Congress

Democrats on the verge of pushing out another committee leader

Published

2 years ago

December 11, 2024

Momentum is building among Democrats to oust their ailing leader on the House Agriculture Committee, part of the party’s generational shake-up on Capitol Hill in the wake of their demoralizing losses in November.

Rep. David Scott (D-Ga.) — the committee’s current ranking member — faces a challenge from fellow Democrats Reps. Jim Costa (Calif.) and Angie Craig (D-Minn.) for the post in the next Congress. And, according to more than two dozen House Democratic lawmakers and aides granted anonymity to discuss the matter, Scott is poised to lose the vote if he doesn’t step aside before then.

“The race is against Costa and Craig at this point,” said one House Democratic lawmaker. “Scott is done.”

If he loses, Scott would be the third septuagenarian House Democrat push out of a committee leadership role in the new Congress — along with Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) and Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), who ended bids to continue as ranking members on the House Natural Resources and House Judiciary Committees following challenges from younger Democrats. And it would be a sign of just how strongly the party wants to turn the page on an older generation of leaders, particularly after losing an election many blame on 82-year President Joe Biden’s initial decision to run for a second term.

“It’s in the air. People want heads to roll on our side,” a House Democratic aide said.

At this point, Scott can only survive if the powerful Steering Committee recommends him for the post again when the panel meets next Monday. Such a move would essentially block Costa and Craig from consideration. But House Democrats, including several on the Steering panel, don’t expect that to happen.

Costa has strong ties to a bloc of senior Democrats on the Steering panel who have been pushing for him. Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has also been telling members she is supporting Costa in the race and trying to advocate for him, according to three people familiar with the conversations. Craig meanwhile is a frontline Democrat who has a strong relationship with Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and his leadership team. Jeffries, according to Democratic lawmakers, hasn’t discouraged her or any other Democrat from challenging Scott and additional senior panel leaders.

Spokespeople for Jeffries and Pelosi declined to comment.

Costa, a Congressional Hispanic Caucus member, also secured the endorsement of the influential caucus Tuesday, according to two people familiar with the closed-door meeting.

Separate discussions are also underway among some members who are searching for a way for the Steering Committee to refrain from making any recommendation on the Agriculture panel race — which would effectively greenlight Scott’s ouster without the panel having to overtly move against him.

Scott, 79, has faced a number of behind-the-scenes attempts to remove him as the Agriculture Committee’s leading Democrat in recent years, as Blue Light News has reported. He became the first Black chair of the Agriculture Committee in 2021, and then stayed on as ranking member in 2023. But a growing group of fellow Democrats have complained to party leaders that he is no longer able to effectively lead the committee, which faces critical negotiations on a $1.5 trillion farm bill in the next Congress.

Spokespeople for Scott did not respond to an inquiry. But Rep. Sanford Bishop (D-Ga.), who still supports Scott, said his fellow Georgia Democrat indicated in a recent conversation that he was staying in the Agriculture panel race.

Scott missed two weeks of votes last month to receive treatment for back problems, and currently relies on a wheelchair to get around the Capitol. And he has shed so much personal staff in recent years that his 26-year-old chief of staff, who was recently promoted from legislative assistant, is one of the few people left in his office to navigate the fallout as members dig in to oust remove Scott from his leadership role.

Scott won his post with the support of then-Speaker Pelosi and the powerful Congressional Black Caucus, but those alliances are now crumbling.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who himself represents a new generation of Democratic leadership, has not publicly backed Scott as strongly in recent monthas Pelosi once did. Jeffries and his leadership team also made the rare move last year to start personally attending several meetings with Scott and his agriculture panel Democrats after members continued to raise alarms about Scott.

In private conversations with rank-and-file members, Jeffries and his team have taken concerns about Scott seriously, according to three Democratic lawmakers familiar with the conversations.

The CBC is navigating its own generational divide on the matter and has so far stayed silent on the challenges to Scott’s leadership in the next Congress, despite strongly pushing back on an effort to replace him in 2022.

“I don’t think he has the capacity,” said one younger House Democrat who is a CBC member, who was granted anonymity to candidly discuss the matter. “I’m leaning towards Angie.”

Asked if younger members within the Black Caucus are more willing to oust Scott compared to the older guard who’ve long backed the Georgia Democrat, the young CBC member responded: “Absolutely.”

But in an incredibly striking move, even some older Black Caucus members say they’re still weighing their options.

“I haven’t made up my mind,” said Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the top Democrat on the Homeland Security panel. “But I do want someone who…can carry the Democratic message far and wide…We need the strongest voice.”

Thompson headed the farm bill task force that Jeffries created in 2023, effectively removing a major piece of Scott’s workload as ranking member. Democrats pleaded with Thompson and senior Democrats for him to take over the Agriculture panel from Scott, but Thompson resisted their efforts.

Scott has raised eyebrows by not showing up to several candidate forums to make his case members. Thompson said it was his understanding that Scott isn’t attending the Black Caucus member forum Wednesday.

“I think that’s a mistake,” Thompson said. “I think anyone running has to make their case as to why they’re there. It’s part of the process.”

“The first inclination of course is to support him,” said Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the Foreign Affairs Committee. “However, I’m also talking to members of the committee, etc. to see where they are.”

“Any member that’s not feeling well, I have concerns about their health, and obviously he would be one of them,” Meeks added, when asked about other members’ concerns regarding Scott.

On Monday, Scott’s team scheduled a meeting with him and House Agriculture Democrats for Wednesday (right before the CBC candidate forum Scott is expected to skip) to provide an update on the ongoing farm bill extension talks as negotiators are close to a deal, according to two Democrats familiar with the plans. Scott’s panel staff have dug into hammering out a complex farm bill extension agreement in a way that’s made fellow lawmakers believe the Georgia Democrat will try to hang onto the role until the very end. He also hasn’t made any indication to panel Democrats that he plans to step aside and told Blue Light News just off the House floor last week that he was in fact not dropping out of the ranking member race.

Scott also skipped making his case before the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which is chaired by House Agriculture member Greg Casar (D-Texas), and a separate closed-door candidate forum on Tuesday for the New Democrat Coalition, a center-left caucus of about 100 Democrats, of which he’s a member.

Congress

House Oversight requests Alan Dershowitz testify in Epstein probe

Published

18 hours ago

June 12, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

The House Oversight Committee requested that Alan Dershowitz, the lawyer who once represented Jeffery Epstein, testify as part of its investigation into the federal government’s handling of the Epstein files.

The interview is tentatively slated for 10 a.m. on July 9, with a video and transcript of the testimony being released “as expeditiously as practical,” Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) wrote in a letter to Dershowitz on Friday.

“Due to public reporting, documents released by the Department of Justice, documents obtained by the Committee, and your former role as Mr. Epstein’s attorney, the Committee believes you have information that will assist in its investigation,” Comer wrote.

Comer told reporters on Wednesday that he wanted to hear from Dershowitz, who helped Epstein secure a controversial plea deal in his 2008 sex abuse case.

“I’m looking forward to testifying,” Dershowitz wrote in a text message to Blue Light News on Friday, adding that he is “trying to adjust my schedule” for July 9.

Congress

Cornyn tells Mike Lee to lay off John Thune

Published

20 hours ago

June 12, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Sen. John Cornyn isn’t a card-carrying member of the Senate GOP’s growing YOLO caucus. But with less than seven months left in office after losing his primary, the Texas Republican appears to be feeling newly free to speak his mind.

The latest clap-back came Thursday night and the early hours of Friday morning, when Cornyn called a conservative influencer a “grifter” and told Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) on social media to stop publicly blaming fellow Republicans — including Senate Majority Leader John Thune — for the fact that the GOP elections bill doesn’t have support to pass inside the party.

“You don’t have the votes” for the SAVE America Act, Cornyn posted on X. “@LeaderJohnThune can’t change that. It is math.”

He was directing his comments at Lee, who had just penned a post telling Thune, “let’s do this!”

