Connect with us

The Dictatorship

Trump says he ‘couldn’t care less’ if some automakers raise prices due to tariffs

Published

on

Trump says he ‘couldn’t care less’ if some automakers raise prices due to tariffs

The Wall Street Journal reported that Donald Trump recently spoke to some of the top U.S. automakers, and as part of the private chat, he issued a warning: The president told them not to raise prices in response to the White House’s tariffs policy.

The report, which has not been independently verified by BLN or NBC News, added that the Republican told the executives “that the White House would look unfavorably on such a move, leaving some of them rattled and worried they would face punishment if they increased prices, people with knowledge of the call said.”

Of course, this was more than just the latest example of heavy-handed White House tactics toward ostensible private-sector allies. There was also an unstated subtext to the president’s message to the domestic automakers: Trump seemed to realize that his policy on tariffs would push the manufacturers to raise prices. He apparently hoped to convince them otherwise.

Two days after the Journal’s report reached the public, the president spoke to NBC News about this and other issues, and he denied the accuracy of the account — or at least tried to.

The president said he “couldn’t care less” if automakers raised prices after he announced he would impose 25% tariffs on all foreign-made automobiles. When pressed if he told CEOs not to raise prices, as reported in the Wall Street Journal, Trump added, “No, I never said that. I couldn’t care less if they raise prices, because people are going to start buying American-made cars.”

Trump continued, “I couldn’t care less. I hope they raise their prices, because if they do, people are gonna buy American-made cars.”

In context, the Republican was apparently trying to argue that he “hopes” to see foreign auto manufacturers raise prices on their vehicles so that consumers would shift their focus to domestic auto manufacturers.

But it’s not quite that simple. Whether Trump’s tariffs would raise prices on domestic manufacturers — many American cars and trucks are made with parts that are imported from other countries — is a detail the White House does not appear to have grappled with.

What’s more, U.S. manufacturers who sell vehicles abroad will have to contend with a series of reciprocal tariffs imposed by other countries.

With this in mind, if the president assumes that U.S. companies are on board with his approach, there’s evidence to the contrary. In fact, it was just last month when Ford Motor CEO Jim Farley spoke at a conference and said the Trump administration’s trade policies were generating “a lot of chaos“ for the industry.

As part of the same remarks, the Ford executive also warned that some of the White House’s plans for trade tariffs would be “devastating” to auto manufacturers and “blow a hole in the U.S. industry that we’ve never seen.”

It might seem like ancient history, but it was just last year when Trump told voters“When I win, I will immediately bring prices down starting on day one.” This is not a cherry-picked quote that he accidentally blurted out once and then quickly forgot. On the contrary, the then-candidate repeated the line over and over again as Election Day approached, assuring Americans that he’d help lower prices immediately after returning to the White House.

It’s hard not to wonder how voters who believed his promises feel after hearing Trump say he “couldn’t care less” if some automakers raise prices.

Steve legs

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an BLN political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

‘He’s a loser’: Tim Walz says Elon Musk’s ‘toxic personality’ repels voters

Published

on

‘He’s a loser’: Tim Walz says Elon Musk’s ‘toxic personality’ repels voters
  • On a scale of 1-10, how freaked out is Eric Holder about the Trump admin so far?

    09:25

  • ‘Worst case scenario’ Hayes says Trump is waterboarding the U.S. economy

    03:54

  • Now Playing

  • UP NEXT

    ‘Horrific’: Joe Rogan blasts Trump for sending innocent people to El Salvador prison

    06:41

  • ‘Game on’: NBC News projects Republicans win Florida special elections, but Democrats overperform

    07:17

  • Sen. Mark Kelly shreds Hegseth for attack plans breach: ‘He crossed the line’

    09:34

  • Trump directs JD Vance to go after ‘woke zoos’

    07:45

  • ‘Incredible’: Trump admin reportedly deports man over autism awareness tattoo

    07:28

  • Trump yanks Elise Stefanik’s Cabinet nomination, citing ‘very tight’ GOP majority

    07:57

  • ‘Sound familiar?’: DHS staffer accidentally added reporter to email about ICE raids

    06:21

  • ‘Flatly authoritarian’: New video shows masked agents arresting Tufts student

    03:51

  • ‘Where was the president?’: Hayes on Trump’s alarming absence amid war plans group chat

    06:52

  • ‘Four-alarm fire’: Passwords for Hegseth, Gabbard and Waltz reportedly found online

    06:38

  • ‘It is wrong’: Warren sounds off on the Trump-Musk attack on Social Security

    08:15

  • ‘Sheer, unfettered, Olympian incompetence’: Hayes on the Trump war plans breach

    04:35

  • ‘Unheard of’: Slotkin says Trump war plans breach endangers ‘human beings’

    06:42

  • Judge smacks down Trump DOJ: This court will not be ‘gaslit’

    07:23

  • Trump official doubts seniors would mind if their Social Security checks stopped

    05:17

  • ‘Desperate’: Elon Musk begs employees to ‘hang onto your stock’ as Tesla flounders

    07:38

  • ‘Elon Musk is playing with fire—but he’ll never get burned’: Michael Lewis

    08:33

  • On a scale of 1-10, how freaked out is Eric Holder about the Trump admin so far?

    09:25

  • ‘Worst case scenario’ Hayes says Trump is waterboarding the U.S. economy

    03:54

  • Now Playing

    ‘He’s a loser’: Tim Walz says Elon Musk’s ‘toxic personality’ repels voters

    10:43

  • UP NEXT

    ‘Horrific’: Joe Rogan blasts Trump for sending innocent people to El Salvador prison

    06:41

  • ‘Game on’: NBC News projects Republicans win Florida special elections, but Democrats overperform

    07:17

  • Sen. Mark Kelly shreds Hegseth for attack plans breach: ‘He crossed the line’

    09:34

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Snubbing Trump, bipartisan group of senators votes against Canada tariffs

Published

on

Snubbing Trump, bipartisan group of senators votes against Canada tariffs

In short order, Donald Trump has done extraordinary harm to the relationship between the United States and Canada. There are plenty of lawmakers on Capitol Hill — in both parties — who believe the president is on the wrong track, especially when it comes to trade tariffs on our allies north of the border.

With this in mind, Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia has championed a privileged resolution that would terminate the president’s Feb. 1 emergency declaration, which the White House used to issue tariffs on Canada. It would also, of course, eliminate the need for Canada’s retaliatory tariffs on American products.

The question has long been whether Kaine, whose measure was co-authored with Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Mark Warner of Virginia, could pick up a handful of Republican supporters to clear the upper chamber. That question now has an answer.

The Senate voted 51-48 to pass the resolutionwith four Republicans — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine — joining all 47 Democrats in support.

The outcome is striking, though it’s not altogether surprising. Paul, for example, is a longtime tariff critic and co-sponsor of Kaine’s resolution, while Collins and Murkowski signaled their support for the Democratic measure ahead of the floor vote.

Of particular interest, though, was McConnell, who is retiring next year and has become an occasional thorn in the White House’s sideand who’s likely to face another round of hysterical criticisms from the Oval Office.

As a practical matter, the fact that Kaine’s resolution passed won’t have any immediate policy implications: The measure will now head to the GOP-led House, where it will very likely go ignored.

That said, as a Politico report summarized it, losing this vote represents “the most significant rebuke to Trump that congressional Republicans have yet mustered in his second term.”

It’s precisely why Trump recently began lobbying aggressively against Kaine’s resolution, publishing an item to his social media platform that said a Senate vote in support of the measure would be “devastating for the Republican Party.”

In a follow-up itemthe president wrote that GOP senators should “fight the Democrats wild and flagrant push to not penalize Canada for the sale, into our Country, of large amounts of Fentanyl, by Tariffing the value of this horrible and deadly drug in order to make it more costly to distribute and buy.” The missive suggested that Trump was under the impression that he’s imposing tariffs on fentanyl, which doesn’t make any sense.

He went on to write, “Why are they allowing Fentanyl to pour into our Country unchecked, and without penalty. What is wrong with them, other than suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome, commonly known as TDS? Who can want this to happen to our beautiful families, and why?”

To the extent that reality still has any relevance in the debate, the idea that fentanyl is “pouring into” the United States is rather silly. In fact, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, only 43 pounds of fentanyl were found crossing the northern border in 2024 — as opposed to 21,100 pounds seized at the southern border.

Fighting a trade war with a trusted ally and neighbor over fentanyl that could fit in a single suitcase is absurd. The president might not understand this, but a bipartisan majority of the Senate got it right.

Steve legs

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an BLN political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Trump’s TikTok proposal for China blows a hole in his tariff talk

Published

on

Trump’s TikTok proposal for China blows a hole in his tariff talk

President Donald Trump is desperate to close a deal for a U.S.-based buyer to purchase TikTok. So desperate, in fact, that he has proposed giving China relief on tariffs if its government approves a deal. That proposal has predictably been panned by Democrats and Republicans alike.

After all, Trump said he was placing tariffs on China largely to try to stop fentanyl from reaching the United States. The fact he’s willing to dangle a reduction in exchange for a TikTok deal shows how incoherent his talk about tariffs is and how eager he is to bring TikTok under America’s — and perhaps, by extension, his administration’s — control.

All the while, Big Tech elites and the companies they lead are circling TikTok like sharks, hoping they get their shot to sink their teeth into the app.

Last year, I wrote about how rich right-wingersincluding “Shark Tank” co-panelist Kevin O’Leary, have shown interest in a purchase. And now, Amazon has joined the list of suitors looking to buy the app.

According to NBC News:

Amazon has made a late bid to purchase TikTok, a person familiar with the ongoing White House-led discussions to identify a non-Chinese buyer for the social media app told NBC News. The bid, first reported by The New York Times, arrived this week, via a letter to Vice President JD Vance and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Given the last-minute timing, days before a Saturday deadline to stave off a ban of the app in the U.S., the bid is not being treated as serious, said the source, who was granted anonymity to share details of private negotiations.

TikTok was set to be banned in January as a result of a bipartisan billsigned last spring by President Joe Biden, that required the Chinese-owned app to be sold to an American-based owner or cease operating in the United States. The app’s owners didn’t meet that deadline, of course, and TikTok was briefly banned. But Trump defied the law when he took office, signing an executive order saying that he was instructing the Justice Department to not take action against TikTok for a period of 75 days, which ends Saturday.

For the record, legal experts have sounded the alarm on Trump’s authoritarian power grab in this case, although sadly, many TikTok fans have seemed indifferent to it as long as they can still have access to their favorite mind control device. Trump’s personal involvement in the negotiations has set up a possibility that TikTok, which like other apps has occasionally been plagued by a raft of propaganda and misinformationmight be sold to a MAGA-friendly owner who is sympathetic to conservatives’ rage over content moderation.

Ownership by Amazon, the company owned by Jeff Bezos, certainly wouldn’t dispel concerns — mine, at least — that TikTok could become even more of a boon for Trump’s movement than it already has been.

Amazon donated $1 million toward Trump’s inauguration, Bezos appeared onstage with the gaggle of Big Tech oligarchs at Trump’s inaugural ceremony, Amazon reportedly signed a sweetheart $40 million deal for the rights to distribute a documentary about with first lady Melania Trump, and Bezos’ changes at The Washington Post — which he also owns — have justifiably prompted speculation that he’s transforming it to become more friendly to Trump. Beyond that, the London-based Institute for Strategic Dialogue released a report in 2022 finding that Amazon’s recommendation algorithms were steering some people toward conspiracy theories and extremist content.

To put it mildly, that’s not great for a company looking to purchase what is arguably the most popular social media platform in the world. That said, there are other sharks in the water looking to sink their teeth into TikTok, and Trump is obviously champing at the bit to secure a buyer before Saturday.

Ja’han Jones

Ja’han Jones is an BLN opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog. He is a futurist and multimedia producer focused on culture and politics. His previous projects include “Black Hair Defined” and the “Black Obituary Project.”

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending