Connect with us

The Dictatorship

Trump’s reckless announcement linking Tylenol and autism is already doing major damage

Published

on

Trump’s reckless announcement linking Tylenol and autism is already doing major damage

On Monday, President Donald Trump and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. finally made their long-anticipated announcement advising pregnant women not to take Tylenol. They made this announcement even though the evidence of a link between autism and acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, is thin and the biggest study about the two showed that “use during pregnancy was not associated with children’s risk of autism, ADHD, or intellectual disability in sibling control analyses.” Even his own FDA’s statement Monday that acetaminophen “can be associated with a very increased risk of autism” carried significant caveats, including that “a causal relationship has not been established.”

On top of making this sweeping claim without proof, Trump —alongside Kennedy, Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary, National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Director Mehmet Oz — added lie after lie. He said that autism doesn’t exist in Cuba (it does and it has at least nine autism schools, and one study showed that Cuban teachers know as much about autism as their peers in other countries). And he repeated the debunked claim that vaccines lead to autism.

For much of the past century, autism suffered from profound misunderstanding.

Beyond the blatant misinformation and willful ignorance, perhaps the biggest danger is how, within just one news conference, Trump and his administration have virtually erased 30 years of work to promote autism acceptance. For much of the past century, autism suffered from profound misunderstanding. People blamed autism diagnoses on everything from unloving “refrigerator mothers” to vaccines. Only in the past few decades, largely thanks to the rise of autistic self-advocates and their loved ones, has society moved much more toward acceptance.

But Trump’s words erased this progress. He spoke, for example, about how one of his employees “lost” her son when she gave him a vaccine, developed a fever and then became autistic. These words treat autism as a sort of a loss in a certain way. They treat autism as a sentence worse than death and that mourning prevents their parents and loved ones from showing their children the love they need.

“When you describe persons having been destroyed, it means you’re breaking them off, they’re gone,” Colin Killick, the executive director of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, told me in an interview before the news conference. “We have full, meaningful lives that are worth living, and we need to be listened to.”

But the fact of the matter is that parents have an autistic kid and they need to be focused on the kid they have in front of them rather than the kid they wished they had.

The words of those around Trump were little better. “If you’ve seen a kid with autism, with severe autism, it’s hard to watch,” Makary said. “Kids get frustrated, they get angry, they can be crying because they want to speak and they can’t speak. It’s hard to watch. And it may be entirely preventable.”

Nobody denies that autistic people who need substantial help with daily activities, especially those who do not speak or who have intellectual disabilities, face major risks. One study showed that autistic people with intellectual disabilities have about 2.8 times the mortality rate compared to people without those diagnoses. But by saying that autistic people’s worst episodes are “hard to watch,” the Trump administration is inherently devaluing autistic people.

Trump, Makary and Kennedy are giving loved ones of autistic people false hope.

Makary’s claim that autism might be “easily preventable” is especially risible when there is limited scientific evidence that leucovorin, the drug the Trump administration is touting, helps a small subset of autistic children. Just as the FDA caveated its press release about acetaminophen, Kennedy’s HHS cautioned that leucovorin is “not a cure” and “may only lead to improvements in speech-related deficits for a subset of children with ASD.”

In peddling this as a potential treatment, Trump, Makary and Kennedy are giving loved ones of autistic people false hope. It also will essentially write off assistance for autistic people for whom leucovorin will not work.

“I worry about what happens when these miracle cures fail to materialize, right? And families are left with these autistic children who they’ve been told are damaged goods?” Killick asks. “Because we’ve seen the result of these kinds of rhetoric around autistic people’s lives not being worth living. It’s filicide.”

I wish that I could say that Killick is exaggerating. But stories abound of parents who kill their autistic children because they are “overwhelmed.”

Already, the language from the White House is striking fear in autistic people. Liliya Wheatcraft, an autistic psychiatrist who lives in the United Kingdom, has two autistic children who are American citizens. But her eldest son said that he would never go back to the United States.

“My 16 year old said, ‘Well, I don’t know, but I certainly don’t wish to go there anytime soon,’” she told me over the phone. “There is some really dangerous rhetoric in the speech that made me honestly concerned about ever returning to the U.S. because I might be concerned for my friends.”

When I wrote my book “We’re Not Broken” in 2021, I mentioned Kennedy’s anti-vaccine nonsense only in passing and mentioned Trump’s past references because I figured it was in the rearview and his successful Operation Warp Speed of the Covid-19 vaccine must have changed his mind.

I was naive. Trump, Kennedy and his entire administration are rolling back decades of progress and hard work by autistic people to shift the narrative from fear to acceptance. And whereas in the past, anti-vaccine sentiment was a venture only for cranks, it now has a bigger megaphone in the form of the presidency. We will need decades to repair the damage.

Eric Garcia

Eric Garcia is the senior Washington correspondent and bureau chief for The Independent. He is the author of “We’re Not Broken: Changing the Autism Conversation.”

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer is leaving Trump’s Cabinet

Published

on

Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer is leaving Trump’s Cabinet

WASHINGTON (AP) — Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer is out of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet, the White House said Monday, after multiple allegations of abusing her position’s power, including having an affair with a subordinate and drinking alcohol on the job.

Chavez-DeRemer is the third Trump Cabinet member to leave her post after Trump fired his embattled Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in March and ousted Attorney General Pam Bondi earlier this month.

In a statement posted on social media, Chavez-DeRemer praised Trump and wrote, “I am proud that we made significant progress in advancing President Trump’s mission to bridge the gap between business and labor and always put the American worker first.”

Unlike other recent Cabinet departures, Chavez-DeRemer’s exit was announced by a White House aide, not by the president on his social media account.

“Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer will be leaving the Administration to take a position in the private sector,” White House communications director Steven Cheung said on the social media site X. “She has done a phenomenal job in her role by protecting American workers, enacting fair labor practices, and helping Americans gain additional skills to improve their lives.”

He said Keith Sonderling, the current deputy labor secretary, would become acting labor secretary in her place. The news outlet NOTUS was the first to report Chavez-DeRemer’s resignation.

Labor chief, family members faced multiple allegations

Chavez-DeRemer’s departure follows reports that began surfacing in January that she was under a series of investigations.

A New York Times report last Wednesday revealed that the Labor Department’s inspector general was reviewing material showing Chavez-DeRemer and her top aides and family members routinely sent personal messages and requests to young staff members.

Chavez-DeRemer’s husband and father exchanged text messages with young female staff members, according to the newspaper. Some of the staffers were instructed by the secretary and her former deputy chief of staff to “pay attention” to her family, people familiar with the investigation told the Times.

Those messages were uncovered as part of a broader investigation of Chavez-DeRemer’s leadership that began after the New York Post reported in January that a complaint filed with the Labor Department’s inspector general accused Chavez-DeRemer of a relationship with the subordinate.

She also faced allegations that she drank alcohol on the job and that she tasked aides to plan official trips for primarily personal reasons.

Late Monday, on her personal X account, Chavez-DeRemer posted, “The allegations against me, my family, and my team have been peddled by high-ranked deep state actors who have been coordinating with the one-sided news media and continue to undermine President Trump’s mission.”

Both the White House and the Labor Department initially said the reports of wrongdoing were baseless. But the official denials got less full-throated as more allegations emerged — and when Chavez-DeRemer might be out of a job became something of an open question in Washington.

At least four Labor Department officials have already been forced from their jobs as the investigation progressed, including Chavez-DeRemer’s former chief of staff and deputy chief of staff, as well as a member of her security detail, with whom she was accused of having the affair, The New York Times reported.

“I think the secretary demonstrated a lot of wisdom in resigning,” Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said Monday after her departure was made public.

She enjoyed union support — rare for a Republican

Confirmed to Trump’s Cabinet on a 67-32 vote in March 2025, Chavez-DeRemer is a former House GOP lawmaker who had represented a swing district in Oregon. She enjoyed unusual support from unions as a Republican but lost reelection in November 2024.

In her single term in Congress, Chavez-DeRemer backed legislation that would make it easier to unionize on a federal level, as well as a separate bill aimed at protecting Social Security benefits for public-sector employees.

Some prominent labor unions, including the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, backed Chavez-DeRemer, who is a daughter of a Teamster, for Labor Secretary. Trump’s decision to pick her was viewed by some political observers as a way to appeal to voters who are members of or affiliated with labor organizations.

But other powerful labor leaders were skeptical when she was tapped for the job, unconvinced that Chavez-DeRemer would pursue a union-friendly agenda as a part of the incoming GOP administration. In her Senate confirmation hearing, some senators questioned whether she would be able to uphold that reputation in an administration that fired thousands of federal employees.

She was a key figure in Trump’s deregulatory push

Aside from reports of wrongdoing in recent months, Chavez-DeRemer had been one of Trump’s more lower-profile Cabinet picks, but took key steps to advance the administration’s deregulatory agenda during her tenure.

For instance, the Labor Department last year moved to rewrite or repeal more than 60 workplace regulations it saw as obsolete. The rollbacks included minimum wage requirements for home health care workers and people with disabilities, and rules governing exposure to harmful substances and safety procedures at mines. The effort drew condemnation from union leaders and workplace safety experts.

The proposed changes also included eliminating a requirement that employers provide adequate lighting for construction sites and seat belts for agriculture workers in most employer-provided transportation.

During Chavez-DeRemer’s tenure, the Trump administration canceled millions of dollars in international grants that a Labor Department division administered to combat child labor and slave labor around the worldending their work that had helped reduce the number of child laborers worldwide by 78 million over the last two decades.

In her statement Monday, Chavez-DeRemer said, “While my time serving in the Administration comes to a conclusion, it doesn’t mean I will stop fighting for American workers.”

The Labor Department has a broad mandate as it relates to the U.S. workforce, including reporting the U.S. unemployment rate, regulating workplace health and safety standards, investigating minimum wage, child labor and overtime pay disputes, and applying laws on union organizing and unlawful terminations.

___

Associated Press writers Steven Sloan and Will Weissert in Washington and Cathy Bussewitz in New York contributed to this report.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

The Latest: US Navy seizure of Iranian ship casts doubt on fresh talks in Pakistan

Published

on

The Latest: US Navy seizure of Iranian ship casts doubt on fresh talks in Pakistan

MORE

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

GOP’s Mills faces expulsion effort launched by one of his Republican colleagues

Published

on

GOP’s Mills faces expulsion effort launched by one of his Republican colleagues

Republican Rep. Cory Mills of Florida was already dealing with multiple, overlapping scandals when a judge issued a restraining order against the congressman last fall after one of his ex-girlfriends accused him of threatening and harassing her. Soon after, Mills found that even some of his allies were keeping him at arm’s length.

In December, Rep. Byron Donalds, a fellow Florida Republican, conceded“The allegations against Cory, to me, are very troubling. I’m concerned about him. I hope he gets his stuff worked out and cleaned up, but it has to go through ethics [the Ethics Committee]. And he has to, you know, basically do that hard work to clear his name, if it can be cleared.”

Donalds, a leading gubernatorial candidate in Florida, had previously suggested he saw Mills as a possible running mate, making the comments that much more potent.

It didn’t do Mills any favors when The Washington Post published a new report a few days ago highlighting body camera footage that showed police officers in Washington, D.C., who were prepared to arrest the GOP congressman after a woman accused him of assault last year, before a lieutenant ultimately ordered them not to when she changed her account. (Mills refused to comment, except to say that the woman’s initial claim was “patently false.”)

Two days after the Post’s report reached the public, one of Mills’ Republican colleagues announced an effort to kick the congressman out of office. NBC News reported:

Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., introduced a resolution Monday to expel Rep. Cory Mills, R-Fla., from Congress over accusations that include sexual misconduct.

Mills is being investigated by the House Ethics Committee in connection with allegations of ‘sexual misconduct and/or dating violence’ and campaign finance violations. He has denied any wrongdoing.

“The swamp has protected Cory Mills for far too long and we are done letting it slide,” Mace said in a statement. “We tried to censure him and strip him from his committee assignments. Both parties blocked it, but we are not backing down.”

By way of social media, the Floridian expressed confidence that he’d prevail if Mace’s resolution reached the floor, encouraging the South Carolinian to “call the vote forward.”

Time will tell whether the expulsion vote actually happens, but in the meantime, after NOTUS reported that Mills intends to respond with an expulsion resolution of his own targeting Mace, the congresswoman wrote online“Cory Mills lied about his military service, has been accused of beating women, has a restraining order against him, and has allegedly been stuffing his own pockets with federal contracts while sitting in Congress. As a survivor, I will always stand up and right the wrongs of others. He is only coming after me because he knows he’s next.”

It’s not often that Americans see members of Congress launch dueling efforts to kick each other out of office, but this is proving to be an unusually awful term.

Indeed, amid growing GOP anxieties about the upcoming midterm elections, there’s fresh evidence that the House Republican conference is both divided and unraveling.

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending