Congress

House Republicans clear $70B go-it-alone immigration enforcement package

Published

4 months ago

June 9, 2026

The House passed a nearly $70 billion package Tuesday to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol for three years, capping off a four-month partisan standoff.

That bill is now on its way to President Donald Trump’s desk following a 214-212 vote, proving Republicans can ignore Democratic demands to crack down on the administration’s immigration policies and still pump unprecedented funding to the agencies carrying them out.

Following the collapse of negotiations to restrict the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement tactics, Republicans harnessed the party-line budget reconciliation process to pass legislation funding ICE and Border Patrol without any Democratic votes. Those faltered talks began after immigration agents fatally shot two U.S. citizens in Minnesota in January.

The end result is the enactment of supercharged budgets for both agencies — and the guarantee that they will be funded beyond the end of Trump’s presidency.

“Hallelujah — they can’t shut them down now,” Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) said in an interview Tuesday, referring to Democrats.

On top of the more than $140 billion Republicans gave ICE and Border Patrol as part of last summer’s tax and spending megabill, the legislation cleared Tuesday will pile on about $65 billion more — plus another $5 billion for Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin to dole out at his discretion.

The annual budgets for those two agencies total about $17 billion combined under the regular government funding process.

“We are asking ICE to not cause chaos and decrease public safety in our neighborhoods. They already got a huge lump sum of money,” Rep. Grace Meng (D-N.Y.), a senior House appropriator, said in an interview. “So I think it’s more than fair that we ask for reforms before we give them another penny.”

The monthslong ordeal to fully fund DHS after a 76-day lapse ran adjacent to a major personnel shakeup, with the March ouster of then-Secretary Kristi Noem and subsequent installation of Mullin.

The new secretary told lawmakers this month that DHS agents are now seeking judicial warrants to enter private residences, unless agents are already in the midst of pursuing an individual who then enters a home. Mullin also said that, starting in July, DHS will begin requiring 72 days of training for new immigration officers rather than the 42-day accelerated program the Trump administration has been using.

But Mullin refused to commit to following court orders and dismissed allegations of inhumane treatment at immigration detention centers, after shutting down the independent DHS watchdog last month tasked with investigating abuses at immigrant holding facilities.

He also accused Democrats of hampering months of bipartisan talks around new immigration enforcement policies to save face with liberal voters ahead of the midterm elections.

“You would never get to ‘yes,’ and so we walked away and did reconciliation,” Mullin told Democratic appropriators during a hearing this month.

Defending his party’s posture, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said in an interview this week that DHS has “refused to rein in a lawless ICE operation” and noted that he publicly pressed Mullin on why DHS has not been cooperating with local authorities investigating the killings in Minnesota.

Despite what is ostensibly a victory Tuesday for the GOP, not every Republican sees it that way. House Republicans initially revolted against the plan, which originated in the Senate, to clear funding for ICE and Border Patrol through the party-line process while separately joining with Democrats to pass a bill to fund the rest of DHS.

One of those House skeptics said Tuesday that the months of work it took to fund the immigration agencies is testament to the foolhardiness of the plan Senate Republicans embraced.

“The deal in the beginning to split out ICE and Border Patrol should have never happened,” Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) said in an interview. “I knew it when it happened, and this proved it.”

To win enough GOP support for the gambit, House Republican leaders had to convince many of their members that they will get a chance to pass a third party-line package later this year. There’s no consensus GOP agenda for that bill, but groups of Republicans are counting on it to cut taxes, bolster military funding, crack down on fraud in safety net programs and boost programs that bring down costs for Americans ahead of the midterms.

But many Republicans doubt GOP leaders will be able to pull off enactment of another reconciliation package in the coming months, considering the House is only scheduled to be in session for nine weeks before Election Day and Speaker Mike Johnson is increasingly struggling to whip enough support for major legislation with a narrow majority.

Johnson had to make another deal with conservative hard-liners on Tuesday, when he promised a floor vote on legislation codifying Trump’s border policies in order to muscle through a procedural vote on the immigration enforcement package, according to three people with knowledge of the conversations.

Johnson promised the holdouts the vote would take place before July 4 — which is just 11 legislative days away.

Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

Congress

Scalise heads to Florida to boost several GOP candidates

Published

2 hours ago

October 21, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise is heading to Florida to boost a raft of Republicans as the House GOP campaign arm launches new spending across the ruby-red state.

Republicans are working to ensure they prevail in a series of tight Florida races after they redrew several districts in their favor. Several GOP incumbents have warned the party needs to do more to help put out fires across these areas. Scalise is just the latest Republican leader who is looking to shore up candidates in once-thought-to-be-safe red territory.

Scalise will hold a GOTV rally Thursday with Republican Dan Green who is challenging Democratic Rep. Darren Soto in central Florida’s 9th District, according to an invite obtained by Blue Light News. Soto should be toast from the GOP redistricting effort, but he’s still hauling in significant fundraising and Democrats say their internal polling shows a tight race.

Over on the Gulf Coast, the National Republican Congressional Committee is also launching its first coordinated ad spending for Rep. Anna Paulina Luna on Wednesday. House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, GOP governor nominee Rep. Byron Donalds and Sen. Ashley Moody, who is also up for reelection, are appearing at a Saturday rally with Luna.

President Donald Trump won Luna’s district by 13 points and Democrats have tried and failed to target her before. But Republicans are warning the headwinds are stronger this year and forcing a tighter than expected race.

Republicans are also working to shore up key seats in South Florida. Scalise will be with GOP Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar in the Miami area Friday, according to two people with direct knowledge of the matter, granted anonymity to share not yet public details. Salazar has raised alarm about Republican erosion with Hispanic voters in his district and other states over the Trump administration’s mass deportations.

Scalise will boost Ryan Elijah, the Republican who beat scandal-ridden Rep. Cory Mills in the primary in Florida’s 7th District, according to another person with direct knowledge of the matter, granted anonymity to speak candidly. The party feels better about the seat in recent weeks, especially more than they would have if Mills had won the GOP nomination.

The House Majority Leader will also hold events with Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Brian Mast and Rep. Gus Bilirakis, according to the person.

Congress

Capitol agenda: The unknowns of a Sherrod Brown return

Published

8 hours ago

October 21, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Democrats may be rooting for Sherrod Brown’s comeback, but they are not exactly prepared for what’d happen next.

If Brown wins on Election Day, Democrats likely face an uncomfortable choice: break longstanding party rules to restore his seniority on powerful committees like Banking, Agriculture and Finance or potentially make him start over at the bottom.

Complicating the issue: Brown will immediately need to prepare for a grueling re-election fight in 2028 and his campaign could greatly benefit from two years with a high-profile gavel. That’s because this midterm is Ohio’s special election where voters are selecting a senator to serve out the remainder of Vice President JD Vance‘s term.

Brown’s post, therefore, may not only deeply impact Democrats’ policy agenda but could also play a key role in the party’s success in winning the battleground seat in 2028.

Some members are already suggesting the party should try to find a middle ground.

“Some accommodation that recognizes he would not be a rank freshman would make sense. But that’s distinct from handing him back a leadership role at Banking,” said Sen. Chris Coons.

The Ohio Democrat served as the top Democrat on the Banking panel for a decade. He was also a longtime member of Finance as well as Agriculture, where he would also be the most senior member if his previous service counted.

To give Brown a gavel on Agriculture or Banking could set up clashes with the Democrats now expected to lead their party on the panels: Sens. Michael Bennet and Elizabeth Warren, respectively.

It would also break Senate Democrats’ caucus rules, and precedent is not on Brown’s side when it comes to making exceptions.

Still, aides and lobbyists around the panels expect Democrats will be eager to give Brown some sort of perch.

Those close to him have been encouraging him to seek the Agriculture gavel. It’d allow him to deliver valuable policy wins for Ohio’s rural areas, influence the farm bill if it gets punted to next year and help guide the direction of cryptocurrency regulation.

Another possibility that avoids an intraparty clash: hand Brown a seat on Appropriations, which could potentially give him a subcommittee gavel and federal funding clout.

Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has avoided any firm commitments on Brown’s seniority, saying last month when asked: “Let’s win back the Senate first.”

What else we’re watching:

— OMAR RAID RAISES QUESTIONS FOR GOP: House Republicans — including Majority Whip Tom Emmer — have publicly cheered on the Trump administration’s investigation of GOP boogeyman Rep. Ilhan Omar. But the raid raises thorny questions for GOP leaders about how aggressively Congress wants to defend itself — regardless of party — from encroaching federal prosecutors. Lawmakers’ work communications are protected from prosecutors’ scrutiny, with few exceptions, under the Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause. That draws into question whether the emails, texts, and materials on Omar’s phone, which was seized in the raid, could legally be reviewed by Trump officials. So far, Speaker Mike Johnson has yet to weigh in on how the House’s legal team may defend Omar.

— TRUMP’S TRICKY FARM MONEY PROMISE: Trump’s move Monday to turn out GOP voters by promising to send farmers $8 billion in taxpayer money is already facing a reality check. The internal USDA taxpayer-funded account Trump is tapping doesn’t actually have enough money in it right now to make the payments, meaning Congress will have to approve new funds or the administration will have to take it from another program, according to three Trump officials granted anonymity to discuss private conversations. Plus, farmers wouldn’t receive the payments until late November or early December at the earliest — well past Election Day, according to three people close to the plans.

Jasper Goodman, Grace Yarrow, Kyle Cheney and Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

Congress

This member is so frustrated with Congress he wants voters to sidestep it

Published

8 hours ago

October 21, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

At the end of one of the least productive Congresses in modern history, freshman Rep. Johnny Olszewski is so sick of the gridlock on Capitol Hill that he wants voters to bypass it entirely.

“It’s been a long two years,” the Maryland Democrat said in a Tuesday interview.

“One of the things that’s made it difficult as a new member is to see not only the dysfunction, but also the missed opportunities,” he added. “There are so many issues out there that Americans support that this Congress and frankly prior Congresses have failed to act on.”

Fed up with the lack of progress on popular policies like banning congressional stock trading, equipping police with body cameras or protecting in vitro fertilization, Olszewski is introducing a constitutional amendment Thursday, first shared with POLITICO, that would create a mechanism for voters to make federal law directly.

The measure would give voters 18 months to gather signatures from at least 5% of people who participated in the most recent presidential election in 25 states. Then any qualifying direct-democracy measure would be put on ballots for the next national election and need a 60% national majority to pass.

Votes to declare war or direct federal spending would not be eligible under the proposal.

“If we were acting, there’d be no need for this to come into play,” Olszewski said. “It would create a really important backstop for the American people to say, ‘You know what … irrespective of which party is in power, Congress is failing to meet not just our everyday needs but act on issues that we overwhelmingly support and want to see acted upon.’”

The amendment — which itself would require support from two-thirds of the House and Senate as well as three-quarters of states — is an incredible longshot and would create serious implementation headaches, but Olszewski — a former civics teacher — hopes his proposal will spark a discussion about congressional reform.

“I understand that any constitutional amendment is going to be difficult,” Olszewski said. “But I’m hopeful that at least for the lame duck session, this is an opportunity to create a conversation around the fact that we have been so gridlocked that we have failed to address the needs of the American people.”