The Dictatorship
I study conservative media for a living. Here’s what ‘Melania’ critics don’t understand.
Uninitiated audiences — and film critics far and wide — see in “Melania,” the feature-length documentary about America’s tight-lipped first lady, 100-plus minutes of tone-deaf moments. The movie is intended to at least soften the first lady’s image as glittering arm candy to the world’s most powerful man, if not establish her as a humanitarian and consequential figure in her own right. Its many discussions of clothing and White House decor will cement some viewers’ perceptions of the first lady as a shallow mannequin, interested mainly in fashion and design.
But MAGA nation is loving it.
“Melania” pulled in $7 million during its opening weekend — a notably high haul for a non-concert documentary.
“Melania” pulled in $7 million during its opening weekend — a notably high haul for a non-concert documentary. Although there were only about a dozen people in the Boca Raton, Florida, theater where I watched it (roughly 24 miles south of the Trumps’ Mar-a-Lago residence), I know from my study of conservative media that the film targeted a specific audience — and appears to have found it.
For the past eight years, I’ve been analyzing right-wing media for my website TheRighting. And if there’s one subject that’s unassailable in those circles, it’s Melania Trump as an object of respect, admiration and even awe. Last October, the Washington Free Beacon called her “the most attractive and intelligent First Lady in American history.” (I have yet to read any pundit on the right dispute that claim.)
The right-leaning RedState gushed over the film on Friday. The headline on Bob Hoge’s review? “Priceless Moments in Gripping Behind the Scenes Look at a Return to the White House.” Admirers of the first lady probably agree. Some 98% of audience scores submitted by verified theatergoers to Rotten Tomatoesthe movie review aggregator site, on “Melania” were positive.
If there’s one subject that’s unassailable in MAGA circles, it’s Melania Trump as an object of respect, admiration and even awe.
For hardcore citizens of MAGA nation, “Melania” seems designed to position the first lady as an enduring icon of sophistication, class and superior taste. An underlying vibe — “Move over Jackie, there’s a new first lady finally getting her due” — targets the large segments of the Trump base who viewed recent Democratic first ladies with disdain. Michelle Obama, for instance, is a constant target of right-wing ire.
Melania Trump’s fashion obsession that dominates so much of the film will probably appeal greatly to the Trump base. From my observations of the political right, Trump-friendly audiences see Melania as a figure of regal grace and femininity. Trump, they would argue, needs to dress the part.

Another mission of the film was arguably to demonstrate the popularity of both Trumps. A dismal turnout opening weekend would have reflected poorly on the administration and perhaps been interpreted as a referendum on the immigration enforcement activities in Minneapolis. But “Melania” notched the highest non-concert documentary revenue in more than a decade, the Associated Press reported.
As its box-office take shows, the film was essentially critic-proof, which was a good thing for the first lady as most professional movie reviewers skewered it. “It’s one of those rare, unicorn films that doesn’t have a single redeeming quality,” hissed The Guardian.
It’s fair to wonder why Melania Trump would subject herself to the potential for such a media beatdown. Perhaps the first lady’s ego was insulated by the $40 million fee her production company received from Amazon MGM Studios for the project. The film also had a $35 million marketing campaign. Ads that promoted the movie — and by extension, Trump herself — popped up in settings as varied as NFL playoff games, billboards in major global cities and some of the right-wing news sites I scour every morning.
Trump’s attempt at an image upgrade is made clear in two scenes.
Trump’s attempt at an image upgrade is made clear in two scenes. Viewers see a Zoom call about limiting children’s screen time with Brigitte Macron, the first lady of France, and see Melania in a face-to-face meeting with Jordan’s Queen Rania in which they discuss efforts to aid children around the world. These felt like perfunctory, tick-the-boxes moments trying to show Trump as a figure of consequence on the world stage and a forceful advocate for the well-being of children.
“Melania” also sheds no light on the Trumps’ marriage. She goes mostly mute every time the president enters the frame and inevitably dominates a scene. While several times he is seen holding her hand, in one scene in which Melania receives a call from her husband, she addresses him as Mr. President, and not in an ironic or playful way. Arguably, many first ladies might have complicated relationships with their husbands, but no previous first lady has been the focus of a multimillion-dollar global marketing campaign for a project she directly profited from.
In a remarkably unrevealing portrait, there are a few accidental insights.
In a remarkably unrevealing portrait, there are a few accidental insights, such as when the first lady exhibits obvious delight when the Michael Jackson hit “Billie Jean” plays in the car in which she is being driven. Melania says, in a film that seeks to present her as a champion of children, that Michael Jackson is her favorite recording artist, with no mention of the many accusations he abused children.
A human side of Melania emerges ever so slightly with the film’s repeated references to the January 2024 death of her mother. There are also short scenes with her father and her camera-shy son, Barron, that point to some humanity lurking beneath the designer clothes and expertly applied makeup.
Ultimately, the film’s emphasis on fashion — and astonishing amount of screen time for her towering stiletto heels — overwhelms the help-the-children points. There’s a moment just before the inauguration when one of the fashion minions orbiting the first lady painstakingly affixes Melania’s broad-rimmed hat on her head, obscuring half of her face. If only her husband would spend that much time and attention to detail articulating the justification for, well, anything.
Howard Polskin is founder of TheRighting, a free newsletter that aggregates more than a dozen right-wing headlines every morning for mainstream and progressive audiences.
The Dictatorship
Trump threatens to cut off trade with Spain
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Tuesday threatened to end trade with Spainciting a lack of support over the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran and the European nation’s resistance to increasing its NATO spending.
“We’re going to cut off all trade with Spain,” Trump told reporters during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. “We don’t want anything to do with Spain.”
The U.S. president’s comments came a day after Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares said his country would not allow the U.S. to use jointly operated bases in southern Spain in any strikes not covered by the United Nations’ charter. Albares noted that the military bases in Spain were not used in the weekend attack on Iran.
Trump said despite Spain’s refusal “we could use their base if we want. We could just fly in and use it. Nobody’s going to tell us not to use it, but we don’t have to.”
It is unclear how Trump would cut off trade with Spain, given that Spain is under the umbrella of the European Union. The EU negotiates trade deals on behalf of all 27 member countries.
“If the U.S. administration wishes to review the trade agreement, it must do so respecting the autonomy of private companies, international law, and bilateral agreements between the European Union and the United States,” a spokesperson from Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s office said Tuesday.
The EU said it expects the Trump administration to honor a trade deal struck with the 27-nation bloc in Scotland last year after months of economic uncertainty over Trump’s tariff blitzkrieg.
“The Commission will always ensure that the interests of the European Union are fully protected,” said European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill.
It was just the latest instance of the president wielding the threat of tariffs or trade embargoes as a punishment and came on the heels of a Supreme Court decision that struck down Trump’s far-reaching global tariffs. While the court said that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the president to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs, Trump now maintains that the court allows him to instead impose full-scale embargoes on other nations of his choosing.
Trump also complained anew Tuesday about Spain’s decision last year to back out of NATO’s 5% defense spending target. At the time, Spain said it could reach its military capabilities by spending 2.1% of its GDP, a move that Trump roundly criticized and responded to with tariff threats as well.
Spain, Trump said, is “the only country that in NATO would not agree to go up to 5%” in NATO spending. “I don’t think they agreed to go up to anything. They wanted to keep it at 2% and they don’t pay the 2%.”
Merz noted that Trump was correct and said, “We are trying to convince them that this is a part of our common security, that we all have to comply with this.”
Spain defended its position Tuesday, saying it is “a key member of NATO, fulfilling its commitments and making a significant contribution to the defense of European territory,” the spokesperson in Sánchez’s office said.
During the Oval Office meeting, Trump turned to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for his opinion on the president’s embargo authority.
Bessent said, “I agree that the Supreme Court reaffirmed your ability to implement an embargo.” Bessent added that the U.S. Trade Representative and Commerce Department would “begin investigations and we’ll move forward with those.”
A representative from the U.S. Treasury Department did not respond to a request from The Associated Press for additional comment.
Sánchez has been critical of the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran, calling it an “unjustifiable” and “dangerous” military intervention. His government has demanded an immediate de-escalation and dialogue and also condemned Iran’s strikes across the region.
Trump said, “Spain has absolutely nothing that we need other than great people. They have great people, but they don’t have great leadership.”
Spain’s position on the use of U.S. bases in its territory marks the latest flare-up in its relationship with the Trump administration. Under Sánchez, Europe’s last major progressive leader, Spain was also an outspoken critic of Israel’s war in Gaza.
___
Naishadham reported from Madrid. AP journalist Sam McNeil in Brussels contributed.
The Dictatorship
The Latest: US and Israel attack Iran as Trump says US begins ‘major combat operations’
Rice secures 80-74 win over Temple
Anthony’s 16 help Iona beat Manhattan 69-65
Folefac scores 23 as Siena beats Rider 76-61
SnoCountry Mountain Reports
Gulf States Sportswatch Daily Listings
Quinnipiac wins 67-63 against Canisius
The Dictatorship
‘It’s fantastic’: Trump tells MS NOW he’s seen celebrations after Iran strikes
President Donald Trump called the celebrations in the streets of Iran “fantastic” following the killing of the country’s supreme leaderAyatollah Ali Khamenei, during a brief phone call with MS NOW on Saturday night.
Trump told MS NOW that he’s seen the celebrations in Iran and in parts of America, after joint U.S.-Israel airstrikes killed Khamenei.
“I think it’s fantastic,” the president said of the celebrations. “I’ve seen them in Los Angeles, also — celebrations.”
“I’ve seen them in Los Angeles, celebrations, celebrations,” Trump said, accentuating the point.
The interview took place roughly 11 hours before the Pentagon announced the first U.S.military casualties of the war. U.S. Central Command said three American service members were killed in action, and five others had been seriously wounded.

Revelry broke out in Iran, the United States and across the globe on Saturday, with Iranians cheering the death of Khamenei, who led Iran with an iron fist for more than 30 years, cracking down on dissent at home and maintaining a hostile posture with the U.S. and Israel.
Asked how he was feeling after the strike on Khamenei, whose death was confirmed just a few hours earlier, Trump said it was a positive development for the United States.
“I think it was a great thing for our country,” he said.
The call — which lasted less than a minute — came after a marathon day, which began in the wee hours of the morning with strikes on Iran and continued with retaliatory ballistic missiles from Tehran targeting Israel and countries in the Middle East region that host U.S. military bases.
The day ended with few answers from the White House to increasing questions about the long-term future of Iran, how long the U.S. will continue operations there, and the metastasizing ramifications it could have on the world stage. In fact, the president has done little to convince the public to back his Iran operation, nor to explain why the country is at war without the authorization of Congress.
On perhaps the most consequential day of his second term, Trump did not give a formal address to the public, nor did he hold a press conference. Instead, he stayed out of public view at Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Palm Beach, Florida, where he attended a $1 million-per-plate fundraising dinner on Saturday evening.
But throughout the day, Trump took calls from reporters at various new outlets, including from MS NOW at around 11 p.m. ET.
The strikes, known formally as “Operation Epic Fury,” came after months of talks over Iran’s nuclear program, and warnings from Trump that he would strike Tehran if they did not agree to his often shifting conditions.
At 2:30 a.m. ET on Saturday, Trump posted a video to social media announcing the operation, which he said was designed to “defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime, a vicious group of very hard, terrible people.”
“The lives of courageous American heroes may be lost and we may have casualties. That often happens in war,” Trump said when he announced the strikes on Iran.
Mychael Schnell is a reporter for MS NOW.
Laura Barrón-López covers the White House for MS NOW.
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Politics1 year agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
Politics1 year agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship6 months agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words
-
Politics1 year agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Uncategorized1 year ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
Politics11 months agoDemocrat challenging Joni Ernst: I want to ‘tear down’ party, ‘build it back up’






