Congress
Capitol agenda: A brutal blow for Johnson and Trump
Donald Trump and Mike Johnson failed to convince enough deficit hawks to back the latest budget plan for the president’s agenda — forcing the speaker to punt his planned Wednesday vote on the resolution and sending House leadership scrambling for a compromise that could satisfy hard-liners’ demands for more spending cuts.
Now, the speaker is staring down two potential options to get holdouts to come on board.
Plan A: Rules — GOP leaders “tentatively” plan to bring the budget blueprint back to the Rules Committee Thursday morning, Johnson said as he emerged from a meeting late Wednesday. They would tack on an amendment that would guarantee more spending cuts in the party-line package of tax cuts, border security investments, energy policies and more.
Rep. Lloyd Smucker has proposed tying the tax cuts to spending cuts — something he said would get him to “yes.” Another option is more straightforward: Language to the budget resolution that would require that a certain level of spending cuts be achieved in a final product that hard-liner holdouts want.
“There’s a mutual commitment that we’re going to find real savings in federal spending, because we have to do that,” Johnson said Wednesday night.
But that would kick the budget blueprint back to the Senate, which already tweaked this version of the budget once and has also held two all-night vote-a-ramas in less than six weeks. Senate Majority Leader John Thune was deeply unenthusiastic about holding a third: “I think everybody realizes that we’re at the time that we’ve got to move,” he said.
Plus, Thune would have to get key senators on board yet again. And many House moderates were privately counting on the Senate’s spending levels to avoid the steep $1.5 trillion to 2 trillion cuts proposed by the House.
Johnson is already trying to reassure them. He reiterated Wednesday night that House Republicans would not cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security benefits, even as their framework makes Medicaid cuts likely to meet their massive deficit reduction targets.
Plan B: Conference Committee — Heading straight to conference would be a rare and time-consuming process that would require House and Senate leaders and committee chairs to hash out the differences between their chambers’ plans. It’s a last resort, but one that some hard-liners have pushed in recent days to avoid a failed floor vote and force more concessions on spending cuts.
Meanwhile, the House also hasn’t played the full Trump card (even after the president Tuesday told House Republicans to “stop grandstanding”). Johnson said he stepped out of a meeting with holdouts Wednesday night to speak with Trump, who’s closely monitoring the situation.
“The president is very anxious, as I am, for us to get this done,” Johnson said after a late Wednesday meeting.
A note for your calendars: Johnson said it is not his “intention” to leave for the scheduled two-week Easter recess before adopting a budget resolution — though he noted that Passover starts this Saturday and he doesn’t want voting to stray into the holiday. The speaker said “the calendar is not our friend,” but “if we have to come back next week, then we’ll do that.”
What else we’re watching:
– GOP senators back Biden-era tax credit: Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski and John Curtis are leading a letter to their leadership, alongside Sens. Thom Tillis and Jerry Moran, asking that clean-energy tax credits created by the Democrats’ 2022 climate law not be repealed as part of the GOP bill enacting Trump’s agenda. The senators say the credits are essential to the president’s goals of spurring American energy and manufacturing dominance.
– Michelle Bowman hearing: Trump’s pick to be the Federal Reserve’s top regulatory official faces Senate Banking this morning to pitch an overhaul of how the Fed supervises banks and argue for a “tailored approach” to regulation that makes it easier for financial institutions to innovate. Her industry-friendly approach broadly echoes the roadmap that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent outlined this week for easing bank regulations.
Katherine Tully-McManus, Jennifer Scholtes and Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.
A clean energy group is launching a $1.5 million spend against Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), its latest effort this midterm cycle targeting Republicans who actively work against renewables.
The Invest in Tomorrow Coalition’s first ad in the spend, which was obtained by Blue Light News, focuses on an embarrassing incident for Boebert: when she was ejected from a live musical performance of “Beetlejuice” for allegedly vaping, singing and recording the show.
“If Lauren Boebert can’t be trusted in a room full of kids, then she can’t be trusted in the halls of Congress,” the ad says.
The spot makes no mention of clean energy or Boebert’s attacks on the so-called “Green New Scam.” The strategy mimics the group’s previous playbook that it has deployed to help defeat Reps. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) in their Republican primaries earlier this year, as the latter two sought statewide office. The PAC had tried to paint Ogles as an absentee member of Congress and Roy as insufficiently MAGA.
The group, which is backed by solar executives, has become an increasingly forceful player this cycle, which has seen a massive influx of outside spending.
“This industry has been villainized and used as a punching bag at times by the right, and the industry hasn’t always punched back,” said Chris Coffey, the CEO of Tusk Strategies, which is helping run the group. “Maybe when they’re deciding who to villainize next year, they will at least be like, ‘You know what? I don’t need problems with those guys.’”
Boebert’s district is historically deeply red. But Invest in Tomorrow also commissioned a poll, which shows she is underwater: 39% of likely voters view her favorably and 55% view her unfavorably. It also found Boebert leading the district’s Democratic nominee Eileen Laubacher by 5 points.
The poll, conducted by Impact Research from Sept. 21 to 24, polled 403 likely voters and had a margin of error of ±4.8%.
Rep. Lori Trahan on Wednesday unveiled a discussion draft for a bill that would make artificial intelligence developers liable when their products cause harm.
The legislation comes after OpenAI’s agents escaped containment and autonomously hacked into AI platform Hugging Face and accessed U.S. government websites.
The Clear Liability for Artificial Intelligence Misconduct Act aims to make it easier for those harmed by so-called rogue AI to bring claims against developers. Trahan’s bill does not preempt new state laws on AI liability — historically a prerequisite for attracting Republican support in the House.
“When someone breaks the law and hurts you, you can take them to court. That shouldn’t change just because the wrongdoer is an AI agent,” Trahan (D-Mass.) said in a statement. “Developers have already built systems capable of acting on their own and causing real damage. The CLAIM Act makes sure they answer for what their systems do.”
Legal experts have warned that existing laws require proof of intent or negligence, standards that can be difficult to show in court when AI models go rogue.
Trahan’s bill would ensure AI developers are unable to argue that their AI systems are incapable of intent. Instead, courts “would presume an AI system acted with the state of mind a person taking the same actions would have had.”
Trahan spokesperson Francis Grubar said work on the CLAIM Act began almost immediately after theJuly introduction of the FRONTIER Act, legislation with Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) that would grant the government power to restrict the deployment of AI models deemed to pose catastrophic risks. While that bill aims to prevent serious harms before they happen, Grubar said the CLAIM Act would address how to impose accountability for existing damages.
Unlike an AI liability proposal announced last week by Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Trahan’s legislation would not amend the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Grubar said the CLAIM Act would instead impose clearer liability on a broader range of harms, as well as autonomous or AI-enabled cyberattacks.
The CFFA, an anti-hacking law that bars individuals from accessing a computer without consent, requires proof of intent to hack into a computer system, which can’t be as easily applied to AI agents.
The Hugging Face incident, along with a flurry of other disclosed hacking incidents by rogue AI agents from OpenAI and other AI developers, has sparked a debate over how companies should be held legally liable for their AI systems.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, in an interview with Blue Light News’s Decoded podcast, said there should be a new “liability framework” to hold developers accountable for AI-powered cyberattacks. His comments come after White House officials like Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton, who was recently appointed as AI czar by President Donald Trump, previously said that existing product liability laws are sufficient for now in addressing AI’s risks.
Vice President JD Vance will take questions from Michigan voters in a CBS News town hall airing Oct. 17 as the Trump administration prepares a closing message to voters ahead of the midterms.
The town hall comes amid a blitz of campaign events for Vance and President Donald Trump as their party faces multiple headwinds that could cost them control of the House and Senate.
Michigan’s Senate contest between Democrat Abdul El-Sayed and Republican Mike Rogers has become one of the cycle’s closely watched battleground contests. Michigan also has several competitive House races and will elect a new governor for the first time in eight years.
Vance campaigned in Michigan with Rogers, gubernatorial nominee John James and Mike Bouchard Jr., the GOP nominee in the 10th Congressional District, at an Aug. 31 rally in Sterling Heights. Rep. Lisa McClain also appeared at the event.
The one-hour special, moderated by “CBS Evening News” anchor Tony Dokoupil, will be recorded earlier in the week. Vance and Dokoupil will discuss issues facing voters, including affordability, tariffs, immigration, health care, artificial intelligence, the war with Iran and the state of American democracy, according to CBS News.
The two were scheduled for a town hall interview in March, but the vice president postponed due to the war with Iran.
The vice president’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
- Iowa’s Ashley Hinson slams the savings habits of millennials
- Trump approved Ohio disaster aid ahead of rally
- Clean energy group sets its sights on a new GOP target: Lauren Boebert
- Blakeman’s campaign finance mess
- HASC Dems weigh reviving Pentagon oversight subcommittee
- Trahan unveils AI liability discussion draft
- Vance to sit for CBS town hall in Michigan ahead of midterms
- Michigan’s Mike Rogers says trade war with Canada needs to end
- ‘He is welcome to raise his own money’: GOP confronts its Paxton woes
- The top House sleeper races to watch, according to the pros
-
Politics2 years agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
Uncategorized2 years ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
The Josh Fourrier Show2 years agoDOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?
-
The Dictatorship2 years agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Politics2 years agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Dictatorship2 years agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics2 years agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words