Connect with us

The Dictatorship

How Elizabeth Warren and other Democrats are looking to call Trump’s bluff

Published

on

How Elizabeth Warren and other Democrats are looking to call Trump’s bluff

As Democrats mostly steel themselves to oppose another term of Donald Trumpprogressives in the party appear to be converging around a new strategy. Blue Light News reports that more liberal Dems plan to take the president-elect’s “populist, working-class proposals at his word — or at least pretend to.” Democratic lawmakers are announcing that they’re willing to work with Trump on promised populist policies that overlap with progressive goals. If he puts his money where his mouth is, then they’ll take some credit for it. “If he doesn’t, they can bash him for it,” Blue Light News said.

In other words, progressives are angling to call Trump’s populist bluff.

For the most part calling Trump’s populist bluff could help expose the fraudulence of his campaign promises.

Deciding how to walk the line between resistance and effective governance is always a complicated endeavor — all the more so when the party in power  threatens to try to unravel democracy. But as a starting strategy it’s a smart approach that could position progressives to expose the false promises of right-wing populism as a salve for the working class.

“President Trump announced during his campaign that he intended to put a 10 percent interest rate cap on consumer credit,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts told Blue Light News. “Bring it on.” A number of her Democratic colleagues sounded similar notes, per Blue Light News:

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in an interview that she would likely work with Trump if he pursues antitrust promises he made on the campaign trail. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said he sees himself partnering with Trump to tackle “large corporate consolidations,” while Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) posted on X that he “looked forward” to Trump “fulfilling his promise” to cap credit card interest rates.

I’m cautiously optimistic that this could be a win-win for progressives. Republicans will be calling the shots, with control of the White House and Congress, but Democrats need to be leading demands for policies that protect working people from corporate exploitation. In the event that Trump and the Republicans do try to pass policies that protect working people from corporate exploitation, Democrats must be situated to take credit for leading the agenda and be ready to credit Republicans for taking a break from the policy agenda of billionaires and bigots.

It may seem far-fetched to think Trump will follow through on any policies that count as progressive, but it is possible. Consider how Trump and his allies have at least rhetorically softened the GOP’s longstanding hostility to organized labor. Trump just picked a Republican congresswoman for labor secretary who has a surprisingly moderate labor record. And Vice President-elect JD Vance has signaled interest in some degree of opposition to corporate consolidation and support of expanding the child tax credit. If Trump’s right-wing populism takes even hyper-incremental steps to win over organized labor, deliver pro-consumer wins or rein in big tech, then Democrats must show themselves to be way ahead of Republicans on those issues. It is of existential importance for Democrats to occupy and dominate the lane of real economic change for the working class and demonstrate that Republicans are merely tourists there.

And for those who fear that Democrats will look spineless by merely expressing a willingness to work with with the Republicans, it’s best to remember President Joe Biden’s tenure. Republican cooperation with Biden on his infrastructure and semiconductor bills did not discredit an otherwise extremely disciplined (as well as bad faith and over-the-top) GOP opposition to his presidency. And in the meantime, Republican lawmakers who supported the bills were able to go home and tell their constituents that they achieved something concrete with broad bipartisan appeal. More substantively, pressuring the GOP to fulfill promises that would actually improve people’s lives is Democrats’ civic responsibility. At the end of the day, good policy is good policy — and politicians are elected to achieve results.

But for the most part calling Trump’s populist bluff could help expose the fraudulence of his campaign promises. Every promise Trump fails to keep  should become a Democratic talking point in the midterm elections. And a laser focus on true economic populism would help Democrats take Trump to task over his plans for extended tax cuts for corporations and the richattacks on the social safety net and a regulatory agenda designed to help tech tycoons and capital at the expense of working Americans.

Democrats cannot cede the language of anti-elitism to the right. Instead, they must claim it as their true turf and hammer home how most right-wing populism is a bait and switch that serves the rich and the powerful.

Zeeshan Aleem

Zeeshan Aleem is a writer and editor for BLN Daily. Previously, he worked at Vox, HuffPost and Blue Light News, and he has also been published in, among other places, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Nation, and The Intercept. You can sign up for his free politics newsletter here.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

U.S. military carries out new strikes in Iran, says ceasefire continues

Published

on

U.S. military carries out new strikes in Iran, says ceasefire continues

The U.S. military on Wednesday carried out new strikes in Iran, shooting down four attack drones and targeting a ground control station. The military stated both the drones and ground facility posed a threat to the Strait of Hormuz, a U.S. official said in a statement to MS NOW.

The official said the ceasefire agreement remains in effect and described the U.S. military actions as intended to maintain the ceasefire.

“Today, U.S. Central Command forces shot down four Iranian one-way attack drones that posed a threat around the Strait of Hormuz. U.S. forces also struck an Iranian ground control station in Bandar Abbas that was about to launch a fifth drone. These actions were measured, purely defensive, and intended to maintain the ceasefire,” the official said in the statement.

At least three explosions were heard east of Bandar Abbas, a port city in Iran along the Strait of Hormuz, The New York Times and CNN reported, both citing Iranian state media. The explosions briefly activated Bandar Abbas’ air defense systems, Fars News Agency, a media outlet affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, reported early Thursday local time.

