Politics
2026 Democrats jump to pan the shutdown deal
Senate Democrats’ embrace of a shutdown deal that doesn’t guarantee extended health care subsidies is already an electoral issue.
Nearly every major Democratic Senate candidate panned the deal, from Texas hopeful Colin Allred, a former member of Congress, deriding it as a “joke” to Illinois Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton condemning it as a “complete betrayal of the American people.” Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.), the party’s most vulnerable incumbent in 2026, voted against advancing it, as did several senators eyeing a 2028 White House bid.
“Pathetic,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote on X. “This is not a deal — it’s an empty promise,” Gov. JB Pritzker of Illinois said.
The Sunday agreement even caused a familial dispute: Stefany Shaheen, who is running in a crowded Democratic primary for an open House seat in New Hampshire, said she couldn’t support a deal that failed to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits. Her mother, retiring Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, was one of the lead Democratic negotiators of the deal.
Democratic Rep. Chris Pappas, who is running to replace Jeanne Shaheen, creating the very opening her daughter is vying to fill, also rejected it in a statement Monday.
After looking to make soaring health care costs an albatross for Republicans in the midterms, Democrats’ deal to reopen the government after 40 days without language extending the expiring insurance subsidies delivered a blow to their base. The result was so fraught, even Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) opposed it amid intense criticism for allowing eight members of the Democratic caucus to side with Republicans.
Now it’s creating a litmus test for candidates in competitive midterm races next year, as Democrats fight to retake the Senate — a tough task they feel better about after routing Republicans in last week’s off-cycle elections throughout the country. They’d need to net four seats in order to seize control of the upper chamber.
“The infighting over the deal will fade quickly and by the time we get closer to the midterms, it’s very clear that Democrats will aggressively prosecute the case against Republicans on health care,” said Matt Bennett of the centrist think tank Third Way. “They will say Republicans yanked lifesaving money away from millions of Americans to fund tax cuts for the rich. And that will have the benefit of being true.”
Thirty-three Senate seats are up for grabs next year and Democrats are making a serious play for holding or flipping at least a dozen of them. A quartet of candidates vying for open seats — Graham Platner in Maine, Mallory McMorrow in Michigan and Zach Wahls and Nathan Sage in Iowa — reiterated their opposition to Schumer’s leadership as news of the deal spread.
“Chuck Schumer failed in his job yet again,” Platner said in a video on X. “We need to elect leaders who want to fight. … Call your senators and tell them Chuck Schumer can no longer be leader. Call your congressman and tell them that they cannot vote for this when it comes to them.”
In Michigan’s three-way primary, each candidate panned the deal, representing the ideologically vast opposition within a party otherwise mired in internal dispute.
“This is a bad deal,” McMorrow said in a video late Sunday, adding that “the old way of doing things is not working.” Abdul El-Sayed slammed the “shit” agreement and castigated Democrats for giving up their leverage “when we actually can force [Republicans] to the table” after their electoral losses last week. Rep. Haley Stevens said the deal “doesn’t work for Michigan” and that she’s “going to need a whole lot more than empty promises that we’re going to lower costs.” She did not say how she’d vote on the measure in the House.
Senate Democrats’ capitulation opened an off-ramp to the record-breaking government shutdown that has snarled air travel and led to missed paychecks and lapsed food assistance. The agreement now advancing through the Senate would fund some agencies and programs for the full fiscal year and extend others until Jan. 30, 2026. It also promises Democrats a December floor vote on extending the expiring Obamacare subsidies, though it’s uncertain to pass the GOP-controlled chamber and Speaker Mike Johnson won’t promise to bring up such a vote in the House.
But in cutting a deal, Senate Democrats infuriated a party reinvigorated by its off-year electoral blowout, sparking accusations that the party again squandered its only leverage in the Republican-led Congress — and ensuring Schumer’s leadership will remain a touchstone in competitive Senate races.
None of the eight Democrats who voted to break the shutdown stalemate are facing voters next year. Two are retiring; the rest are not up for reelection until at least 2028.
They cited the financial pain the prolonged federal funding lapse was inflicting on their constituents. They cast the pending floor vote on the tax credits as a win for Democrats. And they touted other concessions they secured, like the rehiring of federal workers laid off during the shutdown.
“This bill is not perfect, but it takes important steps to reduce their shutdown’s hurt,” Sen. Dick Durbin, the No. 2 Senate Democrat who is retiring next year, said Sunday.
The Democrats vying to replace him disagree. Stratton, who’s previously called for new Senate leadership, cast Democrats’ cave as “a complete betrayal of the American people.” Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi and Robin Kelly both said the outcome failed to help millions of people whose health care premiums are set to skyrocket.
