The Dictatorship
SCOTUS Watch 2025: TikTok, trans rights and Trump’s DOJ
The most important day of the Supreme Court term was Election Day, when Donald Trump won the presidency and Republicans control of the Senate.
The election results will affect the court for years to come in terms of who sits on it, which cases it chooses to decide and how it chooses to decide them. The results could also have more immediate effects on the rest of the court’s term, which started in October and usually issues its final decisions by July.
Here are some things to watch for at the high court in 2025:
TikTok gets a speedy hearing
The justices will kick off the year with a Jan. 10 hearing over the fate of TikTok — specifically over whether there’s a winning First Amendment argument against a federal law that would ban the popular app’s U.S. operations unless its Chinese parent company sells it.
A federal appeals court approved the law, and the justices quickly agreed to consider whether the ban can go forward as a Jan. 19 deadline looms. All eyes will be on Washington for the oral argument nine days prior to that deadline to see what a majority of the justices are thinking ahead of what should be a speedy ruling.
Whatever the court decides, another question is whether the Trump administration will take a more TikTok-friendly approachas the president-elect recently met with the company’s CEO. Trump will be inaugurated Jan. 20, the day after the law could take effect, putting a spotlight on the political dimension on top of the legal.
Trans rights and other cases in flux
Continuing along that political theme, Trump’s election could also affect cases that have already been argued but not yet decided. Perhaps the biggest case of the term thus far is United States v. Skrmetti, over the constitutionality of banning gender-affirming care for minors.
The case has “United States” in its caption because the federal government under President Joe Biden appealed Tennessee’s ban to the justices. The incoming administration could take a different view, raising the question of whether the justices will still decide the matter, argued in early December.
We’ll be watching to see how the political turnover affects not only trans rights but appeals over ghost gunsthe environment and more.
Retirements coming?
Yet another consequence of the election is on the court’s membership. Trump already nominated half of the court’s six-justice GOP-appointed supermajority in his first term. By the time his second term ends, he could appoint more than half the entire nine-justice court.
Trump’s election puts the focus on Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alitothe court’s two oldest GOP appointees. They might not want to quit just yet, but all justices these days know that the way to protect their legacies is to time their retirements so that a president of the same party who appointed them can nominate their successor.
Subscribe to theDeadline: Legal Newsletterfor expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in Donald Trump’s legal cases.
Jordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,” a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined BLN, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.
The Dictatorship
A revolution in warfare is happening right now — and not in Iran
This is the May 5, 2026, edition of “The Tea, Spilled by Morning Joe” newsletter.Subscribe hereto get it delivered straight to your inbox Monday through Friday.
JOE’S NOTE
A revolution in warfare is happening right now — and not in Iran.
The historic shift is occurring instead on the front lines of Ukraine’s war to push back its Russian invaders.
Fifteen months ago, President Donald Trump did his best to humiliate Volodymyr Zelenskyy inside the Oval Office, pressing the freedom fighter to make a bad deal with Trump‘s ally, Vladimir Putin.
“You have no cards left to play,” Trump bellowed to Ukraine’s president.
The American president promptly slashed U.S. military aid to the Ukrainians. His vice president — who yelled at Zelenskyy in the same White House meeting — later said his proudest achievement was abandoning the Ukrainians to Putin’s evil designs. And both Trump and JD Vance worked feverishly to pressure the Ukrainians to surrender land at the negotiating table the Russians could never win on the battlefield.
A year later, Ukraine is holding all the cards, striking down waves of Russian invaders with drone technology that is rewriting the rules of modern warfare.
Retired Gen. David Petraeus said recently, “The future of warfare is happening right now in Ukraine.”
As Russia’s economy teeters on the brink of collapse, it is now the former KGB agent who has holed himself up in secure bunkers — afraid of being assassinated by Russian oligarchs or Ukrainian drones.
Meanwhile, Zelenskyy strolls freely through the streets of European capitals once aligned with Russia — not as a refugee, but as a conquering hero.
European and Canadian leaders now line up to provide his warriors with more than $100 billion in military help in their war of liberation to permanently push Putin’s Russian invaders out of his sovereign land.
And in perhaps the most surreal twist of this still-unfolding historical drama, it was Zelenskyy on social media yesterday who assured the frightened Russian defense minister that Kyiv would not attack Moscow during its annual World War II victory parades held today and tomorrow in the Russian capital.
Zelenskyy does, in fact, have many cards left to play against Putin.
And recently, through true grit and technological superiority, Ukrainians have drawn an inside straight while Trump is left dealing with a strait of another kind — one keeping U.S. troops in Iran far longer than the commander in chief anticipated.
Putin and Trump thought they would easily prevail in quick wars against overmatched opponents. What they didn’t count on was a technological revolution in asymmetric warfare that has radically shifted power dynamics on the global stage — and left Putin’s dream of military success on the ash heap of history.
QUOTE OF THE DAY
“It is time for Russian leaders to take real steps to end their war, especially since Russia’s Defense Ministry believes it cannot hold a parade in Moscow without Ukraine’s goodwill.”
— Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyyafter the Kremlin scaled back its Victory Day celebrations amid intensifying Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russia
CHART OF THE DAY

