Connect with us

Congress

Trump’s Greenland tariffs could squeeze Hill Republicans

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s threat to weaponize steep new tariffs as part of his bid to acquire Greenland could soon put queasy Republicans on the spot.

House and Senate Democrats plan to force votes as soon as next month to block the European tariffs Trump announced over the weekend, according to two aides granted anonymity to disclose private scheduling. That, for now, is likely to be the main avenue of congressional accountability as the president amps up his campaign targeting the icy Danish territory.

Democrats are waiting for Trump to file his executive order, but once he does, a resolution would ripen about 20 days later, according to one Senate aide granted anonymity to describe internal planning.

While some lawmakers have floated using the spending legislation now moving through Congress ahead of next week’s government funding deadline as a way to block Trump, leaders of both parties are wary of taking any steps that could lead to a government shutdown. And, as POLITICO first reported, Danish officials have privately urged against forcing a vote on a separate war powers authorization unless it has overwhelming bipartisan support.

But the 10 percent tariffs threatened against Denmark, France, Germany, the U.K. and four other countries that recently sent a small contingent of troops to Greenland offer a clear opportunity for congressional pushback from Republicans uneasy about the geopolitics of Trump’s audacious demands, their own free-trade views or a combination of both.

The Greenland reckoning comes as the House prepares to come off the sidelines on the gamut of Trump’s second-term tariffs. Speaker Mike Johnson has so far been able to shield Trump — and his own GOP members — from a direct confrontation over the president’s aggressive levies, which have sparked private heartburn among some Republicans.

But that appears to be coming to an end. A procedural maneuver that blocked efforts to cancel prior Trump tariffs expires next week, and Republicans have no firm plan to extend the protections for the president. Already one House Republican — Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska — says he is likely to oppose any effort by Johnson to block a cancellation of the Greenland-related tariffs from coming to the floor.

“It’s crazy — they’re an ally, and we’ve alienated our good friends,” Bacon said Tuesday about Trump’s move targeting the Danes and other NATO countries that have backed them.

With Republicans holding a threadbare House majority, and Democrats outnumbering them on some days, even one or two GOP defectors might be able to quash any effort to prevent a tariff vote.

Three Republicans voted in September against Johnson’s last effortto block tariff votes: Reps. Kevin Kiley of California, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Victoria Spartz of Indiana, who could be likely allies of Bacon.

Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) also said he would oppose any effort to prevent tariff votes and doesn’t support the president’s plan to impose new trade levies on European countries over Greenland.

“I think that the Trump economic policies overall are having a tremendous positive effect on the economy. I think the tariffs are hurting. And when you’re trying to accelerate, it doesn’t make much sense to tap on the brakes,” McClintock said Tuesday.

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) said Trump’s plan to slap financial penalties on European allies over Greenland is a “bad idea” and that he wants to know the rationale for preventing a vote on blocking them. Fitzpatrick didn’t say how he would vote if he had the chance.

“My sense is that he’s trying to gain leverage, but I still don’t support the rhetoric,” Fitzpatrick said. “Denmark has given us full access to the country, they’re a NATO ally. There’s no reason for any of this.”

Republicans are already on edge as they await a ruling from the Supreme Court about Trump’s ability to use emergency powers to implement tariffs at will. The justices skipped an opportunity to issue a decision Tuesday, and it could be a month or more before they rule.

Rep. Jeff Hurd (R-Colo.) said the legality of Trump’s latest tariff threat over Greenland is “a question that I have not seen answered yet.” He said he was wary of allowing a president to deploy tariffs as a way to secure new territory.

“I think if it’s to address trade imbalances or trade abuses … then that’s the sort of thing where tariffs are certainly appropriate,” Hurd said. “Outside of that context, I think it gets more problematic.”

Johnson largely sidestepped a question Tuesday night on Trump’s threat to use tariffs as the latest salvo in his bid to acquire Greenland. He downplayed the odds of a conflict, saying that the U.S. has “great allies” and “everybody there wants to work towards a solution together.”

