Congress

Republicans hope Trump retreats on Pulte to save spy law

Published

4 months ago

June 9, 2026

The Trump administration and congressional Democrats are locked in a high-stakes stalemate that’s dramatically increasing the likelihood that a major government surveillance program will expire.

Democrats have coalesced behind an ultimatum: They won’t support a reauthorization of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act as long as Bill Pulte, an ally of President Donald Trump with no national security experience, remains acting director of national intelligence. The White House is standing by Pulte, at least publicly, while accusing Democrats of holding the spy power “hostage” and putting the country’s “national security at risk.”

Congressional Republicans are largely leaving it to the administration to figure out a path forward after Trump’s decision to tap Pulte as Tulsi Gabbard’s temporary successor derailed an earlier agreement to extend the key spy authority for three years.

But they are also nudging the administration to pick a different nominee to fill the role in a permanent capacity. Pulte is among the subjects Speaker Mike Johnson is expected to discuss with Trump at the White House Tuesday, according to two people granted anonymity to disclose plans for the private meeting.

Unless Trump moves quickly — or one side blinks — lawmakers, aides and the administration are preparing to barrel past the June 12 deadline without an extension.

“I’d like to be involved in the middle of it, but I think it’s strictly — the way things are going — between the Democrats and the White House. It’s all got everything to do with Pulte,” Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said in an interview Monday.

Asked if Pulte should be dropped, Grassley told reporters that he is “temporary” and “the sooner the president gets somebody nominated, the sooner we’re going to be able to get 702 through.”

Senate Majority Leader John Thune added Monday that the administration “at some point is going to have to come up with a nominee … that will be viewed by at least enough Democrats as sufficient to get their support” for reauthorizing the surveillance law.

The law allows spy agencies to target foreigners overseas, but critics of both parties believe it currently lacks sufficient guardrails to prevent U.S. citizens from being spied on, too. That has made reauthorization a complicated endeavor even before Pulte became a factor.

“I’m familiar with some of the conversations that are happening around that,” Thune said when asked about whether Pulte should go. “I think I’ll let the White House speak to whatever the next plan might be there, but we can’t pass this on the floor without Democrats.”

Trump is interviewing potential nominees to permanently fill the director of national intelligence role, according to a Republican lawmaker and a GOP congressional aide, both of whom were granted anonymity to disclose private conversations. But there’s no guarantee that the president will move quickly, and Republicans said Monday they didn’t know if he would make a decision before Friday’s reauthorization deadline.

Because of a quirk in the statute underlying Section 702, the Trump administration would still be able to operate the program for several more months if it lapses. At least some tech providers could mount legal challenges to the program if it expires, however, which national security officials fear could temporarily limit visibility into surveillance targets under the law.

Behind the scenes, national security lawyers in the Trump administration are already working on contingency plans to backfill any gap in foreign intelligence collection, said one GOP congressional aide granted anonymity to speak candidly.

The administration is also having conversations with congressional Democrats and their staff, according to two other people granted anonymity to disclose private conversations. As part of those discussions, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA Director John Ratcliffe have spoken directly to Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, according to one of the people.

Asked about talks with the administration, Warner declined to go into details but said that “we all know the time on the clock” and that “we want a path to get this done.” A spokesperson for Warner declined to comment Monday.

Spokespeople for the CIA did not immediately respond to a request for comment about ongoing conversations with Warner. And the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on conversations with Democrats or Warner specifically.

But White House spokesperson Davis Ingle defended Pulte in a statement Monday issued in response to questions about Pulte’s future and the prospects for a permanent nominee.

“Bill Pulte is a great selection and he will do a great job on behalf of the American people,” Ingle said. “Holding FISA hostage puts America’s national security at risk and it is shameful that some Democrats are threatening to put partisan politics ahead of the safety of the American people.”

Senate Democrats blocked a procedural vote Friday that would have paved the way for a three-year extension of the expiring spy power with some new transparency language and other policy changes. Seven Senate Republicans also voted against advancing the agreement, which was hashed out between Grassley and Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) in coordination with Warner.

The administration will need roughly 15 Democrats, by Warner’s estimate, to get a yearslong reauthorization of Section 702 through the Senate. Congress has already punted the surveillance deadline twice since mid-April, but aides are skeptical that a bipartisan coalition of privacy hawks, who want more sweeping guardrails on the program, will agree this time to another short-term extension.

“I don’t know if there’s going to be an appetite for doing another extension or for what length,” Thune said Monday.

Johnson vowed Monday that Congress would not let the surveillance program expire. But he, too, is likely to need Democratic support given the narrow House GOP majority and the opposition in the Republican ranks.

As in the Senate, top House Democrats are warning not to count on their votes if the administration doesn’t reverse course on Pulte.

“The negotiations prior to Trump’s announcement with respect to Bill Pulte were already in a very sensitive place, and then Donald Trump, as he often does, tosses a hand grenade,” Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters Monday.

Asked if he would let the spy authority expire, Jeffries added that there are “ongoing conversations” led by Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee. He added, though, that Pulte — whom he called a “political hack” and a “malignant clown” — should first be removed from the acting position.

Himes, who has defended the Section 702 program, said he had one conversation with the White House after Trump placed Pulte in the acting role. He warned that Republicans should not expect under the circumstances to win the 42 House Democratic votes that a prior short-term extension won earlier this year.

“It’s a total mess,” Himes said. “Very sadly, I think we’re going to test this untested question about whether the program can run on a judicial certification alone.”

Meredith Lee Hill, Mia McCarthy and Riley Rogerson contributed to this report.

Congress

Scalise heads to Florida to boost several GOP candidates

Published

2 hours ago

October 21, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise is heading to Florida to boost a raft of Republicans as the House GOP campaign arm launches new spending across the ruby-red state.

Republicans are working to ensure they prevail in a series of tight Florida races after they redrew several districts in their favor. Several GOP incumbents have warned the party needs to do more to help put out fires across these areas. Scalise is just the latest Republican leader who is looking to shore up candidates in once-thought-to-be-safe red territory.

Scalise will hold a GOTV rally Thursday with Republican Dan Green who is challenging Democratic Rep. Darren Soto in central Florida’s 9th District, according to an invite obtained by Blue Light News. Soto should be toast from the GOP redistricting effort, but he’s still hauling in significant fundraising and Democrats say their internal polling shows a tight race.

Over on the Gulf Coast, the National Republican Congressional Committee is also launching its first coordinated ad spending for Rep. Anna Paulina Luna on Wednesday. House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, GOP governor nominee Rep. Byron Donalds and Sen. Ashley Moody, who is also up for reelection, are appearing at a Saturday rally with Luna.

President Donald Trump won Luna’s district by 13 points and Democrats have tried and failed to target her before. But Republicans are warning the headwinds are stronger this year and forcing a tighter than expected race.

Republicans are also working to shore up key seats in South Florida. Scalise will be with GOP Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar in the Miami area Friday, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter, granted anonymity to share not yet public details. Salazar has raised alarm about Republican erosion with Hispanic voters in his district and other states over the Trump administration’s mass deportations.

Scalise will boost Ryan Elijah, the Republican who beat scandal-ridden Rep. Cory Mills in the primary in Florida’s 7th District, according to another person with direct knowledge of the matter, granted anonymity to speak candidly. The party feels better about the seat in recent weeks, especially more than they would have if Mills had won the GOP nomination.

The House Majority Leader will also hold events with Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Brian Mast and Rep. Gus Bilirakis, according to the person.

Congress

Capitol agenda: The unknowns of a Sherrod Brown return

Published

8 hours ago

October 21, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Democrats may be rooting for Sherrod Brown’s comeback, but they are not exactly prepared for what’d happen next.

If Brown wins on Election Day, Democrats likely face an uncomfortable choice: break longstanding party rules to restore his seniority on powerful committees like Banking, Agriculture and Finance or potentially make him start over at the bottom.

Complicating the issue: Brown will immediately need to prepare for a grueling re-election fight in 2028 and his campaign could greatly benefit from two years with a high-profile gavel. That’s because this midterm is Ohio’s special election where voters are selecting a senator to serve out the remainder of Vice President JD Vance‘s term.

Brown’s post, therefore, may not only deeply impact Democrats’ policy agenda but could also play a key role in the party’s success in winning the battleground seat in 2028.

Some members are already suggesting the party should try to find a middle ground.

“Some accommodation that recognizes he would not be a rank freshman would make sense. But that’s distinct from handing him back a leadership role at Banking,” said Sen. Chris Coons.

The Ohio Democrat served as the top Democrat on the Banking panel for a decade. He was also a longtime member of Finance as well as Agriculture, where he would also be the most senior member if his previous service counted.

To give Brown a gavel on Agriculture or Banking could set up clashes with the Democrats now expected to lead their party on the panels: Sens. Michael Bennet and Elizabeth Warren, respectively.

It would also break Senate Democrats’ caucus rules, and precedent is not on Brown’s side when it comes to making exceptions.

Still, aides and lobbyists around the panels expect Democrats will be eager to give Brown some sort of perch.

Those close to him have been encouraging him to seek the Agriculture gavel. It’d allow him to deliver valuable policy wins for Ohio’s rural areas, influence the farm bill if it gets punted to next year and help guide the direction of cryptocurrency regulation.

Another possibility that avoids an intraparty clash: hand Brown a seat on Appropriations, which could potentially give him a subcommittee gavel and federal funding clout.

Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has avoided any firm commitments on Brown’s seniority, saying last month when asked: “Let’s win back the Senate first.”

What else we’re watching:

— OMAR RAID RAISES QUESTIONS FOR GOP: House Republicans — including Majority Whip Tom Emmer — have publicly cheered on the Trump administration’s investigation of GOP boogeyman Rep. Ilhan Omar. But the raid raises thorny questions for GOP leaders about how aggressively Congress wants to defend itself — regardless of party — from encroaching federal prosecutors. Lawmakers’ work communications are protected from prosecutors’ scrutiny, with few exceptions, under the Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause. That draws into question whether the emails, texts, and materials on Omar’s phone, which was seized in the raid, could legally be reviewed by Trump officials. So far, Speaker Mike Johnson has yet to weigh in on how the House’s legal team may defend Omar.

— TRUMP’S TRICKY FARM MONEY PROMISE: Trump’s move Monday to turn out GOP voters by promising to send farmers $8 billion in taxpayer money is already facing a reality check. The internal USDA taxpayer-funded account Trump is tapping doesn’t actually have enough money in it right now to make the payments, meaning Congress will have to approve new funds or the administration will have to take it from another program, according to three Trump officials granted anonymity to discuss private conversations. Plus, farmers wouldn’t receive the payments until late November or early December at the earliest — well past Election Day, according to three people close to the plans.

Jasper Goodman, Grace Yarrow, Kyle Cheney and Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

Congress

This member is so frustrated with Congress he wants voters to sidestep it

Published

8 hours ago

October 21, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

At the end of one of the least productive Congresses in modern history, freshman Rep. Johnny Olszewski is so sick of the gridlock on Capitol Hill that he wants voters to bypass it entirely.

“It’s been a long two years,” the Maryland Democrat said in a Tuesday interview.

“One of the things that’s made it difficult as a new member is to see not only the dysfunction, but also the missed opportunities,” he added. “There are so many issues out there that Americans support that this Congress and frankly prior Congresses have failed to act on.”

Fed up with the lack of progress on popular policies like banning congressional stock trading, equipping police with body cameras or protecting in vitro fertilization, Olszewski is introducing a constitutional amendment Thursday, first shared with POLITICO, that would create a mechanism for voters to make federal law directly.

The measure would give voters 18 months to gather signatures from at least 5% of people who participated in the most recent presidential election in 25 states. Then any qualifying direct-democracy measure would be put on ballots for the next national election and need a 60% national majority to pass.

Votes to declare war or direct federal spending would not be eligible under the proposal.

“If we were acting, there’d be no need for this to come into play,” Olszewski said. “It would create a really important backstop for the American people to say, ‘You know what … irrespective of which party is in power, Congress is failing to meet not just our everyday needs but act on issues that we overwhelmingly support and want to see acted upon.’”

The amendment — which itself would require support from two-thirds of the House and Senate as well as three-quarters of states — is an incredible longshot and would create serious implementation headaches, but Olszewski — a former civics teacher — hopes his proposal will spark a discussion about congressional reform.

“I understand that any constitutional amendment is going to be difficult,” Olszewski said. “But I’m hopeful that at least for the lame duck session, this is an opportunity to create a conversation around the fact that we have been so gridlocked that we have failed to address the needs of the American people.”