Connect with us

The Dictatorship

‘We are less-than’: Americans fear more cuts to healthcare programs after RFK Jr. hearings

Published

on

‘We are less-than’: Americans fear more cuts to healthcare programs after RFK Jr. hearings

The walls are closing in on millions of Americans who utilize federal healthcare benefits such as Medicare and Medicaid, as the sweeping changes and cuts promised in President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” inch closer to reality, and lawmakers do little to soften the incoming blow.

All eyes were on Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. last week as he wrapped up a marathon seven congressional committee hearings, in review of several proposed federal health nominees and his handling of HHS. Senators spent the week grilling Kennedy over Trump’s 2027 budget proposalwhich would cut $15.8 billion from HHS and put new restrictions on those seeking Medicaid coverage — on top of the impacts of Trump’s bill, which leaves millions at risk of losing insurance coverage.

But the Kennedy hearings didn’t offer much in the way of positive news for federal aid recipients anxious about the future. Instead, Kennedy spent the week defending Trump’s budget proposal and balking — or making misleading claims — about cuts to Medicaid, which is poised to lose $1 trillion in federal spending by 2034 under Trump’s current terms.

“In all honesty, until Trump is gone, RFK is out, along with others who shouldn’t be anywhere near anything to do with Healthcare, we are screwed,” said Edwina Billhimer, a Medicaid recipient and registered Republican who lives in southern Indiana.

Two people sitting on a couch.
Edwina and Dennis Billhimer at their home in Indiana. Ale Basalo and Konner Barrick / MS NOW

Billhimer suffers from Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, a genetic connective tissue disorder that causes joint issues, chronic pain and severe fatigue. Billhimer cannot physically work and takes medicine around the clock to manage her symptoms. She’s the primary caregiver to her 39-year-old son Dennis, who had half of his brain removed following seizures. Her daughter Michaela was also diagnosed with EDS.

“I feel hopeless. I am waiting for people like myself and my son, along with the elderly, people with cancer and other diseases to be put in camps or hospitals till we die,” she said.

Shifting goal posts

Cuts to government healthcare programs have already had significant impacts on Americans since Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law last July.

In December, Affordable Care Act tax credits expired, causing health premiums to skyrocket for many of the benefit’s 22 million recipients — millions of whom are set to drop their health insurance. Americans without company sponsored healthcare, such as entrepreneurs, small farmers and freelancers, saw immediate increases in their costs.

This year, states across the country have reported hundreds of millions in added costs and lost tax revenue, and hundreds of rural hospitals are on the brink of closure. In January, the House responded by passing a bill to extend the ACA tax credits, but talks have since stagnated in the Senate.

Trump’s bill features one major change for individuals on Medicaid: a new, strict work requirement for eligibility that could block millions from enrolling in the program.

“They must be working at least 80 hours a month, attending school or participating in other specified activities like volunteering in order to receive Medicaid coverage, unless they qualify for an exemption,” said Jennifer Haley, a principal research associate at the Urban Institute’s Health Policy Division. Her team’s recent analysis painted a grim picture for those seeking Medicaid going forward.

Trump’s bill, Hayley said, “would lead to a decline in Medicaid expansion enrollment of about five to 10 million people in 2028.”

Despite ongoing White House claims that people have exploited these programs by avoiding employment, Haley said the majority of those enrolled in Medicaid already work.

But with an average unemployment rate bouncing between 4.3% and 4.45%, getting a job has been challenging for many Americans.

“I think 14 months of looking, I’ve probably put in somewhere around close to 2000 applications, and I’ve had a couple dozen interviews and nothing,” said Medicaid recipient Justin Cornell, 43, of Denver.

A man in a baseball hat standing in front of a library.
Justin Cornell in Denver. Ale Basalo and Konner Barrick / MS NOW

Cornell, who is currently unhoused, said he has been kicked off Medicaid about four times in the last seven years. Even with an advanced education, he said he mostly has relied on temporary gigs and food deliveries for income.

Cornell said his own health challenges got him where he is. In 2016, he was diagnosed with type two diabetes, and spent his 401(k) “on healthcare expenses.”

“I had someone help me get on Medicaid at that point, and it saved my life, because I was in the hospital for two nights in the ICU,” he said. The bill, he added, “was something close to $300,000, which obviously I wouldn’t have had. And unfortunately, I have been kind of in and out of housing and on and off Medicaid and SNAP since then.”

Cornell said he thinks many people have misconceptions about the Americans using healthcare programs such as Medicaid.

“If you were to walk into just about any shelter in any city at this point, you would discover that most of those people are working,” he said. “They’re usually working more than one job, and they’re just not making it. It’s not someone who is lazy, because you can’t get on these programs and not put any effort into it.”

“You need to call every week, you need to go down every week, you need to meet with someone, because that’s how you’re going to get on the program, not just applying to them,” Cornell added.

“We are looked down at”

Now it’s a waiting game as millions of Americans like Cornell and Billhimer brace for further healthcare cuts. The national anxiety over cost and cuts is clear in current polling data.

In a recently released Gallup survey of 20,000 Americans, roughly a third of respondents reported making “at least one trade-off with daily living expenses to afford healthcare.”

Just under half of U.S. adults said they struggle to afford healthcare costs, according to a study by the independent research institute KFF. About 3 in 10 said they or an immediate family member had problems paying for healthcare in the past 12 months.

For Billhimer, living life in fear of what could happen to her family’s coverage has been gruesome.

A woman looking into a medicine cabinet.
Edwina Billhimer at her home in Indiana. Ale Basalo and Konner Barrick / MS NOW

“Ever since the Big, Beautiful Bill passed, I have worried,” she said. “Right now, because of Medicaid, my medications and my son’s medications are covered. … If we were to lose the Medicaid coverage, it would be medications, or eating. And just the thought of that absolutely terrifies me.”

During a private Easter luncheon at the White House earlier this month, Trump suggested the federal government could not — and would not — fund federal aid programs such as Medicaid.

“It’s not possible for us to take care of day care, Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things,” he said.

“They can do it on a state basis. You can’t do it on a federal. We have to take care of one thing: military protection. We have to guard the country,” he continued.

The White House posted, and then deleted, the statement to social media.

Billhimer said Trump’s comments were devastating — and telling.

“People like us are not looked at. We are looked down at, because we’re less than,” Billhimer said. Of Trump’s comments, she said, I’m embarrassed, because this isn’t the United States I grew up in at all.”

Maya Eaglin is a reporter at MS NOW covering breaking news, politics and current events around the country. She was previously an award-winning national correspondent at NBC News specializing in digital storytelling.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

Blanche says administration officials were apparent targets at correspondents’ dinner

Published

on

Trump administration officials — “likely including the president” — were the apparent targets of the shooting at the annual White House correspondents’ dinner, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said Sunday.

In an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press” the morning after President Donald Trump was rushed off stage by Secret Service agents as guests ducked under dining tables while shots rang out at the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner, Blanche said of the gunman: “We believe that he was targeting administration officials.”

Blanche cautioned that the belief is “quite preliminary” as law-enforcement officials sift through evidence.  The acting attorney general said investigators had recovered the suspect’s “electronic devices” and that “there were some writings, and we’ve already spoken with several witnesses who knew him.”

He did not elaborate on the writings. But the New York Post obtained what it called a 1,052-word missive from the gunman, sent to his family members moments before he carried out the foiled attack, in which he said he intended to target administration officials.

The suspect referred to himself as the “Friendly Federal Assassin” in closing his letter. Law enforcement sources described the writings to MS NOW as anti-Trump in nature but not aligned to one specific ideology.

In an interview on Sunday with CBS News’ “60 Minutes,” Trump said he read the alleged gunman’s manifesto. “He’s radicalized,” Trump said. “He was probably a pretty sick guy.”

U.S. Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said Sunday that the suspect’s brother in New London, Connecticut, contacted local police, who then alerted the Secret Service. Guglielmi said the Secret Service learned of the suspect’s writings sometime between 9 and 11 p.m. ET Saturday night.

Blanche said investigators believe that the suspect, which a former senior law enforcement official identified to MS NOW as 31-year old California resident Cole Tomas Allen, acted alone. He said the man traveled by train from Los Angeles to Chicago and then from Chicago to Washington. The suspect had two firearms on him that were purchased legally in past couple of years, Blanche said.

The armed suspect was tackled near a security checkpoint at the Washington Hilton hotel, where the event has been held annually for decades, before he could enter the ballroom. He was taken into custody, hospitalized and remains under observation, according to D.C. interim Police Chief Jeff Carroll. The gunman shot a Secret Service agent in his protective vest and that agent was injured but in good condition, Trump told reporters Saturday night.

Trump, Vice President JD Vance and several top administration officials — including Blanche — were in attendance.

“Obviously, President Trump is a member of the administration, the head of it,” Blanche noted on Sunday. But he said any “exacting threat that may have been communicated beforehand” are still under investigation and not yet known.

Blanche said he expected formal charges, which he said would likely include assault of a federal officer and discharging a firearm during the assault of a federal officer, would be filed on Monday.

CBS News reporter Weijia Jiang, president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, called the shooting a “harrowing moment,” and thanked Secret Service and law enforcement personnel.

“Our dinner exists to celebrate the First Amendment and the hard daily work of the journalists who defend it. Last night, those journalists showed exactly the kind of calm and courage that work demands, jumping into reporting immediately after the incident unfolded,” Jiang said in a statement Sunday.

Jiang said late Saturday night that Trump “insists” the dinner be rescheduled within 30 days, but details of a new event have not been announced.

Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW, with a focus on how global events and foreign policy shape U.S. politics. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Terror overtakes Trump’s first White House Correspondents’ Dinner as president

Published

on

WASHINGTON — As hundreds of journalists exchanged hugs, handshakes and laughter, while they and other attendees took their seats, White House Correspondents’ Association President Weijia Jiang welcomed everyone to this year’s dinner — Donald Trump’s first as president.

A military color guard played the national anthem. Like most events involving a U.S. president, every action was carefully choreographed. The atmosphere felt both routine and yet still historic. The sound of forks hitting plates clattered as Jiang gave her brief remarks, and people returned to conversation.

Suddenly, multiple loud bangs rang out from behind the closed doors of the oval underground ballroom in the Hilton Hotel. Journalists, friends, lawmakers, congressional staffers, and members of Trump’s Cabinet and other administration officials — dropped to the ground. Plates shattered, and chairs toppled over as people took cover under tablecloth-covered tables.

MS NOW reporter Julia Jester, who had reported on air from the red carpet leading up to the event, had briefly gone to an upper level of the hotel and returned to see her fellow journalists crouched on the floor.

“Just as someone said there was a shooter, an officer shouted to ‘get down and stay down,’” Jester recalled. “Not long after, a Secret Service agent ran into the area shouting, ‘Everyone out, this is now an active crime scene.’ Anyone who tried to run back to grab belongings was warned to leave or face arrest. They were not playing around.”

The evening is an annual celebration of the freedom of the press, one that typically includes a comedian’s performance and a joke-filled speech from the president along with the presentation of awards to journalists. Trump broke with tradition in his first term by not attending; his presence Saturday was a lightning rod for debate in the wake of his lawsuits against and threats to sue several media outlets over the past year.

Tension was expected to center on First Amendment speech protections. Instead, the night was derailed by gun violence, another growing threat to America’s democracy.

Outside the ballroom, a man — later identified as Cole Tomas Allen, 31, of Torrance, California — had attempted to run through a security checkpoint with two guns, along with multiple knives, according to Jeffery Carroll, D.C. interim police chief. Several MS NOW reporters, producers and executives were seated in the ballroom, a below-ground space with notoriously poor cellphone service.

“It wasn’t until we were all outside that I remembered how odd, and mildly concerning, I thought it was when no one screened me — or my bags — when I arrived on the terrace-level hours before [most attendees] to cover the red carpet,” Jester said. “The reality sunk in: as jarring as tonight was, it could have been far worse.”

Inside the room, Republican Rep. Marlin Stutzman of Indiana was seated near the center aisle. He estimated he was 50 to 75 feet from the back doors, when “all of a sudden,” he said, “we hear these large gunshots.”

MS NOW “Way Too Early” anchor and senior congressional reporter Ali Vitali heard shouts of “shots fired.”

“Someone behind me shouted ‘get down’ and I hit the floor, grabbing Symone Sanders next to me and telling her to get under the table,” she said. “I worried we couldn’t find cover because of how tightly packed the chairs and tables were. One of the servers also dropped down near us.”

“After a minute, I put my phone in the air and starting filming the dais, trying to understand where the president was,” Vitali said. Then she realized the server on the ground next to her was sobbing. “So, I used one hand in the air with my phone and the other to hold hers, and tell her it was going to be OK.”

Multiple Secret Service agents sprinted to the stage, where Trump, first lady Melania Trump, Vice President JD Vance and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt were seated along with the board members of the White House Correspondents’ Association. As the guests on the dais crouched down and then were evacuated from their table, heavily-armed officers stood guard on the stage.

Quiet fell across the room, as uncertainty and fear spread among the guests. “I don’t recall any screaming. How much of the silence in that room was learned behavior?” Jonathan Capehart, co-anchor of “The Weekend,” reflected about the experience after years of mass shootings in America.

“It felt like a long moment,” said Stutzman.

JD Vance leaves the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
Vice President JD Vance is escorted after an incident at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on April 25, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Andrew Harnik / Getty Images

In an interview with MS NOW’s Mychael Schnell shortly after the incident, Stutzman and Rep. Abe Hamadeh, R-Ariz., recounted following Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, and other officials down the center aisle as they were ushered out of the ballroom.

Hamadeh spotted Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. among those being rushed to safety. “When everybody was down there [on the floor]I’m just hearing people praying,” the Arizona congressman said. “People were obviously scared.”

White House reporter Jake Traylor, who covered the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, during the 2024 campaign, also began filming on his cellphone. “We were a few feet away from FBI Director Kash Patel. I saw agents covering and protecting him moments after the commotion began,” he said.

“We actually left the exit where Ronald Reagan was shot just over 40 years ago,” MS NOW’s senior White House reporter Vaughn Hillyard told viewers on air as law enforcement officials asked him to move further back from the scene.

Hillyard recalled seeing House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth being escorted out by their security details.

Kari Lake, who has overseen a gutting of the government-funding international news agency Voice of America into a pro-Trump media organization, expressed disdain for journalists in the room as she exited in an interview with Newsmax, a conservative streaming service, moments after the shooting.

“I saw so many people from all of these news outlets,” Lake said, accusing journalists of spreading falsehoods. “They’re part to blame of this,” she claimed moments after the shooting occurred and only as an investigation was just underway.

Back inside the ballroom, MS NOW’s Traylor reported that the president was safe and that he still intended to deliver a speech from the dinner, citing a White House official.

The president posted on social media that he wanted to “LET THE SHOW GO ON.” He praised law enforcement’s swift response and announced a press conference at the White House after it was determined that, following security guidance, he would leave the premises. Attendees were soon asked to leave the hotel as law enforcement investigated what had become a crime scene.

Trump posted a photo of a man handcuffed on the carpeted floor of the hotel and then shared video of a person charging through a security checkpoint. Shortly after, he addressed journalists — many still dressed in gowns and tuxedos — from the White House briefing room, saying the posts were part of an effort to create transparency as law enforcement worked to learn more about the suspect and possible motives.

“It’s always shocking when something like this happens,” Trump told reporters. “Melania was very cognizant, I think, of what happened. I think she knew immediately what happened. She was saying, ‘That’s a bad noise,’ and we were whisked away.”

People run out of the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
Members of law enforcement respond during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on April 25, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Tom Brenner / AP Photo

MS NOW “The Weeknight” anchor Symone Sanders recalled on air riding a scooter up to the driveway of the Hilton, describing her ability to arrive that close to the entrance as “unusual” compared to previous dinners. She questioned the hotel’s overall security after attending numerous events where presidents and vice presidents were present.

“I have been with a protectee, then the vice president of the United States of America, when they have had to be evacuated. What happened tonight, in terms of protocol, from what I know, having experienced it myself, was not protocol,” Sanders said late Saturday, referring to her time as a senior adviser to former Vice President Kamala Harris.

Before the dinner began, MS NOW White House associate producer Emily Hung witnessed a handful of protestors enter the hotel, holding their signs against a WHCD-branded backdrop, before they were escorted out.

It is unclear whether Trump was the intended target, but, if so, this would be the third time a gunman has targeted Trump since 2024. In the Washington Hilton Saturday  night were two officials in the presidential line of succession: the vice president and House Speaker Mike Johnson.

Unlike Lake, Trump praised the reaction of journalists in the room and what he saw of the event before it was derailed. “I told the representatives of the evening, and they did such a beautiful job with such a beautiful evening,” the president said. “They’re talking about free speech in our Constitution. That’s what it’s all about.”

As he addressed the reporters in the briefing room who sprang into action to tell the world what had happened, he also took questions and shared that he has “studied assassinations.”

“The people that make the biggest impact, they’re the ones that they go after,” Trump said. “I hate to say I’m honored by that, but I’ve done a lot. We’ve done a lot.”

Contributed Jake Traylor, Ali Vitali, Symone Sanders, Mychael Schnell, Ken Dilianian, Carol Leonnig.

Akayla Gardner is a White House correspondent for MS NOW.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Marco Rubio’s rising star on the right is a sign of the times

Published

on

Sarah Longwell, the publisher of The Bulwark, runs weekly focus groups of Trump voters to see how their views are changing over time. She has recently noticed a surprising trend: When she asks voters about whom they’d like to see as a future president, Secretary of State Marco Rubio is garnering what she describes as a “strange new respect” from participants. Simultaneously, Vice President JD Vance is receiving more and more criticism.

That doesn’t necessarily mean Rubio has a good shot in a potential future presidential run, or that Vance will lose his lead in 2028 polling. But it does tell us something about how Trump supporters see the current moment. It seems likely that, at a time when President Donald Trump is increasingly over his head with an unpopular war and rising energy pricesmany are craving what Rubio symbolizes as a competent pre-Trump-era Republican.

Rubio’s growing popularity plausibly represents a growing appetite for normie politics.

As Longwell explained in an article this week for The AtlanticTrump voter focus group participants are increasingly describing Rubio as a “stabilizing” force with impressive capabilities. She quotes a focus group participant — Boris from Texas — praising Rubio as “a real statesman.” Andrea from Georgia says Rubio has been “killing it from an international policy perspective.” Dave from West Virginia says he believes Rubio is “doing a good job” and “speaks well” while “wearing multiple hats” — a reference to Rubio also holding the title of national security adviser. (He was also previously acting USAID administrator and acting archivist.)

The common theme is that Rubio’s star is rising based on the perception that he’s a high-functioning, competent operator who can get things done. Rubio played a key role in the ouster of Venezuela’s former president, Nicolás Maduro, in an operation that was, while substantively reprehensible, pulled off swiftly and smoothly. Rubio is also arguably the calmest and most articulate top Trump official when it comes to laying out and defending the president’s foreign policy maneuvers. (This is not to say Rubio is successful at itbut compared to many of his peers, he’s been relatively free of unforced errors.)

Some of Rubio’s higher station comes from what he has not done. In an administration plagued by scandalsconstant turnovera steady stream of reports about the incompetence of loyalists and optics-obsessed cabinet membersRubio stands out for not standing out. He’s handling major policies as the country’s top diplomat, but he doesn’t aim to create fodder for viral videos, and there isn’t a constant drip of reports from underlings describing him as failing at the most basic elements of his job, as there has been with officials such as FBI Director Kash Patel and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. As one of Longwell’s two-time Trump voter focus group participants summed it up: “Marco Rubio, when you look at the totality of who surrounds Trump, and particularly as it relates to defense and international policy — he seems the most normal.”

It’s not just in focus groups. Esteem for Rubio is also growing among right-wing activists. In the Conservative Political Action Conference’s annual straw poll of attendees, Rubio leapt from 3% to 35% as respondents’ preferred choice in the 2028 Republican presidential primary between spring 2025 and spring 2026. (Vance led in both of those polls, but he dropped from 61% in 2025 to 53% in 2026.)

The explanation for Vance’s more incrementally declining reputation is less clear. It may be due to his recent political missteps, including his sparring with Pope Leo XIV and campaigning fruitlessly for a failed Central European autocrat. It might be that he is more closely identified with Trump and hardcore MAGA ideology, and so Trump’s plunging ratings weigh more on Vance than other administration officials. Or, somewhat paradoxically, it might be — as many of Longwell’s quoted focus group participants suggest — that Vance comes across as less sincere rhetorically and seems to have “sold his soul” for proximity to power.

Sometimes these things boil down to vibe. Even though both Rubio and Vance, like most of their GOP colleagues, have shifted many of their political views during the Trump era, Vance can come across as more try-hard than Rubio, perhaps because of the theatrical zeal with which he speaks, or because the very premise of his relatively short career in national politics was rejecting Trumpism.

Whatever the case, Rubio’s growing popularity plausibly represents a growing appetite for normie politics and straightforward competence in certain sectors of the right — which makes sense at a time when Trump’s presidency is going off the rails in a way it hasn’t before. Maybe people are realizing there’s a downside to electing the guy who said he’d burn it all down.

Zeeshan Aleem is a writer and editor for MS NOW. He primarily writes about politics and foreign policy.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending