Congress

Cornyn tells Mike Lee to lay off John Thune

Published

4 months ago

June 12, 2026

Sen. John Cornyn isn’t a card-carrying member of the Senate GOP’s growing YOLO caucus. But with less than seven months left in office after losing his primary, the Texas Republican appears to be feeling newly free to speak his mind.

The latest clap-back came Thursday night and the early hours of Friday morning, when Cornyn called a conservative influencer a “grifter” and told Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) on social media to stop publicly blaming fellow Republicans — including Senate Majority Leader John Thune — for the fact that the GOP elections bill doesn’t have support to pass inside the party.

“You don’t have the votes” for the SAVE America Act, Cornyn posted on X. “@LeaderJohnThune can’t change that. It is math.”

He was directing his comments at Lee, who had just penned a post telling Thune, “let’s do this!”

Cornyn continued, “Try focusing on Democrats instead of Republicans. Republican on Republican attacks are hurting our chances to win the majority in November.”

Lee responded to ask, “on what planet is this an attack on Republicans?” and appeared to suggest a staffer was tweeting on Cornyn’s behalf: “Once my friend John Cornyn realizes that you’re saying this in his name—whoever you are—I don’t think he’ll be happy with you.”

Cornyn, however, is known for posting himself on his social media accounts in a chamber where many Senate accounts are run solely by staff. And he’s been making it clear all week that he will push back on Trump and his party when he thinks it’s needed.

In multiple conversations with reporters in the Capitol, Cornyn said that Republicans need to “stop the circular firing squad.” And he added that he won’t intentionally be “a thorn in [Trump’s] side,” but he’s also “not going to go out of my way to try to appease him.”

“I want him to succeed, I want the Republican Party to succeed, I want the country to succeed,” Cornyn said this week. “But on a case-by-case basis, when I think there’s been overreach or just a bad idea, I’m not going to hesitate to weigh in.”

The four-term senator’s comments come after he lost his primary last month to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who Trump endorsed in the final days of the runoff.

Cornyn said in an interview with The New York Times that he was not a “wounded bear” but that he believed Trump’s insistence on “slavish adherence” was going to backfire for Republicans in the midterms and result in “the most miserable two years of his life” if Democrats flip the House or Senate.

“I think it is going to be a pretty bumpy ride for the next seven months,” Cornyn said.

Congress

Elon Musk is in Democrats’ oversight crosshairs

Published

7 minutes ago

October 20, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Democrats are eyeing many targets as they make plans to probe corruption in and around President Donald Trump’s administration should they win control of the House next month.

Few loom larger than Elon Musk.

The world’s richest man and nine-figure Republican donor has emerged as a man of intense interest to several potential committee chairs — not to mention scores of rank-and-file Democratic lawmakers — who see multiple fronts for investigations.

Those include Musk’s whirlwind stint as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, his companies’ multibillion dollar contracts with the federal government and — most recently — his possible role in throttling crucial internet access to the Ukrainian military as the White House seeks to pressure President Volodymyr Zelenskyy into cutting a peace deal with Russia.

“What happens when one guy gets a giant contract from the government and then uses it to do something that shuts down communication in a war that has been extremely important to the United States to support Ukraine?” Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington, a member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, said in an interview. “There’s a lot of different parts of the corruption around Musk.”

Multiple committees are now gaming out how they will take on Musk next term if Democrats win back gavels, with senior members and aides considering how he fits into the various panels’ jurisdiction. Any number of committees in both chambers could stake a claim to probing a piece of Musk’s dealings with the federal government.

“We definitely have a lot of questions about Elon Musk’s role in DOGE and it is something we plan to investigate,” said Sara Guerrero, a spokesperson for top Oversight Committee Democrat Rep. Robert Garcia of California.

Spokespeople for Musk did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Some members are not waiting for election results to get started. Democrats on the House Homeland Security Committee demanded last month that Musk testify under oath about a Government Accountability Office report claiming that DOGE overstated its savings, while the House Ways and Means Committee has already called to investigate alleged DOGE-related data theft from Social Security.

Huge parts of Musk’s dealings with the federal government could come under congressional scrutiny, including the billions of dollars in spaceflight contracts SpaceX holds with NASA as well as the clean-energy subsidies Tesla has reaped.

But leading Democrats of multiple committees remain fixed on Musk’s five-month rampage through the federal bureaucracy as DOGE leader, in which an estimated 250,000 federal jobs were cut amid allegations of data breaches and illegally withheld congressional spending.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, the top Democrat on the Space, Science and Technology Committee, which oversees NASA, said her panel has more “to learn about the damage that DOGE inflicted on our science agencies.”

“Elon Musk and his DOGE cronies stirred up chaos, ruined careers, and played a large role in illegal grant cancellations and firings of civil servants,” she said in a Monday statement.

“He helped orchestrate the systematic destruction of government programs and services over the last nearly two years,” Lofgren added. “The sheer number of conflicts of interest are astounding.”

Rep. Greg Meeks of New York, the top Foreign Affairs Committee Democrat, said much the same — calling in a Monday statement for “a full accounting of the damage Mr. Musk and DOGE caused.”

“The cruel dismantling of USAID, championed by Elon Musk and carried out by Secretary Rubio, saved no taxpayer money, balanced no budget, and made America no safer,” Meeks said, adding that the panel “will not let anyone obstruct our oversight.”

The House Oversight Committee, considered to have the most robust investigative staff of any congressional panel, could also get involved in probing Musk’s dealings.

“I think DOGE was the original sin,” said one Democratic member of the panel granted anonymity to describe internal discussions about its agenda. “A third of the committee is lawyers and we see the lawlessness, the intentional violations of the law.”

“I certainly hope that Elon Musk and DOGE get brought in,” the member added. “No one should be above the law.”

Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has not named Musk as a preeminent target as tries to keep the Democratic midterm message trained on affordability, but he has spoken out about the need to crack down on the “wealthy, the well-off and the well-connected.”

Garcia also spoke at length in an August interview about targeting corruption within Trump’s inner circle, and others have emphasized the need to take a broad view of potential oversight subjects. Many top Democrats, for instance, want an early focus on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

“I don’t think that there is a single like, ‘You are the one,’” Rep. Emilia Sykes (D-Ohio), a member of the Science panel, said in an interview. “I think it is across the board — we need answers.”

But plenty of rank-and-file Democrats want Musk personally held to account — including some on panels with less obvious ties to the tech mogul.

Rep. Maxine Dexter (D-Ore.), for instance, sits on the Natural Resources and Veterans Affairs Committees. She said she sees Musk among “the well-connected billionaire, trillionaires who have seen government contracts as a way to subsidize their own company’s research, development, and bottom line.”

“We need to shut that down,” she added.

Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Calif.), a Foreign Affairs member, was succinct in describing the need to probe Musk’s dealings and haul him before that committee: “Bring it all on.”

Musk has made no secret of his preference for House control next term as the GOP’s single biggest known midterm donor, with $276 million and counting going to Republican committees and candidates.

Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), an Oversight Committee member and the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said delving into the allegedly transactional nature of Musk’s influence is the whole point.

“Our committees need to be doing oversight both into the Trump administration, but I think even more importantly or equally importantly, into the corporations and ultrarich people who have tried to corrupt our government,” he said. “And, of course, Elon Musk is on that list because it takes two to tango.”

Kelsey Brugger and Ari Hawkins contributed to this report.

Congress

The ‘Congress addict’ serving as Trump’s fixer on Capitol Hill

Published

7 minutes ago

October 20, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

President Donald Trump’s pick for top emissary to Capitol Hill is a longtime former congressional aide with wide-ranging experience in oversight and investigations — a telling choice at a time when Washington could be heading toward divided government.

As the new director of the Office of Legislative Affairs, Katie Bailey will serve as the lead liaison between the White House and Congress. Her first task will be helping navigate a fast-moving, high-stakes “lame duck” legislative session, where lawmakers will be rushing to pass outstanding bills and avoid a government shutdown in the immediate aftermath of the midterm elections.

Bailey is also staring down the possibility of having to advocate for Trump’s agenda on Blue Light News with one or both chambers under Democratic control.

It’s a job that could require Bailey to strike a balance between standing up for the president with a need to compromise with Democrats on major legislative priorities in 2027. She’ll also have to manage intraparty conflicts among Republicans, including lawmakers with presidential aspirations in 2028.

James Braid, who previously held the role before announcing his departure in August, said in an interview that Bailey is up for that task.

He said his successor — who had previously been leading the Senate side of the White House legislative affairs team — was essential to the White House’s ability to get things done in Congress. He pointed to Bailey’s help in passing a Russian sanctions package and negotiating the terms of a bipartisan deal to overhaul the federal permitting process for energy projects.

And she was critical in advancing key nominations, Braid said — especially in the 18-day sprint to confirm then-Sen. Markwayne Mullin to be secretary of Homeland Security this summer and the scramble to seat Keith Sonderling as secretary of Labor before the Senate left town for the October recess.

“Katie handled those nominations with unbelievable skill, grace, humility, and professionalism in a process that can really have a lot of complicated personalities at stake,” Braid said in an interview.

Bailey, who was not available for an interview, has been with the White House legislative affairs office since June 2026, but got her start in Washington more than two decades earlier as a legislative assistant to former Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), then the chair of the Education and Workforce Committee.

She held different jobs in the subsequent years but kept returning to Capitol Hill, with Eric Schmitz, a former aide to Speaker Mike Johnson, noting — with admiration — that Bailey is a “Congress addict” with deep reverence for the institution.

Bailey went to the Senate in 2009 to work for the late-Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), eventually becoming the governmental affairs director for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that Coburn chaired.

