Politics
Supreme Court refuses to take up Michael Cohen’s Trump retaliation appeal
The Supreme Court has refused to take up Michael Cohen’s appeal seeking civil damages for alleged government retaliation during Donald Trump’s administration.
The high court’s denial, which comes as Trump has vowed a revenge-filled second term, is unsurprising for reasons having nothing to do with Cohen and the former president. That’s because the court has long restricted the sort of claim that Cohen sought to bring.
In a 1971 case called Bivens, the high court allowed a damages claim against federal officials for alleged Fourth Amendment violations. But the court has taken a stingy view since then, routinely rejecting so-called Bivens claims. In a 2022 decision, Justice Clarence Thomas’ majority opinion cited Bivens while noting: “Over the past 42 years, however, we have declined 11 times to imply a similar cause of action for other alleged constitutional violations.” Thomas wrote that the court will deny claims “in all but the most unusual circumstances.”
Cohen argued that his case met those circumstances, but not enough justices agreed. It takes four justices to grant review. The court denied the petition without comment from any of the justices.
The high court was unmoved, despite Cohen’s claim stemming from what a federal judge found was clear government retaliation. The dispute is related to when Cohen served time for Trump-related crimes and started writing a book that would be unfavorable to the then-president. He was released during the Covid pandemic, but when he didn’t immediately agree to waive his free speech rights, he was sent back to prison. He was released after a federal judge said that the government’s action had been “retaliatory in response to Cohen desiring to exercise his First Amendment rights to publish a book critical of the President and to discuss the book on social media.”
In separate opposition motions, both Trump and the federal government (representing former Attorney General Bill Barr and others) urged the justices to deny review. Cohen was supported by constitutional scholars and former federal officials, who wrote to the justices that:
The stakes could not be higher. The decision below [denying Cohen relief] sends a clear signal to federal actors that critics of the government can be punished without repercussion for exercising their constitutional rights.
Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in Donald Trump’s legal cases.
Jordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,” a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined BLN, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
Members left their interview with the Microsoft founder and philanthropist conflicted about his legacy…
Read More
The Section 702 spy program will lapse for at least a week if members then depart for a scheduled recess…
Read More
Speaker Mike Johnson swore in Rep. James Gallagher (R-Calif.) Wednesday as the 431st member of the House, succeeding the late Rep. Doug LaMalfa, a Republican who died in January. Gallagher brings the partisan balance of the chamber to 219-212, meaning Republicans can afford as many as three defections on party-line votes where all members are participating…
Read More
- Lawmakers once saw Bill Gates as a benevolent innovator. After Epstein, they aren’t sure.
- House will vote Thursday on expected-to-fail surveillance patch
- Introducing Rep. James Gallagher
- Bill Gates tells lawmakers he was ‘never interested’ in being Epstein’s friend
- US to reach $41T debt ceiling as soon as late winter, forecasters predict
- Inside the war to sideline stronger climate science, before it’s used in court
- Hakeem Jeffries says Democrats will prioritize affordability. Not all of his members agree.
- Trump demands $350B Pentagon infusion, elections overhaul in next party-line GOP bill
- Lawmakers once saw Bill Gates as a benevolent innovator. After Epstein, they aren’t sure.
- US to reach $41T debt ceiling as soon as late winter, forecasters predict
-
Politics1 year agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Uncategorized2 years ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
Politics1 year agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
The Josh Fourrier Show2 years agoDOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?
-
Politics1 year agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship9 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words