Across the Senate map, opposition spanned Schumer’s handpicked recruits — who’ve been largely silent about the shutdown — to the insurgents who’ve called for his ouster.
“This is a bad deal for Ohioans,” former Sen. Sherrod Brown said in a statement. Maine Gov. Janet Mills panned “the promise of a vote [on the subsidies] that won’t go anywhere.” Former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper — Democrats’ best chance for flipping a Senate seat and the last major candidate to weigh in on the deal — said in a statement that “any deal that lets health care costs continue to skyrocket is unacceptable.
Sage slammed the Senate Democrats who “caved and accomplished nothing.” Jordan Wood, another Democrat running in Maine, said “America needs an opposition party willing to fight for them.” Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan said in a video, “we deserve so much more than this bullshit.” Hours later, she was endorsed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who voted against the deal.
“If people believe this is a ‘deal,’ I have a bridge to sell you,” said Flanagan’s rival, Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.), adding that she’s a “no” when the measure comes up for a vote in the House. “I’m not going to put 24 million Americans at risk of losing their health care.”
Senate Democrats who brokered the spending deal argued Sunday that they had succeeded in hanging rising health care costs on Republicans’ necks heading into the midterms.
“If Republicans want to join us in lowering costs for working families, they have the perfect opportunity,” Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nevada) said Sunday at the Capitol. “If they do choose not to come to the table, they can own the disastrous premium increases.”
Democrats continued to target their own.
Rep. Mikie Sherrill, who was elected the next governor of New Jersey in last week’s blue wave, denounced the deal as “malpractice.” Zohran Mamdani, New York City’s incoming mayor who Schumer declined to endorse, said the compromise and anyone who supports it “should be rejected.”
“That’s not a deal,” Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.), who drew a primary challenge last week, said Sunday. “It’s an unconditional surrender.”
The political blast radius is extending to Schumer, who is up for reelection in 2028.
Some progressive Democrats and advocacy groups called for his ouster as leader, blaming him for failing to keep his caucus in line even as he voted against the deal he said didn’t address the “health care crisis” and vowed to “keep fighting.”
Schumer “is no longer effective and should be replaced,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a potential 2028er, blasted out on X.
The Sunrise Movement called for Schumer to step aside. Justice Democrats urged voters to reject the eight Senate Democrats who allowed the funding patch to proceed.
“I don’t think the Democrats leading this surrender effort understand the trust they are shattering in their own voting coalition,” Andrew O’Neill, the national advocacy director for Indivisible, warned Sunday night.
Schumer voted against the bill because it does “nothing” to address a “health care crisis” he called “devastating.” He pledged to “keep fighting.”
As House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, too, vowed to fight on, O’Neill called for his caucus to follow suit. Several said Sunday that they would.
Adam Wren contributed to this report.
Politics
GOP senators urge Trump to find Iran exit plan as energy prices rise: ‘The clock is ticking’
“I think our members are going to be very interested in what next steps are,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune said…
Read More
Politics
Forced out of the military — and into the redistricting wars
The latest battle in the 2026 redistricting wars will be decided Tuesday in Virginia, where a map favoring Democrats in 10 of 11 districts looks narrowly poised to spell doom for Republican incumbents — and tee up Democrats’ next big fight.
Welcome to primaries in the era of redistricting, where a Democrat-on-Democrat clash in a Washington, D.C.-adjacent district is opening a long-shot bid for one progressive candidate with a made-for-resistance background.
Veteran Bree Fram is seizing on the Virginia referendum to mount a race from the left against Rep. James Walkinshaw, a six-month incumbent who slid into the seat held by Rep. Gerry Connolly, his former boss, after Connolly died in May 2025.
Fram’s candidacy highlights an unintended consequence of Democrats’ retaliation against the redistricting wars President Donald Trump declared in an effort to retain the GOP House majority. And win or lose, it will inform the direction of a Democratic Party still seeking an exit from the political wilderness.
Fram, once the highest-ranking transgender person in the military, was forced into retirement last year when Trump declared via executive order that trans people are “not consistent with the humility and selflessness required” of service. Now, Fram and her campaign manager Sabrina Bruce, also a trans woman pushed out of the Space Force, are running their campaign like a military operation. And while they acknowledge the bid is a long shot, they think they have a chance — if Virginia voters approve redistricting in the state.
“Assuming that it does go through, there is a path to victory there, because when it comes to the landscape, when you’re looking at this from a strategic sense, you can’t go where your [opponent] is strongest. You have to go where they are weakest,” Bruce said.
And if redistricting fails, or the state Supreme Court blocks it? “The circumstances in that path to victory are much more out of our hands,” Bruce admitted.

At first glance, Fram has a resume expected of congressional candidates. She’s a 23-year veteran — 18 in the Air Force and five in the Space Force — and is quick to mention the high marks she earned from the military’s best schools. She’s smart — an actual rocket scientist — and has written or edited three books, including one on leadership. She’s married, with two teenage children, and lives in a house in the sprawling Washington suburbs. She talks a lot about democracy, duty and service.
But the circumstances surrounding Fram’s underdog bid against Walkinshaw are anything but ordinary — and her candidacy highlights the perfect storm that Trump swept into the American political universe. It’s a path that wanders from the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to the redistricting wars of 2026. And its terminus will be instructive as the country looks toward the future.
Fram has the type of progressive platform that will play well in Washington’s deep-blue suburbs: no money from corporate PACs, universal health care, altering the capital gains tax. She wants to keep data centers — for which the region is the global capital — away from residential areas. She’s a harsh critic of DOGE, whose decimation of the federal workforce was uniquely painful for the bureaucrats who call Northern Virginia home. And she joins a number of Democratic politicians bolstered by their military service credentials, calling Trump’s consistently unpopular war in Iran “a reckless disaster.”
Fram also isn’t afraid to bash her own party. She said she was “disappointed” by some Democrats who sought to distance themselves from trans advocacy in the aftermath of 2024. And she’s called for a constitutional amendment restricting presidential pardon power — including the type of preemptive pardons Biden issued his inner circle before leaving office.
Walkinshaw is running as an establishment Democrat — and an extension of Connolly, who served in Congress for 16 years and is mentioned five times on the webpage laying out Walkinshaw’s policy priorities. He sits on the House Oversight Committee (which Connolly chaired) and Homeland Security Committee — two high-profile panels whose Democratic members have set themselves in opposition to Trump’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and immigration crackdown. He is also co-chair and founder of the Federal Workforce Caucus, which advocates for federal workers.

Bruce and Fram knew it would be an uphill battle to defeat Walkinshaw, who ended 2025 with more than $340,000 cash on hand. Then, days before Fram announced her campaign on Jan. 20, the Virginia state Senate and House of Delegates passed the constitutional amendment setting the stage for the redistricting referendum.
Weeks later, Democratic Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger signed legislation drawing a new congressional map that would take effect if voters approve the measure. Fram’s home district in that map — the “new 11th” — includes a majority of voters from surrounding districts currently represented by Reps. Suhas Subramanyam (D), Don Beyer (D) and Ben Cline (R). Walkinshaw and every other Democrat in the Virginia delegation have endorsed the map.
“We were aware that the terrain and the battlefield had shifted slightly in our favor with redistricting,” Bruce said. “That chaos is a ladder, and when you have an opportunity to exploit that, to take advantage of it, it’s clear that you can use that to win.”
The campaign is operating under the assumption that the referendum, which is polling very narrowly in Democrats’ favor, will pass. So far, that’s involved a “listening tour” of the new 11th — inspired by a commander’s first order of business when they take over a new base or squadron: Speaking to all the people who work for them to understand their needs.

But Fram is still the underdog.
An internal poll commissioned by Fram’s campaign and shared with Blue Light News shows Walkinshaw with a major lead. In a head-to-head contest between the two, 43 percent of Democratic primary voters in Virginia’s new 11th district said they would support Walkinshaw, and only 9 percent said they would vote for Fram — while 48 percent said they weren’t sure. In the same poll, after being presented with information about both candidates, Fram cuts into the gap, if only slightly: Walkinshaw carries 42 percent, and Fram garners 21 percent.
Then there’s the money.
Fram’s campaign raised just over $250,000 in the first quarter of 2026 and had about $135,000 cash on hand at the end of March, according to FEC filings. Her campaign has received donations from every state and D.C., and every county in the new 11th district. None of it came from PACs.
Walkinshaw raised more than $630,000 over the same period, nearly $210,000 of which came from PACs. His campaign reported nearly $800,000 cash on hand as of March 31. Donald Brownlee, Walkinshaw’s campaign manager, said in a statement that over the past year, they received more than 6,000 individual donations, averaging $25 each.
“The grassroots energy we saw in our special election last year remains strong and [Walkinshaw] is focused on helping deliver a win for the Yes campaign in next week’s redistricting referendum,” Brownlee said.
Despite their differences, Fram is focused on running a campaign that steers clear of trench warfare. Fram and Walkinshaw are on the same team, the campaign says.
“I think that there is a line between winning, and being happy with the way that you won,” Bruce said. “And for a campaign that is centered on hope, centered on building something that is better than what we have, I don’t think we can stray too far from that and start attacking fellow Democrats. How are we going to get away from this malaise that Trump has put us in if we don’t try to be better ourselves?”
To understand Fram’s motivation for running, her background is important. The fact that she is trans, Fram says, is “the 17th most interesting thing about” her. When she was promoted to Space Force colonel in 2024, Fram became the highest-ranked openly trans person in the entire military. But then came the Supreme Court’s emergency stay on Trump’s executive order ousting Fram and thousands of other trans service members.
“That was devastating, because that was the day I knew the Supreme Court had just fired me,” Fram said.
Fram’s journey to the military began decades earlier with an episode of “Star Trek: Next Generation.” A young Fram was drawn to the character Geordi La Forge, helmsman of the show’s Enterprise-D starship. “I saw Geordi and I’m like, ‘That’s my job. I want to make the warp engines go. I want to help humanity expand into the stars,’” she said. Fram graduated from the University of Minnesota in 2001 with a degree in aerospace engineering and began looking for jobs at places like NASA and Boeing.

But the Sept. 11 attacks changed Fram’s trajectory. In the days after, Fram was driving from Minneapolis to Duluth to visit her girlfriend — now wife — when she saw an American flag draped from an overpass. She started to cry. “I walked into her apartment and said, ‘I’m going to join the Air Force,’” Fram recalled. By January 2003, Fram reported to officer training school, just as former President George W. Bush was beginning his second term and plotting the invasion of Iraq.
During her first 13 years in the Air Force, Fram told only two people in the military she was trans. In one close call around 2014, Fram recalled, she reported to work on a Saturday and accidentally brought a personal phone — which contained female-presenting photos of herself — into a classified zone. After quickly realizing and turning over the device to the security office, Fram waited in terror. “My wife thought that black helicopters were going to appear over our house,” she said. But five days later, security officers pulled Fram aside and asked if she could be blackmailed over the pictures. She said no, and they told her to pick up her phone on the way out.
On June 30, 2016, the Obama administration declared that “effective immediately, transgender Americans may serve openly, and they can no longer be discharged or otherwise separated from the military just for being transgender.” Fram was ready: She had drafted an email coming out to her colleagues and a Facebook post to come out to the world. She took a couple breaths. And then she hit send.
Fram scurried to the Pentagon gym, where she got on the elliptical and “went nowhere faster than I’d ever gone anywhere in my life,” she said. When she returned to her desk, her colleagues walked up to her one by one to shake her hand and say it was an honor to serve alongside her.

Four months later, Trump won his first presidential election.
On the 2016 campaign trail, Trump’s comments about trans people were fairly moderate. In April of that year, he said they should “use the bathroom they feel is appropriate.” Mostly, he avoided the topic altogether.
But in July 2017, the president said in a post on Twitter that, “After consultation with my Generals and military experts … the United States Government will not accept or allow … Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military.” Fram wasn’t sure what to make of the missive — was a tweet an official order? — but she knew something had shifted.
That trans ban by tweet faced swift legal challenges, and in March 2018, the administration issued a revised policy that barred trans people from enlisting but allowed those already serving to remain if they received a diagnosis of “gender dysphoria” from a military doctor.
“It felt like being an endangered species at that point,” Fram said, “where the policies were just going to be so onerous and unpleasant that they thought we were just going to walk away, and eventually all of us would be gone.” She decided to stay and became one of the founding members of Trump’s Space Force.
When former President Joe Biden took office, he reversed the trans ban on Day One. Fram ascended the military’s ladder, climbing to the rank of colonel by the end of his term.

