Connect with us

Politics

Democrats get aggressive on remapping congressional lines

Published

on

Democrats are launching a redistricting counteroffensive across the country as they try to keep pace with the GOP’s aggressive gerrymandering ahead of next year’s midterms.

Recent developments in Virginia, New York and Illinois mark an escalation among Democrats after months of internal deliberations and inaction on how to combat President Donald Trump’s push to redraw congressional lines throughout the nation. He’s eyeing up to 19 new GOP seats as his party looks to retain its slim House majority, according to a Blue Light News analysis. The nascent Democratic rebuttal in recent days is the minority party’s most aggressive set of moves yet outside of California, where voters will decide next week whether to create a new congressional map that would grant the state five blue seats.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries made stops in Chicago and Springfield, Ill., with state and federal legislative leaders Monday on his latest swing to convince local lawmakers to redraw their maps. Democrats could pick up one seat in the Prairie State.

Virginia lawmakers on Monday began to amend the state’s constitution to enable drawing new lines ahead of the 2026 midterms. And in New York, a prominent Democratic election lawyer’s firm filed suit Monday challenging the constitutionality of a Republican-held congressional district and opening the door to another potential redraw.

It all amounts to a new tenor for a party grasping for victory after devastating losses last year.

“This is unprecedented stuff to undermine the ability of the American people to participate in the free and fair election, which is why Democrats, on behalf of the American people, need to respond decisively,” Jeffries told reporters after Monday’s high-stakes meeting in Chicago with Black leaders.

He said that it’s essential to counter Trump’s push that’s underway in Texas, North Carolina and Missouri. The White House is also pressuring the Republican-led states of Indiana and Kansas to redesign their congressional maps, with Indiana Gov. Mike Braun calling a special session Monday to consider redrawing its congressional districts. The GOP’s effort threatens to put Democrats at a steep disadvantage and has been raising pressure on party leaders to respond.

Virginia Democrats could swing as many as three of the state’s 11 congressional seats away from Republicans.

Democrats are working against a tight timeline to present voters with a new map. Under the state’s constitution, a new amendment to create the lines has to be approved by consecutive sessions of the state legislature, with an election occurring in between the votes. That sets up a statewide referendum, which can’t take place until at least 90 days after the amendment is passed, just two months before the state’s primaries next year.

The action in the Virginia General Assembly has scrambled the final days of the state’s off-year election, topped with the high-profile gubernatorial contest. All members in the House of Delegates are on the ballot, and are being yanked off the campaign trail the week before the election as they head to Richmond to approve the amendment.

Virginia Republicans have blasted their rivals’ surprise push as undermining the will of voters.

“Democrats in our General Assembly are calling this special session not to serve the people but to serve themselves,” Winsome Earle-Sears, the Republican nominee for governor, said in a press conference ahead of the special session. As lieutenant governor, Earle-Sears serves as presiding officer of the state Senate.

In New York, the lawsuit filed on behalf of a group of residents argues the state’s congressional map illegally dilutes Black and Latino voters. The district in question, which encompasses Staten Island and parts of Brooklyn, is represented by GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who has been the focus of Democratic mapmakers since the start of the last redistricting cycle. The suit, brought by Elias Law Group, asks for a judge to chop off the moderate Brooklyn portion of the district, replacing it with deep blue portions of Lower Manhattan.

A Democratic court victory leading to changes before 2026 would require quick movement. The trial level court has two months to issue a decision, said New York Law School’s Jeff Wice. “And then it would go through the appellate division challenge and then the Court of Appeals. So the clock is ticking on this case,” he added.

New York GOP Chair Ed Cox said in a statement that the lawsuit “is seeking a blatant racial gerrymander,” and the current district “is compact, respected communities of interest, and has been approved by both the courts and the State Legislature.”

Jeffries’ visit to Illinois coincided with the state General Assembly’s fall session, which could take up the issue in the coming days. Those efforts face opposition from some of the state’s Black leaders over concerns that a new map would dilute their influence across congressional districts.

State Sen. Willie Preston, head of the Senate Black Caucus, said he would oppose any map that reduces Black political power. “We understand what’s at stake, but if Black representation is going to be diluted, that’s not a map I can support,” he said.

And in Colorado, Democrats may have another state to add to their gameplan.

Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, who is running for governor, is calling for Democrats to put forward a “break glass in case of emergency” ballot initiative in 2026 that would give the state Legislature the power to redraw its congressional map for 2028 and then return the reins to the Colorado’s independent redistricting commission. While Democratic Gov. Jared Polis, who is term-limited, has shown no appetite for circumventing the commission, Weiser insisted there’s a groundswell of support for doing so as more red states redistrict.

“I remain open and even modestly hopeful that other states will see the handwriting on the wall and we won’t have to go down this road,” he said. “But if that’s not the case, we can’t deny reality. We have to be prepared to do our part.”

Lisa Kashinsky contributed reporting

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Democratic governors pledge to boycott White House events after a Trump snub

Published

on

Most of the nation’s Democratic governors pledged to not attend events hosted by the White House later this month, after President Donald Trump snubbed some state executives amid his ongoing feud with blue states.

Blue Light News reported last week that the White House decided to invite only Republicans to a meeting between the president and governors that was timed to the National Governors Association’s annual gathering — a break from its bipartisan past. And while a dinner celebrating governors of both parties was still planned, some Democrats — including Wes Moore of Maryland and Jared Polis of Colorado — confirmed they did not receive an invitation.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that while the White House is the people’s house, “it’s also the president’s home, and so he can invite whomever he wants to dinners and events here at the White House.”

Trump’s decision not to invite Moore — the association’s vice chair — and Polis sparked backlash from Democrats, with 18 sitting governors announcing that they would boycott the dinner.

“If the reports are true that not all governors are invited to these events, which have historically been productive and bipartisan opportunities for collaboration, we will not be attending the White House dinner this year,” the Democratic governors wrote in a joint statement Tuesday. “Democratic governors remain united and will never stop fighting to protect and make life better for people in our states.”

Moore also suggested Sunday that his race may have played a role in the White House’s decision not to invite him to the event.

“It’s not lost on me that I’m the only Black governor in this country, and I find that to be particularly painful, considering the fact that the president is trying to exclude me from an organization that not only my peers have asked me to help to lead, but then also a place where I know I belong in,” he said in an interview with BLN’s “State of the Union.”

Blue Light News previously reported that the NGA decided not to sponsor the planned meeting between Trump and the governors once it became clear only Republicans would be invited, with the organization writing in an email to people involved in planning that “no NGA resources will be used to support transportation for this activity.”

Brandon Tatum, the CEO of the NGA, said in a statement last week that the group was “disappointed in the administration’s decision to make it a partisan occasion this year.”

At last year’s annual meeting between Trump and the governors, the president got into an argument with Maine Gov. Janet Mills over his administration’s moves to restrict transgender athletes’ participation in school sports, with Trump ultimately threatening to pull funding and Mills promising to sue.

The NGA has undergone considerable turmoil in the last year, with Democratic governors raising alarm about the association’s unwillingness to more vocally criticize the Trump administration.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker threatened to withdraw from the group over Trump’s decision to deploy other states’ National Guard troops to their states.

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, the group’s Republican chair, also criticized the administration’s National Guard deployments, telling The New York Times in an October interview that he worried the president was undermining states’ rights.

In a letter sent Monday by Stitt to other governors and obtained by The Associated Press, he urged members to unite together, writing “the solution is not to respond in kind, but to rise above and to remain focused on our shared duty to the people we serve.”

The New York Times also first reported last week that some Democratic governors weren’t invited to the dinner.

“The President has the discretion to invite whomever he wants to the White House, and he welcomes all those who received an invitation to come, and if they don’t want to, that’s their loss,” Leavitt said of the dinner on Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Politics

NYC officials plan to reraise pride flag at Manhattan’s Stonewall monument after Trump administration removed it

Published

on

New York City officials plan to reraise a pride flag at the federal monument at Stonewall in Manhattan, setting up a potential fight with the White House at the birthplace of the modern gay rights movement nearly 60 years ago.

Federal officials quietly took the flag down after the Trump administration in January issued guidance drastically limiting the types of flags that could be displayed at sites managed by the National Park Service. But Manhattan Borough President Brad Hoylman-Sigal said in an interview on Tuesday that he and other New York City-area politicians would reraise the flag at the federal monument on Thursday.

“I think it’s important that we speak out and stand up for the community, frankly, just as our forebearers, who exhibited much more courage back in 1969,” he said. “This is not a moment for our community to stand by idly as attempts to undermine our history are put forward by Trump and the federal administration.”

The Stonewall Inn was the site of famous protests in 1969, which were sparked after police raided the New York City gay bar and arrested its patrons. The subsequent uprisings led to greater visibility for gay and lesbian people across the country.

The Inn remains in private hands, but a park across the street is national parkland. Hoylman-Sigal said New York City officials intended to raise the flag on federal land.

The Department of Interior — NPS’ parent agency — confirmed the flag was removed in a statement.

“Under government-wide guidance, including General Services Administration policy and Department of the Interior direction, only the U.S. flag and other congressionally or departmentally authorized flags are flown on NPS-managed flagpoles, with limited exceptions,” the Department of the Interior said in a statement. “Any changes to flag displays are made to ensure consistency with that guidance.”

An Interior spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the New York City officials’ plans. The National Park Service did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Trump administration has made several changes to national parks as the president pushes what he describes as an “anti-DEI” agenda. The agency took down exhibits on slavery at the Philadelphia site of the Liberty Bell and Independence Hall in January. And last August, NPS announced plans to reinstate a statue of Confederate general Albert Pike in Washington.

Hoylman-Sigal called the latest move “another outrage by the Trump administration directed at the LGBTQ community, whether it’s transgender youth or immigrants or queer people in general.”

Pride flags have continued to fly at the Stonewall Inn and visitor’s center, which are privately owned, according to Brandon Wolf, the national press secretary at the LGBTQ+ rights group Human Rights Campaign.

“We will keep showing up at Stonewall, for each other, and being out and proud,” he said in a statement. “There’s nothing the White House can do about that.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Epstein made regular payments to Ohio State head of gynecology, records show

Published

on

Epstein made regular payments to Ohio State head of gynecology, records show

Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein paid Ohio State University’s head of gynecology quarterly payments of thousands of dollars, Department of Justice files show…
Read More

Continue Reading

Trending