The Dictatorship
President Trump wants to impose 15% tariff, up from 10% he announced after Supreme Court decision
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Saturday that he wants a global tariff of 15%, up from 10% he had announced a day earlier after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down many of the far-reaching taxes on imports that he had imposed over the last year.
Trump’s announcement on social media was the latest sign that despite the court’s check on his powers, the Republican president still intends to ratchet up tariffs in an unpredictable way. Tariffs have been his favorite tool for rewriting the rules of global commerce and applying international pressure.
The court’s decision on Friday struck down tariffs that Trump had imposed on nearly every country using an emergency powers law. Trump now said he will use a different, albeit more limited, legal authority.
He’s already signed an executive order enabling him to bypass Congress and impose a 10% tax on imports from around the world, starting on Tuesday, the same day as his State of the Union speech. However, those tariffs are limited to 150 days unless they are extended legislatively.
The White House did not immediately respond to a message inquiring when the president would sign an updated order to peg the tariffs at 15%.
He wrote on social media that he was making the announcement “based on a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on Tariffs issued yesterday.”
By a 6-3 vote, the justices ruled that it was unconstitutional for Trump to unilaterally set and change tariffs because the power to tax lies with Congress.
In addition to the temporary tariffs that Trump wants to set at 15%, the president said Friday that he was also pursuing tariffs through other sections of federal law which require an investigation by the Commerce Department.
He wrote on Saturday that “during the next short number of months, the Trump Administration will determine and issue the new and legally permissible Tariffs, which will continue our extraordinarily successful process of Making America Great Again.”
After the Supreme Court decision, Trump made an unusually personal attack on the justices who ruled against him in a 6-3 vote, including two of those he appointed during his first term, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. Trump, at a news conference on Friday, said that the situation is “an embarrassment to their families.”
He was still seething Friday night, posting on social media complaining about Gorsuch, Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, who ruled with the majority and wrote the majority opinion. On Saturday morning, Trump issued another post declaring that his “new hero” was Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who wrote a 63-page dissent. He also praised Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, who were in the minority, and said of the three dissenting justices: “There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that they want to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
Tariffs have been central to Trump’s economic policies, which he has said address a host of illsfrom reviving trade imbalances and reviving U.S. manufacturing to forcing other nations to action, whether it be stepping up efforts to combat drug trafficking or ceasing hostilities with each other.
He also regularly claimed despite evidence to the contrary that foreign governments would pay the tariffs—not American consumers and businesses.
Federal data shows the Treasury had collected more than $133 billion from the import taxes the president has imposed under the emergency powers law as of December, and Trump has made many promises about what that money might go toward, such as paying down the national debt and sending dividend checks to taxpayers. The Supreme Court decision did not address what happens to the funds that have already been collected from tariffs.
Democrats spoke out quickly on Trump’s new tariff threat. Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee accused Trump of “pickpocketing the American people” with his newly announced higher tariff.
“A little over 24 hours after his tariffs were ruled illegal, he’s doing anything he can to make sure he can still jack up your costs,” they wrote on social media.
California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Trump nemesis, added that “he does not care about you.”
______
AP reporter Ali Swenson contributed to this story.
_
The Dictatorship
Canadian Prime Minister Carney secures a majority government with special election wins
TORONTO (AP) — Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney secured a majority government with special election wins Monday night, allowing his Liberals to pass legislation without the support of opposition parties.
Voters cast ballots for three vacant seats of the 343 districts represented in Parliament. Liberal candidate Danielle Martin won the election for the Toronto district of University Rosedale and Liberal Doly Begum won the Toronto district of Scarborough Southwest. The result for a Quebec district was expected later.
The Liberal party could stay in power until 2029 after Monday’s results.
Carney won Canada’s electionlast year fueled by public anger over U.S. President Donald Trump’s annexation threats, and he has vowed to reduce Canada’s reliance on the U.S.
Since then, five defectionsfrom opposition parties, including four from the main opposition Conservative party, put Carney’s Liberals on the cusp of the majority with 171 members of Parliament in the House of Commons.
One of those defectors referenced Carney’s speech at the World Economic Forumin Davos, Switzerland, as helping his decision. In the speech, Carney condemned economic coercion by great powers against smaller countries and received widespread praise for his remarks.
Carney, former head of the Bank of England as well as Canada’s central bank, has moved the Liberals to the center-right since replacing Justin Trudeauas prime minister in 2025.
“Congratulations to Danielle Martin, new Member of Parliament for University-Rosedale,” Carney posted on social media. “Danielle has spent her career building better public health care for Torontonians and all Canadians. Now she’s bringing her experience and determination to the House of Commons, and our country will be stronger for it.”
Daniel Béland, a political science professor at McGill University in Montreal, said the Liberals also had a shot at winning in the seat in Quebec.
Béland said the deterioration of Canada-U.S. relations under the second Trump presidency has convinced many Canadians, including people who do not identify as Liberal, to rally behind the prime minister.
“Carney has thus far proved that he is an astute politician, despite the fact that he only formally entered the political arena in January of last year,” Béland said.
“The Davos speech has certainly helped boost Carney’s support at home, and he is now significantly more popular than when he became prime minister nearly 13 months ago.”
Carney’s majority and the recent defections are another blow to Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who lost the previous national election last year and even his own seat in Parliament. He has since rejoined Parliament.
Poilievre won a party leadership reviewearlier this year, but continues to have problems controlling his lawmakers.
The Dictatorship
Earth Day: Why sustainability and transparency matter more than ever
ByKnow Your Value staff
Knowing your value starts with taking ownership of your health.
That’s why Know Your Value and its founder Mika Brzezinski is partnering with the Environmental Working Group for an Earth Day event on April 22nd in Los Angeles.
We’re bringing together leading voices in environmental and women’s health for a conversation about knowing – and owning – our value…as women, movement creators and champions of environmental health.
Brzezinski recently spoke to Mark Abrials, chief marketing and sustainability officer – and co-founder at “Avocado green mattress” – one of our event sponsors – about the role companies play in advancing environmental and social responsibility.
“For Avocado … Earth Day is every day. I mean, Earth Day is built into our DNA ,” said Abrials. “I think it’s a time for consumers to just maybe reflect upon the products that they do bring into their house and maybe use it as an opportunity to dig deeper into how they’re made, how materials are sourced, because that has a direct impact on your own personal health, but also the health of the planet.”
You can watch the entire interview below:
![]()
Know Your Value staff
The Dictatorship
Viktor Orbán’s loss in Hungary shows how a strongman can be defeated
Strongman rule often appears unbeatable at the ballot box, but the defeat of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán on Sunday shows even entrenched systems can be challenged with the right strategy.
Peter Hungariandisrupted Orbán’s 16-year tenure with the support of a broad, unlikely coalition united by three core messages: Orbán must go, corruption must end and Hungary must align with the West rather than Russia. He also emphasized national sovereignty and strict border control, defying easy ideological categorization.
Péter Magyar disrupted Orbán’s 16-year tenure with the support of a broad, unlikely coalition united by three core messages: Orbán must go, corruption must end and Hungary must align with the West rather than Russia.
Magyar, the ex-husband of Orbán’s former justice minister, drew on personal knowledge of the government’s inner workings and crafted a bold, patriotic campaign. His social media strategy centered on a relatable persona. This winning combination goes a long way toward reshaping what effective opposition can look like.
For years, the “Orbán playbook” served as a manual for capturing power through elections — and then systematically dismantling checks and balances, hollowing out independent institutions, and consolidating control over the media and business sphere. Now, Hungary’s politics may be offering a different kind of playbook: one for how to bring down a strongman. Three points are particularly notable.

Change can come from within
It is tempting to view everyone inside an illiberal system as complicit. But such systems are often most vulnerable to those who understand them intimately. After 16 years of failed opposition efforts, Magyar became an effective challenger thanks in part to his insider knowledge — rather than outsider credentials.
