Connect with us

Congress

Meet Ken Nahigian, RFK Jr.’s guide to Congress

Published

on

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Donald Trump’s controversial pick to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, has an experienced guide to shepherd him to confirmation in the Senate.

Ken Nahigian, who led the Trump transition in 2017, is Kennedy’s liaison to senators, according to four people familiar with the matter.

Nahigian knows the Senate well. He worked for the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee under then-Chairs John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Ted Stevens (R-Alaska). He cut his teeth in politics working advance for longtime Kansas Sen. Bob Dole’s 1996 presidential campaign.

Nahigian is currently executive vice president for policy and communications at the communications shop Nahigian Strategies.

After working on Trump’s transition in 2017, he and his firm secured hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal consulting contracts through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

He once lobbied for health care interests, including the Israeli drugmaker Teva Pharmaceuticals and the Coalition for Access Now, which promotes cannabidiol, a marijuana derivative, for medical purposes.

Nahigian is working with Katie Miller, who was then-Vice President Mike Pence’s communications director and is married to Trump adviser Stephen Miller. She is handling the communications around Kennedy’s confirmation process.

Nahigian declined to comment. He and his brother Keith have run Nahigian Strategies since 2007, and both have done stints for GOP campaigns.

Kennedy spent Wednesday and Thursday on Capitol Hill, attempting to win the votes of Senate Republicans and Democrats who will decide whether he leads HHS.

House Democrats, the Democratic governor of Hawaii, and progressive groups are urging a no vote. On Thursday, the Committee to Protect Health Care, a physicians’ advocacy group, released an open letter signed by more than 15,000 doctors calling Kennedy, who has long questioned public health consensus about the importance of vaccination, “dangerous.”

Republicans have mostly backed Kennedy and he can win confirmation if 50 of the 53 GOP senators vote for him.

Texas Sen. John Cornyn, who sits on the Finance Committee, which will likely hold a confirmation hearing in the coming weeks, said he would vote to confirm.

“He’s not anti-vaccine,” Cornyn said. “He is pro-vaccine safety, which strikes me as a rational position to take.”

Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, a longtime advocate of farm interests, told reporters Kennedy’s views on farming and food production are “much more reasonable than I expected,” despite Kennedy’s past criticism of genetically modified plants and pesticides.

“The reports I read didn’t reflect what he actually believes and how he will act in those areas,” Grassley said.

Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman of Arkansas also said he had a “good meeting” with Kennedy during which they spoke about Kennedy’s views on pesticides.

“That’s the kind of talk I like to hear,” Boozman said.

Boozman added that Kennedy would merely try to discourage consumption of ultra-processed foods, not seek to ban ingredients or manufacturing processes.

Boozman said he’d wait until Kennedy’s confirmation hearing to say if he’ll vote for him.

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who leads the committee that oversees HHS, said he had a “frank” discussion with Kennedy Wednesday, offering a more tepid assessment than some of his fellow Republicans.

Democratic senators who sat down with Kennedy, including Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire, wouldn’t comment after meeting with him.

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) deflected on whether he would vote to confirm.

“I absolutely believe in vaccinations,” Fetterman said. “I would never argue against [vaccines].”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

House rejects effort to force a balanced budget in the US

Published

on

Lawmakers rejected legislation Wednesday to compel the United States to maintain a balanced budget, a perennial pursuit of fiscal conservatives that stood little chance of becoming the law of the land.

The House voted 211-207 against the resolution that would have launched an effort to amend the U.S. Constitution to bar the federal government from running a deficit. It needed to clear each chamber of Congress by a two-thirds vote, then be ratified by three-fourths of all the states.

But the measure’s consideration had major symbolic meaning for budget hawks like its sponsor, Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.).

“Many of us have been agitating for years to do a balanced budget amendment and out of the blue, they said, ‘we’re ready to do it,’” Biggs said in an interview Tuesday, referring to House GOP leaders.

“They didn’t ask me to do anything, didn’t offer anything,” he said of whether leaders scheduled the vote in an effort to court Biggs, who has in the past threatened to tank spending bills for where he hasn’t liked the price tag. “Just out of the blue, I got a call.”

A spokesperson for Speaker Mike Johnson did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the timing of the measure’s consideration.

Various balanced budget amendment proposals have been offered more than a hundred times since 1999, but peaked in the 1970s and 1980s. The Pew Research Center found that balancing the budget is the single most popular subject of constitutional amendment proposals since 1999, according to analysis of legislative data from the Library of Congress.

Biggs’ latest resolution stated that “total expenditures for a year shall not exceed the average annual receipts collected in the three prior years,” adjusted for inflation and changes in the population.

It would have made an exception for war, where “specific expenditures in excess of the limit” can be approved by Congress “for any year in which a declaration of war is in effect.” Modern wars after World War II have largely been funded by debt; none of them, including the decades-long Global War on Terror, were never backed up by an official declaration of war.

The Biggs measure also would have instituted a two-thirds majority vote threshold in both chambers as necessary to approve any new tax or increase the tax rate. The GOP megabill passed last summer, which included significant tax cuts, passed the Senate in a simple majority vote through the filibuster-skirting budget reconciliation process.

Continue Reading

Congress

Kiley switches parties, loses committees

Published

on

Rep. Kevin Kiley, the former Republican who recently registered as an Independent, said in an interview Wednesday he plans to caucus with the House GOP and will seek to regain his committee assignments.

The California lawmaker was formally removed from his panels Wednesday after giving official notice he was switching parties to serve as an Independent and run in a new district after his state redrew congressional maps.

The House GOP Steering Committee will need to approve Kiley’s effort to take back his seats on Education and the Workforce, Transportation and Infrastructure and Judiciary. Kiley told reporters this was “completely expected” and that he looked “forward to being reappointed as an Independent.”

Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Congress

Tim Scott to run for reelection to the Senate

Published

on

Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) will run for reelection in 2028, his campaign told Blue Light News on Wednesday, reversing a promise to serve just two full terms in the chamber.

Appointed by then-Gov. Nikki Haley to serve out the last two years of outgoing Sen. Jim DeMint’s Senate term in 2012, Scott had long said that 2022 would mark his final bid for the Senate.

He easily won reelection that year, besting Democratic state lawmaker Krystle Matthews by more than 25 percentage points. Scott then ran for president but abandoned his short-lived bid for the White House before the Iowa caucuses.

He was briefly considered to serve as now-President Donald Trump’s running mate and has since emerged as a key White House ally in the Senate.

“And I’ll say without any question that as I think about my own reelection in 2028, I think about all the lessons I’ve learned on the campaign trail for all these other candidates, and frankly, even in South Carolina,” Scott told the Charleston, South Carolina-based Post and Courier, which was first to report his reelection plans.

Continue Reading

Trending