Connect with us

Politics

How Republicans could foil Harris’ Supreme Court plans if she’s elected

Published

on

How Republicans could foil Harris’ Supreme Court plans if she’s elected

A panel of Donald Trump-appointed judges issued a ruling Oct. 25 that an election law expert called “bonkers.” The appellate judges said that a Mississippi law counting ballots postmarked by Election Day but arriving afterward violated federal law. 

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel didn’t put the ruling into immediate effect for this election; it sent the case back to a lower court for further proceedings. But whatever comes of the decision, it carries a lesson heading into Election Day: The courts are on the ballot.

During his presidency, Trump appointed more than 200 federal judges, including half the high court’s six-justice Republican-appointed majority: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. Among the other judges he appointed are the ones who issued that Mississippi ruling: Andrew Oldham, James Ho and Kyle Duncan. They’ve all been floated as possible Supreme Court picks for the Republican nominee. 

So if, heading into Election Day 2024, you’re thinking about how this Supreme Court would handle a case like the Mississippi one, imagine if, heading into Election Day 2028 or 2032, the next justices are the judges who handed down that ruling.

The two oldest justices are Clarence Thomas, 76, and Samuel Alito, 74. Chief Justice John Roberts is 69, while Democratic appointees Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan are 70 and 64, respectively. All three Trump justices as well as President Joe Biden’s lone pick, Ketanji Brown Jackson, are in their 50s.

The Senate is therefore important, too. Democrats hold precarious control by a 51-49 margin. Even if Kamala Harris keeps the White House in Democratic control, we don’t have to wonder how a Republican-controlled Senate would act during her administration. Look what happened when then-President Barack Obama nominated the mild-mannered Merrick Garland to fill the late Antonin Scalia’s seat. Republicans wouldn’t even give Garland a hearing. That left Scalia’s seat open for Republicans to install Gorsuch, who, along with Kavanaugh, Barrett, Thomas and Alito, was in the five-justice majority that went on to overturn Roe v. Wade. 

How such issues are decided at the high court in the future could effectively be decided Tuesday.

Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in Donald Trump’s legal cases.

Jordan Rubin

Jordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,” a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined BLN, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Democrats go all in on unproven insider trading allegations as they target Trump’s tariffs

Published

on

Congressional Democrats are raising increasingly pointed concerns about potential financial malfeasance by President Donald Trump and his allies surrounding his dramatic recent tariff moves, despite a lack of evidence of wrongdoing. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Friday joined the growing number of Democrats formally calling for investigations zeroing in on the wild swings in the stock market amid Trump’s escalating trade war…
Read More

Continue Reading

Politics

House Republican sues for $2.5 million over 2021 Capitol Police office search

Published

on

A House Republican is suing the federal government for $2.5 million, claiming he was retaliated against by the Capitol Police four years ago for his vocal criticism of the department’s leadership after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack. Rep. Troy Nehls’ unusual lawsuit, filed in federal court in his home state of Texas…
Read More

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump pushes Congress to make daylight saving permanent

Published

on

President Donald Trump called Friday for Congress to adopt permanent daylight saving time — meaning there would be more daylight in the evening hours and most Americans would no longer have to change their clocks twice a year. He’s weighing in as Congress is also starting to debate the issue…
Read More

Continue Reading

Trending