Consider: His rise began just two years ago with a Facebook post and a viral interview exposing corruption in the Orbán regime. A meteoric ascent followed. Magyar drew on his insider understanding of how Orbán’s government exerts control over business, education, the judiciary and the media. He named methods and perpetrators with a precision, and a sense of humor, that few outsiders could match, while sharply criticizing the opposition for its weakness and lack of political imagination. This positioning — outside the regime yet deeply familiar with it, and distinct from an ineffective opposition — created a powerful advantage, one that appealed to an electorate in search of change.
Patriotism must be contested, not conceded
This point resonated with Hungarians and could be equally resonant among many Americans. Orbán consolidated power not only through his control of institutions but also by monopolizing national identity. His long-standing strategy has been to frame patriotism as the exclusive domain of his political camp — and the left, to its detriment, largely ceded the point.
Along came Magyar, whose surname literally means “Hungarian,” with several methods for reversing this dynamic. From the prominent use of the national flag at campaign events to his cross-country tour in a flatbed truck decorated in the tricolor, his campaign reclaimed patriotism, visually and rhetorically, as a shared national identity rather than a partisan weapon. He gave speeches urging citizens to “take back” their country “step by step, brick by brick,” making clear with both symbols and words that patriotism is not the property of any single party.
Crucially, Magyar has avoided issues that could fracture his diverse coalition. He has largely steered clear of culture-war flashpoints, including the 2025 Pride parade in Budapest, which was banned by Orbán but more widely attended than ever. By staying laser-focused on regime change, anti-corruption and Western orientation, especially toward the European Union and NATO, he has maintained a fragile but expansive alliance across urban and rural divides and across ideological lines.
Many Hungarian voters may not support Magyar enthusiastically — but enough were eager for change that they were willing to support his campaign.
Charm matters
In a media environment where many of us pay more attention to personality than to institutions, values and factsMagyar’s energetic and athletic persona and willingness to show vulnerability at times contrasted with Orbán’s carefully curated and inherently insulated image. Social media does not simply compare ideas; it stages a continuous visual contest of bodies, lifestyles and vitality. Even Orbán’s formidable propaganda apparatus has struggled against a challenger who appeared unscripted and dynamic, which resonated as authentic.
Magyar’s ability to withstand constant propaganda attacks with a small but agile communications team, combining start-up-style social media tactics with large-scale, well-produced public events, further reinforced perceptions of him as a resilient political challenger.
Orbán’s long-standing strategy has been to frame patriotism as the exclusive domain of his political camp — and the left, to its detriment, largely ceded the point.
Even moments that would be vulnerabilities in traditional politics, such as outbursts of anger or bouts of passionate partying, ultimately contributed to his appeal as a flawed but driven figure — a Hungarian determined to bring change to his beloved country. Magyar emerged as a folk hero, set against an entrenched incumbent who appeared overweight, both politically and physically. The contest became, in part, one of masculinity; and here, too, the 45-year-old, more athletic Magyar claimed the advantage — even though 62-year-old Orbán has long cultivated an image as a sports enthusiast, especially in soccer.
As opposition movements across democracies struggle against entrenched populist leaders, Hungary’s election outcome offers cautions and insights. Success may depend less on ideological purity than on strategic adaptability. An electorate’s openness to unconventional figures, especially those who make an effective argument to reclaim patriotism, can allow for the construction of cross-ideological coalitions. Leaders must also project authenticity, particularly on social media. A broad, inclusive coalition united around change may be enough to upend even entrenched incumbents, leaving the harder questions of how to govern for the days that follow.
Julia Sonnevend is a sociology professor and co-director of the Center for the American Experience at The New School in New York City. She is the author of “Charm: How Magnetic Personalities Shape Global Politics.” She grew up in Budapest, Hungary.
-
Politics1 year agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics1 year agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Politics1 year agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship7 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words
-
Uncategorized1 year ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
The Josh Fourrier Show1 year agoDOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?







