The Dictatorship
DOJ investigating Biden-era prosecutions of anti-abortion protesters, draft report shows
The Trump Justice Department is expected to release a report as early as next week concluding that the prior administration politically targeted abortion opponents because of their religious beliefs when prosecuting them for blocking access to abortion clinics, according to three people familiar with the report and a draft reviewed by MS NOW.
The nearly 60-page draft seeks to justify President Donald Trump’s pardons of two dozen defendants who were convicted during the Biden administration of blockading abortion clinics, threatening violence and verbally assaulting patients and staff. The report argues those defendants’ convictions under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act — a 1994 law that prohibits interfering with people trying to access reproductive health clinics — were unjustly motivated by what the report characterizes as the targeting of people “with traditional Christian views.”
“Upon assuming office, the Biden DOJ shattered the public’s trust by weaponizing the FACE Act to advance a pro-abortion agenda, and DOJ’s Civil Rights Division was at the forefront of this weaponization,” the draft states.
The report does not reconcile its claims of Biden-era weaponization with the fact that Trump’s DOJ has unsuccessfully sought to prosecute several of the president’s political enemies, and is currently trying to bring FACE Act charges against former BLN anchor and independent journalist Don Lemon and protesters who entered a church in Minneapolis earlier this year.
A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment on reports or findings that are not yet public but pointed to acting Attorney General Todd Blanche’s remarks at a Tuesday news conference that the public should expect the results of DOJ weaponization investigations soon.
The draft criticizes the work of Sanjay Patel, a longtime Civil Rights Division attorney who has been a target of Republicans for prosecuting all but four of the 24 people Trump pardoned. The report alleges Patel prioritized prosecuting cases against anti-abortion protesters while comparatively ignoring violence against churches and anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers — an allegation two former DOJ employees who worked with Patel denied to MS NOW.
The draft also criticizes Patel for suggesting prosecutors bring additional charges against violators of the FACE Act to ensure longer jail sentences — though Trump’s DOJ is doing just that in its case against Lemon and the Minneapolis protesters.
Last month, the department put Patel on administrative leave, according to two people who have knowledge of the move but are not authorized to speak about sensitive matters.
Patel did not respond to a LinkedIn message and emails from MS NOW and could not be reached by phone.
Word of the report and Patel being placed on administrative leave comes as the DOJ has removed experts and installed loyalists who are committed to advancing Trump’s agenda. That has included emboldening anti-abortion protesters — even as abortion providers have faced hundreds of incidents of trespassing, obstructions and death threats in recent years — and pledging to combat what it describes as the previous administration’s anti-Christian bias.
Days after Trump pardoned the two dozen protesters last year, the Office of the Associate Attorney General released a memo announcing that the office would roll back abortion-related FACE prosecutions except in circumstances involving “death, serious bodily harm, or serious property damage.”
The memo also demanded the immediate dismissal of three federal cases brought under FACE charges, in which defendants were accused of barricading themselves inside abortion clinics, refusing to leave and verbally harassing patients in PennsylvaniaFlorida and Ohio in 2021 and 2022. The draft report reviewed by MS NOW characterizes these dismissed cases as involving “peaceful, pro-life demonstrators.”
The FACE Act report also comes in the run-up to the midterm elections, and would mark a rare win for abortion opponents who have been upset with the Trump administration for not taking stronger action to restrict access nationwide.
The law was passed in 1994 to deter mounting violence — including murders — against abortion providers. Trump’s DOJ has focused on a lesser-used provision of the law that prohibits blockading or invading houses of worship, which prosecutors are using in both the Minneapolis case and against pro-Palestinian protesters who demonstrated at a New Jersey synagogue in November 2024. The report states that Patel previously argued that provision of the law was “unconstitutional because it lacks a jurisdictional hook.”
Patel worked as a trial attorney in the Civil Rights Division’s Criminal Section beginning in 2011, according to a short biography available online, and has prosecuted FACE Act cases against people charged with threatening to bomb abortion clinicsassaulting a clinic escort and threatening to kill an abortion patient. Patel prosecuted all but one of those cases under Biden. He also prosecuted two FACE Act cases during the Biden administration against people who vandalized anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers.
Patel also served as the director of the DOJ’s National Task Force on Violence Against Reproductive Health Care Providers, a group that was formed in the wake of a murder of an abortion provider in the late 1990s to provide security tips to abortion providers and clinics and coordinate prosecutions of people who enact violence against them.
A former DOJ employee who prosecuted a FACE Act case with Patel described him to MS NOW as a “good guy” whose prosecutions were not politically motivated.
“He was by-the-book, in my experience with him,” the former DOJ employee said. “He followed the facts and the law.”
The defendants who Patel helped prosecute under the Biden administration — and who Trump later pardoned — include people who entered abortion clinics, blocked doorways and refused to leave; verbally harassed patients and staff; injured multiple clinic staffers; and livestreamed their actions on social media. But the report paints a largely sympathetic picture of them, characterizing them as “nonviolent, pro-life demonstrators, including a Catholic priest and elderly people.”
Although the report suggests that the DOJ previously only brought FACE prosecutions for “violent conduct [and] repeat blockaders,” it fails to mention that many of the people Trump pardoned were repeat offenders themselves. Several of the people Trump pardoned have since been rearrested multiple times for blockading abortion clinics, as MS NOW previously reported.
According to the draft, Biden’s DOJ charged more than 45 anti-abortion defendants in more than 20 cases with violating FACE, which it characterizes as “a significant increase … compared to prior administrations” that was motivated by the administration’s desire to preserve abortion access in the wake of the Supreme Court’s overruling of Roe v. Wade in June 2022.
The Biden DOJ prosecuted only five people for damaging anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers — which the report says saved “the lives of numerous unborn children” — and did not prosecute any cases for damages against churches, the report states. Testifying before Congress in 2023, former Attorney General Merrick Garland said the department “put full resources” into investigating vandalizations of crisis pregnancy centers, but that those centers were more often attacked at night, making them harder to prosecute than blockades of abortion clinics, which were more often done during the day.
Patel argued in 2022 that prosecutors should bring other charges against FACE Act violators that “may provide stronger penalties,” such as conspiracy against rights, a charge punishable by up to a decade in prison that was originally intended to prosecute members of the Ku Klux Klan. The report critiques this argument, yet Trump’s DOJ is charging Lemon and the Minneapolis protesters under both the FACE Act and conspiracy against rights.
Laura-Kate Bernstein, a former DOJ prosecutor who also worked on FACE Act prosecutions, said claims that she and fellow prosecutors pursued these cases for political or religious reasons is “outrageous.” She called Patel a “stellar” prosecutor focused on facts, not politics. She pointed to the office’s prosecution of protesters who blocked one devout Christian woman from getting medical care at a clinic that provides abortions and other services — a case discussed in detail in the report.
The woman and her husband had been trying to have a baby, but when she had a miscarriage in her second trimester, the woman’s doctor urged her to undergo a medical procedure to remove the fetal tissue and staunch her bleeding for her own safety.
“She’s bleeding and crying in the back of her car,” Bernstein said. “People who blockaded doors and prevented this woman from getting access to the health care she needed were prosecuted and found guilty by a jury of their peers.”
The Dictatorship
Trump’s proposed cuts to NASA are an insult to astronauts like the Artemis crew
Friday’s splashdown of the Artemis II crew, the first to travel to the moon since the Apollo program ended in 1972, is a moment of celebration for all of us on Earth.
But it’s also an important reminder that, despite this success, the current administration’s Office of Management and Budget is proposing budget cuts that will all but dismantle much of NASA. It’s surprising, illogical and very troubling.
The proposed cuts would terminate 53 NASA Science missions, throwing away more than $13 billion in taxpayer investment.
The proposed cuts would terminate 53 NASA Science missions, throwing away more than $13 billion in taxpayer investment and halting the development of nearly every future NASA Science mission.
These cuts would be an insult to our astronauts and entire NASA workforce. Astronauts and their colleagues are civil servants who work hard, accomplish nearly impossible things and represent our country to the world.
It’s an odd choice from an administration that has pledged to put America first, to be sure. But stranger still, and quite personal to me, is the OMB’s proposal to completely end NASA’s STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) outreach program, which supports students and teachers nationwide. Programs like this have helped the United States be a world leader in science and technology.
We cannot allow this.
The U.S. has many great institutions, but NASA is a unique part of the American story. NASA is the best brand our nation has. When people around the world think of the U.S. at its best, they think of astronauts exploring the moon, telescopes opening new windows on the cosmos and spacecraft making profound discoveries on other worlds. NASA is who we are when we’re curious, bold and united.

There is also a growing consensus in Washington that we are in a new space race, this time, with the China National Space Administration, which, by the way, is planning to have taikonauts walk on the Moon in 2030. If the race is on, why abandon so much? Why cede the lead? The U.S. cannot be first in space if it is second in science and technology.
The administration proposed almost the same draconian cuts to NASA last year. When it did, we the people fought back. The Planetary Society, along with more than 300 advocates and 19 other partner organizations, went to Washington and organized the largest grassroots advocacy outreach for space science in history. Tens of thousands of citizens from every state and congressional district wrote, called and made their case to their elected officials. Together, we successfully saved NASA.
Now, this year, we have no choice but to fight back. On April 20, we will return to Washington, where people can join in person or join our Save NASA Science campaign online.
Science is not a luxury. It is a responsibility. Our founders knew it; you will find “Science” cited in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. Only a public space agency can sustain decades-long investments in the kind of science that tells us whether life ever existed on Mars, that tracks the asteroids that could threaten every living thing on Earth and that reveals the story of our origin.
NASA’s science program is a bargain for Americans. It accounted for one-tenth of 1% of the nation’s expenditures last year, a tenth of a penny of every tax dollar.
Cutting science would not just delay discovery; it would destroy it. It would shatter our STEM talent pipeline. It would abandon our international partners. And, it would cede U.S. leadership in space science to China and other nations.
NASA’s science program is a bargain for Americans. It accounted for one-tenth of 1% of the nation’s expenditures last year, a tenth of a penny of every tax dollar. And for every dollar spent, three come back into the economy. Every year, NASA generates $75 billion of economic growth and supports over 300,000 jobs in all 50 states.
Members of Congress and the Senate agree: NASA is a remarkable investment. I’ve met with both Republicans and Democrats, all of whom support space science. And last year, an overwhelming bipartisan majority rejected these same cuts.
NASA is what makes America great. It represents our best values: curiosity, determination, tenacity, and global cooperation. It proves that we are capable of extraordinary things. When we invest in scientific exploration, we invest in ourselves — in our economy, security and future.
If we concede and retreat from the frontier of space after a half century of leadership, it would be an unworthy choice. If Artemis II has showed us anything, it’s that the public, across the political spectrum, strongly supports space exploration, scientific discovery and a deeper understanding of the universe and our place within it.
Bill Nye is the chief ambassador at The Planetary Society, the world’s largest space interest organization.
The Dictatorship
Artemis II mission splashes down, returning to Earth
After making history as the farthest journey into space humans have ever made, NASA’s Artemis II mission returned to Earth on Friday, splashing down off the coast southwest of San Diego.
The Artemis II crew splashed down successfully at 5:07:47 p.m. PT. The Orion spacecraft launched last weekfrom the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the first crewed flight to the moon in more than 50 years. The entire mission from liftoff took a total of nine days, one hour, 31 minutes and 35 seconds, which NASA rounds up, to call it a 10-day mission.
In the buildup to the mission, questions about the craft’s heat shield led to concerns among some experts about whether Orion would hold up on reentry to the Earth’s atmosphere, the most perilous part of any crewed mission. A NASA-commissioned panel ultimately deemed the ship safewith the astronauts themselves endorsing it ahead of time.
The four-member crew — NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover and Christina Koch, along with Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen — embarked on the 10-day mission to fly around the moon, setting the stage for future missions aimed at establishing a permanent lunar base.
After splashdown, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman praised the crew, calling them “wonderful communicators, almost poets,” during an interview Friday evening.
“These were the ambassadors from humanity to the starts that we sent out there,” Isaacman said.
He also emphasized that this mission set the stage for a future moon landing — and base.
“This is not a once in a lifetime … This is just the beginning,” he said during the interview. “We are going to get back into doing this with frequency, sending missions to the moon, until we land on it in 2028 and start building our base.”
On April 6, the spacecraft reached 252,756 miles from Earth, the farthest distance traveled by humans. Artemis II broke the Apollo 13crew’s record of 248,655 miles, set in 1970.
The crew conducted a seven-hour lunar flyby, coming within about 4,000 miles of the moon’s surface and seeing areas of the moon never before seen by the naked eye. In addition to testing the spacecraft, the astronauts studied the far side of the moon during a solar eclipse and observed lunar geological features and color variations.
Now back on Earth, the astronauts will undergo medical evaluations before heading to shore and traveling to NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.
The next such mission, Artemis IIIis expected to launch next year.
Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW, with a focus on how global events and foreign policy shape U.S. politics. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.
The Dictatorship
Former staffer accuses Rep. Eric Swalwell of sexual assault, reports say
A former staffer has accused Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell, a current candidate for California governor, of reportedly sexually assaulting her.
The allegations were first reported by the San Francisco Chronicle.
The woman, who has not been publicly identified and worked for Swalwell for nearly two years, alleged she had sexual encounters while he was her boss, and he sexually assaulted her on two occasions when she was too intoxicated to consent, the Chronicle reported. The woman told the paper Swalwell began pursuing her weeks after she was hired at age 21 to work in the Democrat’s district in 2019.
The woman claimed Swalwell invited her for drinks in 2019, and during that encounter, she became too intoxicated to remember what happened. She alleged she woke up naked in his hotel bed, and following the incident, he distanced himself and their relationship eventually dissolved.
Five years later, in 2024, the woman alleged she attended a charity gala where Swalwell was honored. After the event, she said they met for drinks and she became intoxicated, but remembers only fragments of the night, including pushing him away and saying “no” as he allegedly forced himself on her. She texted a friend three days later, according to the Chronicle, saying she had been sexually assaulted by Swalwell.
In text messages, independently review by the Chronicle, the woman told her friend she “blacked out” but “woke up once during it and even told him to stop at one point.”
The Chronicle spoke with the woman’s friend and the woman’s ex-boyfriend, who she said she told about the alleged 2024 assault the following day. Both corroborated her story and described her as appearing disoriented.
Medical records, according to the Chronicle, also show she sought pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease tests about a week after the incident.
The woman told the Chronicle she did not immediately tell authorities because she feared people wouldn’t believe she was telling the truth.
Swalwell, who has represented California’s 14th Congressional District since 2013 and launched his gubernatorial campaign earlier this year, strongly denied the claims in a statement Friday.
“These allegations are false and come on the eve of an election against the frontrunner for governor. For nearly 20 years, I have served the public — as a prosecutor and a congressman and have always protected women,” Swalwell said. “I will defend myself with the facts and where necessary bring legal action. My focus in the coming days is to be with my wife and children and defend our decades of service against these lies.”
An attorney for Swalwell sent the woman a cease-and-desist letter on Thursday, according to the Chronicle, accusing her of making false claims of sexual assault and nonconsensual encounters, and warning that legal action would follow if she did not retract the allegations.
In a separate report, three other women spoke with CNNabout alleged various kinds of sexual misconduct, including Swalwell sending them unsolicited inappropriate messages or photos. The messages, the women said, were often sent through Snapchat, which is a social media platform that allows messages to delete automatically and notifies users of screenshots.
“Some of the allegations I’ve seen, which is that we’ve had NDAs in the office — never. There’s never been an allegation, and there’s never been a settlement,” Swalwell told reporters Tuesday.
Political fallout
Swalwell’s campaign initially showed signs of strong momentum in the crowded California governor’s race to replace current Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has called the allegations “deeply troubling.”
“As we continue to learn more, these allegations from multiple sources are deeply troubling and must be taken seriously,” Newsom’s spokesperson said in a statement to MS NOW.
Swalwell’s campaign also benefited from backing from key Democratic allies, positioning him as a viable contender in a fragmented field with no clear front-runner.
But the reports of the allegations, along with separate unverified claimscirculating online, have sparked backlash and prompted some political fallout, including campaign disruptions and heightened attention from rivals. Multiple people resigned from Swalwell’s orbit ahead of Friday’s scathing report of sexual assault, including Courtni Pugh, who served as a strategic adviser.
Rep. Jimmy GomezD-Calif., resignedas co-chair of Swalwell’s campaign, saying in part “he cannot in good conscience remain” in the role and suggesting that Swalell “should leave the race now.” Rep. Adam Gray, D-Calif., also resigned as campaign co-chair and called for Swalwell to suspend the campaign.
Other prominent Democrats also quickly began distancing themselves.
House Democrats issued a joint statement calling for a “swift investigation” and for Swalwell to end his bid.
“All perpetrators of sexual assault and harassment must be held accountable,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-NY wrote.
Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared this an “extremely sensitive matter” and said she discussed with Swalwell that the investigation would be “best done outside of a gubernatorial campaign.”
Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said he is “deeply distressed” about the allegations surrounding Swalwell and immediately withdrew his endorsement.
“This woman was brave to come forward, and we should take her story seriously,” Schiff said on X. “I am withdrawing my endorsement immediately, and believe that he should withdraw from the race.”
Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., called the allegations “indefensible” and also immediately withdrew his endorsement of his longtime ally.
“Women who come forward with accounts like this deserve to be heard with respect, not questioned or dismissed. I regret having come to his defense on social media prior to knowing all the information. I am equally as shocked and upset about what has transpired,” Gallego wroteon X.
Two of Swalwell’s key labor allies, Service Employees International Union of California withdrew and California Teachers Association, retracted their support Friday, marking a significant blow to his campaign.
“The allegations are incredibly disturbing and unacceptable against Rep. Swalwell. We are immediately suspending our support. Our elected board will be meeting as soon as possible to follow our union’s democratic process to determine next steps,” the CTA said in a statement.
Democratic billionaire Tom Steyer said he commends“the brave former staffer who came forward with her story” about Swalwell.
“Speaking out is never easy, and her account must be taken seriously. At a moment like this, we must make sure that women are heard, and justice is pursued,” Steyer added.
Former Rep. Katie Porter called the allegation “horrifying,” adding she is thinking of the courageous women who have come forward to share their stories.”
The California Democratic Party labeled the allegations “deeply disturbing.”
“Any person engaged in misconduct must take responsibility and be held accountable for their actions — including a Member and candidate for Governor,” CADEM Chair Rusty Hicks said.
Swalwell’s Republican gubernatorial opponent, former Fox News host Steve Hilton, blasted Swalwell over the allegations in a statement to MS NOW.
“It’s incredible to me that Eric Swalwell thought he could run for Governor of California while all this was going on,” Hilton said in the statement. “It shows the complete contempt these career politicians have for the public.”
As of Friday evening, Swalwell’s fundraising page on ActBlue appeared to no longer be accepting donations.
Jillian Frankel and Syedah Asghar contributed to this report.
Ebony Davis is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked at BLN as a campaign reporter covering elections and politics.
-
Politics1 year agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics1 year agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Politics1 year agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship7 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words
-
Uncategorized1 year ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
Politics12 months agoDemocrat challenging Joni Ernst: I want to ‘tear down’ party, ‘build it back up’






