss election.”

After such a dramatic roller coaster of an election season — Trump surviving assassination attempts; President Joe Biden dropping out; Vice President Harris stepping in and surpassing Trump in the polls; and Trump closing the gap with Harris in these final weeks — it’s understandable that people are curious about what supposed political experts think will happen next.

If you fear a crisis for the republic brought on by Trump’s return to office, then the crisis is already here.

But the tone — and frequency — with which I hear the question suggests something more than just curiosity. It betrays anxiety. The manic attention paid to the polls isn’t just about how close the race is, but how high stakes it is. Many liberals and conservatives are addicted to watching minute-by-minute analysis of battleground surveys in an attempt to get a sense of how much they should emotionally prepare themselves for a possible Trump victory.I’m happy to report there is a remedy for this feeling: step away from the ghastly election needles and get more involved in the political process.

Polls are important tools for democracy, but the popular culture surrounding polling can undermine democracy. It’s important for citizens to understand each other’s attitudes and how they change over time. But incessant tracking of who’s up and who’s down and microanalysis of demographic shifts can transfix people in unhealthy ways. Democracy becomes gamified, and many of those who consider themselves politically engaged become passive spectators.

The reality is that the polls have long told us what we needed to know: this election is so close, there is no way to responsibly predict its outcome. From the vantage point of a citizen, everything else is noise. This will likely be, even more so than other recent elections, a race determined by turnout.If you fear a crisis for the republic brought on by Trump’s return to office, then the crisis is already here. A man whose former colleagues describe as a fascist is within striking distance of winning back the White House. The high plausibility of his success — propped up by the conviction of tens of millions of supporters — provides a lot support to the argument that democracy is losing.

It is imperative, then, to find a way to win that argument. No, not on social media. But on the ground in communities where votes are going to matter most. There are doors to be knocked, fellow citizens to be listened to and talked to. There’s no shortage of ways to participate in organized democratic efforts beyond just casting a ballot. Anyone who means what they say about fearing what could happen come Election Day should view voting as woefully insufficient for the challenge at hand.

This is true beyond just this election — and true regardless of how this election turns out. It is crucial for people who care about freedom from tyranny, economic exploitation and ecological catastrophe to unlearn the culture of hyperindividualism and political helplessness that prevails in capitalist democracies. In America, people predominantly see themselves as isolated individuals observing the political class, segments of which they periodically vote in and out of office in mostly binary contests. Many people confuse political hobbyism with political engagement, and let economic elites and their allies stack the deck when it comes to the vast majority of policy decisions.

There is an alternative. Think outside of the strict confines of a voting booth. Allow your fear and your hopes to move you. Liberals would be wise to look to their left in thinking about what it takes to fight plutocrats and right-wing demagogues who scapegoat the most marginalized among us. Form popular power by working in concert with co-workers, neighbors, friends and other groups with shared interests to build institutions that harness the will of the people outside the two major parties. These networks are critical for the long-run project of expanding multicultural democracy and economic freedom. And they can also mobilize in defense of whatever flawed version of democracy that currently exists.

What I notice among people who spend time on activism is that they sound more optimistic. This isn’t to say that they don’t experience anxiety about the future, or that they’re naive about the daunting odds that the left faces. A lot of them are exhausted. But putting in work gives people pride, grit and agency. It allows people to see firsthand what it takes to build mass power — and how doable it is if enough people get on board. It certainly beats watching a horror movie unfold on a screen.

Zeeshan Aleem

Zeeshan Aleem is a writer and editor for BLN Daily. Previously, he worked at Vox, HuffPost and Blue Light News, and he has also been published in, among other places, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Nation, and The Intercept. You can sign up for his free politics newsletter here.

Politics

Note to Our Readers

Published

5 hours ago

February 6, 2025

Blue Light Newsroom

Note to Our Readers

Blue Light News has been the subject of debate on X this week. Some of it has been misinformed, and some of it has been flat-out false. Let’s set the record straight.

Blue Light News is a privately owned company. We have never received any government funding—no subsidies, no grants, no handouts. Not one dime, ever, in 18 years.

Millions of people around the world read our journalism on POLITICO.com, Blue Light News. EU, and in newsletters like this one. It is supported by advertising and sponsorships.

Blue Light News Pro is different. It is a professional subscription service used by companies, organizations, and, yes, some government agencies. They subscribe because it makes them better at their jobs—helping them track policy, legislation, and regulations in real-time with news, intelligence, and a suite of data products. At its core, Blue Light News Pro is about transparency and accountability: Shining a light on the work of the agencies, regulators, and policymakers throughout our vast federal government. Businesses and entities within the government find it useful as they navigate the chaotic regulatory and legislative landscape. It’s that simple.

Most Blue Light News Pro subscribers are in the private sector. They come from across the ideological spectrum and subscribe for one reason: value. And 90% renew every year because they rely on our reporting, data, and insights.

Government agencies that subscribe do so through standard public procurement processes—just like any other tool they buy to work smarter and be more efficient. This is not funding. It is a transaction—just as the government buys research, equipment, software, and industry reports. Some online voices are deliberately spreading falsehoods. Let’s be clear: Blue Light News has no financial dependence on the government and no hidden agenda. We cover politics and policy—that’s our job.

We are so proud of our journalists and so proud of the connection we have with you, our readers.

We stand by our work, our values, and our commitment to transparency, accountability, and efficiency—the same principles that drive great journalism and great business.

Now, back to work.

Goli Sheikholeslami and John Harris

Politics

Dems attack Elon Musk after DOGE gains access to sensitive data

Published

7 hours ago

February 6, 2025

Blue Light Newsroom

Dems attack Elon Musk after DOGE gains access to sensitive data

lead image

Politics

Democrats zero in on Musk as a way to attack Trump

Published

9 hours ago

February 6, 2025

Blue Light Newsroom

Democrats are starting to wake up and sketch out a plan to help them win back the working class: Turn the world’s richest person into their boogeyman.

They’ve set their sights on holding Elon Musk to account. Armed with new polling showing Musk’s popularity in the toilet, key Democratic leaders are going after the top Trump adviser who is dismantling the federal government. They are attempting to subpoena him and introducing legislation to block him from receiving federal contracts while he holds a “special” role leading Trump’s cost-cutting crusade.

In a sign of how toxic Democrats believe Musk is, battleground Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) called Musk an “unelected, weirdo billionaire” and said he has “been getting a lot of calls over the past few days” about him. Golden is a moderate who represents Trump country.

Even Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents Silicon Valley and has had a relationship with Musk for years, is distancing himself from him. Khanna posted on X on Wednesday that Musk’s “attacks on our institutions are unconstitutional.” Khanna previously likened Musk to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “dollar-a-year men,” the corporate leaders who helped the government mobilize for WWII, and said he texts with him.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) is seen during the ceremonial roll call on the second night of the Democratic National Convention at the United Center in Chicago on Aug. 20, 2024.

Democrats are also protesting him in Washington, making the calculation that the idea of an unelected billionaire wreaking chaos on the bureaucracy will be unpopular with voters. And they have some data fueling their efforts.

New internal polling, conducted on behalf of House Majority Forward, a nonprofit aligned with House Democratic leadership, found Musk is viewed negatively among 1,000 registered voters in battleground districts. Just 43 percent approve of him and 51 percent view him unfavorably. The poll, conducted by the Democratic firm Impact Research and completed between Jan. 19 to 25, also found that Musk evoked strong negative feelings. Of the 51 percent who disapproved of him, 43 percent did so strongly.

The survey isn’t a one-off, either. An Economist/YouGov poll published on Wednesday also found Musk’s approval rating underwater, 43 percent favorable to 49 percent unfavorable.

In the Democrats’ internal polling, pollsters asked respondents for their thoughts on “the creation of a government of the rich for the rich by appointing up to nine different billionaires to the administration,” and found 70 percent opposed with only 19 percent in support — a stat that suggests Democrats have landed on a message that could gain traction with swing voters.

That data and focus groups held by House Majority Forward helped bring attacks on the administration into focus: Democrats “shouldn’t chide Musk, Trump, and others for being rich,” the group wrote, but point out Musk’s conflicts of interests as head of DOGE and note that he could undermine key safety net programs to enrich himself at the expense of American taxpayers.

“Participants laud Musk’s business acumen and aren’t opposed to the ideals of DOGE,” HMF found. But “Musk’s relationship with Trump – who they view as inherently pro-big business” makes them wary that billionaire’s cuts “could include programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.”