The Dictatorship
Criticism of media coverage of US casualties has long history
Remarks by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that the American press emphasizes U.S. casualties in the Iran war because it “wants to make the president look bad” are a reminder of something that has endured across many decades and conflicts: the tension and trepidation about news that reminds Americans of the human cost of war.
During his Pentagon briefing on the war on Wednesday, Hegseth bashed “fake news” while addressing the six U.S. Army reservists killed in an Iranian attack on an operations center in Kuwait.
“When a few drones get through or tragic things happen, it’s front-page news,” Hegseth said. “I get it. The press only wants to make the president look bad. But try for once to report the reality. The terms of this war will be set by us at every step.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavittwhen questioned about the remark by BLN’s Kaitlan Collins at her own news conference later, doubled down. “You take every single thing this administration says and try to use it to make the president look bad,” Leavitt said. “That’s an objective fact.”
Memories of night after night of graphic images beamed into homes through a then-recent invention — television — were hard to shake for those who lived through the Vietnam War in the 1960s. Many believed the cumulative impact of seeing that suffering night after night turned Americans from supporters to skeptics.
Such vivid, intimate scenes of military action by Americans haven’t been seen to that extent since, a legacy still in place with the war that President Donald Trump and Hegseth are waging right now on behalf of the United States.
“For many presidents, the lesson seemed to be: Don’t allow the realities of war into people’s living rooms if you can help it,” said Timothy Naftali, senior research scholar at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs.
Coverage of war — and access to it — have changed
Today, the images the public sees of warfare can resemble a video game — explosions seen lighting up the sky from afar — with the pain much more private.
Generations ago during World War II, journalists were embedded with the military, and many became household names — reporters Ernie Pyle and Walter Cronkite, photographers Robert Capa and Margaret Bourke-White. Those were the days before television, however.
Vietnam was arguably the most accessible American war for reporters. Journalists stationed in the country sent back a steady stream of death and destruction.
Cronkite, by then a CBS-TV anchorman of the most popular evening news program in the U.S., reported from Vietnam in 1968 and concluded the only rational way out was a negotiated peace. “If I’ve lost Cronkite,” President Lyndon Johnson said, “I’ve lost Middle America.”
During the Gulf War in 1991, President George H.W. Bush was angered by split-screen television images that showed the coffins of U.S. service members being returned to the United States while he, apparently unaware of the timing, was joking with reporters about another subject at the White House. The Pentagon banned coverage of these ceremonies, saying it was to protect the privacy of family members of the dead, although critics said it was to avoid showing pictures of coffins.
That ban, with a few exceptions, stayed in place until it was lifted by President Barack Obama in 2009.
Reporters who approached the battlefield in wars fought by the U.S. military in the 2000s were likely to have their movements restricted, if they were allowed at all. Jessica Donati, a reporter for The Wall Street Journal and Reuters who covered the war in Afghanistan, wrote for the Modern War Institute in 2021 that “it’s easier these days for journalists in Afghanistan to embed with the Taliban than with the U.S. military.”
Reporting on casualties predates Trump’s presidency
The nature of this war — fought thousands of miles from the American homeland and not yet on the ground in Iran — has limited the number of American casualties and thus made them more newsworthy. Several journalists have pointed out that reporting about military casualties predates Trump’s presidency. Hegseth’s statement “is a warped way of looking at the world,” said BLN’s Jake Tapper. “Ahistorical.”
“The news media covers fallen service members because they have made the ultimate sacrifice for their country,” he said. “It’s a tribute. It’s an honor.”
There has been relatively little coverage from the ground in Iran. A BLN team led by Frederik Pleitgen on Thursday became the first journalists from a U.S.-based television network to enter the country, and he spent the day racing across the country to Tehran.
Dan Lamothe, military affairs reporter for The Washington Post, posted on social media that Hegseth’s comments won’t stop him from continuing to cover the casualties of war — as has been done under presidents of both major political parties.
“These efforts haven’t always been perfect,” Lamothe wrote. “But they’ve highlighted sacrifices by American servicemembers and their families, and shortcomings that sometimes allowed these deaths to happen. We’ll continue to do so. It’s too important to stop.”
When Robert H. Reid was a top editor at Stars and Stripes between 2014 and 2025, he found that the newspaper’s audience, primarily service members, wanted more than raw numbers when Americans were killed in military action. They wanted to know details about the lives of the people who served — where they grew up, who they left behind, what their passions were, he said.
In 10 or 20 years, many of these people will be forgotten by all but those who loved them. But for what they gave for their country, they deserve recognition for their lives, said Reid, an Associated Press international correspondent for most of his career.
“The public needs to know that war is not a video game,” Naftali said. “It affects people.”
___
This story has been corrected to show Obama lifted the Pentagon ban in 2009, not 2019.
___
David Bauder writes about the media for the AP. Follow him at http://x.com/dbauder and https://bsky.app/profile/dbauder.bsky.social.
The Dictatorship
Trump announces 100% tariff on some patented drugs
NEW YORK (AP) — United States President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday that could impose tariffs of up to 100% on some patented medicines from companies that do not reach agreements with his government in the coming months.
Companies that have signed a “most favored nation” pricing agreement and are actively building facilities in the United States to move production of patented drugs and their ingredients there will have a 0% tariff. For those that do not have a price agreement but are building projects of this type in the United States, a 20% tariff will apply, although it will increase to 100% in four years.
A senior government official told reporters on a conference call that companies still have months to negotiate before the 100% tariffs take effect: 120 days for the largest companies and 180 days for everyone else. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to preview the executive order before it was issued, did not identify any companies or drugs that were at risk of receiving the tariff increase, but noted that the government had already reached 17 pricing agreements with big pharma, 13 of which have already been signed.
In the order, Trump wrote that he considered these measures necessary “to address the potential deterioration of national security posed by imports of pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical ingredients.” The order was announced on the first anniversary of Trump’s so-called “Liberation Day,” when the president unveiled new tariff rates on imports on nearly every country in the world, rocking the stock market. Those tariffs were among the levies that the Supreme Court struck down in February.
Some warned of the consequences of the tariffs announced Thursday. Stephen J. Ubl, chief executive of the pharmaceutical industry trade group PhRMA, said taxes “on cutting-edge drugs will increase costs and could put billions in U.S. investments at risk.” He noted the already extensive presence of the United States in biopharmaceutical production and noted that drugs obtained from other countries “the vast majority come from reliable allies of the United States.”
Trump has launched a barrage of new tariffs on America’s trading partners since the start of his second term, and has repeatedly promised sky-high levies on medicines made abroad. But the government has also used the threat of new tariffs to strike deals with big companies — such as Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Bristol Myers Squibb — over the past year, with promises of lower prices for new drugs.
Beyond company-specific rates, a handful of countries have reached trade frameworks with the United States to further limit tariffs on medicines. The United States will apply a 15% tariff on patented drugs to the European Union, Japan, South Korea and Switzerland, matching previously agreed rates for most goods, and will impose a 10% tariff rate on the United Kingdom, which, Thursday’s order noted, “will then be reduced to zero” under future trade agreements. The United Kingdom had previously said it had secured a 0% tariff rate on all medicines exported to the United States for at least three years.
Trump also presents an update on metal tariffs
Also on Thursday, Trump released an update on his 50% tariffs on steel, aluminum and copper. Starting Monday, tariff rates on those metals will be calculated based on the “full customs value” of what customers in the United States pay when purchasing foreign metal, according to the latest order, which government officials said will prevent importers from other countries from avoiding higher payments.
Products made entirely of steel, aluminum and copper will continue to be subject to a 50% tariff for most countries. But the government will also change the way it calculates tariffs for derived metals — or finished goods that contain some of these metals, but are not made entirely of them.
For a product whose metal makes up less than 15% of its total weight (such as the lid of a perfume bottle), only country-specific tariffs will now apply, officials told reporters Thursday. But for products with more metal, such as a mostly steel washing machine, they indicated that a tariff of 25% will be applied to the total value.
More sectoral taxes accumulate
Thursday’s orders are another example of Trump’s use of sectoral levies. The president used Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose the tariffs, the same authority he cited to impose taxes on imports of automobiles, lumber and even kitchen cabinets. And many expect to see more product-specific tariffs later.
That’s because a Supreme Court ruling struck down blanket tariffs that Trump imposed using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977.
Although the February 20 court decision represented a significant blow to Trump’s economic agenda, the president still has many options to continue taxing imports aggressively. In addition to the sectoral levies, Trump also imposed a 10% tariff on all imports under another legal authority, just hours after the Supreme Court ruling, but that levy can only last 150 days. About two dozen states have already challenged the new tariffs.
Trump has maintained that his new taxes on imports are necessary to recover the wealth that was “stolen” from the United States. He claims they will reduce the decades-long U.S. trade deficit and bring manufacturing back to the country. But Trump has also resorted to tariffs over personal grudges or in response to political critics. And disrupting the global supply chain has proven costly for businesses and households already under pressure from rising prices.
___
This story was translated from English by an AP editor with the help of a generative artificial intelligence tool.
The Dictatorship
Judge rejects DOJ push to resurrect Powell probe
A federal judge on Friday denied the Trump administration’s bid to revive the defunct subpoenas targeting Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, another blow to the Justice Department’s ability to execute President Donald Trump’s demands.
The subpoenas sought records from a $2.5 billion renovation project at the Fed’s headquarters in Washington. The investigation alleged Powell knowingly misled Congress about the project’s cost. The accusation became central to Trump’s public smear campaign against Powellwhom he appointed to the top Fed position in his first term.
Powell’s lawyers fought the subpoenas, and the Fed chief publicly argued the investigation was motivated by his refusal to succumb to Trump’s pressure campaign on the central bank to slash interest rates, which the president said will boost the U.S. economy.
In his orderChief Judge James E. Boasberg of U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia wrote, “The Government’s arguments do not come close to convincing the Court that a different outcome is warranted.” He rejected the DOJ’s motion to reconsider his March 13 decision to quash the investigation.
Boasberg wrote in his March 13 decision that “a mountain of evidence” suggested that “the Government served these subpoenas on the [Federal Reserve] Board to pressure its Chair into voting for lower interest rates or resigning.” The judge threw out the subpoenas, but the DOJ quickly filed a motion to reconsider.
On Friday, Boasberg ruled the DOJ’s motion “ignores the fact that its total lack of a good-faith basis to suspect a crime is relevant to the second, separate question of the subpoenas’ true purpose.”
The federal government can formally appeal Boasberg’s decision, which could complicate the confirmation process for Kevin WarshTrump’s pick to lead the central bank after Powell’s term as Fed chair ends next month.
Powell was joined by every living former Fed chair in denouncing the probe as an act of partisanship against the leader of an institution designed to be insulated from political pressure.
Two Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee, Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, expressed deep concern over the investigation. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Ala., called the probe “an attempt at coercion,” in a post on X in January.
Tillis is a key vote on the banking committee, which handles confirmation hearings for Fed appointees and has a narrow 13-11 Republican majority. He has vowed not to support Trump’s pick for Fed chair as long as Powell is under criminal investigation.
Sydney Carruth is a breaking news reporter covering national politics and policy for MS NOW. You can send her tips from a non-work device on Signal at SydneyCarruth.46 or follow her work on X and Bluesky.
Fallon Gallagher is a legal affairs reporter for MS NOW.
The Dictatorship
Friday’s Mini-Report, 4.3.26
Today’s edition of quick hits.
* Iran’s military assets still matter: “An American fighter jet carrying two crew members was shot down today by Iranian forces, a U.S. official told MS NOW. The military has rescued a pilot of the F-15E, and a search is underway for the second crew member, two officials said.”
* In related news: “A second U.S. military plane involved in the U.S. war with Iran crashed on Friday, a U.S. official with knowledge of the matter told MS NOW. The plane’s pilot was safely rescued by American forces after it went down near the Strait of Hormuz. The crash was first reported by The New York Times. It was not clear if the plane, an A-10 Warthog, was shot down or crashed due to mechanical failure, the U.S. official said.”
* Crisis conditions in Lebanon: “The U.S. Embassy in Lebanon issued an alert Friday to U.S. citizens to ‘Leave Lebanon NOW,’ urging them to depart ‘while commercial flight options remain available.’ The alert said if people choose not to leave, they should ‘prepare contingency plans’ in case ‘the situation deteriorate further.’”
* A probe worth watching: “An expansive inquiry by the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general into the handling of contracts under the agency’s former secretary, Kristi Noem, is scrutinizing her senior adviser Corey Lewandowski’s interactions with companies seeking federal business, according to multiple people familiar with the investigation.”
* The obvious call: “A federal judge on Friday reaffirmed his decision to block subpoenas from the Justice Department to the Federal Reserve on the grounds that the probe appears to be driven by a political vendetta, setting the stage for an appeal by the Trump administration.”
* Hegseth ice”https://apnews.com/article/pentagon-policy-guns-military-bases-hegseth-09cdd079f8ac28aa72b2349859e2f54e”>full of ideas: “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Thursday that he will allow service members to carry personal weapons onto military installations, citing the Second Amendment and recent shootings at bases across the country.”
* In light of the occasional rumors about his possible retirement, this seems notable: “Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito became ill during an event in Philadelphia on the evening of March 20, a spokesperson for the high court said Friday. … Alito, 76, underwent an examination and received fluids for dehydration, the spokesperson said, adding he returned home that night, which was previously planned.”
Have a safe weekend.
Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”
-
Politics1 year agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics1 year agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
Politics1 year agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship7 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Uncategorized1 year ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
Politics12 months agoDemocrat challenging Joni Ernst: I want to ‘tear down’ party, ‘build it back up’