The latest strikes come amid an unstable ceasefire agreement between the U.S. and Iran.

Speaking at a Cabinet meeting at the White House earlier Wednesday, President Donald Trump said Iran wants “very much to make a deal” but “they haven’t gotten there,” adding that Iran was “negotiating on fumes.”

“We’re not satisfied with it, but we will be,” Trump said. “Either that or we’ll have to just finish the job. Their navy is gone … their air force is gone, everything’s gone. And they’re negotiating on fumes. But we’ll see what happens. Maybe we have to go back and finish it, maybe we don’t.”

On MondayU.S. Central Command said in a statement that the U.S. carried out “self-defense” strikes on missile launch sites and boats in southern Iran in order “to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces.” That same day, Trump said in a Truth Social post that negotiations with Iran were “proceeding nicely!”

Julia Jester covers politics for MS NOW and is based in Washington, D.C.

Carla Herreria is an editor for MS NOW’s breaking news and liveblog team. She was previously a senior assignment editor at HuffPost.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Trump’s plan for white South Africans is straight out of the KKK’s playbook

Published

on

Trump’s plan for white South Africans is straight out of the KKK’s playbook

President Donald Trump’s racist policy of welcoming white South Africans while excluding refugees from other countries is back in the spotlight after his administration raised its refugee ceiling — to bring in more white people.

According to Reuters:

Trump increased the refugee admissions ceiling by 10,000 for ‌this year to allow more white South Africans to come into the country, a signed presidential determination reviewed by Reuters showed.

The document, dated May 21, said white South Africans of Afrikaner ethnicity face an emergency situation due to the “incitement of racially motivated violence” by the government and political parties in the majority-Black ​country.

The document, found herecites an “unforeseen emergency refugee situation” that doesn’t actually exist. Trump and his allies have pushed false claims that a “white genocide” is occurring, but South Africa’s government — and even advocacy groups representing the country’s white Afrikaner minority — have rejected the claim.

Reuters reported that the increased refugee limit is now 17,500 — and that only three non-South African refugees have been admitted into the U.S. this fiscal year. Reuters previously reported that the administration wanted to bring in 4,500 white South Africans immigrants per montha number that I noted mirrors the number of white German refugees the Ku Klux Klan wanted to welcome to the United States a century ago — when its members were popularizing xenophobic slogans like “America First” and launching campaigns of racist terror against people of color.

It’s noteworthy here that white supremacists have latched on to racist conspiracy theories, such as the “replacement theory,” saying that there is some kind of plot to replace white Americans with nonwhite people, particularly foreigners. In reality, what’s actually underway is the exact opposite: a government effort to deport nonwhite people in America — including people who have lived in the U.S. for years — while Trump’s regime takes steps to import white people, and as some conservatives fret over white birth rates.

It’s hard to imagine the klan itself wouldn’t approve of this policy.

Ja’han Jones is an MS NOW opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Democrats warn companies against aligning with Trump’s Jim Crow resurgence

Published

on

Democrats warn companies against aligning with Trump’s Jim Crow resurgence

Amid the Republican Party’s ongoing assault on Black peopleDemocrats are borrowing a tactic from 20th-century civil rights activists and putting corporate America on notice.

On Tuesday, the Congressional Black Caucus said it sent a letter to more than 200 companies and business organizations, urging them to oppose the GOP’s push to eliminate majority-Black districts after the Supreme Court’s Callais v. Louisiana decision, which effectively permitted racist gerrymandering.

In 2021, the companies sent a letter to Congress in support of the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, saying the legislation was needed to guard against racial discrimination and voter suppression. Signees on that letter included AppleDell and Googlewhose executives have since aligned themselves with President Donald Trump’s regime.

“Many corporations spoke clearly during that moment about the importance of protecting democratic participation, defending civil rights, and advancing racial equity,” the CBC’s letter reads. “Today, those commitments are being tested.”

The letter presses the companies to issue statements condemning the GOP’s push to dilute Black voters’ power, as well as information on corporate political spending. The pressure campaign follows the CBC’s public call for student-athletes to boycott public universities in states where Republicans have taken action against majority-Black voting districts.

Meanwhile, 16 Democratic state attorneys general sent a letter last week to three donor-advised funds urging them to lift restrictions on donations to the Southern Poverty Law Centeran anti-racist organization known for helping law enforcement officials take down white supremacist extremist groups. The charity-based arms of Fidelity and Vanguard, as well as a company called Donor Advised Charitable Giving, imposed the restrictions after the Trump administration’s baseless indictment of the SPLC. I recently wrote about how Trump allies have used these charges to downplay and outright deny the existence of racist extremismas well as spread lies about liberals being responsible for groups like the Ku Klux Klan.

This scrutiny of corporate America and its acquiescence to the MAGA movement has me thinking of a conversation I had with the Rev. Al Sharpton and the “Morning Joe” crew last week. During our chat, Sharpton warned that companies that align themselves with Trump’s war on diversity do so at their own risk, because Democrats could take steps in the future to hold these companies to account.

These letters show a strong interest among Democrats in pressuring companies that appear to be propping up, or placating, the rise of what many people see as Jim Crow 2.0.

Ja’han Jones is an MS NOW opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending