The Dictatorship
Chuck Schumer still has plentiful options for stalling Trump

As the Trump administration continues to smash a metaphorical wrecking ball into the federal government, many congressional Democrats seem to have embraced the role of passive observers. In response to a vocal base wondering why they aren’t doing more, Democrats, who have minority representation in both chambers of Congress, have at times complained that they lack power and leverage to act forcefully. There’s some truth to that sentiment — but it illustrates a lack of tactical creativity and a strategic certainty.
It’s true, as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., lamented last week, that the House’s rules are set up to benefit whoever can muster a majority, even if it’s only by one vote. The most leverage House Democrats can use then depends on peeling off support from a Republican caucus that is largely in lockstep. In the Senate, though, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has more plentiful options for stalling President Donald Trump’s agenda — and he’s barely used any.
There is another option for, if not totally stopping things, at least slowing things to a crawl.
For better or for worse, the Senate’s rules are designed to empower individual senators and those members who find themselves in the minority on an issue. In general, those rules are meant to keep the debate flowing among the Senate’s members, but there are two mechanisms on opposite ends of the spectrum that are designed to either speed things up or slow them down. Most of the focus in recent years has been on the filibusterwhich requires a vote of 60 senators to end debate and force a vote on almost any substantive matter.
It remains my belief that the filibuster is an antidemocratic tool that doesn’t serve as the bulwark against extremism its defenders say it does, as much as it’s used to shelter abuses of Americans’ rights and prevent positive change. But there is another option for, if not totally stopping things, at least slowing things to a crawl. Much of the Senate’s work is measured in floor hours, the amount of time a bit of business must be debated before a vote can be held on it. If the filibuster is the spanner in the works, meant to grind things to a halt in the Senate, “unanimous consent” is the grease that keeps the gears turning smoothly.
Here’s how I previously described unanimous consent agreementswhich generally involve a senator telling the chair, “I ask unanimous consent for” whatever they are proposing: “Such agreements basically operate on the assumption that all 100 senators are totally fine with whatever action is being proposed, no vote needed. The most basic unanimous consent agreement can be used to insert items into the Congressional Record; the most complicated can line up weeks’ worth of legislative action in the time it takes to read out the agreement.” It only takes one senator’s disagreement to nip those agreements in the bud though making it a primed weapon for obstruction, especially when it comes to speedily working through a raft of nominations.
In 2022, then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., was threatening to all but shut down the Senate if Democrats overturned the legislative filibuster to pass a voting rights bill. If he’d followed through with his threat, it would have been a massive headache for Democrats, but also for Republicans. Rejecting a unanimous consent agreement can add hours of debate time from the calendar, as the majority leader often uses lengthy requests to set up even short recesses, general administrative business like approving the Senate Journal’s records and other parliamentary necessities. If each of the mundane tasks usually covered by unanimous consent required a vote, it would also require a majority of the Senate to be present which, if you ever watch C-SPAN 2, you know is a rarity.
Schumer has been reluctant to encourage his members to oppose every unanimous consent request. That’s led though to moments like we saw last week during the leadup to the Senate voting on Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s confirmation. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., was positively giddy last Tuesday night as he read out the text of a request that allowed for Gabbard’s vote to take place the next morning and cut the post-cloture debate time for Kennedy’s nomination. There was no objection from Senate Democrats, prompting major frustration from supporters who want Democrats to act more like an opposition party.
Schumer has been reluctant to encourage his members to oppose every unanimous consent request.
Tactically speaking, there would be a clear benefit in Schumer pulling every lever possible to make the process of legislating more difficult for his counterpart, Sen. John Thune of South Dakota. Forcing votes on even the little things and requiring Republicans to stay on the Senate floor to keep processes moving would at least be something in the face of Trump’s threatened usurpation of congressional powers. It would also require some sacrifice from his members, who have gotten used to heading home on Thursday afternoons, and some of whom still hope to maintain a measure of comity with their GOP colleagues.
I can see, though, the risk of placing too much emphasis on tactics over a broader strategy. The decision to hold all-night debates arguing against Russel Vought’s confirmation as the head of the Office of Management and Budget makes sense tactically. But it’s impossible to promote such a delay as a victory when the GOP is still able to run out the clock and vote on whatever they want. The same would apply to Schumer pulling the ripcord and rotating in a senator to disapprove of any and all unanimous consent requests. It would be frustrating for Republicans in the short run, potentially even limit some of the damage done in the long run, but can still be overcome with little more than patience from Republicans.
Moreover, the internal debate over tactics is only possible because Democrats still lack an overall strategic goal. When the year began, Schumer argued that allowing some nominations to proceed and making a fuss about the more controversial ones would show that Democrats were being reasonable. As the chaos has grown, that idea has been abandonedbut there’s still reluctance to be seen as an obstacle versus putting forward a more focused economic message.
In contrast, the Senate GOP under McConnell had a simple strategy: Regain and maintain power — period. During the Obama era, that looked like Republicans making sure the Senate became the “graveyard of legislation.” There is no similar agreement as to what that should look for Democrats like under the Trump regime, even as it becomes clear that there’s little that he could do that will cause his legislative allies to cross the aisle in defense of the country. It’s up to Democrats then to decide — and fast — what they want to do over the next two years: hope that Trump will fail and rebuild later, or work to ensure that he fails and preserve as much as possible.
Hayes Brown is a writer and editor for BLN Daily, where he helps frame the news of the day for readers. He was previously at BuzzFeed News and holds a degree in international relations from Michigan State University.
The Dictatorship
‘Accountability has a face’: ‘The Weeknight’ co-hosts react to California’s mask ban

Gov. Gavin Newsom is taking action against the Trump administration over its sweeping immigration raids in California. On Saturday, the governor signed a bill that prevents U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and other law enforcement officials from wearing masks in his state. The law is set to take effect in January.
In response, acting U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said the law would have “no effect on our operations.” In a statementEssayli claimed “the State of California has no jurisdiction over the federal government” and advised Newsom that if he “wants to regulate our agents, he must go through Congress.”
On Monday, the co-hosts of “The Weeknight” shared their reactions to California’s move. Symone Sanders Townsend said the situation reminded her of the HBO series “Watchmen.” In the show, Sanders Townsend said, masks “serve as a double-edged sword,” with vigilantes using them to protect their identities and police using them as a way to shield themselves from accountability. “They become a faceless tool to carry out the law,” she explained.
The BLN host and former Biden White House official said that kind of approach doesn’t belong in a democracy. “I think about the fact that in a democracy, accountability should have a face,” she said. “That is a hallmark of a democracy, right? Accountability has a face. You can put a name to it — who wields power has a face and a name. It’s not in secret.”
“And when law enforcement dons masks and no insignia, honestly, the people then are unable to effectively hold them accountable,” Sanders Townsend said.
While Michael Steele applauded Newsom for “drawing the line” and “pressing the administration” on the issue, the former chairman of the Republican National Committee also agreed with Essayli that the correct path for such a restriction is through Congress.
However, Steele noted the White House has also often acted outside of the normal political process, testing the bounds of executive power. Because of this, he argued, many Democratic governors have had to fight fire with fire and “stand in the breach for their people.”
Alicia Menendez weighed in, saying she couldn’t “help but think of the contrast between all of these agents in masks and all of these folks who are showing up and doing their jobs as gardeners or construction workers and speaking Spanish to one another, knowing that they live in a country where there is racial profiling that’s been sanctioned by the Supreme Court of the United States.”
You can watch Sanders Townsend, Steele and Menendez’s full discussion in the clip at the top of the page.
The Dictatorship
Jury finds Ryan Routh guilty on charges of attempting to assassinate Trump


By Are Salam
The man charged with attempting to assassinate Donald Trump last year was found guilty by a jury Tuesday.
Ryan Wesley Routh was arrested in September 2024 after a Secret Service agent spotted him in some bushes near the Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Florida, while Trump was campaigning for president. Ruth, who was found with a rifle, was charged with the attempted assassination of a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer and weapons violations. A jury found him guilty on all five counts, two of which carry a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Shortly after the verdict was read, Routh attempted to stab himself in the neck with a pen but was wrestled out of the courtroom by court officers, NBC News reported. As he was being dragged away, his daughter Sara Routh, who was in the courtroom, shouted, “Dad I love you, don’t do anything. I’ll get you out. He didn’t hurt anybody,” according to The Associated Press.
Despite having no legal background, Routh represented himself at trial and called only three witnesses: a sniper instructor and two of his former employees. Judge Aileen M. Cannon, citing lack of relevance, cut off Routh multiple times while he was delivering his opening statement and questioning witnesses.

Trump was golfing at the fifth hole at the time of Routh’s arrest, according to the Secret Service agent who first saw him. The weapon found by agents had a scope attached, an extended magazine and an “obliterated and unreadable” serial number, according to the FBI. In the DOJ statement announcing the charges, the FBI said agents also found documents including a handwritten list of dates where Trump was scheduled to appear.
A witness informed law enforcement that Routh dropped off a box with him that contained a handwritten letter that said, “Dear World … This was an assassination attempt on Donald Trump but I am so sorry I failed you,” according to the DOJ’s press release.
“No one ever intended to kill anyone,” Routh argued in courtand said the only thing he was guilty of was caring “deeply for this country.”
The incident was the second attempt on Trump’s life last year. Trump survived an earlier assassination attempt in July during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, when a bullet grazed his ear.
“This was an evil man with an evil intention, and they caught him,” Trump responded on Truth Social after the verdict, adding, “A very big moment for JUSTICE IN AMERICA!”
Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement that “this attempted assassination was not only an attack on our President, but an affront to our very nation itself.”

Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter and producer for BLN Digital. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.
The Dictatorship
Virginia Republican calls rural health clinics closures due to Trump’s budget bill a ‘win’


By Rachel Maddow
This is an adapted excerpt from the Sept. 22 episode of “The Rachel Maddow Show.”
If you live in Virginia, here’s a headline you may have seen recently from the Richmond Times-Dispatch: “Three Va. health clinics close as Trump tax law squeezes system.”
Residents of Virginia’s rural Shenandoah Valley region are about to lose not one, not two, but three of their local health care centers. All three of those centers are run by a hospital organization called Augusta Health.
In a statement announcing these closures, the group said that the decision was “part of Augusta Health’s ongoing response to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and the resulting realities for healthcare delivery.”
In other words, if you live in rural Virginia and are wondering why you no longer have access to a local health care facility, you can thank President Donald Trump and the Republican Congress for gutting health care funding in their one and only piece of major legislation.
The executive director of Virginia’s Republican Party was asked about those cuts by CNN. He told them the closure of those three rural health care centers is “a win for rural communities,” because now residents will be able to get “better, more consistent” service elsewhere — meaning, not where they live.
Sure, why not? Nothing says “winning” like losing access to the only clinic for miles around in your rural community.
That kind of absolutely tone-deaf, callous response from Virginia Republicans would be strange in normal times. But it is an especially strange thing to hear from them at this important moment.
On Friday, early voting officially began in Virginia’s high-stakes race for governor. Right now, Republicans in Virginia control the governor’s mansion, but recent polls show Democratic candidate former Rep. Abigail Spanberger leading her opponent, Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, by as much as 12 points.
Republicans are swimming upstream in this election, voting is already underway — and now the Virginia Republican Party is telling rural voters who just lost access to health care, “Yeah, we did that, and you should be grateful.”
Election Day is six weeks from Tuesday in Virginia. Watch this space.

Rachel Maddow is host of the Emmy Award-winning “The Rachel Maddow Show” Mondays at 9 p.m. ET on BLN. “The Rachel Maddow Show” features Maddow’s take on the biggest stories of the day, political and otherwise, including in-depth analysis and stories no other shows in cable news will cover.
Allison Detzel
contributed
.
-
Uncategorized11 months ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
The Josh Fourrier Show11 months ago
DOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?
-
Politics7 months ago
Former ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
The Dictatorship7 months ago
Pete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Politics11 months ago
What 7 political experts will be watching at Tuesday’s debate
-
The Dictatorship7 months ago
Luigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics11 months ago
How Republicans could foil Harris’ Supreme Court plans if she’s elected
-
Politics7 months ago
Blue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit