Some of President Donald Trump’s Capitol Hill critics were quick to condemn his administration’s military action against Iran early Saturday, criticizing what they described as an unjustified act of war that hadn’t been approved by Congress.

Shortly after reports of the attack against Tehran emerged in the predawn hours, frequent Trump-basher Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) characterized the strikes on social media as “acts of war unauthorized by Congress.”

Massie and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) had planned to force votes next week on legislation that would curb Trump’s ability to take unilateral military action against Iran without congressional approval. But the U.S.’ Saturday morning strikes came before the bipartisan pair was able to compel a war powers vote.

One of the first Democrats to respond to the strikes, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), condemned the attack on social media, writing that “we can support the democracy movement and the Iranian people without sending our troops to die.”

In a Saturday morning video announcing the strike, Trump warned “the lives of courageous American heroes may be lost and we may have casualties. That often happens in war, but we’re doing this for the future.” It’s unclear if there were casualties.

Other lawmakers, including longtime Iran hawk Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) rejoiced at the joint U.S.-Israel operation, calling it “necessary and long justified.”

“The end of the largest state sponsor of terrorism is upon us,” Graham wrote on social media. “Freedom for the long suffering Iranian people.” The South Carolina senator has repeatedly encouraged military action against Iran, urging Trump to follow through on his January promise to respond with force after the Iranian regime killed thousands of its own citizens during a mass wave of protests.

In a longer post, Graham lauded what he called a “well-planned” operation, though he acknowledged it would be “violent, extensive and I believe, at the end of the day, successful.” Graham also deliberated on what he predicted would be the fall of the nearly 50-year old Islamic Republic, arguing that “the likelihood of normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel getting back on track is exceedingly high.”

Crossing the aisle, Sen. John Fetterman (D-Penn.) joined Graham in cheering on the operation. “President Trump has been willing to do what’s right and necessary to produce real peace in the region,” Fetterman wrote on social media.

The attack is sure to be a politically risky move for the president — especially ahead of this fall’s midterms. Trump had vowed not to entangle the U.S. in any more foreign wars, a promise that he made part of his America First agenda. But as recent POLITICO polling showed, his base has embraced the president’s increasingly aggressive use of military might abroad, with nearly half of Trump voters saying they would support U.S. military action in Iran.

For lawmakers less eager to strike Iran, the Trump administration has sought to make the case that Tehran was working toward developing a nuclear weapon. During last week’s State of the Union, Trump accused Tehran of rebuilding its nuclear program — something the president has repeatedly said he would not allow happen.

In the days leading up to Saturday morning’s strikes, Secretary of State Marco Rubio briefed top House and Senate leaders and intelligence committee heads on Iran. Democrats emerged from the classified briefing arguing that the Trump administration needed to lay out its justification to the American public before entering into a potential war with Tehran.

“Look, this is serious, and the administration has to make its case to the American people,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune stressed at the time that “consultation” with Congress “needs to happen” on Iran before any military action.

CHAPPAQUA, New York — As House Republicans and Democrats embarked on two days of depositions with Bill and Hillary Clinton, both sides professed a seriousness of purpose to find answers that could aid their investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

They left with completely different versions of what transpired behind closed doors.

Republicans said President Donald Trump was now “exonerated.” Democrats said Trump was no such thing and called the event an “unserious clown show.” And amid dueling news conferences and social media posts throughout Thursday and Friday, the public is now left with starkly divergent narratives in a congressional probe that shows few signs of ending anytime soon.

The split screen underscores the politically fraught nature of the House investigation, which is unfolding as the electorate clamors for someone to be held accountable for the years that the sex trafficking operation of Epstein and his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, went unchecked.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee spent hours grilling both Clintons — the former secretary of State on Thursday and the former president on Friday — about Epstein and Maxwell, in compliance with a pair of subpoenas issued by the panel as part of its long-running Epstein investigation.

Republican and Democratic committee members took turns chiding each other for their characterizations of the Clintons’ testimonies, while also selectively leaking comments from inside the room to support their respective party lines.

Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said that Bill Clinton told the committee that Trump “never said anything to me to make me think he was involved” with Epstein and left Republicans confident there was no reason now to depose the president.