ON THIS DATE
In 1973, Secretariat won the Kentucky Derby, the first of his Triple Crown victories, in a time of 1:59.4 — a record that still stands.

A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE TECH RIGHT
Silicon Valley’s libertarian billionaires helped put Donald Trump back in the White House. Now, according to a sweeping new piece in The Atlantic, George Packer argues they’re running it — and selling out the president’s populist base to do it. He joined “Morning Joe” today to discuss “The Venture-Capital Populist” and whether the MAGA coalition can survive its own oligarchs.
JS: Talk about David Sacks, Elon Musk, and Peter Thiel — what do they actually believe?
GP: These men have been hardcore libertarians all their lives. Thiel famously said freedom and democracy are incompatible. But now they’ve come around to the view that government can actually be useful — as long as it serves them. As Trump’s AI and crypto adviser, Sacks worked to align government policy with the wishes of those industries, not the public interest.
JS: And what are they ultimately after?
GP: They are wielding this power to fit their financial interests and their sense that the world should be ruled by a small number of very smart, wealthy men — an oligarchy.
JS: Sacks has aligned himself with Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán and against liberal democracy. What’s driving that?
GP: Sacks is pretty ignorant about the history and politics of that region. But his view mimics his approach to business: There’s no moral calculation. Ukraine is a risky bet, so naturally you end up sympathizing with Putin — because morality has been replaced by a cold calculation of where your interests lie.
Claire McCaskill: A lot of powerful, wealthy people bent the knee to Donald Trump out of fear. These guys did it out of opportunity. Talk about how this romance is hurting the president with his base.
GP: Here’s an example: Just yesterday, the White House — after dismissing AI safety concerns as Biden-era wokeness — announced that AI models would have to report their safety tests to the government. Why? Because their working-class populist base is afraid of AI. The numbers make that clear: They don’t see it the way David Sacks and Peter Thiel do.
JS: These guys reject the idea of Western civilization as Winston Churchill and World War II leaders thought of it — and blame everybody in the fight for Western democracy except Vladimir Putin. Why?
GP: They use the phrase “Western civilization” as a kind of flag that they’re waving when they criticize European democracies. But what do they mean by it? That’s the real puzzle.
Because if Donald Trump — who tried to overthrow an elected government — is the embodiment of Western civilization, it doesn’t mean to them what it means to you and me.
This conversation has been condensed and edited for brevity and clarity.
0.1%
— The share of accounts on Polymarket making more than two-thirds of the platform’s profits.
ONE MORE SHOT

Madonna poses at the Metropolitan Museum of Art for the 2026 Met Gala, celebrating “Costume Art” on Monday.
CATCH UP ON MORNING JOE




The Dictatorship
2 months later, Trump’s boast about ‘stabilizing’ oil prices looks ridiculous
Exactly two months ago, on the sixth day of the war in Iran, Donald Trump hosted a White House event intended to honor a championship soccer team, though the president took some time to comment on an issue on the minds of many.
“Yesterday, my administration announced decisive action to help keep down the oil prices,” the Republican declared. Moments later, he went on to say oil prices “have pretty much stabilized.”
It was never altogether clear what “decisive” actions the president was referring to, but two months later, it’s painfully clear that those mysterious moves failed to “pretty much stabilize” prices. MS NOW reported:
The average price for a gallon of gas in the U.S. reached $4.46 [on Monday] as the standstill in the Strait of Hormuz continues to strain global energy markets. The average price for one gallon of diesel fuel topped $5.64, according to national averages tracked by AAA.
A day later, that national average inched higher, reaching $4.48 per gallon, while the average for diesel climbed to $5.66.

Chart: Carson Elm-Picard / MS NOW; Source: AAA
An analysis published by Bloomberg News described the recent trend as the sharpest spike in pump prices in at least three decadesand while the president has continued to insist that prices will plummet after the war, the fact remains that (a) it’s far from clear when the conflict will be over; and (b) dozens of energy sites throughout the Middle East have been struck as part of the war; wells have to be reopened; and some infrastructure will have to be rebuilt, all of which will take time.
As for the politics, the White House and its allies appear to have no idea what to tell the public about this. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise appeared on CNBC last week, for example, and tried to argue that gas prices are lower now than they were in 2024.
“People will remember that two years ago, we were paying almost $6 a gallon for gas,” the Louisiana Republican said. “Right now, it’s $3.”
He was spectacularly wrong on both points.
Around the same time, Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina appeared on Fox Business and told viewers“Gas prices continue to come down,” even as gas prices continued to go up.
As for Trump, in March, he tried to pitch the public on the idea that higher prices were a good thing — a line that proves so foolish that even he didn’t repeat it — which gave way to the president saying in April that gas prices were “not very high.”
His latest line, offered on Tuesday morning, argued that higher prices at the pump are “a very small price to pay,” which is easy for him to say given he doesn’t have to worry about paying those prices.
As for the “decisive” actions he claims to have taken two months ago, that he said “pretty much stabilized” prices, Trump still hasn’t explained what in the world he was talking about, or why those undefined moves failed so badly.
Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”
The Dictatorship
Tuesday’s Campaign Round-Up, 5.5.26: Voters head to the polls in Indiana, Ohio and Michigan
Today’s installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.
* While there are some closely watched contests in Ohio and Michigan, Tuesday’s marquee elections are in Indianawhere several GOP state senators are facing White House-backed primary rivals after they defied Donald Trump’s demands on gerrymandering.
* Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices did another favor for GOP officials and candidate on Monday. As The New York Times reportedthe conservative majority agreed to “immediately transmit to the lower courts its opinion striking down Louisiana’s congressional map, rather than wait 32 days, as would have been routine.”
* As expected, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law the gerrymandered congressional map approved by his fellow Republicans. Voting rights advocates filed suit against the legally dubious gambit immediately.
* With just three weeks remaining before Texas’ closely watched Republican Senate primary, the latest University of Houston pollfound state Attorney General Ken Paxton with a narrow advantage over incumbent Sen. John Cornyn, 48% to 45%.
* Speaking of closely watched Republican Senate primaries, the latest poll from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution in Georgia found Rep. Mike Collins leading the GOP field with roughly 22% support, though more than half of the state’s primary voters remain undecided. Primary Day in the state is two weeks away.
* In Louisiana’s Republican Senate primary, Trump has continued to go after his party’s incumbent. “Hopefully all of the Great Republican People of Louisiana, which I won, BIG, three times, will be voting Bill Cassidy OUT OF OFFICE in the upcoming Republican Primary!” the president wrote on his social media platform late last week.
* And in California’s gubernatorial race, Republican Steve Hilton, widely seen as his party’s top contender, appeared on MS NOW and was asked whether he accepts the fact that Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election. He refused to answerdespite multiple attempts to solicit a straight answer.
Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”
-
Politics1 year agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics1 year agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Uncategorized1 year ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
Politics1 year agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship8 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words
-
The Josh Fourrier Show1 year agoDOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?