Back on the House side in 2015, she was a senior staffer under then-House Oversight Chair Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and then staff director for the Government Operations subcommittee, at that time helmed by Mark Meadows — the North Carolina Republican who would go on to become White House chief of staff at the end of the first Trump administration.

In mid-2017, she moved back to the Senate Homeland Security panel to lead governmental affairs under then-Chair Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) and in 2019 became then-GOP Sen. Mike Braun’s legislative director for six years. She left Blue Light News to serve a stint as Braun’s federal liaison when he became governor of Indiana.

“She’s going to be well-suited for this particular job in that, if the House or the Senate ends up in Democratic party control, she’s used to dealing and building consensus with her previous jobs,” said one Republican who previously worked with her and was granted anonymity to share details of private relationships.

At the same time, Bailey’s experience working on House Oversight and the Senate Homeland’s permanent select subcommittee on Investigations — the “linchpin of the Senate oversight efforts,” as Braid put it — could give her the tools to push back against a Democratic onslaught of inquiries into the Trump administration should Republicans lose their House or Senate majorities.

“The administration is confident it’s going to be successful in the November elections,” said Braid, when asked about the possibility of a split government. “But in the event that it’s not, dealing with congressional oversight, Katie has perhaps the single best possible resume for that.”

He added that Bailey was “broadly respected by Democrats as a serious person and a serious counterpart, and somebody with whom they can make deals.”

Bailey could be looking at a busy last few months of the 119th Congress — even if the GOP trifecta survives the midterms. Republicans have already pushed several priorities to the post-election legislative session that are looking increasingly likely to get punted again, from a farm bill to a reauthorization of surface transportation programs.

More imminent and non-negotiable deadlines include passing a government funding bill and the annual defense policy measure. There also will be pressure on Bailey to help clear the way for passage of a permitting package and a bill to regulate the college sports industry, where fragile coalitions of Republicans and Democrats supporting both those efforts are eager not to squander the opportunity to notch legislative victories.

Looking ahead, Bailey will play a major role in helping broker a deal between Congress and the White House to increase the debt limit ahead of a deadline expected next summer.

Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), who said he knows Bailey “really well,” described her as “even keeled” with a “great temperament” — and, like Braid, not “easily rattled.”

“And believe me,” Moreno said, “if you had been to a few of my Republican lunches, [senators] try to rattle them pretty good. These guys stay pretty steady.”

He also praised Bailey for pitching in to arrange constituent tours of the White House and otherwise going “above and beyond the call of duty.”

Blue Light News reported further evidence of that in 2021, when she was spotted bringing an air fryer to work so her staff could enjoy late night mozzarella sticks during a marathon voting session.

“She thinks like a member but acts like a staffer, which is normally very, very welcomed by those that she works with and around her,” said the Republican who once worked with her.

Congress

GOP-linked PAC spends over $1M to boost third-party socialist in Ohio Senate race

Published

13 hours ago

October 19, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

A GOP-aligned super PAC has more-than tripled its investment in the Ohio Senate race over the last week as it seeks to boost a socialist candidate — an apparent attempt to sink former Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown’s chances.

Enough Promises Ohio, which was created last month, has spent a combined $1.58 million to promote Greg Levy and oppose Brown, according to recent filings from the Federal Election Commission. Levy, a candidate with the Party for Socialism and Liberation, is also on the ballot in the tight race for Senate between Brown and Ohio GOP Sen. Jon Husted. He’s running a longshot bid, currently polling at 5 percent, but could siphon away more progressive voters from Brown.

It wouldn’t be the first time this cycle that operatives for a major political party attempted to raise a third-party candidate’s profile to meddle with the outcome. Recent public polling shows a dead heat between Brown and Husted in the race.

The super PAC spent a total of $828,359 on mailers supporting Levy or opposing Brown. Spectrum News, The Washington Post and Axios previously reported Enough Promises Ohio spent $400,000 on such mailers, but the expenditure has since grown.

The group also poured an additional $753,000 into ads supporting Levy and opposing Brown over the weekend, including one video ad on Google that knocks Brown as someone who “sold us out” and boosts “real progressive Greg Levy.”

The campaign finance filings show Enough Promises Ohio used a printing company linked to a Republican political firm, Whistletop Strategies. Whistletop has worked with an affiliate of President Donald Trump’s MAGA Inc. super PAC and lists as its “director” Big Dog Strategies, which helped run Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno’s 2024 election campaign and is a consultant for the Ohio GOP.

Enough Promises Ohio did not respond to a request for comment. Neither did Big Dog Strategies.

Amy Natoce, a spokesperson for the Husted campaign, told Blue Light News, “our campaign had no involvement with the group you are referencing. Therefore, we have no comment.”

Levy himself has distanced himself from the PAC, calling its boosting of him an “attempted deception of voters” that’s “a form of digital blackface.” Levy is Black. His spokesperson, Charlie Koenigsmark, also told Blue Light News he and the campaign “completely condemn this attempt to manipulate voters.”

Brown did not respond to a request for comment.