The Senate is likely to pass a resolution to block the Greenland-related tariffs when it comes up for a vote. Already three Republicans — Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Thom Tillis of North Carolina — have publicly bashed Trump’s tariffs and urged Congress to take back its institutional prerogatives. Democrats would only need to pick up four GOP votes, and Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have both been publicly critical of Trump’s Greenland threats and previously supported resolutions targeting Trump’s other tariffs.

“The way we are going about projecting power in the Arctic is costly, divisive and unnecessary,” Tillis said during a Blue Light News panel Tuesday at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

The House and Senate both voting to block Trump’s tariffs would be a significant moment — marking the first time both chambers have moved to check Trump’s most controversial trade tactic. But the president would surely veto such an effort, and there are no signs he is yet facing the type of GOP jailbreak that would allow Congress to override him.

But forcing a vote stands to make things uncomfortable for those in the GOP who have tried to telegraph their discomfort with the Greenland push without fully breaking with Trump.

Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), for instance, sidestepped weighing in directly on Trump’s latest tariff threat Tuesday, instead saying that the president has “been a strong supporter of tariffs.”

“We’ve had a great relationship with them in the past, and there’s a significant military presence,” Barrasso added on Greenland. “We need to build on that.”

House Democrats, meanwhile, are seizing on the momentum to try to squeeze their GOP counterparts.

Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), the top Democrat on the Rules Committee, recited Tillis’ and Murkowski’s remarks during a meeting of the panel Tuesday. He pressed Rep. Adrian Smith of Nebraska, a tariff-skeptical Republican who was testifying on an unrelated bill, whether he would support an effort by Johnson to block a vote on the Greenland-related tariffs.

Smith said he would “prefer to vote on tariffs, certainly,” while adding he would need to look over any new language before making a commitment.

“I wasn’t expecting to have this discussion,” Smith said, later adding: “I’ve been on the record for saying I’m not a fan of tariffs.”

Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

House Transportation chair reveals markup date for highway bill

Published

on

House Transportation Chair Sam Graves (R-Mo.) is targeting April 29 as the markup date for the surface transportation reauthorization bill and is negotiating a topline number between $500 and $550 billion, he told Blue Light News Wednesday.

While a final topline number has yet to be agreed on, Graves said he has a ballpark figure.

“I’m gonna say it’s gonna be somewhere in the neighborhood of $550 billion or $500 billion — somewhere in there. That will be our number. We’re still actually — believe it or not — negotiating that,” Graves said.

That $550 billion total number being discussed for what is also known as the highway bill would be a combination of authorizations and contract authority for a five-year span.

If that number holds, the bill would be well below the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law, which totaled $1.2 trillion, with $550 billion of that going to new federal spending for roads, bridges, transit, broadband, resilience and water infrastructure. Graves has said he wants the upcoming bill to be more traditional than the previous one with more focus on roads and bridges.

He added that he is in active talks with ranking member Rick Larsen (D-Wash.) and that he thinks Larsen “wants a little bit more” in funding. Peter True, a spokesperson for Larsen, confirmed Larsen wants a higher number than $550 billion.

Graves said there will be a registration fee for electric vehicles in the surface bill, a long-sought goal of his. Last year, he succeeded in inserting a $250 registration fee for EVs and $100 for hybrids in the House version of the GOP-led budget reconciliation bill, but those provisions never made it into law. He said the EV fee will be different this time around.

“We lowered it a little bit,” Graves said of the EV fee, though he did not provide an exact figure.

As for a registration fee on hybrid cars, he was less clear: “We’re not sure yet, but yes, probably.”

Continue Reading

Congress

DHS shutdown disrupts World Cup planning, officials tell senators

Published

on

The Department of Homeland Security shutdown is already undermining federal preparations for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, administration officials warned senators Wednesday — cautioning that the ongoing funding lapse has slowed coordination with state and local authorities and cost the agency hundreds of airport screeners as the U.S. gears up to host one of the largest sporting events in the world.

“It has significantly impacted our operations,” Christopher Tomney, DHS director of the Office of Homeland Security Situational Awareness, told lawmakers at a joint congressional hearing convened by the Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Homeland Security and Commerce-Justice-Science.

Tomney, who is serving as the federal government’s senior coordinating official for the 2026 tournament, said the shutdown has “hindered our coordination with state and locals” and “reduced our planning efforts.”

He added that “hundreds” of unpaid Transportation Security Officers have quit during the DHS funding lapse: “We just can’t replace that expertise overnight.”

Tomney’s testimony provided the starkest public acknowledgment yet of the DHS shutdown’s impact on the administration’s planning for the World Cup, which will bring millions of fans to 11 U.S. host cities this summer. It also highlighted broader anxieties about whether President Donald Trump’s rhetoric toward foreign visitors could dampen international travel and undercut the economic upside host cities are counting on.

Administration officials insisted the U.S. would be ready no matter what, but senators from both parties pressed witnesses on how the federal government can ensure a safe and welcoming tournament while DHS remains shuttered and key agencies juggle threats ranging from drones to cyberattacks.

On hand alongside Tomney was Douglas Olson, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Portland Field Office and the bureau’s senior coordinating official on the White House task force for the World Cup; and Robert O’Leary, deputy assistant secretary for travel and tourism at the Commerce Department.

Collectively, they sketched out an enormous effort already underway ahead of the 78-match tournament, which will unfold over 39 days and spill far beyond the official host cities into base camps, fan festivals and surrounding communities.

Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.), who chairs the Senate Homeland Security funding panel and presided over part of the Wednesday hearing, asked Tomney directly how the 60-day DHS shutdown has affected preparations.

Tomney linked the shutdown to broader strains across DHS, which is expected to shoulder much of the burden for tournament security while also carrying out its regular missions in aviation, border security and emergency response.

Olson told senators that unmanned aerial systems remain one of the most serious concerns heading into the tournament: “The threat is very real. It’s growing,” he said, noting that drones are increasingly easy to acquire and difficult to detect.

Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who chairs the Commerce-Justice-Science panel, asked what the federal government is doing to show that the United States is “open” and “welcoming” to fans from around the world.

O’Leary replied that the Commerce Department is working with other agencies, host committees and tourism groups to smooth travel and encourage future visits. He also pointed to the State Department’s work to reduce visa wait times and said the administration sees the World Cup as the first in a long run of major global events that can boost U.S. tourism.

But Democrats argued that Trump’s own policies are sending the opposite message.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Commerce-Justice-Science appropriations subcommittee, said he is anxious that the administration’s actions unrelated to security — including the president’s anti-immigration rhetoric and travel restrictions — will discourage fans from coming and blunt the financial benefits expected to flow to host communities.

“What I worry about most is that factors unrelated to security will dampen enthusiasm for the tournament and reduce the economic benefits that should flow to communities that are hosting,” Van Hollen said.

He pointed to weaker-than-expected international tourism trends and pressed O’Leary on why Commerce had not yet produced updated travel forecasts required by law.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) zeroed in on Canada and Mexico, which are co-hosting the tournament with the United States. She said Canadian tourism to her state has dropped sharply and tied the decline to Trump’s rhetoric toward America’s northern neighbor.

“We love our Canadian visitors,” said O’Leary, adding that the administration welcomes travel from Canada.

“Perhaps you should share that with President Trump,” Shaheen shot back.

Continue Reading

Congress

Obernolte wins

Published

on

Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) is officially GOP conference policy chair.

He was elected by voice vote at the candidate policy forum on Wednesday, five members told Blue Light News as they were leaving the meeting. His only opponent, Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-N.Y.), withdrew from race on Tuesday.

Obernolte secured endorsements from senior Republicans like Republican Study Committee Chair August Pfluger (R-Texas) and the former policy chair Kevin Hern (R-Okla.). Hern left the position to launch a Senate bid.

Continue Reading

Trending