The Dictatorship

Why Judge Cannon blocked Jack Smith’s report

Published

2 years ago

January 8, 2025

Blue Light Newsroom

Why Judge Cannon blocked Jack Smith’s report

Jan. 7, 2025, 7:19 PM UTC/Updated Jan. 8, 2025, 3:58 PM UTC

By Jordan Rubin

UPDATE (Jan. 8, 2025, 10:46 a.m. ET): The Justice Department on Wednesdayasked the11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reject the defense attempt to block the release of special counsel Jack Smith’s final report. The DOJ said it doesn’t intend to publicly release the volume of the report related to the classified documents case while the case remains pending against Donald Trump’s former co-defendants, but it does intend to release the volume related to the federal election interference case. The DOJ asked the appeals court to deny the defense motion seeking to block the release of the report, set aside U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s order temporarily blocking it, and make clear that the attorney general can allow limited congressional review of the classified documents volume and the public release of the federal election interference case volume.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has issued an order temporarily blocking the release of special counsel Jack Smith’s final report on his investigations into Donald Trump.

The action comes as litigation continues in the classified documents case, which has been on appeal in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals against former Trump co-defendants Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, where the government is appealing Cannon’s dismissal of the case. Smith has wound down Trump’s two federal prosecutions.

There is a similar defense motion pending in the appeals court trying to block the report. Noting that motion, Cannon wrote that her order is in effect until three days after the 11th Circuit resolves the appellate motion, unless the appeals court directs otherwise. Specifically, the order says:

Attorney General [Merrick] Garland, the Department of Justice, Special Counsel Smith, all of their officers, agents, and employees, and all persons acting in active concert or participation with such individuals … are TEMPORARILY ENJOINED from (a) releasing, sharing, or transmitting the Final Report or any drafts of such Report outside the Department of Justice, or (b) otherwise releasing, distributing, conveying, or sharing with anyone outside the Department of Justice any information or conclusions in the Final Report or in drafts thereof.

Cannon wrote that she was issuing the order to “preserve the status quo” while awaiting word from the 11th Circuit, “to prevent irreparable harm arising from the circumstances as described in the current record in this emergency posture, and to permit an orderly and deliberative sequence of events.” She noted that the order was not a final resolution of the motion to block the report.

Nauta and De Oliveira, backed by Trump, had argued to both Cannon and the appeals court that releasing the report would unfairly prejudice them because the criminal case against them could still proceed. They have both pleaded not guilty.

Of course, the case might not proceed against them much longer after Trump is inaugurated, whether it is with the appeal being withdrawn by Trump’s Justice Department (to which he has picked his defense lawyers for top posts) or by Trump pardons. Smith dropped the documents case appeal only against the president-elect, not Nauta and De Oliveira, while Trump was the only defendant charged in the federal election interference case, which also was dismissed and is the subject of its own volume in Smith’s report.

Subscribe to theDeadline: Legal Newsletterfor expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in Donald Trump’s legal cases.

Jordan Rubin

Jordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,” a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined BLN, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.

The Dictatorship

E. Jean Carroll finally gets Trump’s $5 million — plus interest

Published

51 minutes ago

July 14, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

E. Jean Carroll finally gets Trump’s $5 million — plus interest

Christmas. 14, 2026, 11:06 AM EDT

Writer E. Jean Carroll finally has the $5 million — plus interest — that a jury ordered President Donald Trump to pay her in damages in one of her two cases against him, after Trump fought the payout for years.

Court records posted Tuesday show a transfer of $5,625,005.48 to Carroll’s legal team took place the day before.

Carroll received the money more than three years after a jury found that the president was liable for sexually abusing her in a Manhattan department store in 1996, and then for defaming her on social media. Trump has repeatedly appealed the judgment to no avail — including petitioning the Supreme Court multiple times — and last week launched a last-ditch attempt to block her from getting the money.

Last Tuesday, his legal team filed a briefrequesting that the disbursement of the damages be halted, pointing to his pending request for the Supreme Court to reconsider its refusal to hear his appeal.

A federal judge nevertheless ordered Wednesday that Carroll be paid, prompting a swift appeal from Trump and a motion for an emergency administrative stay on the disbursement of the funds.

That request was denied.

“Three years ago, a unanimous nine-person jury found President Trump liable for sexually assaulting and defaming E. Jean Carroll. Today, we are pleased to report that she has received the damages payment the jury awarded her as a result of that verdict,” said Carroll’s lead attorney, Roberta Kaplan.

Clarissa-Jan Lim is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW. She was previously a senior reporter and editor at BuzzFeed News.

Lisa Rubin is MS NOW’s senior legal reporter and a former litigator.

The Dictatorship

Trump downplays importance of failing Iran deal that he previously celebrated

Published

51 minutes ago

July 14, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Trump downplays importance of failing Iran deal that he previously celebrated

To the extent that the United States and Iran had a ceasefire deal in place to end the deadly, destabilizing war, that agreement has unraveled. Donald Trump has declared the ceasefire “over”; both countries have renewed their military strikes; and the American president is positioning the U.S. as a mercenary forcewith plans to charge tolls to pay for guarding the Strait of Hormuz.

As for the deal the Trump administration negotiated with Iran, formally known as a memorandum of understanding, or MOU, conservative host Hugh Hewitt asked the president whether the framework was “built to fall apart.” The Republican responded with an answer he hadn’t shared previously.

“It was built to test. It was a test,” Trump replied. “We didn’t know. It didn’t, look, memorandum of understanding, when you’re dealing with sleazebags, don’t mean much. And they don’t mean much when you’re dealing with honorable people, too, because it’s memorandum of understanding. It doesn’t mean much.”

The president went on to say that Iran “didn’t honor the test,” before suggesting that he had predicted from the outset that officials in Tehran would cause the agreement to collapse through noncompliance. “I said, ‘Watch, I guarantee. Watch.’ And they never, they never followed it.”

The apparent point of the on-air comments wasn’t merely to blame Iran for the unravelling deal, it was also to convey the suggestion that Trump knew all along Iran would cause the framework to collapse.

The trouble is, very recent history proves otherwise.

It was exactly one month ago when the president published a statement to his social media platform, announcing, “The Deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete. Congratulations to all!” About an hour later, seemingly eager to pat himself on the back, he added“This Great Deal will bring Peace and Security to the whole Region. Many presidents have tried to make Peace with Iran, and all have failed before me. The Leaders of the Region have, for the first time, found a President who can help them achieve real Peace.”

In the days that followed, not only did Trump continue to celebrate his alleged triumph, but the White House invested an enormous amount of time and effort in touting the deal, all while Vice President JD Vance went on a media tour, doing his best to defend the policy on the merits.

There was nothing about this being a “test.” Not a word was uttered about the idea that the deal “doesn’t mean much.”

If the president expects his post hoc rationalization of this failure to persuade anyone, he’s probably going to be disappointed.

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

The Dictatorship

GOP’s Ron Johnson shares, then retracts, a conspiratorial ‘rumor’ about Mitch McConnell

Published

51 minutes ago

July 14, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

GOP’s Ron Johnson shares, then retracts, a conspiratorial ‘rumor’ about Mitch McConnell

We’ve known for a month that Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was hospitalized, but neither he nor anyone on his team has been willing to say why. Over the weekend, McConnell finally took steps to end the speculation, issuing a statement to explain that he’s been recovering from a fall, followed by what he described as “a mild case of pneumonia.”

The statement was accompanied by a photograph of the senator in a hospital bed alongside his wife, former Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao. For good measure, the image showed a newspaper — specifically, Sunday’s Washington Post sports section — in McConnell’s right hand.

It stood to reason that the statement and photo would revive the conversation about why the former Senate majority leader hadn’t disclosed any of these details earlier — the lack of transparency surrounding his personal health has long been a point of concern — but some in conservative politics went furtherfloating assorted conspiracy theories about the authenticity of the image of McConnell and his wife.

The chatter was not limited to the far-right fringe.

Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin appeared Monday on conservative media channel Real America’s Voice, where the senator told host Eric Bolling, in reference to the McConnell image, “I’ve just heard from some other sources that was an older photo. So I really don’t know.” (He did not identify his alleged “sources.”)

The Wisconsin Republican went on to say that he hadn’t spoken directly with McConnell, but that he hoped his colleague has a speedy recovery so he can return to Capitol Hill and help advance Donald Trump’s agenda.

Hours later, when pressed by reporters about his conspiratorial on-air comments, Johnson said, “It was a rumor, don’t — discount it, just discount it. … I just heard it, so assume it’s false.”

The bigger picture matters. Johnson isn’t just some guy; he’s a three-term member of the U.S. Senate who was speaking to a national television audience about an ailing colleague. It’s the opposite of his job to amplify baseless “rumors” and add fuel to fringe conspiracy theories. As the Wisconsin Republican really ought to know, those in his position have a responsibility to avoid conspiratorial nonsense.

What’s more, there’s the GOP senator’s track record to consider. Shortly after Trump grudgingly left the White House after his 2020 defeat, he was effectively banned from most major social media platforms and made few television appearances. Around this time, The New York Times described Johnson as Trump’s successor as the GOP’s “foremost amplifier of conspiracy theories and disinformation.”

In the years that followed, Johnson seemed a little too eager to prove his critics right, peddling bizarre and easily discredited nonsense about Covid-19. And the Jan. 6 attack. And vaccines. And climate change. And the 2020 presidential election. And the 2024 presidential election.

Last year, the Wisconsin Republican reached new depths, becoming the only senator from either party to embrace fringe ideas from the so-called 9/11 truther movement.

With this in mind, his on-air comments about McConnell and what he’s “heard from some other sources” are consistent with what we’ve come to expect from Johnson, though this only makes matters worse for his unfortunate reputation.

Finally, that the senator walked back his own rhetoric seemed like a step in the right direction, though I’m curious about his motivation: Did Johnson urge reporters to “discount” the “rumor” he spread because he recognized it as irresponsible, or was he scrambling to better position himself as the next chairman of the Senate Budget Committee in the wake of Sen. Lindsey Graham’s death?