Congress

Paxton reports $18M quarterly fundraising haul

Published

2 hours ago

October 5, 2026

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton raised $18 million in the third quarter of 2026 across his campaign and his joint fundraising committees, his campaign tells Blue Light News, a significant haul for the homestretch of the election.

Paxton’s number is double his $9 million second-quarter total, and signals Republican donors are rallying behind their Texas nominee. The campaign did not provide a current cash-on-hand total.

Democrat James Talarico’s campaign has yet to release his fundraising totals for the quarter. He raised $30 million last quarter.

“We now have the resources to make sure every Texan sees Talarico’s radical record between now and Election Day,” said Nick Maddux, senior adviser to the Paxton campaign.

The past quarter — the first full reporting period after Paxton’s primary runoff victory in May — saw Republicans flock to Texas for their midterm convention, which featured pro-Paxton fundraisers on the sidelines. Last week, the Paxton campaign announced a massive $20 million ad buy across the state, one of the largest-ever single media investments in a Texas Senate race.

Paxton needs the money: In a recording of a private donor event last month shared with POLITICO, he said he has “never been in a race where I felt less control over the campaign,” pointing to influence “from D.C.”

Texas has emerged as a huge money suck for Senate Republicans, who have poured tens of millions into the state to aid Paxton. Senate Leadership Fund, their top super PAC, has spent or reserved well over $100 million in the state to date, and the Trump-aligned MAGA Inc. and its affiliates plan to spend near $45 million in the state through Oct. 12.

Paxton has acknowledged that money has changed the race’s narrative: In a recording of a private donor event last monthshared with POLITICO, he said he has “never been in a race where I felt less control over the campaign,” pointing to influence “from D.C.”

Most recent public polling shows Talarico with a small lead in the race in spite of the recent onslaught in GOP spending, though Paxton’s campaign released an internal poll last week showing Paxton leading by three points.

Congress

Where Warnock is visiting in the final midterms sprint

Published

9 hours ago

October 5, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Sen. Raphael Warnock is hitting the road for the last month before Election Day.

The Georgia Democrat’s final midterm campaign surrogate sprint will only increase chatter around the possibility that he might run for president in 2028, according to a nine-stop itinerary shared first with Blue Light News.

First, he’ll touch down in New Hampshire on Tuesday before hitting Nevada on Wednesday. Next, he’ll travel to South Carolina (Oct. 13), Mississippi (Oct. 14), North Carolina (Oct. 15), South Carolina (Oct. 16-17), Michigan (Oct. 20-21), Wisconsin (Oct. 23) and Ohio (Oct. 24-26).

“Senator Reverend Warnock will be hitting the trail to energize voters who are sick of the President enriching himself while ordinary people continue to pay more for everything,” a spokesperson told Playbook. “Tapping into the righteous anger that voters are feeling across the country, the pastor in the Senate will again make the campaign trail his pulpit: calling out Trump’s corruption, while leaving voters hopeful for the next generation of Democratic leadership.”

Asked recently at the Texas Tribune Festival about whether he would run for president, Warnock said: “We’ll see what happens.”

Congress

Capitol agenda: Dems split on probing Trump corporate allies

Published

11 hours ago

October 5, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Democrats are eager to win back subpoena power if they retake Congress, but they’re split on how hard they’ll go after corporate America.

The party is united by the idea of aggressive oversight of President Donald Trump’s administration, which will help shape their messaging in the run-up to the 2028 election. But Democrats are at odds over how fiercely to use their probing power to go after the corporations, law firms and universities that courted the White House over the past two years.

“We don’t want to turn into a banana republic where you lose an election and it’s all about retribution,” Rep. Bill Foster, a senior member of the Financial Services Committee, said.

“We’re going to have to be a little bit wise about when companies simply did something they had to do to survive this unprecedented level of corruption, compared to companies that actually got on board and profited more by being a partner in his corruption,” he added.

Some progressives counter that a restrained approach would sit uneasily with the party’s base.

“It would be political suicide for Democrats to campaign on fighting corruption and then turn around and go easy on the very companies that are facilitating it,” said Ella Fanger, corporate power policy adviser at the liberal nonprofit group Demand Progress.

Prime targets for some Democrats are the tech companies that have taken steps to be on the president’s good side, like Apple, Amazon and Meta, which have all donated to Trump’s ballroom effort. Major cryptocurrency players, including Coinbase, Ripple and Tether also chipped in for the ballroom, and will be subject to questioning from Democrats.

The late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s networks and associates are also poised for probes — a push that has ensnared big banks like JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank and Bank of America in the past.

Sen. Chris Murphy said the party should focus on the nexus between Trump and corporate corruption.

“We should get to the bottom of the corrupt relationship that exists between corporations in this country and the Trump administration,” Murphy said, pointing to questions he’s posed about a tobacco company’s donation to Trump’s super PAC before new e-cigarette rules were unveiled.

Still, Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, who serves on Senate Banking, warned against the weaponization of power.

“Our focus should be solving problems that we’re seeing happening,” she said, pointing to cost-of-living issues around health care, housing and energy.

What else we’re watching:

— FIRST IN IC: BUILD AMERICA CAUCUS AGENDA — Energized by progress on permitting and housing legislation this term, a bipartisan development-focused caucus is rolling out a detailed agenda for next term. The 40-member Build America Caucus is releasing a 95-page package of proposals, first shared with Blue Light News, that outlines plans touching on health care, transportation, child care and research. The group launched last year with the goal of cutting red tape and regulatory bottlenecks to spur development.

— AI COLLAB STILL ILLUSIVE FOR CRUZ, CANTWELL — Commerce Chair Ted Cruz and ranking member Maria Cantwell might still be celebrating Senate passage of their landmark college sports bill last week, but it’s unclear the momentum will carry forward to agreement on another committee priority: artificial intelligence. Among the dozen lawmakers, aides and industry experts who spoke to Blue Light News, few expect the two senators to shed their well-established ideologies and styles after the mutual win. That could doom their ability to replicate their latest achievement in something as complex and divisive as an AI regulatory framework.

Jasper Goodman, Katherine Hapgood, Riley Rogerson and Kelsey Brugger contributed to this report.

Congress

Why Cruz and Cantwell’s big win on college sports probably won’t lead to an AI breakthrough

Published

11 hours ago

October 5, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Sens. Ted Cruz and Maria Cantwell typically find themselves at odds, but in the past week each expressed optimism that their major bipartisan breakthrough on college sports could set them up to tackle other big things — like artificial intelligence.

Evidence suggests that confidence ought to be tempered.

Cruz, a Texas Republican, and Cantwell, a Washington Democrat, have served together atop the Senate Commerce Committee for nearly four years — with Cantwell first serving as chair before turning the gavel over to Cruz in 2025.

They have occasionally found common ground, such as trying to eliminate hidden ticket fees for concerts and sporting events, and enacting safety measures after the deadly plane crash near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Their bill to overhaul the multibillion-dollar college sports industry, which overwhelmingly passed the Senate last week, has been their highest-profile achievement to date, requiring months of brass-tacks negotiations, painful compromises and uncomfortable divisions with colleagues and key constituencies.

Asked if her partnership with Cruz on college sports could translate into an agreement on AI, Cantwell did not exactly embrace the idea.

“I thought a century ago … if we all worked together and got something done on the sports thing, it would be a good basis to show we could get something done on privacy and AI,” she said. “And look how long it took.”

After a pause, she added, “I think this is showing people that you can get something done.”

Posed the same question, Cruz said in an interview he did think the college sports win bodes well for future collaborations.

“Senator Cantwell and I have a very good, productive working relationship, and she is someone who works very hard,” he said. “And without her tireless work and commitment to getting this done, we’d never be here.”

But among the dozen lawmakers, aides and industry experts who spoke to Blue Light News, few expect the two senators to shed their well-established ideologies and styles. That could doom their ability to replicate their latest achievement in something as complex and divisive as an AI regulatory framework.

“I believe that bipartisanship is a muscle and therefore does atrophy. And I think that when you have one success, that is a good omen for future success,” said Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), who sits on the Commerce Committee and was involved in negotiations over the college sports package.

“It is no guarantee,” he acknowledged, “and AI is a whole different kettle of fish.”

Cantwell is a longtime Democratic politician and former tech executive — so firm in her belief in strong federal AI guardrails it’s hard to imagine a path to consensus with Cruz, whom she has a history of publicly bashing when the two are divided on an issue.

Cruz is a staunch conservative with a popular podcast and well-known desire to be president. He has sought to balance his concern that AI threats are “scary as hell” with his allegiance to the White House, which argues that heavy regulations on the industry would cede ground to China.

With college sports regulation, they shared the belief that there was a problem for Congress to solve — that a wide range of college sports programs risked being canceled in an era when powerhouse schools could pay huge sums of money to attract top athletes.

Both Cruz and Cantwell wanted to establish national rules on compensation, eligibility and transfers while preserving the rights of students to earn money from their name, image and likeness.

The senators and their aides spent countless hours together in conference rooms, with Cruz often saying he would bring out “very sweet Cuban coffee” when discussions became tense. Cruz, eager to advance a bill backed by Trump, was willing to make concessions to win Democratic support after failing to move an earlier version of the package. For instance, he backed off his insistence that student-athletes be defined in the bill as non-employees.

Cantwell, for her part, broke with years of Democratic resistance to granting the NCAA any antitrust protections at all. An earlier bill she sponsored dealing with student-athlete rights did not include such protections. And when her bill with Cruz passed, Cantwell acknowledged there was still “more to do.”

Their approach to AI legislation so far is not as clear cut. While Cantwell has pushed for stricter regulations, Cruz’s exact perspective is harder to pin down. And while he’s been promising for months to convene hearings and markups on bipartisan AI safety legislation, he has yet to do so. In September, he blamed stalled negotiations between Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.).

Even as Cruz and Cantwell were busy making progress on college sports over the summer, Cantwell was openly telling reporters that Cruz had tried to undermine her on AI policy in late 2024. That’s when she, as Commerce chair, attempted without success to bring seven bipartisan measures related to AI to the Senate floor that had advanced through the committee.

“There’s a lot of bipartisan bills that he put his big foot on” and “basically stonewalled” in the previous Congress, Cantwell griped — a sign of the deep distrust that still remains between the two lawmakers. Cruz’s aides at the time disputed he had sought to undercut her efforts.

Back in 2024, Cruz was also regularly blasting Democratic-led efforts to regulate the AI industry. At one Committee Committee hearing, he warned that creating a new bureaucracy to prevent AI models from annihilating the human race amounted to “an absurd exaggeration that would make Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov laugh” — references to the famous science fiction writers.

With the college sports legislation, Cantwell and Cruz were united enough in their larger mission they were each willing to take on powerful forces inside their own parties.

Cantwell forged ahead despite deep opposition from members of the Congressional Black Caucus and organized labor. Cruz had to arm-twist GOP senators who had objections, including former college football coach-turned-Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville. Their bill eventually passed the Senate 77-22, but there’s still no guarantee it will be victorious in the House.

With AI legislation, it’s not clear whether either senator has the fortitude to lock arms around a framework and take similar risks.

The results of the midterm elections also will determine whether it’s Cruz or Cantwell who will hold the Commerce gavel in January. That dynamic will, in turn, affect what sort of dealmaking can be achieved going forward.

Sen. Todd Young, an Indiana Republican who sits on the Senate Commerce Committee and was initially opposed to the college athletics legislation before voting “yes,” said in an interview he was trying to remain positive.

“Do I think that the sports initiative is a confidence-building measure to bring them together and sweet harmony on AI?” Young said. “Maybe. I hope so.”