Connect with us

Congress

Jack Smith plans to double down on the need for his Trump investigations

Published

on

For years, Jack Smith — the prosecutor with the best chance of putting President Donald Trump in prison — was an elusive figure. His work was cloaked in secrecy and his voice was seldom heard aloud, save for a few choice utterances at carefully scripted news conferences. Public sightings were rare, and he was best known by a single scowling image from a 2020 appearance at The Hague.

Thursday morning, however, Smith’s low profile will disappear when he becomes one of the most-watched people in Washington.

Smith is set to testify at a public hearing of the House Judiciary Committee that’s likely to be aired live across the country. The veteran prosecutor is prepared to tell the public what he’s already told lawmakers behind closed doors: A jury would have found Trump guilty of a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, had Smith been able to move forward with the evidence he amassed during his time as special counsel with the Biden Department of Justice.

Smith is expected to stand behind his decision to prosecute Trump, and say doing otherwise would have been “shirk[ing] my duties as a prosecutor and a public servant,” according to prepared remarks obtained by Blue Light News.

“I made my decisions without regard to President Trump’s political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election,” Smith plans to say. “President Trump was charged because the evidence established that he willfully broke the very laws that he took an oath to uphold.”

Because Trump won reelection in 2024 and there’s a Justice Department prohibition against charging or trying a sitting president, Smith dropped the charges he brought in the election subversion case. Smith was also pushing charges against Trump for hoarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

“Highly sensitive information was held in non-secure locations, including a bathroom and a ballroom where events and gatherings took place,” Smith is expected to tell members of the Judiciary Committee. “Tens of thousands of people came to the social club during the time period when those classified documents were stored there.”

For Democrats, the hearing will be an opportunity for Smith to describe in painstaking detail evidence of Trump’s criminality and threat to the transfer of presidential power in 2020 — when he spent months pressuring elected officials to overturn the election results based on false claims of fraud. Smith has argued that Trump’s efforts fueled the Jan. 6 mob that attacked the Capitol, which the prosecutor says Trump attempted to exploit to continue his effort to stop Joe Biden from taking office.

“I’m thrilled the Republican chairman is having Jack Smith testify publicly, because Jack Smith is going to tell the American people all the evidence that he has collected against Donald Trump and why Donald Trump was lawfully indicted, and why Donald Trump violated federal law,” Rep. Ted Lieu of California, the vice-chair of the House Democratic Caucus, told reporters Wednesday morning. “And American people are going to hear that. And I encourage everyone to watch.”

Republicans, meanwhile, have fumed over revelations last year that Smith secretly obtained the phone records for several sitting GOP senators during his election subversion investigation.

“He’s got a lot to answer for,” Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Wednesday regarding Smith. “These are answers that have been, I think, long overdue.”

House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan’s decision to allow Smith to answer lawmakers’ questions in a public forum came after he initially would only agree to let Smith sit for a closed-door interview, the contents of which Jordan later released in the form of a transcript and an hours-long video recording. That session revealed a prosecutor with firm command of the details of his case and ready answers to Republicans’ toughest queries.

Smith is expected to reiterate, during his Thursday testimony, that the choices he made as special counsel complied with Justice Department policy — eschewing accusations from Republicans that he went rogue in an effort to take Trump down. He will assert that he would prosecute a former president of either party under the same conditions, according to his prepared remarks.

He will also describe the evidence his team built to demonstrate Trump’s criminal behavior and why that proof extended beyond a reasonable doubt.

Jordan, asked Wednesday whether he was concerned about Smith sharing damaging information about the president to a live audience, replied, “We’re just focused on letting our members ask questions, letting the American people see.”

But in what is likely to be a highly confrontational and hours-long hearing, Republicans are expected to pummel the former special counsel for what they see as a political vendetta against the GOP — this time knowing their audience includes the public and, just as likely, Trump himself.

Trump made clear Wednesday his mind is still on the 2020 election, insisting repeatedly — and falsely — to a gathering of European leaders that he prevailed in the contest but was robbed by fraud. He also said that people would soon be prosecuted for “rigging” that election. Smith told lawmakers last month that he expected to face Trump’s wrath and retribution for his work as special counsel, potentially in the form of criminal charges.

“Jack Smith is a continuation of this weaponization of government against the president,” Jordan said in an interview. “It’s been a decade long ordeal.”

Republicans also could stand to benefit from the limitations on what Smith will and won’t be able to divulge at the Thursday hearing. As with his closed-door testimony last month, Smith’s remarks will be hamstrung by a court order sealing the second volume of his report around the classified documents case. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who oversaw that investigation and initially dismissed the charges against Trump and labeled Smith’s appointment as special counsel illegal, has since barred the Justice Department from disclosing his final report in the case.

Trump urged Cannon Wednesday, on the eve of Smith’s testimony, to make her order permanent, saying anything less would legitimize what he described as Smith’s effort “to imprison and destroy the reputations of President Trump and his former co-defendants.”

Smith is expected to stand firm.

“No one should be above the law in our country and the law required that he be held to account,” he is expected to say. “So that is what I did.”

Mia McCarthy and Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

House Transportation chair reveals markup date for highway bill

Published

on

House Transportation Chair Sam Graves (R-Mo.) is targeting April 29 as the markup date for the surface transportation reauthorization bill and is negotiating a topline number between $500 and $550 billion, he told Blue Light News Wednesday.

While a final topline number has yet to be agreed on, Graves said he has a ballpark figure.

“I’m gonna say it’s gonna be somewhere in the neighborhood of $550 billion or $500 billion — somewhere in there. That will be our number. We’re still actually — believe it or not — negotiating that,” Graves said.

That $550 billion total number being discussed for what is also known as the highway bill would be a combination of authorizations and contract authority for a five-year span.

If that number holds, the bill would be well below the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law, which totaled $1.2 trillion, with $550 billion of that going to new federal spending for roads, bridges, transit, broadband, resilience and water infrastructure. Graves has said he wants the upcoming bill to be more traditional than the previous one with more focus on roads and bridges.

He added that he is in active talks with ranking member Rick Larsen (D-Wash.) and that he thinks Larsen “wants a little bit more” in funding. Peter True, a spokesperson for Larsen, confirmed Larsen wants a higher number than $550 billion.

Graves said there will be a registration fee for electric vehicles in the surface bill, a long-sought goal of his. Last year, he succeeded in inserting a $250 registration fee for EVs and $100 for hybrids in the House version of the GOP-led budget reconciliation bill, but those provisions never made it into law. He said the EV fee will be different this time around.

“We lowered it a little bit,” Graves said of the EV fee, though he did not provide an exact figure.

As for a registration fee on hybrid cars, he was less clear: “We’re not sure yet, but yes, probably.”

Continue Reading

Congress

DHS shutdown disrupts World Cup planning, officials tell senators

Published

on

The Department of Homeland Security shutdown is already undermining federal preparations for the 2026 FIFA World Cup, administration officials warned senators Wednesday — cautioning that the ongoing funding lapse has slowed coordination with state and local authorities and cost the agency hundreds of airport screeners as the U.S. gears up to host one of the largest sporting events in the world.

“It has significantly impacted our operations,” Christopher Tomney, DHS director of the Office of Homeland Security Situational Awareness, told lawmakers at a joint congressional hearing convened by the Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Homeland Security and Commerce-Justice-Science.

Tomney, who is serving as the federal government’s senior coordinating official for the 2026 tournament, said the shutdown has “hindered our coordination with state and locals” and “reduced our planning efforts.”

He added that “hundreds” of unpaid Transportation Security Officers have quit during the DHS funding lapse: “We just can’t replace that expertise overnight.”

Tomney’s testimony provided the starkest public acknowledgment yet of the DHS shutdown’s impact on the administration’s planning for the World Cup, which will bring millions of fans to 11 U.S. host cities this summer. It also highlighted broader anxieties about whether President Donald Trump’s rhetoric toward foreign visitors could dampen international travel and undercut the economic upside host cities are counting on.

Administration officials insisted the U.S. would be ready no matter what, but senators from both parties pressed witnesses on how the federal government can ensure a safe and welcoming tournament while DHS remains shuttered and key agencies juggle threats ranging from drones to cyberattacks.

On hand alongside Tomney was Douglas Olson, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Portland Field Office and the bureau’s senior coordinating official on the White House task force for the World Cup; and Robert O’Leary, deputy assistant secretary for travel and tourism at the Commerce Department.

Collectively, they sketched out an enormous effort already underway ahead of the 78-match tournament, which will unfold over 39 days and spill far beyond the official host cities into base camps, fan festivals and surrounding communities.

Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.), who chairs the Senate Homeland Security funding panel and presided over part of the Wednesday hearing, asked Tomney directly how the 60-day DHS shutdown has affected preparations.

Tomney linked the shutdown to broader strains across DHS, which is expected to shoulder much of the burden for tournament security while also carrying out its regular missions in aviation, border security and emergency response.

Olson told senators that unmanned aerial systems remain one of the most serious concerns heading into the tournament: “The threat is very real. It’s growing,” he said, noting that drones are increasingly easy to acquire and difficult to detect.

Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), who chairs the Commerce-Justice-Science panel, asked what the federal government is doing to show that the United States is “open” and “welcoming” to fans from around the world.

O’Leary replied that the Commerce Department is working with other agencies, host committees and tourism groups to smooth travel and encourage future visits. He also pointed to the State Department’s work to reduce visa wait times and said the administration sees the World Cup as the first in a long run of major global events that can boost U.S. tourism.

But Democrats argued that Trump’s own policies are sending the opposite message.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, the top Democrat on the Commerce-Justice-Science appropriations subcommittee, said he is anxious that the administration’s actions unrelated to security — including the president’s anti-immigration rhetoric and travel restrictions — will discourage fans from coming and blunt the financial benefits expected to flow to host communities.

“What I worry about most is that factors unrelated to security will dampen enthusiasm for the tournament and reduce the economic benefits that should flow to communities that are hosting,” Van Hollen said.

He pointed to weaker-than-expected international tourism trends and pressed O’Leary on why Commerce had not yet produced updated travel forecasts required by law.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) zeroed in on Canada and Mexico, which are co-hosting the tournament with the United States. She said Canadian tourism to her state has dropped sharply and tied the decline to Trump’s rhetoric toward America’s northern neighbor.

“We love our Canadian visitors,” said O’Leary, adding that the administration welcomes travel from Canada.

“Perhaps you should share that with President Trump,” Shaheen shot back.

Continue Reading

Congress

Obernolte wins

Published

on

Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) is officially GOP conference policy chair.

He was elected by voice vote at the candidate policy forum on Wednesday, five members told Blue Light News as they were leaving the meeting. His only opponent, Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-N.Y.), withdrew from race on Tuesday.

Obernolte secured endorsements from senior Republicans like Republican Study Committee Chair August Pfluger (R-Texas) and the former policy chair Kevin Hern (R-Okla.). Hern left the position to launch a Senate bid.

Continue Reading

Trending