Cornyn continued, “Try focusing on Democrats instead of Republicans. Republican on Republican attacks are hurting our chances to win the majority in November.”

Lee responded to ask, “on what planet is this an attack on Republicans?” and appeared to suggest a staffer was tweeting on Cornyn’s behalf: “Once my friend John Cornyn realizes that you’re saying this in his name—whoever you are—I don’t think he’ll be happy with you.”

Cornyn, however, is known for posting himself on his social media accounts in a chamber where many Senate accounts are run solely by staff. And he’s been making it clear all week that he will push back on Trump and his party when he thinks it’s needed.

In multiple conversations with reporters in the Capitol, Cornyn said that Republicans need to “stop the circular firing squad.” And he added that he won’t intentionally be “a thorn in [Trump’s] side,” but he’s also “not going to go out of my way to try to appease him.”

“I want him to succeed, I want the Republican Party to succeed, I want the country to succeed,” Cornyn said this week. “But on a case-by-case basis, when I think there’s been overreach or just a bad idea, I’m not going to hesitate to weigh in.”

The four-term senator’s comments come after he lost his primary last month to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who Trump endorsed in the final days of the runoff.

Cornyn said in an interview with The New York Times that he was not a “wounded bear” but that he believed Trump’s insistence on “slavish adherence” was going to backfire for Republicans in the midterms and result in “the most miserable two years of his life” if Democrats flip the House or Senate.

“I think it is going to be a pretty bumpy ride for the next seven months,” Cornyn said.

Congress

Capitol agenda: What Schumer told us about AI

Published

1 day ago

June 12, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Chuck Schumer wants Congress to pass AI legislation. But he’s casting doubt on it happening this year.

“In this Congress, it’s hard,” the Senate minority leader said in an interview Thursday.

Schumer’s reality check isn’t a complete door-slam. But it underscores the steep climb lawmakers face to bridge a slew of intra-party and inter-chamber divides about what Washington’s approach should be toward the emerging opportunities and risks from the rapidly developing technology.

The problems are multi-pronged.

The White House, whose posture toward AI has shifted dramatically in recent weeks, is angling to enact legislation that would preempt state laws in favor of a national standard. Most recently, administration officials have been exploring a plan to attach preemption legislation to bills designed to shore up kids’ safety online. But there are issues — House Republicans aren’t in love with the Senate GOP’s kid safety bills and Senate Majority Leader John Thune has warned that many senators have concerns “about not trampling states’ rights in the process.”

Democrats aren’t unified on what to do next, with the public broadly skeptical about AI.

Some House and Senate Democrats are leery of state preemption and want to wait until next year to tackle AI, when they might be in power. Opposition from key Democrats is a major factor derailing an attempt by Reps. Lori Trahan and Jay Obernolte to strike a deal on legislation that would set nationwide safety and transparency rules while restricting state action. And Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have proposed a moratorium on AI data centers pending stricter government oversight.

Schumer is striking a balanced tone on how to proceed, arguing that there are “tremendous benefits” from AI but that “we also have to have guardrails.”

“We should get something done on AI, and it’s … got to be balanced — keep innovation strong, but have guardrails to prevent the dangers,” he said. “That’s a hard needle to thread, but I would very much like to see that get done the sooner the better.”

What else we’re watching:

— FISA LAPSE, CLAYTON NOMINATION: Thune is vowing to move “fairly quickly” to confirm Jay Clayton as director of national intelligence, with the FISA Section 702 spy authority set to lapse at midnight thanks to a stalemate between Democrats and the White House over the position.

— GOP ADVANCES BIG DEFENSE BOOST — Republicans have taken the first steps toward granting President Donald Trump’s request for the largest budget ever for the Pentagon. Senate Armed Services members on Thursday approved a draft of their annual defense authorization bill outlining priorities for $1.14 trillion in defense spending next year. The House Appropriations defense subcommittee advanced $1.1 trillion in fiscal 2027 funding for the Defense Department in a closed-door markup.

Calen Razor and Connor O’Brien contributed reporting.