Connect with us

The Dictatorship

After Hegseth and Bondi hearing blunders, it’s time for Democrats to get creative

Published

on

After Hegseth and Bondi hearing blunders, it’s time for Democrats to get creative

On Tuesday, Pete Hegseth sailed through his first Senate confirmation hearing. It was shocking, although perhaps it shouldn’t have been, to watch someone on his way to likely confirmation who has been dogged by so many moral and ethical concerns, from reports of his excessive drinking to his questionable nonprofit management to allegations about sexual misconduct. (Hegseth has denied wrongdoing and was not charged.) It seemed that if ever there was a shaky candidate for heading an organization of more than 3 million people, it was the former Fox News host.

If ever there was a shaky candidate for heading an organization of more than 3 million people, it was the former Fox News host. But it didn’t shake out that way.

But it didn’t shake out that way. Blue Light News’s nightly letter was titled “The death of the Senate confirmation hearing,” stating that “today we learned only one thing: after decades of smash mouth Senate confirmation hearings, they’ve become all but useless as a vetting exercise or a check on presidential power.” A headline from Blue Light News read, “Democrats’ hopes of derailing Trump nominees are fading fast.” Washington newspapers had spoken; Hegseth’s future as secretary of defense  was a fait accompli.

Now it wasn’t a complete disaster; Democrats got some good moments in there. In perhaps the most evocative exchange of the hearing, Black Hawk helicopter pilot and Illinois Sen. Tammy Duckworth asked Hegseth to name the countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). “I know we have allies in South Korea and Japan in AUKUS (a pact between Australia, the United Kingdom and the U.S.) with Australia,” Hegseth replied. He was not even close. “None of those three countries are in ASEAN,” Duckworth responded, adding, “I suggest you do a little homework.”

Sen. Tim Kaine was able to push a line of questioning about Hegseth’s reported drinking and bad behavior, which was important. But as much as well-aimed questions helped expose Hegseth’s questionable character and eligibility for the high-stakes role, I think Democrats would do better if they would realize that the math is not on their side — there are 53 Republican senators, so these Cabinet nominees can only lose four senators, and or President-elect Donald Trump — and that lecturing the nominees about their past is not as effective as nailing them down and highlighting what they plan to do.

Democrats do best when they take a page from the Mehdi Hasan playbook and nail the candidates on specifics — then follow up with more specifics. We saw some of this with the questions put to Scott Bessent on Thursday for his confirmation hearing for treasury secretary.

“Yes or no, will you recommend cutting Medicaid?” Sen. Ben Ray Lujan asked Bessent. When Bessent failed to deliver a satisfactory response, Luján asked the question again.

Bessent stumbled through yet another nonresponse.

Another promising example  was when Sen. Bernie Sanders pushed Bessent on the minimum wageforcing the investor and hedge fund manager to say he doesn’t support raising the federal rate.

“You don’t think we should change the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour?” Sanders asked.

“No, sir,” Bessent replied.

Democrats may not actually be able to derail a confirmation — it’s historically fairly rare that a nominee is not confirmed, although it happens. That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t absolutely try, but they also need to reassess the value and purpose of a public hearing, and use it to their advantage. Democrats have an opportunity to shape the narrative, to explain to voters, on the record, what Trump is about to do. With all the misinformation and disinformation clouding the political ecosystem, there’s a responsibility here that shouldn’t be ignored.

It can be tempting to use the hearings as a personal showcase or an opportunity to grandstand, but that doesn’t move hearts and minds or votes. We know, for example, that Hegseth is no feminist. Democratic senators pontificating on this helps no one at this point. But asking specific questions like Duckworth did potentially can, by exposing real knowledge gaps and exactly why a person is unqualified for a role.

Mike Pence is already going after Robert F. Kennedy Jr. using his Advancing American Freedom platform to try and knock him out for not being anti-choice enough. Perhaps Democrats could focus on getting RFK Jr. to admit that he’s actually pro-choice. Better yet, remind Republicans that he is, in fact, a Democrat.

A lot of Trump’s Cabinet nominees have figured out that they are playing to an audience of one. Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, for example, refused to answer the question of who won the 2020 election, saying, “President Biden is the president of the United States. There was a peaceful transition of power.” When Sen. Chris Murphy pushed Sen. Marco Rubio about Trump’s international business conflicts, Rubio was careful with his response. But while nominees play to their audience of one, it’s Democrats’ responsibility to play to the audience that really matters here: the American people.

I urge Democrats to keep this in mind as hearings continue in the coming days and weeks.

Kennedy in particular has a history of being a wild card in interviews. In his upcoming hearings, Democrats need to press him on abortion, his fealty to Trump, his advocacy of raw milk. Or focus on something that might enrage Mitch McConnell, like the misinformation he’s spread in the past about the polio vaccine. As we plan for more hearings following Trump’s inauguration, Democrats are going  to need to get more creative. It’s not always easy to think differently but, right now, it’s their constitutional responsibility.

Molly Jong-Fast

Molly Jong-Fast is a political analyst for BLN, special correspondent for Vanity Fair and host of the podcast “Fast Politics with Molly Jong-Fast.”

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

Energy chief says coal plant orders helped during winter storm

Published

on

Energy chief says coal plant orders helped during winter storm

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration said Friday that its use of emergency orders to keep aging coal-fired plants operating helped prevent a major blackout from power shortages during the brutally frigid weather that has gripped most of America for the past two weeks.

Scattered outages occurred because of ice accumulation that felled local power lines, leaving hundreds of thousands without power, at least briefly. But the nation’s regional power grids generally maintained reliable electricity service, with natural gas and coal leading the way, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and other officials said.

“The big picture story is where we actually got energy from during this storm,” Wright said at a news conference at the Energy Department. “In fact, we had times where our existing capacity couldn’t deliver anything and the lights would have gone out if not for emergency orders.’’

Critics said Wright’s comments understated the role that wind and solar power played during the storm, adding that the administration’s orders over the past nine months to keep some oil and coal-fired plants open past their planned retirement dates could cost U.S. utility customers billions of dollars over the next few years.

In the lead-up to the storm and cold temperatures, Wright also excused utilities from pollution limits on fossil fuel-fired plants and ordered that backup generators at data centers and other large facilities be available to grid operators and utilities to supply emergency power.

Trump administration’s ‘way of doing business’

Deputy Energy Secretary James Danly drew a contrast with the grid performance during a similar severe storm in 2021, calling the Trump administration’s approach a “new way of doing business” during power emergencies.

“The bottom line here is that we managed to ensure that there was sufficient capacity,” Danly said. “Not one area had a blackout or a forced outage due to loss of capacity.”

There were nearly 1 million outages during the storm’s peak, but most were not long-lasting, Danly said. Nearly 55,000 customers were without power as of Friday, including more than 17,000 in Mississippi and 7,000 in Texas, according to the outage tracking website poweroutage.us.

Wright cited statistics showing that natural gas — long the nation’s leading source of electricity — provided 43% of electric power at peak generation during the storm, followed by coal at 24% and nuclear at 15%. Renewables such as wind, solar and hydropower provided a combined 14%, Wright said.

Wright and President Donald Trump have frequently made the case for their fossil fuel-friendly orders, blaming the Biden administration and Democratic-leaning states for policies they say threaten the reliability of the nation’s electric grid and drive up electricity bills.

The proportion of coal and natural gas power rose substantially during the storm, while the proportion of wind power used during the storm dropped by 40%, Wright said. Solar stayed flat at a fraction of the amount of coal and natural gas power.

Wright dismissed solar as “meaningless” during a severe storm in certain regions and said, “It’s not an all-weather power source.”

Pushback on orders to keep coal plants running

Some state and utility officials have chafed at Wright’s orders to keep plants operating, saying they’re not necessary for emergency power and are simply raising electric bills for regular ratepayers to keep relatively expensive plants operating.

