Connect with us

Congress

Jim Jordan goes after Adam Schiff at FBI oversight hearing

Published

on

House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan on Wednesday opened FBI director Kash Patel’s second Congressional oversight hearing in two days by going after a former colleague, Sen. Adam Schiff.

“Why would the head of the Intelligence Committee, the chair of that committee, who’s supposed to be guarding our secrets — why would he be encouraging the leaking of classified information?” Jordan, the Ohio Republican, said in his opening remarks regarding Schiff, the California Democrat who was elected to the Senate last year.

Republicans, including Patel, have accused Schiff of moving to leak damaging information about President Donald Trump in his former capacity as chair of the House Intelligence panel.

Patel, a former staffer on House Intelligence who once worked to discredit Schiff’s investigation into Russian election interference, went after Schiff directly during his appearance before Senate Judiciary the day before, calling him a “liar,” “the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate” and “a political buffoon at best.”

A Schiff spokesperson said in a statement that “Kash Patel’s smear against Senator Schiff is absolutely and categorically false, and is just the latest in a series of defamatory attacks from the President and his allies meant to distract from their plummeting poll numbers and the Epstein files scandal.”

Schiff, who led Trump’s first impeachment, has become a prominent political target for the Trump administration, and the Trump has repeatedly levied attacks against him since his inauguration. The Justice Department has also begun probing his mortgage activities.

In his opening remarks Wednesday, Patel also signaled he was prepared to project a defensive posture in his testimony in the House as he did in the Senate, particularly when challenged by members of either party.

“If you want to criticize me, bring it on, but do not attack the brave leaders in the field,” he told House lawmakers. “I’m dedicated to restoring the trust in the mission and the integrity of the FBI, and we cannot do so without Congressional oversight.”

Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, contended that the Senate hearing underscored Patel’s “explosively volatile temper.”

“The intractable problem is that you are running the FBI not as a law enforcement agency charged with keeping the American people safe, but as a political enforcement agency working directly for the President’s vengeance campaign,” said Raskin, a Maryland Democrat.

Both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees have scheduled their annual oversight hearings with the FBI director at a watershed moment for the agency — and for Patel’s tenure as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer.

His handling of materials in the case of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the manhunt for conservative political activist Charlie Kirk’s killer, and recent FBI personnel departures have all prompted renewed questioning of Patel’s leadership.

In both his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday and House Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, Patel has been forcefully defensive, brandishing how his agency handled the Kirk investigation and crime at-large across the country.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

House eyes Friday vote on stopgap as partisan tensions flare

Published

on

Republican leaders vowed Wednesday to barrel forward with a stopgap funding bill in the coming days as Democrats threatened to oppose it in favor of their own alternative — raising the chances for an Oct. 1 government shutdown.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise told reporters Wednesday morning that a vote on the GOP-written bill unveiled Tuesday is expected “likely Friday” amid Democratic objections about a lack of bipartisan negotiations.

“We’re going to do our job, and that’s all we can do, is do our job,” he said. “If Democrats want to shut the government down and continue to hold America hostage because they don’t like the results of the election, the American people are fed up with that kind of childish politics.”

While House GOP leaders have pushed their members for earlier action, they believe Friday morning is the likeliest option for the vote. Hard-liners and others are pushing leaders to stick to the chamber’s 72-hour-review rule.

GOP leaders are also still working to win the votes of several undecided Republicans, including Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio), but are confident they are on track to pass the measure by the end of the week. “Like any big vote, they’re always tight,” Scalise said Wednesday.

Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), chair of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus, said in a brief interview he was expecting a “Friday morning” vote, saying that was “close enough” to fulfilling the 72-hour rule. GOP leaders have privately acknowledged a Thursday vote could cost them votes among hard-liners, and they can’t afford to lose many Republicans with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) already a hard “no.”

“I suspect leadership knows it’s easier to get guys to a yes when we’re following the rules than not,” said another Republican involved in the conversations granted anonymity to speak candidly.

Senate Republicans, who want to act quickly on the House bill, are closely watching the House action as they plan their own schedule.

If the House votes Friday, the earliest the Senate would be able to vote is Monday. While voting on Thursday could theoretically move up that schedule a day, a number of Republican senators want to attend activist Charlie Kirk’s funeral Sunday, making a vote that day unlikely.

Furthermore, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss chamber scheduling, senators are not eager to return Monday only to leave again for an already scheduled recess for Rosh Hashanah. Instead, senators would likely return next Thursday, after the Jewish holiday, the people said.

The scheduling conflicts come as the Sept. 30 funding expiration looms and as Senate Democrats threaten to use the chamber’s filibuster rule to block the GOP stopgap.

“In the Senate, it takes 60 votes,” Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Wednesday. “So that means Republicans will need to work with us. If they can’t even bother to have a conversation with Democrats, then it’s Republicans who the American people will know are causing a shutdown in two weeks.”

Senate Majority Leader John Thune reiterated Wednesday that Republicans see nothing to negotiate on the “clean” stopgap, which would extend current funding through Nov. 21. “These guys are trying to take a hostage here,” he said.

Speaker Mike Johnson, asked about the prospect of Senate Democrats blocking the House stopgap, said in a brief interview Tuesday that he hoped that wouldn’t happen.

“There would be no reason to, because it’s clean and short term.” Asked if he would work on a backup plan in that case, he replied, “We’re going to see what happens.”

But House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole signaled some support Wednesday for Republicans working on a Plan B if Senate Democrats do block the GOP-led stopgap as they’re threatening.

“I certainly would,” Cole said in a brief interview, but he acknowledged it was “a leadership decision.”

Cole, asked if the talks could be salvaged at that point to stave off a shutdown, replied, “I don’t know.”

The comments came as tensions between normally cordial appropriators appear to be reaching a breaking point. Senate Appropriations Vice Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) on Tuesday accused Cole of having “pulled out” of bipartisan talks and “produced a one-sided CR.”

“Where are the Republican leaders?” Murray said. “If Republicans can’t even sit down with [Democratic leaders] to simply have a conversation, then they cannot govern.”

Cole retorted Wednesday that Democrats were threatening to oppose a stopgap funding bill “they asked for” and are now planning to unveil their own alternative that adds on health care provisions and other measures GOP leaders are opposing.

“We gave them the time frame and a clean bill, now they’re wanting to put other things in,” he said, adding that health care and other issues Democrats want to tackle “ought to be dealt with in separate discussions.”

Continue Reading

Congress

Kash Patel says court orders bar him from releasing the Epstein files. Judges have said otherwise.

Published

on

FBI Director Kash Patel claimed Wednesday that he is barred by recent court orders from releasing thousands of documents connected to disgraced sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

“I’m not going to break the law to satisfy your curiosity,” Patel said during the second day of Congressional oversight hearings after Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) challenged him on why he hasn’t released more of the files.

But Patel appears to be mischaracterizing those recent court orders, which came amid a hurried effort by the Trump administration to ask federal judges for permission to release grand jury materials stemming from the case of Epstein and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.

Judges considering the ask said it appeared to be an effort to confuse the public, noting that the materials consisted of only a few dozen pages of hearsay — much of which became public during court proceedings — and were dwarfed by the FBI’s massive trove of records.

In fact, one of the judges who ruled on the grand jury matter — and who presided over Epstein’s criminal case before he died by suicide in a jail cell in 2019 — said the Trump administration had the power to release the records.

“The government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein files,” U.S. District Judge Richard Berman wrote last month, emphasizing that the materials in the FBI’s possession are not subject to typical secrecy of grand jury material.

Berman, a Clinton appointee, called the Trump administration’s effort to seek release of the limited grand jury material an apparent “diversion from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the government’s possession.”

Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) pressed Patel on this point, suggesting that the grand jury orders had no bearing on his ability to release more materials. Patel then cited other sealed orders and protective orders from Epstein and Maxwell’s criminal cases that he said barred the release of additional information.

“Why are you not going to a court, like you did for the grand jury testimony?” Goldman wondered. “You are hiding the Epstein files, Mr. Patel. You are part of the cover-up.”

Continue Reading

Congress

DOJ impeachments could continue Democratic retaliation against Ilhan Omar censure push

Published

on

A Texas Democrat is planning to file impeachment articles against President Donald Trump’s top law enforcement officials as a partisan slap flight plays out on the House floor this week.

Dueling censure resolutions are currently awaiting floor votes that could come as soon as Wednesday afternoon after Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) took aim at Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) for comments made after the killing last week of activist Charlie Kirk. Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) immediately countered with a measure targeting Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.) who is subject to an ethics investigation and a restraining-order proceeding.

In swept Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas) on Wednesday, saying he is ready to take the retaliatory campaign against Mace up a notch.

“If [Mace] (soon to be a sucker and loser in her governors race) wants to strip [Omar] of her committees for words she never said, MANY people are saying we should impeach the incompetent Kash Patel and Pam Bondi for the lies they ACTUALLY TOLD!!” he wrote on X, referring to the FBI director and attorney general.

Veasey is drafting articles of impeachment for the two Trump officials, according to a person granted anonymity to discuss his intentions.

Mace, who is running for South Carolina governor, brought up her measure Tuesday under special expedited procedures that would force a House vote no later than Thursday. Casar did the same with his Mills measure.

A top Omar aide e-mailed all House chiefs of staff Tuesday with a rebuttal to the GOP effort, saying that “Mace is trying to censure Rep. Omar over comments she never said.”

Democrats could withdraw the measure targeting Mills if the Omar measure is withdrawn or fails on the floor. A similar measure targeting Mills was dropped earlier this month after a GOP-led effort to censure Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) flopped on the House floor.

Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending