Connect with us

The Dictatorship

RFK Jr.’s new Head Start policy shows the U.S is losing its moral conscience

Published

on

RFK Jr.’s new Head Start policy shows the U.S is losing its moral conscience

The Department of Health and Human Services announced in a press release Thursday that the agency will restrict undocumented immigrants from accessing Head Starta federal program that provides children with education, health screenings and food. “For too long, the government has diverted hardworking Americans’ tax dollars to incentivize illegal immigration,” HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in that press release. “Today’s action changes that—it restores integrity to federal social programs, enforces the rule of law, and protects vital resources for the American people.”

Thursday’s egregious and inhumane action robs innocent children of critical and often life-changing services.

No, that’s not what it does. Thursday’s egregious and inhumane action robs innocent children of critical and often life-changing services including medical screenings, mental health resources, access to developmental therapies and, of course, early education. Removing such a program will cost Americans, literally. Research has shown that early investment in childhood education yields significant economic returns, on the order of 7 to 10 dollars for every dollar invested. This positive return would occur through increased earnings and reduced reliance on welfare.

But forget about the return on investment. Kennedy’s new policy tells the parents of these children that their kids aren’t deserving of fundamental care critical for their well-being because of their immigration status. It tells them that America is not a land of opportunity for them. Or even a land that recognizes their humanity. Taking away Head Start’s benefits from such children will most certainly result in untreated developmental delays and exacerbation of chronic medical conditions, as well as overcrowded emergency rooms when those children get sick.

Hostility toward immigrants has become Trump’s hallmark, and some people may shrug at Kennedy’s announcement Thursday as another cruel, if unremarkable, tactic toward that end. But we shouldn’t become jaded. What HHS is doing isn’t just cruel to immigrant children and their parents; it’s yet another sign that the United States is losing grip on its moral conscience.

Head Start was launched in 1965 as part of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s “war on poverty.” More than 30 years later, in 1998, President Bill Clinton’s administration interpreted the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 in such a way that allowed for noncitizen children to access Head Start’s benefits. Kennedy’s new policy rolls that back. According to Kennedy’s announcement, “Head Start’s classification under the new PRWORA interpretation puts American families first by ensuring taxpayer-funded benefits are reserved for eligible individuals.”

Undocumented children are not strangers, but an integral part of the American community.

Undocumented children are not strangers, but an integral part of the American community. There are at least 1 million undocumented children living in America, as well as 5.5 million children with one undocumented parent, according to the American Psychological Association. Denying these children access to health care and education is entirely un-American. It betrays our ideals of providing equal opportunity for everyone.

Research has also shown that programs such as Head Start have improved health outcomes by reducing obesity rates and increasing vaccination rates. Improved vaccination rates increase herd immunity that protects all children, not just those being vaccinated and not just children at Head Start. That means that removing critical health supports for undocumented children would contribute a public health crisis that affects all children, not just the undocumented ones.

Our founding forefathers argued that all men were created equal, and by extension all children are. They deserve a chance to thrive, regardless of the color of their skin, creed or immigration status. The policy to remove undocumented children from Head Start dehumanizes our most vulnerable population.

Public health is not just about getting the latest vaccine or getting the latest screening test. Sure, that is part of it. But at its core, public health is about building an infrastructure that works seamlessly to protect the most vulnerable populations. By pushing children out of classrooms, hospitals and clinics, Kennedy is doing the opposite.

Dr. Omer Awan

Dr. Omer Awan M.D., MPH, CIIP, is a practicing radiologist physician in Baltimore, Maryland, who writes about the most pressing issues in healthcare and public health.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

Iran moves to take permanent control of Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping choke point

Published

on

Iran announced on Thursday that it was drafting a “protocol” that would allow it to “monitor transit” by oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuzthe strategic waterway Tehran has shut downsending oil and gas prices soaring in the U.S. and across the world.

Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister for legal and international affairs, said tanker traffic through the narrow route “should be supervised and coordinated” between Iran and Oman, the two countries that border the strait, according to a translation of a report from Iran’s state news agency cited by CNBC.

“Of course, these requirements will not mean restrictions, but rather to facilitate and ensure safe passage and provide better services to ships that pass through this route,” Gharibabadi said according to the report.

President Donald Trump has suggested that the U.S. may leave it to other countries to end Iran’s de facto blockade of the strait, which it enforces by firing missiles at tankers. Trump has called on European nations to do so, but experts say Europe lacks the military resources to halt Iranian attacks on tankers for the long term.

Iranian and Omani officials did not respond to requests for comment from MS NOW.

For decades, the strait has been an international waterway, controlled by no country, that ships from all nations could transit.

Gregory Brew, a senior Iran and oil analyst at the Eurasia Group, said that if Iran manages to take control of the Strait of Hormuz permanently, it would be a “colossal win” for the country.

“It’s a massive strategic win, given that Iran has demonstrated that it can close the strait,” Brew told MS NOW. “It’s a huge financial win.”

Brew added that if Iran gains long-term control of the straitit would be more powerful than it was before the Trump administration attacked it. Iran’s parliament passed a law to begin charging “tolls” of up to $2 million per ship, which could mean as much as $100 billion in annual revenue — or the equivalent of Iran’s current annual oil export earnings.

“It’s not innocuous,” Brew said, referring to the protocol announced on Thursday. “Iran has passed legislation and is now claiming to be coordinating with Oman in establishing joint management of the Strait of Hormuz.”

Brew predicted that Oman, which has less oil and wealth than other Gulf nations, may be willing to accept a temporary arrangement that could help end the conflict.

“The Omanis are probably hedging; they’ve always tried to manage their relationship with Iran, and they lose relatively little by cooperating with Iran right now to ease pressure on the strait,” Brew said. “The bigger question is whether they continue to cooperate after the war.”

Ted Singer, a former senior CIA official who oversaw the agency’s operations in the Middle East, said Iranian officials are likely trying to see what they can achieve.

“I wouldn’t see this as a fork in the road,” Singer told MS NOW.

Singer, who served as a CIA station chief in five different countries over a 35-year career, said Iranian officials could be trying to stoke division between gulf countries.

“The Iranians are good at doing more than one thing at a time,” he said. “Why not stake out a maximalist position on tolls, then toss out options to roil the waters?”

The United Arab Emirates, for example, is adamantly opposed to Iran taking control of the strait.

“The Iranians play multi-dimensional chess,” said Singer, now a senior adviser to the Chertoff Group, a security consulting firm run by Michael Chertoff, who served as secretary of Homeland Security in the George W. Bush administration.

“Try to create division between Oman and the rest of the Gulf countries,” Singer said. “Why not fiddle around with this and see if something sticks?”

David Rohde headshot

David Rohde

David Rohde is the senior national security reporter for MS NOW. Previously he was the senior executive editor for national security and law for NBC News.

Ian Sherwood is the director of international newsgathering for MS NOW, a former executive editor for NBC News and a former deputy Washington bureau chief for the BBC.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Thursday’s Mini-Report, 4.2.26

Published

on

Thursday’s Mini-Report, 4.2.26

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Targeting Iranian infrastructure: “President Trump celebrated the destruction of a bridge near Tehran on Thursday, warning on social media that there was ‘much more to follow.’ The attack on the B1 bridge between Tehran and the nearby city of Karaj killed eight people and wounded 95, according to Fars, a semiofficial Iranian news agency.”

* I don’t think the speech worked: “The price of oil rose sharply and stocks wavered on Thursday after President Trump, in an address from the White House the day before, said the war against Iran was ‘nearing completion’ but failed to offer a concrete timeline and committed to more attacks. In the 19-minute address, Mr. Trump said U.S. forces would hit Iran ‘extremely hard over the next two to three weeks.’”

* Reversing one of Noem’s worst ideas: “Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin on Wednesday rescinded a rule that DHS expenditures over $100,000 be personally approved by his office, ending a widely criticized policy implemented by his predecessor Kristi Noem that critics said put a particular burden on the Federal Emergency Management Agency ’s work aiding disaster response and recovery.”

* The latest on the ballroom: “Donald Trump’s handpicked National Capital Planning Commission voted Thursday to authorize the president’s plan to erect a gilded 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom in place of the historic East Wing, which was destroyed last fall to make way for the ballroom.”

* Remember when Congress, by constitutional mandate, had the power of the purse? “President Donald Trump said Thursday he will soon sign an order to pay all Department of Homeland Security employees who have gone without paychecks during the record-long partial government shutdown that has reached 48 days.”

* A year after “Liberation Day,” there’s fresh tariff news: “President Donald Trump announced Thursday he will levy tariffs as high as 100 percent on some name-brand pharmaceuticals and is adjusting tariffs on products that contain steel and aluminum, the administration’s first move to expand duties since the Supreme Court dealt his trade agenda a blow in February.”

* The latest from Artemis II: “NASA’s latest update about the Artemis II moon mission shows a breathtaking view of Earth as the Orion capsule with four astronauts on board orbits tens of thousands of miles above. Hitching a ride beyond Earth’s atmosphere atop NASA’s powerful Space Launch System rocket, the three Americans and one Canadian selected for the mission are preparing to begin heading toward the moon.”

See you tomorrow.

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Judge weighs legality of Trump’s planned arch near Arlington National Cemetery

Published

on

Judge weighs legality of Trump’s planned arch near Arlington National Cemetery

A federal judge is weighing whether the Trump administration can legally build a 250-foot arch just across the Potomac River from the Vietnam and Lincoln memorials, as three veterans who fought in Vietnam have argued the project would violate federal law and permanently alter one of the country’s most sacred landscapes.

Judge Tanya Chutkan declined on Thursday to issue a preliminary injunction, instead asking the parties to report by 5 p.m. on Friday whether they can agree to halt groundbreaking while the case proceeds. If no agreement is reached, she will ask the executive branch to provide supplemental sworn declarations disclosing any awards, grants, contracts, permits or other relevant information related to the arch’s construction.

The suit was brought by three Vietnam War veterans and an architectural historian, who argued the project would obstruct views of the Vietnam War and Lincoln memorials from Arlington National Cemetery. The plaintiffs contended the planned arch would violate federal laws governing historic sites and monuments, and the White House cannot lawfully proceed without congressional authorization.

The plaintiffs cited Trump’s various Truth Social posts and public statements to support their claim that construction is underway, pointing to design specifications, a target completion date of July 4 and renderings backed by a White House fact sheet. They also argued the National Park Service must sign off on any use of the land before construction begins.

President Donald Trump told reporters in January that his proposed arch “will be the most beautiful in the world,” and is already “being built.” He also shared renderings of the arch on his Truth Social account.

The government’s attorney, Bradley Craigmyle, argued that Trump’s media and social media statements constitute hearsay. Chutkan pushed back sharply, saying Trump’s posts are admissible as statements by a party. Throughout the hearing, Craigmyle argued the project is in the conceptual phase despite the president’s statements.

Today’s hearing comes as the National Capital Planning Commission voted 9-1, with two abstentions, to approve construction for Trump’s 90,000-square foot ballroom at the White House, clearing the final procedural hurdle for the project. Chutkan referenced the ballroom case during the hearing, saying, “If we haven’t had the whole White House ballroom situation, this might be a little more academic than it is now.”

Selena Kuznikov contributed to this article.

Peggy Helman is a desk associate at MS NOW.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending