Connect with us

The Dictatorship

Trump says he’s invalidating some Biden pardons, claiming power he doesn’t have

Published

on

Trump says he’s invalidating some Biden pardons, claiming power he doesn’t have

Midway through Barack Obama’s third year as president, Congress approved a controversial measure related to national security, with just 15 minutes to spare before certain surveillance powers were set to expire. The president, however, was in France when the bill cleared Capitol Hill.

In generations past, this might’ve posed a logistical challenge, but thanks to modern technology, White House officials weren’t concerned: Obama authorized use of the presidential “autopen” to sign the legislation into law. Some House Republicans weren’t pleasedbut the administration pointed to a Justice Department guidancewritten for George W. Bush, on the legal permissibility of the tool.

For the first time in American history, a sitting president is asserting the right to invalidate a predecessor’s pardons.

In the years that followed, discussion about the use of autopens has largely evaporated, though late last week, it apparently made a comeback: During remarks at the Justice Department on Friday, Donald Trump questioned Joe Biden’s use of the toolsaying that measures signed by his Democratic predecessor might not be “valid.”

Two days later, the Republican incumbent posted an item to his social media platform, suggesting that it was the autopen, and not Biden himself, who served as president for four years.

Shortly after midnight, Trump went considerably further, claiming he was invalidating at least some of Biden’s pardons. The message read in its entirety:

The ‘Pardons’ that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the Unselect Committee of Political Thugs, and many others, are hereby declared VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT, because of the fact that they were done by Autopen. In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them! The necessary Pardoning Documents were not explained to, or approved by, Biden. He knew nothing about them, and the people that did may have committed a crime. Therefore, those on the Unselect Committee, who destroyed and deleted ALL evidence obtained during their two year Witch Hunt of me, and many other innocent people, should fully understand that they are subject to investigation at the highest level. The fact is, they were probably responsible for the Documents that were signed on their behalf without the knowledge or consent of the Worst President in the History of our Country, Crooked Joe Biden!

There’s a lot to unpack in this 158-word harangue, and there’s probably no point in highlighting every individual error of fact and judgment. The bottom line, however, is relatively straightforward: Trump claims that Biden didn’t actually sign pardons for members of the bipartisan House Jan. 6 committee, so as far as the Republican is concerned, prosecutors are free to go after them, despite the fact that there’s literally no evidence that they did anything wrong.

The entire pitch is based on the president’s apparent belief that (a) his immediate predecessor used an autopen to sign the pardons; (b) documents signed by autopens don’t count; and (c) Biden suffered from mental deterioration to such a horrific degree that he wasn’t aware of his own policies and preferences.

The first point is dubious, given that there’s no evidence that Biden used the tool to issue the pardons; the second point appears unsupported by law; and the third point is offensive on its face.

But let’s also not lose sight of the forest for the trees: For the first time in American history, a sitting president is asserting the right to invalidate a predecessor’s pardons.

In other words, as the United States deals with a sustained offensive against the rule of law, Trump has made up a new power for himself that does not exist.

To be sure, there’s often a disconnect between what Trump says he’s doing and what he’s actually doing. The Republican has now claimed in writing that he’s voiding some Biden-era pardons, but given recent history, it’s entirely possible that in the coming hours and days, the White House will pretend he never actually published such a message. Perhaps, in other words, this radicalism will soon be forgotten.

But if Trump seriously takes steps to undo Biden’s pardons, because he feels like it, the coming fight will be dramatic.

Steve legs

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an BLN political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

Wednesday’s Mini-Report, 5.13.26

Published

on

Wednesday’s Mini-Report, 5.13.26

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Warsh was confirmed with 54 votes: “The Senate voted to install Kevin Warsh as chair of the Federal Reserve on Wednesday, handing the millionaire Trump ally the reins of America’s monetary policy even as he faced skepticism over his ability to remain independent of presidential influence.”

* When Barack Obama visited China in 2009, he was greeted by Xi Jinping himself. Nearly two decades later: “President Trump arrived Wednesday night in Beijing, where he was welcomed by a military band, an honor guard, hundreds of Chinese youth waving flags and China’s vice president, Han Zheng. Such carefully designed receptions for foreign leaders telegraph Beijing’s attitude toward these visits. … This time, they sent someone who is high-level but whose position is mostly that of a figurehead — which could be a way to send a layered message.”

* All the news on inflation is bad: “Wholesale prices in April posted their highest annual increase in more than three years, signaling more nettlesome inflation as pipeline costs intensify. The producer price index rose a seasonally adjusted 1.4% for the month, much higher than the 0.5% Dow Jones consensus forecast and the upwardly revised 0.7% March increase, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Wednesday. This was the largest monthly gain since March 2022.”

* The bar is low, but this represents a little progress: “Republican divisions over the Iran war deepened on Wednesday as three GOP senators voted with Democrats to curtail the conflict, signaling greater headwinds for President Donald Trump as he seeks to stem economic impacts that have damaged the party’s political standing. While the Democratic-led measure failed, it was the closest a war powers vote came to advancing in the Senate in the seven attempts since the war began as GOP concerns slowly grow over the path forward.”

* ICE’s newest chief: “The Department of Homeland Security has selected David Venturella, a former private prison executive, to lead U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency at the center of President Donald Trump’s controversial effort to detain and deport millions of undocumented immigrants. Venturella, who has served as a senior ICE adviser since February 2025, will be named acting director following the departure of Todd M. Lyons, DHS spokeswoman Lauren Bis said in a statement Tuesday.”

* In related news: “Ten thousand losses. That’s the Trump administration’s track record in court as federal judges grapple with the way ICE agents have swept through major U.S. cities and detained thousands of people in support of President Donald Trump’s aggressive deportation agenda.”

* It’s always interesting to me when discharge petitions work: “A bipartisan effort to force a vote on legislation sending fresh American security aid to Ukraine has amassed the 218 signatures needed to force a floor vote, the latest in a series of instances of rank-and-file lawmakers wresting control of the chamber’s agenda from Republican leaders.”

See you tomorrow.

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

The MAGA movement’s KKK revisionism is revealing

Published

on

The MAGA movement’s KKK revisionism is revealing

Ku Klux Klan denialism is in vogue for the MAGA movement these days.

As the GOP uses Jim Crow-like racial profiling and voter suppression tactics such as gerrymanderingsome Republicans are engaged in a campaign of obfuscation and misinformation to downplay allegations of racism.

And it increasingly seems that some of President Donald Trump’s supporters want to use falsehoods about the KKK to advance their goals.

Last week’s fact-free diatribe from Rep. Harriet Hageman, R-Wyo., about the KKK supposedly being a leftist organization is a prime example. As I recently wroteRepublicans have used the Justice Department’s dubious indictment of the anti-racist Southern Poverty Law Center to falsely portray racist extremism, which the SPLC tracks and investigates, as either nonexistent or a liberal contrivance. This tactic mirrors rhetoric deployed by conservatives who sought to deny the threat of the KKK during its rise, or even its mere existence.

The aforementioned falsehoods about the SPLC were the subject of an exchange Hageman had with conservative podcaster Winston Marshall in which she made the demonstrably false claim that the KKK, Nazis and the Aryan Nation are “far-left organizations” and “always have been.”

Hageman told Marshall:

The Aryan Nation, the Nazis and the KKK are not far-right organizations. Those are far-left organizations, and they always have been. The KKK was created and started by the Democrats in the United States to prevent Blacks from being able to participate in the political arena, if you will. So I’m going to say they’ve never been associated with the right; they’ve always been associated with the left.

This is the kind of derangement that would make a reputable historian weep.

And you can see in Hageman’s comments why speaking of politics in directional terms (i.e., “right” vs. “left”) is flawed. The KKK has never been liberal and essentially has always been a conservative group of Christian white supremacists. Some Republicans — particularly Black supporters of Trump’s, as we have seen lately — like to portray Democrats as the party of the KKK because at the time of the organization’s rise, the white Christian conservatives most vehemently opposed to Black civil rights called themselves Democrats.

But in reality, the KKK didn’t belong to any particular party, and the Democratic Party didn’t create it. People suggesting otherwise are most likely trying to score cheap political points.

As historian Elaine Frantz explained in a 2011 essay titled “Klan Skepticism and Denial in Reconstruction-Era Public Discourse,” the conspiracy to turn a blind eye to the KKK and its racist terrorism was a bipartisan project:

While Klansmen and their Democratic political allies deliberately spread doubt about Klan reports, they could not have succeeded as thoroughly as they did without the substantial, if intermittent, collaboration of their Republican opponents.

Hageman and some of her fellow Trump supporters apparently don’t want Republicans to be associated with racists, but pseudointellectual diatribes on American history are not the way to avoid that. Instead, I’d suggest not using phrases popularized by the KKK decades ago, such as “America First,” and refraining from celebrating former klan leaders, like Nathan Bedford Forrest.

And, of course, ceasing the GOP’s demonstrable and devastating political crusade against Black people would go a long way.

Ja’han Jones is an MS NOW opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Raskin wants answers from Todd Blanche about alleged payments to fired FBI agents

Published

on

Raskin wants answers from Todd Blanche about alleged payments to fired FBI agents

The Trump administration allegedly paid off FBI agents fired or punished for misconduct, including one who impeded a probe into a white nationalist group and another agent who appeared at the Capitol during the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Those are the bombshell claims at the heart of a new probe Maryland Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin opened Tuesday into the Justice Department, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel.

Raskin “launched an investigation into a scheme inside the Department of Justice (DOJ) to direct millions of taxpayer dollars to FBI agents fired for serious misconduct, many of whom are aligned with Donald Trump,” according to a press release announcing the probe.

Raskins letter to Blanche demands details on the alleged payouts, which Raskin said were negotiated by Empower Oversight, a well-funded conservative activist group linked to Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley that has focused on MAGA conspiracy theories under the guise of defending “whistleblowers.”

Raskin cites as an example an FBI agent who allegedly received a payout and reinstatement at the FBI after being removed for refusing to participate in a probe of the white supremacist group Patriot Front, which has been involved in acts of violence and intimidation toward Black people and immigrants. Raskin said this occurred despite revelations that the agent also “engaged in commercial sex overseas while on an official FBI assignment—unequivocal grounds for security clearance revocation and dismissal from the FBI.” The letter notes the agent was reinstated under Patel.

This claim seems particularly noteworthy in light of the Trump Justice Department’s indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Centerwhich investigates racist extremism and has even previously assisted the DOJ in such investigations. The SPLC is seemingly being targeted for purported fraud in connection with its work against white supremacist groups. Meanwhile, Raskin’s allegation is that the Justice Department rewarded someone for refusing to investigate white supremacy.

Raskin’s list of alleged payouts overseen by Blanche or Patel includes an agent who was reinstated and given more than $100,000 by the department after a court declined to reinstate him after he leaked details of a probe into the far-right group Project Veritas to the media. The representative also references an agent who was reinstated and given his security clearance back after facing punishment over documents, including photos and video, that showed him in a restricted area during the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol back in 2021.

“There are many more examples of these indefensible and lawless payments,” Raskin’s letter to Blanche claims.

The letter demands a list of all FBI or DOJ employees who have received settlements or back pay after being fired or disciplined for alleged misconduct, and all documents pertaining to the negotiations.

Raskin lays out the picture of a lawless regime that prioritizes loyalty to the president — the first to be convicted of a felony — and subservience to his political agenda over seemingly all else. If the allegations are accurate, it’s a disturbing development, but arguably a predictable one.

The DOJ did not immediately respond to MS NOW’s request for comment.

Ja’han Jones is an MS NOW opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending