The Dictatorship

Congress needs to help Americans make sense of what happened in Minneapolis

Published

4 hours ago

February 16, 2026

Feb. 15, 2026, 6:00 AM EST

ByMark Greenblatt

Because President Donald Trump administration’s immediately responded to the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by demonizing them and defending the immigration officers who shot them dead, it seems a safe bet the Justice Department won’t fully investigate or seriously consider pursuing criminal charges in either shooting. Consequently, there’s a pervasive sinking feeling that there’ll never be a resolution and that the two Minneapolis shootings will remain a festering wound. Each side has put forward its preferred narrative, and while one subset of Americans wouldn’t trust an inquiry by the Republicans who control the federal government, another subset wouldn’t trust an inquiry led by Minnesota Democrats.

What America needs is something similar to the 9/11 Commission.

What America needs, then, is something similar to the 9/11 Commission: an independent, nonpartisan national commission created by Congress and empowered to investigate the facts surrounding these shootings and the broader circumstances that allowed them to occur. Such a commission should be led by respected, nonpartisan professionals, perhaps former judges or inspectors general, who are chosen for their professional integrity and independence, not political affiliation and can be expected to gather the facts in a fair and objective manner. With the appointment of such commissioners and a mandate that the process be transparent, Congress could help instill confidence in the fairness of the outcome.

As was the case with the 9/11 Commission, the goal of this commission wouldn’t be a mere determination of what happened in two tragic encounters but insight into what happened before the tragedies. In this case, we would expect such a commission to give its attention to the systemic practices — including federal use-of-force rules, coordination (or lack thereof) with local authorities, body-worn camera usage and the chain of command — under which these operations were conducted. Beyond finding facts, we’d want such a panel to prescribe reforms to prevent future tragedies, whether through clearer use-of-force guidelines, mandatory body cameras, better community engagement protocols or new oversight mechanisms.

Both senior Democrats and Republicans have called for an independent review of what happened in Minneapolis, and such an independent commission would be good for both sides of the aisle. For example, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich.expressed skepticism on Thursday of the official account of Pretti’s killing and DHS’ response since then.

A commission likely would not descend into partisan bickering like the Jan. 6 committee; rather, it would give time for cooler heads to prevail and allow breathing space to deescalate the tensions. Second, a transparent process with neutral arbiters would instill confidence that all voices and relevant evidence are considered. Even if some ultimately disagree with the commission’s findings, there will likely be public confidence that the process was fair. That alone would help lower the temperature and reduce the risk of further escalation.

Those who believe the federal agents were justified in those shootings should welcome such a review, as an independent review could exonerate the officers. On the flip side, those who believe the officers used excessive force should also welcome an independent review because they’re not inclined to trust an internal review conducted by the same agencies whose actions are under scrutiny, especially not when the relevant leaders immediately labeled the shooting victims “domestic terrorists.”

Normally, I would call for the inspector general to take the lead, but this is a unique circumstance.

I’m speaking from experience. When I was inspector general of the U.S. Department of the Interior, my office conducted a review of a 2017 fatal federal law enforcement shooting of an unarmed person in a vehicle just outside Washington, D.C.

The circumstances were eerily similar to the Good shooting and, like the Minnesota events, were highly politicized. We ultimately found that the Park Police officers’ actions did not violate relevant policies.

Normally, I would call for the relevant agency inspector general to take the lead, as they are perfectly positioned to conduct independent reviews. But this is a unique circumstance. First, DHS has reportedly threatenedto shut down the OIG’s oversight over immigration-related efforts. In my experience, no agency has ever used this authority to terminate an IG’s oversight, but even that threat could hang over the IG’s head like the Sword of Damocles. Second, while I have great confidence in the professionals in the OIG community across the federal government, Democrats have previously called for the resignation of the DHS inspector generaland, thus, are unlikely to trust the results from that office.

To be clear, the DHS OIG staff is professional and capable of high-quality work. But I don’t see Congress having any confidence in the credibility of reports under this IG’s signature. Removing these matters from DHS and placing them in the hands of an external, transparent and credible commission would bring forensic rigor, public legitimacy and moral authority is the right for this moment of profound national consequence.

We are at an inflection point. Minneapolis is not the only place these issues are unfolding. Protests and debates are happening across the country, from Boston to San Francisco. Confidence in federal law enforcement, especially when local communities feel disenfranchised from the process, is fraying. Trust, once lost, is hard to rebuild.

The country deserve a process rooted in honesty, fairness and accountability.

America deserves more than competing narratives. The country deserve a process rooted in honesty, fairness and accountability. To those who argue that existing mechanisms are sufficient, I would say this:A crisis that roils the country demands an extraordinary response.Ordinary oversight cannot repair extraordinary damage to public trust. Ordinary explanations cannot address extraordinary questions about federal authority, force and the rights of citizens.

An independent commission, modeled on the 9/11 Commission or other bipartisan inquiries into national trauma, would bring clarity where there is confusion. It would give context where there is chaos. History will judge us not by what we say today, but by what steps we take tomorrow. Let us act with courage, with integrity and with the resolve to restore public trust in the institutions that must serve us all.

Mark Greenblatt

Mark Greenblatt was inspector general of the Interior Department from August 2019 until January 2025. He also served as chairman of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency from 2023 to 2024 and as vice chair from 2022 to 2023.

The Dictatorship

Rubio says ‘no reason’ to doubt Navalny was killed by dart frog poison

Published

4 hours ago

February 16, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Feb. 15, 2026, 6:50 PM EST

ByDavid Rohde

Secretary of State Marco Rubio says there is “no reason” to doubt a new report by five European nations that Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny was killed in a Russian government prison with poison found in Latin American dart frogs.

A fatal toxin not found naturally in Russia — epibatidine — was “conclusively” discovered in samples of Navalny’s body by a joint investigation conducted by Germany, France, Britain, the Netherlands and Sweden, according to a joint statement by the nations on Saturday.

The toxin is only known to exist in poison dart frogs in Central and South America. One species, the phantasmal poison frog, contains a chemical that is 200 times more potent than morphine.

“It’s a troubling report,” Rubio told reporters at a news conference during a visit to Slovakia on Sunday. “We don’t have any reason to question it.”

It was not clear why the United States did not participate in the investigation of Navalny’s death. But the finding comes amid rising support in the Senate for a bill that would impose sweeping new sanctions against the government of Vladimir Putin, which has been opposed by the Trump administration.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, noted on the closing day of the Munich Security Conference, where Rubio received a standing ovationthat 84 out of 100 senators have signed on to co-sponsor the bill authored by Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

“I don’t understand the reluctance to go after Vladimir Putin and what Russia is doing in Ukraine,” Shaheen told a group of reporters. “The failure by the United States to act has extended this war.”

Russian officials have repeatedly denied playing any role in the death of Navalny two years ago in a government-run penal colony in the Arctic. They called the new European report “a Western propaganda hoax,” according to Russia’s state news agency.

The report comes as U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kusher, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, are expected to meet with both Russian and Iranian officials on Tuesday in Geneva. The goal of the Russia talks is to reach a peace settlement in Ukraine by a June deadline the administration has set. (Witkoff and Kushner are also set to join a second round of nuclear talks with Iranian officials in Geneva on the same day.)

Critics of Trump, who promised to end the war days after returning to office, say Russia has not been seriously negotiating and is simply playing for time so it can gain ground on the battlefield. Democrats have also expressed concerns over reports that Witkoff has been negotiating business deals during peace talks with Kirill Dmitriev, a former Wall Street banker who runs Russia’s sovereign wealth fund.

Last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that Dmitriev pitched $12 trillion in bilateral economic agreements with the U.S. It is unclear how such large deals could be achieved. The $12 trillion figure is about four times the size of Russia’s 2025 gross domestic product.

A European diplomat whose country has negotiated with Russia in the past told MS NOW that Moscow has repeatedly made such investment offers. But the business entities end up being largely Russian controlled. “They lure you in,” said the diplomat, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly.

Shaheen expressed skepticism as well.

“I’m concerned about all things Russian in this administration,” Shaheen said. “I’m not a conspiracy theorist. But I’m beginning to become one with respect to Putin and President Trump.”

David Rohde

David Rohde is the senior national security reporter for MS NOW. Previously he was the senior executive editor for national security and law for NBC News.

The Dictatorship

FBI links glove found near Nancy Guthrie’s home to suspect on video

Published

4 hours ago

February 16, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Feb. 15, 2026, 3:51 PM EST

A glove with DNA found near 84-year-old missing Nancy Guthrie’s home appears to match those worn by a masked person caught on surveillance footage, the FBI said Sunday.

“The FBI received preliminary results yesterday on 2/14 and are awaiting further testing,” the bureau said in a statement. “This process typically takes 24 hours from when the FBI receives DNA.”

The FBI said investigators collected “approximately 16 gloves in various areas near” Guthrie’s house in Tucson, Arizonawhere she was last seen on Jan. 31. Most of those gloves were “searchers’s gloves that they discarded in various areas when they searched the vicinity” but the glove with the “DNA profile recovered is different and appears to match the gloves of the subject in the surveillance video,” the FBI said.

“What we have is a lead here. The glove retrieved would need to have the victim’s DNA or some other forensic material to tie it to the home,” a law-enforcement source familiar with the investigation cautioned. “It must be connected to the home and victim. That would make the glove actual evidence, at this point it’s a lead. A good lead.”

The FBI said said the glove was found in a field approximately two miles from Guthrie’s house. The glove resembles the one on the hand of a person who was captured on porch camera video footage at the home of NBC “Today Show” host Savannah Guthrie’s mother the night she went missing.

The agency said it is awaiting quality control and official confirmation before putting the individual’s profile into the bureau’s national database, which could take up to 24 hours.

The FBI has described the man captured in photographs and on video as approximately 5’9”-5’10” with an average build. In addition to gloves, he was also seen wearing a ski mask and a black, 25-liter “Ozark Trail Hiker Pack” backpack. The agency on Thursday increased its reward for any information leading to an arrest and conviction of anyone involved in Guthrie’s disappearance to $100,000.

Guthrie was reported missing by her family on Feb. 1. Sheriff’s deputies also found blood on the front porch that was later confirmed to belong to the network host’s mother. Guthrie’s children, including Savannah, have posted several videos pleading for their mother’s release, agreeing to pay any ransom demanded and asking for help from the public.

Alex Tabet, Marc Santia and Ken Dilanian contributed to this report.

Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter and producer for MS NOW. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.

The Dictatorship

Lawmakers slam Justice Department’s defense of Epstein files redactions

Published

4 hours ago

February 16, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Feb. 15, 2026, 1:09 PM EST

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., co-author of the Epstein Files Transparency Acton Sunday slammed what he called Donald Trump’s “Epstein administration” for not fulfilling its legal obligation to release all government documents related to the late convicted sex offender.

Massie cited a Justice Department letter sent to Congress on Saturday defending its redactions made to the newly released final batch of Epstein documents. Appearing on ABC’s “This Week” show, the GOP congressman noted the DOJ letter, signed by Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, cited “deliberative-process privilege” as a reason for withholding certain records.

“The privileges that applied to the withheld records were deliberative-process privilege, work-product privilege, and attorney-client privilege.,” the Feb. 14 DOJ letter said. The letter listed the names of more than 300 people, many of whom had no direct dealings with Epstein and have long been dead, including Marilyn Monroe, Elvis Presley and Ronald Reagan.

Other names include President Donald Trump, former Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, Treasury Secretary Howard Lutnick — who was grilled before Congress last week over his association with Epstein — Jeff Bezos and Peter Thiel. None of the people listed have been accused of criminal wrongdoing with regard to Epstein’s actions.

Rep. Ro Khanna, the California Democrat who co-authored the Epstein bill, also criticized the DOJ letter regarding its redactions.

“The DOJ is once again purposefully muddying the waters on who was a predator and who was mentioned in an email,” Khanna said on X. “To have Janis Joplin, who died when Epstein was 17, in the same list as Larry Nassar, who went to prison for the sexual abuse of hundreds of young women and child pornography, with no clarification of how either was mentioned in the files is absurd.” (The Justice Department announced in December that a letter released in a tranche of Epstein files purportedly from Epstein to Nassar, the convicted Olympic gymnastics coach, was a fake.)

Massie objected to the DOJ’s claim of privilege in withholding certain Epstein documents because, he said, the Justice Department “must release internal memos and notes and emails” related to investigative and prosecutorial decisions regarding the Epstein matter.

“It’s important they follow that because then we could find out why they didn’t prosecute Leslie Wexner,” he told ABC’s Martha Raddatz. A legal representative for Wexner said in a statement that the assistant U.S. Attorney in charge of the Epstein investigation “stated at the time that Mr. Wexner was neither a co-conspirator nor target in any respect” and that “Mr. Wexner cooperated fully by providing background information on Epstein and was never contacted again.”

Massie accused the Justice Department of taking down documents before members of Congress were able to review them in their unredacted forms. “We want to be able to look at all these files,” he said. Lawmakers have also been subject to apparent surveillance while reviewing Epstein documents in a private room at the Justice Department.

Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, echoed calls for answers about who was involved in the trafficking of girls and women besides convicted Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell.

“We have questions for President Trump, and I think the broader issue here is why wasn’t this investigated when these accusations and these stories actually were heard by the FBI years ago?” Garcia said in a Sunday interview with CBS’s “Face the Nation” show. “Where was the investigation? Where was the DOJ? And this, by the way, is an issue not just in Republican administrations, but also ones led by Democrats. We have to get answers.”

The Justice Department, in its letter to the Republican chairmen and ranking Democrats of House and Senate Judiciary Committees, said no records were withheld or redacted “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”

Several of those listed have faced backlashincluding ex-prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who was stripped of his royal titlesevicted from Windsor Castle and faces a potential investigation in the U.K.

The DOJ said the lengthy list of high-profile names included in its letter includes “all government officials and politically exposed persons.” But the letter does not differentiate between people mentioned in news stories who likely had little or no connection to Epstein and those who were shown to have communicated with Epstein, Maxwell and other associates.

Massie, who is facing a primary opponent endorsed by Trump, said the president is “still with the Epstein class. This is the Epstein administration and they’re attacking me for trying to get these files released.”

Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter and producer for MS NOW. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.