“From all the evidence I’ve seen, he’s been exonerated for a long time,” Comer said of Trump during a news conference Friday.

Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the committee, said repeatedly the former president’s deposition Friday sets a precedent for Trump to testify under oath, and that Comer’s remarks were not an “accurate description” of Bill Clinton’s testimony.

Democrats said Bill Clinton’s deposition raised additional questions about Trump and Epstein’s falling out. Trump has long said he kicked Epstein out of his club, Mar-a-Lago in Florida, years before Epstein’s 2019 arrest on sex trafficking charges, because he “stole people that worked for me,” while the White House has said Epstein was banned “for being a creep.”

Neither of the Clintons have been accused of misconduct in connection with Epstein. Bill Clinton has maintained he was an acquaintance of Epstein’s and traveled on his plane several times internationally, while Secret Service details were present, but stopped communicating with him at least a decade before his arrest in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges.

Trump also has not been charged with any wrongdoing. Behind closed doors, however, Bill Clinton testified that Trump told him he and Epstein had “great times together,” according to a person in the room who was granted anonymity to describe the private deposition.

Democratic Rep. Maxwell Frost said Bill Clinton testified that Trump told him the falling out with Epstein was over a land dispute.

“He’s been caught in multiple lies as it relates to his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein,” Frost said.

Bill Clinton’s office did not immediately return a request for comment. The White House referred back to an earlier statement from press secretary Karoline Leavitt, who said, “the President has always remained consistent in that he kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club at Mar-a-Lago because frankly, Jeffrey Epstein was a creep.”

The Republican-led committee is expected to release videos of the proceedings as soon as this weekend. Democrats on the committee requested full, unedited versions to be made public, with each side promising their version of events will then be vindicated.

Republicans are under increasing public pressure to have something to show for their investigation and are eager to find a win in the Clintons’ testimony.

Comer said Friday his panel would call in additional witnesses as part of the ongoing probe, saying lawmakers had refrained from naming any of these individuals before the Clintons’ depositions. He suggested names could be announced before the depositions of the co-executors of Epstein’s estate, which will take place in the coming weeks.

“I didn’t want to do anything that jeopardized losing them,” he told reporters Friday, referring to the Clintons.

As lawmakers left the deposition site in Chappaqua, it also appeared likely the panel would soon subpoena Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who has faced calls to resign over revelations in the Justice Department’s materials about the extent of his relationship with Epstein. Rep Nancy Mace of South Carolina, a Republican on the Oversight panel, said she was on board.

Lutnick recently acknowledged that he visited Epstein’s island in 2012 with his family, after he previously claimed their relationship ended before Epstein was convicted in 2008 of soliciting a -r0st9t8te. Lutnick has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein’s crimes.

“We have a lot of questions about anyone who spent time with Epstein post-conviction,” Comer told reporters when asked about calling in Lutnick to testify.

Former President Bill Clinton told members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that it’s “for you to decide” whether to call up the current president, Donald Trump, to testify in the panel’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation, chair James Comer told reporters Friday.

“[He] went on to say that, ‘President Trump has never said anything to me to make me think he was involved and he met with Epstein,’” Comer, a Kentucky Republican, recalled Bill Clinton telling the committee during his deposition.

“I know there’s a lot of curiosity about President Trump,” Comer continued. “I thought that was an interesting thing that President Clinton said.”

But Rep. Robert Garcia of California, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said in a subsequent news conference during a break in the deposition proceedings that Comer’s remarks were not an “accurate description” of Bill Clinton’s testimony.

Garcia declined to share more details, accusing Republicans of breaking the rules with their disclosures about what was being discussed inside the room. But he reiterated that Trump should be subpoenaed in the panel’s Epstein probe.

Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) said that he now, in fact, had “new questions” about Trump’s alleged falling out with Epstein. Trump has said the two men fell out years before Epstein’s 2019 arrest and that he had no part in Epstein’s criminal activities. Trump also has not been charged with any crimes.

Bill Clinton has maintained he was an acquaintance of Epstein’s but stopped communicating with him at least a decade before the late financier’s arrest in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, during her testimony before the committee Thursday, denied ever meeting Epstein and said she had no knowledge of his or Maxwell’s crimes.

Neither of the Clintons have been accused of wrongdoing.