Preventing the nation’s coal plants from retiring over the next three years could cost consumers at least $3 billion per year, according to a report from Grid Strategies, a consulting firm.

“A lot of these plants were retiring because they’re no longer economic to operate,” said Michael Goggin, an executive vice president at Grid Strategies. “It’s expensive to keep them going.”

Opponents have challenged the coal orders in court, arguing that Congress intended for emergency powers to be used only in rare, temporary cases.

The nonprofit owners of the Craig Generating Station in Colorado, the Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association and Platte River Power Authority, last week filed a protest with the Energy Department seeking to reverse Wright’s order to keep its Unit 1 operating. The Dec. 30 order came one day before it was to shut down.

In its request for a rehearing, the nonprofits said its members and communities were unfairly being forced to pay to keep a costly and unreliable plant operating and that the department didn’t even comply with the law requiring it to show why this was the best alternative. They also said the department’s order unfairly punished them for the mistakes of other utilities.

Wright brushed off the criticism, saying there would be “far larger costs from blackouts.”

Solar and wind said to save consumers ‘billions’

Clean energy advocates said that renewable sources saved consumers billions during the storm and helped ensure the lights stayed on, especially in regions that have significant investments in wind, solar, and energy storage.

In Texas, wind, solar and storage provided about 25% of power for the grid’s 27 million customers — a major increase over 2021 and a key reason blackouts were largely avoided, said John Hensley, a senior vice president at the American Clean Power Association, an industry group.

Wind and solar also accounted for significant power in the Midwest and Southwest, Hensley said. In the mid-Atlantic region served by grid operator PJM, only 5% of power came from wind and solar generation, a fact Hensley blamed on lack of investment in renewables in the region, as well as hostility by the Trump administration to new wind and solar power.

Blaming renewables for not performing during the storm “is like trying to blame someone on the bench for losing the game,” Hensley said. “They didn’t get a chance” to play.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Facing high Trump tariffs, South Africa signs framework agreement for trade deal with China

Published

on

Facing high Trump tariffs, South Africa signs framework agreement for trade deal with China

CAPE TOWN, South Africa (AP) — China and South Africa signed a framework agreement for a new trade deal on Friday as Africa’s leading economy looks to other options following the high import tariffs imposed on it by the U.S. and its diplomatic fallout with the Trump administration.

South Africa’s Ministry of Trade and Industry said the agreement would start negotiations over a deal that would give some South African goods, such as fruit, duty-free access to the Chinese market. The ministry said it expected the trade deal to be finalized by the end of March.

In return, the trade ministry said China will get enhanced investment opportunities in South Africa, where its car sales have seen rapid growth.

The U.S. slapped 30% duties on some South African goods under U.S. President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs policy — one of the higher rates applied across the world. South Africa has said it is still negotiating with the U.S. for a better deal.

The China-South Africa deal follows others looking for alternatives to U.S. partnership in the face of Trump’s aggressive trade policies.

The announcement on the negotiations between China and South Africa came days after Trump issued a short-term renewal of a longstanding free-trade agreement between the U.S. and African nations. The U.S. extended the African Growth and Opportunity Act, which South Africa is a major beneficiary of, just until the end of the year and indicated it would be modified to fit the administration’s America First policy.

China is already South Africa’s largest trade partner for both imports and exports, while Chinese economic influence across the African continent continues to grow and it dominates in the extraction of Africa’s critical minerals that are key components for new high-tech products.

“South Africa looks forward to working with China in a friendly, pragmatic and flexible manner,” the trade ministry said.

Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau, who traveled to China to sign the agreement, said the deal would benefit South Africa’s mining, agriculture, renewable energy and technology sectors.

U.S.-South Africa diplomatic ties have plunged to their worst point in decades after the Trump administration accused South Africa of pursuing an anti-American foreign policy and allowing the violent persecution of a white minority group at home. South Africa’s government has denied allegations that white Afrikaner farmers are being killed in a widespread effort to seize their land as baseless.

Trump has also barred South Africa from taking part in meetings of the Group of 20 rich and developing nations this year in the U.S.

South Africa’s biggest exports to China are gold, iron ore and platinum-group metals, while Chinese cars have quickly grown their market share in South Africa. Industry groups estimate Chinese brands have grown from around 2.8% of the South African market in 2020 to between 11% and 15% last year.

China’s BYD overtook Elon Musk’s Tesla in 2025 as the world’s biggest electric vehicle maker.

___

AP Africa news: https://apnews.com/hub/africa

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Treasury Secretary Bessent’s testimony descends into shouting matches

Published

on

Treasury Secretary Bessent’s testimony descends into shouting matches

WASHINGTON (AP) — A hearing about oversight of the U.S. financial system devolved into insults several times Wednesday as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent clashed with Democratic lawmakers over fiscal policy, the business dealings of the Trump family and other issues.

Appearances by treasury secretaries on Capitol Hill are more typically known for staid exchanges over economic policy than for political theater, but Wednesday’s hearing of the House Financial Services Committee hearing featured several fiery exchanges between the Republican Cabinet member and Democrats, with Bessent even lobbing insults back to the lawmakers.

Bessent called Rep. Sylvia Garcia “confused” when she questioned how undocumented immigrants could affect housing affordability across the country, prompting the Texas Democrat to snap back, “Don’t be demeaning to me, alright?”

Bessent later mocked a question from Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., about shuttered investigations into cryptocurrency firms. Lynch expressed frustration with Bessent’s interruptions, saying, “Mister Chairman, the answers have to be responsive if we are going to have a serious hearing.”

Bessent replied, “Well, the questions have to be serious.”

After a back-and-forth over whether tariffs cause inflation or one-time price increases for consumers, California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters asked committee leaders to intervene with Bessent: “Can someone shut him up?”

And in a fiery exchange with Rep. Gregory Meeks over the Abu Dhabi royal family’s investment into the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial cryptocurrency firm last year, the New York Democrat dropped an F-bomb as he shouted at Bessent: “Stop covering for the president! Stop being a flunky!”

The Treasury Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the fireworks.

Bessent’s performance was “not a role you typically see a treasury secretary play,” said Graham Steele, a former assistant secretary for financial institutions under Biden-era Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. The department has traditionally “been removed from some of the day-to-day, hand-to-hand political combat,” Steele said in an interview.

He recalled his former boss having tense exchanges over climate change and policy issues with Republican lawmakers during committee hearings, but the exchanges were not personal, he said, noting treasury secretaries have to strike a “delicate balance” of working with the White House while safeguarding the “economic stature” of the country internationally.

In recent months, Bessent has ratcheted up his insults when it comes to Democratic leaders.

He has called California Gov. Gavin Newsom “economically illiterate,” compared him to the fictional serial killer Patrick Bateman, and called him “a brontosaurus with a brain the size of a walnut.” He has on several occasions called Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren an “American Peronist” after she told American financial institutions not to finance the Trump administration’s massive support package for Argentina.

Bessent’s combativeness is, in part, a sign of the times, said David Lublin, chair of the Department of Government at American University’s School of Public Affairs.

“President Trump has shown he likes belligerence and he likes nominees and others who defend him vociferously,” Lublin told The Associated Press.

“It’s hard to say that this is unusual for this political environment. What used to be the normal modicum of respect for Congress has frayed to the point of vanishing,” Lublin said.

What was unusual, in Lublin’s view, was for Bessent to reveal his thoughts on monetary policy — normally the purview of the Federal Reserve — and his insistence that Trump has the right to interfere with the decision-making of the central bank. “You have a cabinet secretary defending the president’s efforts to erode institutions,” Lublin said.

On Thursday, Bessent will get another opportunity to spar with lawmakers. He is scheduled to appear before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee on the same topic: the annual report by the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which Bessent leads.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending