Connect with us

Politics

Dealing with post-election stress? Now’s the time to breathe.

Published

on

Dealing with post-election stress? Now’s the time to breathe.

Many of us woke up Wednesday morning — if we slept at all — anxious about how to speak to our children, loved ones and how to feel ourselves.

The 2024 presidential election has left our country more polarized than ever. With now President-elect Donald Trump returning to the White House, many Americans are feeling angry, fearful and deeply concerned about the future. As a physician who has worked in health policy at the highest levels of government, I’ve seen firsthand how political divisions can impact people’s well-being.

We need to recognize that the deep partisan polarization in our country didn’t start with Trump, and it won’t end with his re-election.

I’ve also witnessed the resilience of the American people and our ability to come together in times of crisis. As we look ahead to the next four years, there are some key steps we can take to begin healing our national wounds and bridging the divides that threaten to tear us apart.

First, we need to recognize that the deep partisan polarization in our country didn’t start with Trump, and it won’t end with his re-election. The roots of our current divisions go back decades, fueled by economic inequality, cultural changes and an increasingly siloed media landscape. Trump’s inflammatory rhetoric and norm-breaking behavior have certainly exacerbated these divisions. But simply removing him from office was never going to be a panacea. We must address the underlying factors that have led so many Americans to feel angry, disenfranchised and disconnected from their fellow citizens.

That starts with rebuilding trust, in our institutions, in our democracy, and in each other. Trust in government and the media is at historic lows, with many Americans retreating into partisan echo chambers that reinforce their existing beliefs. We need to create more opportunities for genuine dialogue and understanding across political and cultural lines. This means getting out of our comfort zones and engaging respectfully with those who hold different views. It also requires a shared commitment to facts and truth, even when they challenge our preconceptions.

At the same time, we can’t ignore the very real policy differences and values that divide us as a nation. On issues from health care to immigration to climate change, there are fundamental disagreements about the role of government and the direction our country should take. These debates are a healthy and necessary part of democracy. But we must find ways to disagree without demonizing those on the other side or questioning their basic humanity and patriotism. 

As a doctor, I know that healing starts with treating the symptoms of here and now. When patients are presenting with symptoms that are consistent with grief reactions, post-traumatic stress and affective disorders, there are some simple practices I often suggest:

1. Take a news break: Allow yourself 1-2 hours away from all news and social media by putting the phone down and walking outside, rain or shine. This can help lower your stress levels and provide mental space.

2. Practice deep breathing: Try the 4-7-8 technique: Inhale for four counts, hold for seven, exhale for eight. Repeat 4 times. 

3. Use grounding exercises: Focus on your five senses to anchor yourself in the present moment. Name five things you can see, four you can touch, three you can hear, two you can smell, and one you can taste.

4. Engage in physical activity: Even a short walk or some stretching can help reduce anxiety and improve mood.

5. Connect with supportive people: Reach out to friends or family who can offer comfort and understanding.

6. Practice self-compassion: Acknowledge your feelings without judgment. It’s OK to feel upset or anxious.

7. Focus on what you can control: Make a list of small, positive actions you can take in your community or personal life. 

Remember, it’s normal to feel strong emotions during this time.

Remember, it’s normal to feel strong emotions during this time. If your distress persists or interferes with daily functioning, don’t hesitate to seek professional help.

Ultimately, healing our national divisions will require sustained effort from leaders and citizens alike. We need a renewed commitment to civic education, community building and the shared values that have long united Americans across partisan lines. We must resist the forces seeking to pull us apart and remember that what we have in common as Americans is far greater than our differences.

The road ahead won’t be easy. But I remain optimistic about our ability to overcome this difficult moment and emerge as a stronger, more united nation. Time and again throughout our history, Americans have risen to meet grave challenges. By recommitting ourselves to our highest ideals and to each other, we can do so once again.

Dr. Kavita Patel

Dr. Kavita Patel is a teaching professor of medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine at Stanford University and a board certified internal medicine physician. She served in the Obama administration as director of policy for the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Engagement in the White House. Her area of expertise is around the intersection of health policy, clinical medicine and innovation. She also spends time advising venture capital and is a medical contributor for NBC news.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

2028 Dem veteran? Uncle Sam wants you.

Published

on

In the 15 days since President Donald Trump launched Operation Epic Fury on Iran, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) is approaching nearly a dozen media appearances, offering his often visceral reaction to the conflict.

Gallego, a 46-year-old combat veteran who deployed to Iraq as an infantryman in 2005, has emerged as a blunt, clear voice for the Democratic Party on foreign policy, speaking as someone whose own generation experienced the forever wars.

There he was on BLN’s “The Source with Kaitlin Collins” saying Secretary of State Marco Rubio was doing “CYA” and noting that the “MAGA base is pissed.” There he was sitting down with the AP speaking “as someone who lives with PTSD,” adding “it’s not been an easy week.” And there he was on Derek Thompson’s podcast, speaking about “going town to town searching for insurgents” 21 years ago, “but there was no clear direction of what victory looked like, what the end goal was, what was going to be the after-action report on Iraq.”

Gallego isn’t alone. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a Navy captain who flew combat missions during Operation Desert Storm in 1990, has also racked up a run of high-profile media appearances, as has former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a U.S. Navy Reserve intelligence officer who deployed to Afghanistan. Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, who served in Afghanistan in the Army’s 82nd Airborne, went on local radio this week to link Americans’ affordability woes to the war.

In a year after many Democrats pined for a metaphorical fighter, the party is now having a conversation with itself about whether it needs a literal fighter — a veteran who can speak with credibility on issues of war and national security.

In an interview with Blue Light News, Gallego spoke of “dodging bullets, IEDs, RPGs, clearing towns and then coming back to the same towns with insurgents” and of “losing friends and still not understanding what the end goal was the whole time.”

“It leaves a mark on you, and you start seeing it happening again, you know, you don’t really think about the politics,” Gallego said. “You think about the people who are going to be potentially dying. And that’s why I think I was not hesitant to speak my mind on that.”

Later this month in San Antonio, Texas, Gallego will join VoteVets Action for its third town hall featuring potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidates, promising “fresh voices to the national conversation — those who have worn the uniform and served alongside us, who connect with everyday Americans others can’t,” according to a promotional video. (They’ve also done town halls with Buttigieg and Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin.)

“On foreign policy, the Dems need a candidate who is seen as strong/tough — not in rhetoric or bravado political platitudes but who conveys a sense of judgement and resolve with which voters connect instinctively,” said Doug Wilson, the former assistant secretary of Defense for Public Affairs during the Obama administration and co-lead of Buttigieg’s 2020 foreign policy team.

The “Iran war underscores the need” for such a candidate, Wilson added.

Whomever the Democrats select as their nominee could potentially face a Situation Room-steeped ticket deep with national security credentials, including a Marine Iraq war veteran in Vice President JD Vance or Rubio, with his secretary of State experience.

Depending on how the many conflicts the U.S. is engaged in at the moment resolve, that experience could cut against them.

But right now, Democrats who can match those bona fides have some currency others without them can’t.

“That’s obviously going to be helpful to them,” said Matt Bennett, co-founder of the center-left think tank Third Way. “It’s gonna be a big part of what they’re talking about for the next little while. But you know, how long does it last? We just don’t know, right? In my professional lifetime, foreign policy stuff and national security has mattered in a presidential race once — in 2004. That’s it. Otherwise, it comes up, but it’s not driving the conversation.”

Some potential Democratic candidates without such credentials have still managed to break through amid the Iran news cycle. Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) has said the White House has treated aspects of the war “as a video game,” in a clip gaining traction on X. “When American service members killed in action are returning to the United States in flagged-draped coffins, and even more Americans have lost limbs or suffered terrible brain injuries or are fighting for their lives, this White House treats war like a game, and it’s a disgrace,” Ossoff said.

When asked whether military service is an essential for the party’s eventual nominee, Gallego acknowledged there is a benefit for someone who can “speak with that type of credibility.”

“I’m not the type of person that’s like, ‘you have to be a veteran — Iraq War veteran,’” Gallego said. “This is a democracy. We’re still one, and there’s a lot of people that can bring valuable experience and knowledge. But you know, someone that actually has a nuanced understanding of foreign policy; that doesn’t go to the total knee-jerk reactionism that sometimes we see where we go to the point of, you know, isolationism; or the other way, where we go to full neocon. There needs to be a very balanced way to how we approach the world.”

Like this content? Consider signing up for Blue Light News’s Playbook newsletter.

Continue Reading

Politics

House Republicans find it difficult to focus on rising costs as they plot 2026 agenda

Published

on

House Republicans find it difficult to focus on rising costs as they plot 2026 agenda

A longshot elections bill and an uphill reconciliation fight dominated the yearly policy conference…
Read More

Continue Reading

Politics

Cornyn backs ending filibuster as he courts Trump’s endorsement

Published

on

Cornyn backs ending filibuster as he courts Trump’s endorsement

The president has called on Republicans to pass the SAVE America Act…
Read More

Continue Reading

Trending