Politics

Dems maintain they’re ‘looking forward’ as questions about Biden loom

Published

1 year ago

May 14, 2025

Democrats thought they were done with Joe Biden. Now, new revelations about his mental and physical decline while in office are putting a harsh spotlight back on him — and Democrats’ failings last year — at a critical moment in the party’s attempts to move on.

On Blue Light News, Democrats rallying against the GOP megabill that could slash Medicaid benefits and enact sweeping tax cuts instead ran into blaring headlines this week about Biden’s deteriorating condition and doomed campaign.

“It’s a discussion that was overdue. I don’t know if it’s helpful, but it’s unavoidable,” said Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.), the 78-year-old who called for Biden to step aside from the ticket last year.

In interviews with more than two dozen other Democrats on Capitol Hill, lawmakers met questions about Biden’s campaign failings and mental lapses with heavy sighs and topical pivots. Many talked about “looking forward” — to combating President Donald Trump, to retaking control of Congress — in a sign of how awkward and potentially damaging the recriminations about Biden have become.

Many in the party had treated Biden with kid gloves in the aftermath of Kamala Harris’ loss to Trump, with lawmakers publicly and privately lauding Harris’ effort and eliding Biden’s drag on the ticket.

Now, most in the party are desperate to talk about anything else.

“Our energy needs to be in our priorities to be looking forward, not backwards,” said Rep. Greg Stanton (D-Ariz.). “This relitigation is backwards looking, and that’s not very helpful to us.”

Top Democratic congressional leaders also shrugged off Biden when confronted this week with the latest divulgences about his mental and physical acuity — and whether they helped cover them up.

“We’re not looking backward, we’re looking forward at this moment in time,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in a Tuesday press conference. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer echoed him hours later: “We’re just looking forward.”

A Biden spokesperson declined to comment.

But the party’s problems aren’t going away with Biden. All week, while contending with news coverage and a forthcoming book about the past president, the party was also confronting turmoil at the Democratic National Committee over a DNC official’s effort to challenge “asleep at the wheel” Democrats. House Democrats raced to shut down a rogue Trump impeachment effort by Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.). And there was a spate of negative press about one of the party’s own senators, John Fetterman.

Some Democrats welcomed the renewed conversations about Biden, worried their party has yet to fully reckon with last year’s electoral shellacking. It has been a point of tension in the party since last year, flaring up for some House members at the White House Christmas party. One Democratic lawmaker approached Harris in the photo line to tell her “we love you,” according to a person familiar with the interaction and granted anonymity to speak freely. When the lawmaker got to Biden, the then-president asked, “Well, do you love me, too?”

Even today, there are Democrats who think the party should be doing more to learn from their mistakes in 2024.

“Joe Biden clearly just was not capable of delivering the message we needed to deliver in 2024,” said Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) “Why did it take so long? Why was it so hard to recognize that and make the change? So I guess to some degree it is helpful to have that conversation.”

“It’s OK for us to come to grips with our failures so that we can make the changes necessary to win. And while I am very much focused on the future, I’m concerned that there’s still a lot of denial in our party about how badly we’ve lost,” said Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), who was one of the first Democrats to call for Biden to step aside last summer.

He added: “Some of the same people who just want to move on are the same people who are basically in denial that we lost.”

Others like Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) acknowledged that the former president clearly lost a step, but didn’t believe it was a death knell to the party’s prospects of winning future elections.

“Look, most Democrats … had no idea that Biden had lost some of it — not all of it — but he lost some of it. It’s one of those things that happens in all aspects of life. You don’t want it to happen at that level, but it does,” Cleaver said. “I think some people in the White House who were trying to be helpful, didn’t talk to the right people who … could have addressed it a little better. But it’s not like that’s going to destroy the Democratic Party.”

But their views are far from the prevailing ones. Instead, on Capitol Hill, Democrats were rushing to shift the public’s focus to the House GOP’s megabill — and a moment of unity for Democrats as they lined up in opposition to Trump’s domestic agenda. Ideological disagreements on taxes, immigration and entitlements have largely been paved over with the legislation giving Democrats plenty to oppose.

“We have more important things to talk about,” said Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) when asked questions about revelations about Biden’s mental acuity this week — a far cry from where she was some 10 months ago, when she joined an ever-growing caucus of Democrats calling for the then-president to leave the Democratic ticket.

Others saw this moment as another chance to take a dig at the GOP.

“There’s nothing more unifying than watching Republicans try to rip [health care] away and absolutely destroy our economy,” said Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-Mich.).

“So I think important conversations are being had about the values that unite us.”

Andrew Howard contributed to this report.

Politics

The US-Australia face-off that isn’t happening

Published

12 minutes ago

June 19, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Who’s not here at Seattle’s Lumen Field for the Pacific Rim face-off between the United States and Australia?

If they’re following the match, the two countries’ elected heads — President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese — are doing so from afar.

Politics

The soccer boss in Mark Carney’s ear

Published

42 minutes ago

June 19, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

VANCOUVER — Major League Soccer commissioner Don Garber joined Prime Minister Mark Carney on Friday to watch Canada’s thrashing of Qatar. Garber probably did not want Carney to enjoy the stadium experience too much.

BC Place is Major League Soccer’s most troublesome facility. The arena is old, was not designed with soccer in mind, and is owned by a government agency — the BC Pavilion Corporation, which also controls the Vancouver Convention Center — that forces the Vancouver Whitecaps to fight for dates on the calendar against concerts and other events.

“We want to be the ones that control our destiny, like every sports team does,” Garber told reporters Friday in Seattle.

The Whitecaps are now up for sale, and Garber is actively pushing British Columbia’s political establishment — including Premier David Eby and Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim — to find a solution can keep the team from decamping to Las Vegas. While the government has been willing to renegotiate its financial relationship with the team, a proposed new stadium would take “four-plus years” in construction, which Garber said was untenable.

“It unimaginable how long we’re going to be out of the stadium,” he told reporters Friday in Seattle. “They are very relevant club that doesn’t have a good business model, and you can’t be sustainable.”

Garber recounted he met with Eby while in Vancouver, and sat with Carney and Victor Montagliani — the head of regional soccer confederation CONCACAF and a close ally of the prime minister — during the match itself. Garber said he has placed a league official in Vancouver full-time to manage the negotiations with local officials over the Whitecaps’s future.

“We want to be the ones that control our destiny, like every sports team does,” said Garber. “It’s easier for business people to make decisions, a little harder for politicians.”

Politics

The accidental American

Published

1 hour ago

June 19, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

In 2001, airline employees stopped a seven-months pregnant Florence Balogun from traveling home to London, deeming her too pregnant to fly. She stayed in New York, where she was visiting, eventually giving birth to a son, Folarin, before returning to London.

Twenty-five years later, Folarin Balogun has attracted global notice as a rising soccer star. Despite training in Arsenal’s youth academy and spending much of his career playing for England’s youth teams, Balogun — legally an American citizen, thanks to his Brooklyn birth — has emerged as a key contributor to the U.S. team’s attack at this year’s World Cup. The striker scored two goals in America’s opener against Paraguay last Friday, hoisting his team to a record-breaking 4-1 victory, the most goals the U.S. men’s team has ever scored in a World Cup game.

While Balogun’s performance has fueled fresh hopes about America’s World Cup prospects, he’s also found himself in the middle of America’s ongoing birthright citizenship debate.

On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order overturning the country’s long-standing birthright citizenship practice. The American Civil Liberties Union then sued to block the move, taking their legal battle to the Supreme Court. The court is expected to issue a final ruling soon — though it seems“broadly skeptical” of Trump’s effort.

“The executive order itself doesn’t claim to strip away [Balogun’s] citizenship or or the citizenship of other people born before [Feb. 19, 2025],” Cody Wofsy, the lead lawyer in the ACLU’s case, told Blue Light News. “But the constitutional theory that the government is asking the Supreme Court to adopt casts a shadow over the citizenship of millions and millions of people who were born in this country and have lived their entire lives as citizens.”

Examples of high-profile birthright citizens — like Balogun, but also politicians such as Kamala Harris and Marco Rubio — help illustrate the reality of banning birthright citizenship, Wofsy said.

“We don’t know what the justices are thinking,” he said, “but I would hope that they understand just how grave an action the government’s asking them for.”