At the same time, Trump was stepping out of exile and back into the national political spotlight. His comeback campaign centered on anti-trans rhetoric, railing against “transgender for everybody” — a phrase he ambiguously attributed to Democrats. The GOP platform pledged to “End Left-wing Gender Insanity.” One of the Trump reelect’s most successful ads bashed Kamala Harris over the issue: “Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you,” the narrator of the ad said.
“The 2017 tweet was a lightning bolt out of a clear blue sky that no one saw coming,” Fram said. “But approaching 2024, we had $200 million spent in the last two months of the campaign demonizing trans people. This was like a hurricane you saw forming far away. You know it’s coming toward you, and the question is just how bad is it going to be when it hits shore.”
As the prospect of Trump’s return to office became more of a reality, Fram was sitting on a beach in Maine when her mother asked her a jarring question: “What’s your plan to flee?”
It hit home for Fram, whose grandfather and great grandfather according to family lore left Germany at the onset of the Holocaust on a midnight train to Paris.
“I plan to stay and fight,” Fram said she told her mother. “If the uniform gave me anything, it’s the courage to stand up when it’s appropriate to do so.”

When the Supreme Court issued the decision that precipitated her ouster, Fram had one final meeting with the joint staff, which she attended as a colonel due to the Space Force’s small size. After delivering an update on her work, Fram informed the admirals and generals of her “unexpected departure.”
“The person sitting next to me looked over and said, ‘Oh, why? What new assignment did you get? Where are you going?’” Fram said. “And I’m like, ‘Well, I don’t meet this administration’s standard for military excellence and readiness, so I’m going to be placed on administrative leave in two days.’ And it took a moment for what that meant to descend upon the people in the room.”
Just like the day she came out nearly a decade earlier, Fram said each person at the meeting shook her hand and told her “it’s an honor to have served with you.”

Fram was placed on administrative leave in early June 2025. A week before her retirement — authorized for Jan. 1, 2026, after a bureaucratic delay for approval — a three-star general summoned Fram to the Pentagon to deliver a message: the normal retirement celebrations would not be available. There would be no honor guard and no band. Others from her unit would not be allowed to attend. And she wouldn’t be able to wear her own uniform.
“Every pettiness, every cruelty as part of this process was inflicted on us,” Fram said.
Neither the Pentagon nor the White House responded to requests for comment by the time of publication.
Later that month, the Human Rights Campaign Foundation hosted a ceremonial retirement in Washington for five trans service members, including Fram. Their uniforms were displayed on mannequins.

“Our uniforms are not coming off because we failed in our duty, but because we did it so well that what it represented could not be hidden away,” Fram said in that ceremony’s closing remarks. “We may be done with our military service. We are not done serving.”
On April 28, 2025, Connolly released a statement announcing that he would not seek reelection after nine terms in Congress, citing the return of esophageal cancer.
Just over a week later, on May 6 — the same day the Supreme Court ordered its emergency stay — Walkinshaw, who had served as Connolly’s chief of staff for 10 years, filed paperwork seeking the Democratic nomination to replace his former boss. Connolly endorsed him the same day and transferred $1.8 million to a PAC backing Walkinshaw, according to campaign finance records first reported by the Washington Examiner.
Connolly died on May 21, triggering a firehouse Democratic primary to replace him in the deep-blue district on June 28 ahead of a Sept. 9 special election. Even after his death, Connolly’s campaign sent emails to its listserv soliciting donations for Walkinshaw, and his X account told followers to vote early for him, the Examiner reported. Walkinshaw cruised to victory in the primary, notching nearly 60 percent of the vote.
In the background, Fram and Bruce — who had known each other since 2018 — were set on a collision course with Walkinshaw. As Walkinshaw was announcing his campaign, Bruce was driving to her Space Force reenlistment ceremony when the high court released the decision that would force her out of the service. She went on administrative leave the next week. Fram had already been eyeing a run for Virginia’s 11th District, but couldn’t retire quickly enough to jump into the special election.

But by September, Fram and Bruce began to seriously discuss their next mission: a 2026 bid.
“If this administration thinks they can kick out a bunch of highly motivated badasses without expecting it to come back and bite them in the butt,” Fram said, “this is a way to show them wrong.”
-
Politics1 year agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics1 year agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Politics1 year agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship7 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words
-
Uncategorized1 year ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
The Josh Fourrier Show1 year agoDOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?



