Connect with us

The Dictatorship

Cheap labor isn’t the only advantage China has over the United States

Published

on

Cheap labor isn’t the only advantage China has over the United States

The trade deficit with China in the current tariff war is overshadowing another important shortfall — our country’s education deficit with China.

As the Trump administration threatens American universities, guts crucial research programs, slashes education spending and threatens to kill the Department of Education, Chinese leaders are steaming ahead to improve their vast nation’s education standards and outcomes. And China is doing this with a laserlike focus on programs around science, technologyindustrial innovation and ai.

As the Trump administration slashes education spending, Chinese leaders are steaming ahead to improve their nation’s education standards and outcomes.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon confused the abbreviation for artificial intelligence with A-1the popular steak sauce brand. The contrast could not be more stark, and the consequences should worry all of us.

China graduates almost twice as many STEM-oriented Ph.D.s in science and technology programs than the U.S. — an estimated 77,000 versus 40,000 according to the Center for Security and Emerging Technology. But those numbers don’t tell the whole story. If you exclude international students from that count, then China outpaces the U.S. 3 to 1.

Their advantage doesn’t end with science and technology Ph.D.s. China has also been forging ahead to create stronger undergraduate engineering programsand vocational engineering disciplines to create a massive workforce of factory and innovation, with workers that have mastered specialized hands-on technological, problem solving and math skills.

There is a 2015 video with Apple CEO Tim Cook that has been re-circulating recently that explains why China is so attractive to foreign manufacturers. Here’s the newsflash: It’s not just about cheap labor. In that interview with former Fortune executive editor Adam Lashinsky at the Fortune Global Forum, Cook spells out why China is so important to Apple’s global supply chain for computers, iPads, iPhones and other products. He says, “The popular conception is that companies come to China because of low labor costs…. but the truth is China stopped being the low labor cost country many years ago.  That is not the reason to come to China from a supply point of view. The reason is because of the skill and the quantity of skill in one location and the type of skill it is.”

Cook said in that video that “the products we do require really advanced tooling and … the tooling skill is very deep here. In the U.S., you could have a meeting of tooling engineers … and I am not sure you could fill the room. In China, you could fill multiple football fields. It is that vocational expertise is very deep, very very deep here, and I give the education system a lot of credit for continuing to push on that even when others were de-emphasizing vocational.”

He said workers there demonstrate an “intersection of craftsman kind of skill and sophisticated robotics and sort of the computer science world, that intersection that is very rare to find anywhere.”

Trump defends his torrent of tariffs by promising that such economic saber rattling will bring American manufacturing roaring back. However, his team does not seem to have a plan to rebuild a new model of American manufacturing that is based on brains as much as brawn, as well as the ability to keep up with rapid technological and engineering changes that require precise skills and advanced training.

Whether companies are creating washing machines or weather instruments, the manufacturing models that have become so attractive in China (and also increasingly in places like Vietnam and Indonesia) are based on those advanced skills Cook was talking about. That requires prioritizing academics and investing more in education at all levels — pre-K, K-12, vocational programs and higher education. It also requires investing in the government research programs that partner with universities. But Elon Musk’s DOGE brigade is enthusiastically ravaging the agencies and departments that support such partnerships.

Trump has been all bark and no long-term strategy.

Trump has been all bark and no long-term strategy. What’s sad is that America could continue to be the greatest economic global powerhouse. The ingredients for success are here, but Trump and his team seem hell-bent in destroying the educational and research infrastructure that could insure growth and dominance in the economic sphere. It’s like attacking the fuse box with a blow torch and expecting that the lights and the oven and the computers will all keep running.

It just doesn’t make sense.

In truth, America’s struggles with education predate Trump. Tuition rates have soared to levels that are hard to justify, and almost impossible for most families to finance without steep sacrifice. American students lag behind their international counterparts in several disciplines. A 2019 study conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics found that American 8th graders ranked 16th in math and 14th in science. As the Asia Times put it, our kids “were outclassed by students from Singapore, Taiwan, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Canada, Dubai and several European countries.”

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s 2018 Program for International Student Assessment found China to rank first — and far ahead of the U.S. — in reading, math and science, but even if we eliminate China’s cherry-picked data, the Asia Times reported, “the US still ranks 34th in math and 15th in science.” It rightly calls that “an appalling result for a country with the world’s best universities.”

Even though China has sometimes presented an overly flattering portrait of its students’ academic achievements, the truth remains that the country has put muscle into building a world-class compulsory education program for young people at the lower rungs of the economic ladder. They’re no longer primarily plowing the best resources into educating the social elite class at the expense of everyone else.

Kishore Mahbubani, the Singapore-based scholar and author of several books on Asia, including “Has China Won?,” argues that the economic standoff between the U.S. and China will be won and lost in the heartland of both countries and that education is the thing that will make the biggest difference.

Donald Trump,Xi Jinping
President Donald Trump with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Osaka, Japan in 2019.Susan Walsh / AP file

“At the end of the day, the outcome of the geopolitical contest between the US and China will not be determined by which society is doing a better job at taking care of its bottom 50 percent and by which society’s kids can read, write and count,” Mahbubani argued in the Asia Times.

When you poll voters about what matters to them, they always put education high on the list, but our spending and strategic priorities as a nation don’t reflect that. The education stories that break into the news cycle are more often about school shootings, book bans, restrictions on transgender athletes and debates over critical race theory.

Instead of building America’s world-class education system, President Trump spends his time picking fights with universities or threatening to withhold funding from schools that allegedly teach concepts like white privilege or have what he considers to be “illegal DEI programs.” We have an administration that acts like America’s educational infrastructure is more of a whipping post than a whopping piston of growth.

A country that wants to stay ahead of or even keep up with China doesn’t treat its advanced education system with this kind of disdain and scorn.

Michele Norris

Michele Norris is a senior contributing editor for BLN and the author of “Our Hidden Conversations: What Americans Really Think About Race & Identity.”

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

A revolution in warfare is happening right now — and not in Iran

Published

on

A revolution in warfare is happening right now — and not in Iran

This is the May 5, 2026, edition of “The Tea, Spilled by Morning Joe” newsletter.Subscribe hereto get it delivered straight to your inbox Monday through Friday.

JOE’S NOTE

A revolution in warfare is happening right now — and not in Iran.

The historic shift is occurring instead on the front lines of Ukraine’s war to push back its Russian invaders.

Fifteen months ago, President Donald Trump did his best to humiliate Volodymyr Zelenskyy inside the Oval Office, pressing the freedom fighter to make a bad deal with Trump‘s ally, Vladimir Putin.

“You have no cards left to play,” Trump bellowed to Ukraine’s president.

The American president promptly slashed U.S. military aid to the Ukrainians. His vice president — who yelled at Zelenskyy in the same White House meeting — later said his proudest achievement was abandoning the Ukrainians to Putin’s evil designs. And both Trump and JD Vance worked feverishly to pressure the Ukrainians to surrender land at the negotiating table the Russians could never win on the battlefield.

A year later, Ukraine is holding all the cards, striking down waves of Russian invaders with drone technology that is rewriting the rules of modern warfare.

Retired Gen. David Petraeus said recently, “The future of warfare is happening right now in Ukraine.”

As Russia’s economy teeters on the brink of collapse, it is now the former KGB agent who has holed himself up in secure bunkers — afraid of being assassinated by Russian oligarchs or Ukrainian drones.

Meanwhile, Zelenskyy strolls freely through the streets of European capitals once aligned with Russia — not as a refugee, but as a conquering hero.

European and Canadian leaders now line up to provide his warriors with more than $100 billion in military help in their war of liberation to permanently push Putin’s Russian invaders out of his sovereign land.

And in perhaps the most surreal twist of this still-unfolding historical drama, it was Zelenskyy on social media yesterday who assured the frightened Russian defense minister that Kyiv would not attack Moscow during its annual World War II victory parades held today and tomorrow in the Russian capital.

Zelenskyy does, in fact, have many cards left to play against Putin.

And recently, through true grit and technological superiority, Ukrainians have drawn an inside straight while Trump is left dealing with a strait of another kind — one keeping U.S. troops in Iran far longer than the commander in chief anticipated.

Putin and Trump thought they would easily prevail in quick wars against overmatched opponents. What they didn’t count on was a technological revolution in asymmetric warfare that has radically shifted power dynamics on the global stage — and left Putin’s dream of military success on the ash heap of history.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

“It is time for Russian leaders to take real steps to end their war, especially since Russia’s Defense Ministry believes it cannot hold a parade in Moscow without Ukraine’s goodwill.”

— Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyyafter the Kremlin scaled back its Victory Day celebrations amid intensifying Ukrainian strikes deep inside Russia

CHART OF THE DAY

ON THIS DATE

In 1973, Secretariat won the Kentucky Derby, the first of his Triple Crown victories, in a time of 1:59.4 — a record that still stands.

Joe Dombroski/Newsday RM via Getty Images

A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE TECH RIGHT

Silicon Valley’s libertarian billionaires helped put Donald Trump back in the White House. Now, according to a sweeping new piece in The Atlantic, George Packer argues they’re running it — and selling out the president’s populist base to do it. He joined “Morning Joe” today to discuss “The Venture-Capital Populist” and whether the MAGA coalition can survive its own oligarchs.

JS: Talk about David Sacks, Elon Musk, and Peter Thiel — what do they actually believe?

GP: These men have been hardcore libertarians all their lives. Thiel famously said freedom and democracy are incompatible. But now they’ve come around to the view that government can actually be useful — as long as it serves them. As Trump’s AI and crypto adviser, Sacks worked to align government policy with the wishes of those industries, not the public interest.

JS: And what are they ultimately after?

GP: They are wielding this power to fit their financial interests and their sense that the world should be ruled by a small number of very smart, wealthy men — an oligarchy.

JS: Sacks has aligned himself with Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán and against liberal democracy. What’s driving that?

GP: Sacks is pretty ignorant about the history and politics of that region. But his view mimics his approach to business: There’s no moral calculation. Ukraine is a risky bet, so naturally you end up sympathizing with Putin — because morality has been replaced by a cold calculation of where your interests lie.

Claire McCaskill: A lot of powerful, wealthy people bent the knee to Donald Trump out of fear. These guys did it out of opportunity. Talk about how this romance is hurting the president with his base.

GP: Here’s an example: Just yesterday, the White House — after dismissing AI safety concerns as Biden-era wokeness — announced that AI models would have to report their safety tests to the government. Why? Because their working-class populist base is afraid of AI. The numbers make that clear: They don’t see it the way David Sacks and Peter Thiel do.

JS: These guys reject the idea of Western civilization as Winston Churchill and World War II leaders thought of it — and blame everybody in the fight for Western democracy except Vladimir Putin. Why?

GP: They use the phrase “Western civilization” as a kind of flag that they’re waving when they criticize European democracies. But what do they mean by it? That’s the real puzzle.

Because if Donald Trump — who tried to overthrow an elected government — is the embodiment of Western civilization, it doesn’t mean to them what it means to you and me.

This conversation has been condensed and edited for brevity and clarity.

0.1%

— The share of accounts on Polymarket making more than two-thirds of the platform’s profits.

ONE MORE SHOT

Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for The Met Museum/Vogue

Madonna poses at the Metropolitan Museum of Art for the 2026 Met Gala, celebrating “Costume Art” on Monday.

CATCH UP ON MORNING JOE

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

2 months later, Trump’s boast about ‘stabilizing’ oil prices looks ridiculous

Published

on

Exactly two months ago, on the sixth day of the war in Iran, Donald Trump hosted a White House event intended to honor a championship soccer team, though the president took some time to comment on an issue on the minds of many.

“Yesterday, my administration announced decisive action to help keep down the oil prices,” the Republican declared. Moments later, he went on to say oil prices “have pretty much stabilized.”

It was never altogether clear what “decisive” actions the president was referring to, but two months later, it’s painfully clear that those mysterious moves failed to “pretty much stabilize” prices. MS NOW reported:

The average price for a gallon of gas in the U.S. reached $4.46 [on Monday] as the standstill in the Strait of Hormuz continues to strain global energy markets. The average price for one gallon of diesel fuel topped $5.64, according to national averages tracked by AAA.

A day later, that national average inched higher, reaching $4.48 per gallon, while the average for diesel climbed to $5.66.

Chart: Carson Elm-Picard / MS NOW; Source: AAA

An analysis published by Bloomberg News described the recent trend as the sharpest spike in pump prices in at least three decadesand while the president has continued to insist that prices will plummet after the war, the fact remains that (a) it’s far from clear when the conflict will be over; and (b) dozens of energy sites throughout the Middle East have been struck as part of the war; wells have to be reopened; and some infrastructure will have to be rebuilt, all of which will take time.

As for the politics, the White House and its allies appear to have no idea what to tell the public about this. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise appeared on CNBC last week, for example, and tried to argue that gas prices are lower now than they were in 2024.

“People will remember that two years ago, we were paying almost $6 a gallon for gas,” the Louisiana Republican said. “Right now, it’s $3.”

He was spectacularly wrong on both points.

Around the same time, Republican Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina appeared on Fox Business and told viewers“Gas prices continue to come down,” even as gas prices continued to go up.

As for Trump, in March, he tried to pitch the public on the idea that higher prices were a good thing — a line that proves so foolish that even he didn’t repeat it — which gave way to the president saying in April that gas prices were “not very high.”

His latest line, offered on Tuesday morning, argued that higher prices at the pump are “a very small price to pay,” which is easy for him to say given he doesn’t have to worry about paying those prices.

As for the “decisive” actions he claims to have taken two months ago, that he said “pretty much stabilized” prices, Trump still hasn’t explained what in the world he was talking about, or why those undefined moves failed so badly.

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Tuesday’s Campaign Round-Up, 5.5.26: Voters head to the polls in Indiana, Ohio and Michigan

Published

on

Tuesday’s Campaign Round-Up, 5.5.26: Voters head to the polls in Indiana, Ohio and Michigan

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.

* While there are some closely watched contests in Ohio and Michigan, Tuesday’s marquee elections are in Indianawhere several GOP state senators are facing White House-backed primary rivals after they defied Donald Trump’s demands on gerrymandering.

* Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices did another favor for GOP officials and candidate on Monday. As The New York Times reportedthe conservative majority agreed to “immediately transmit to the lower courts its opinion striking down Louisiana’s congressional map, rather than wait 32 days, as would have been routine.”

* As expected, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law the gerrymandered congressional map approved by his fellow Republicans. Voting rights advocates filed suit against the legally dubious gambit immediately.

* With just three weeks remaining before Texas’ closely watched Republican Senate primary, the latest University of Houston pollfound state Attorney General Ken Paxton with a narrow advantage over incumbent Sen. John Cornyn, 48% to 45%.

* Speaking of closely watched Republican Senate primaries, the latest poll from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution in Georgia found Rep. Mike Collins leading the GOP field with roughly 22% support, though more than half of the state’s primary voters remain undecided. Primary Day in the state is two weeks away.

* In Louisiana’s Republican Senate primary, Trump has continued to go after his party’s incumbent. “Hopefully all of the Great Republican People of Louisiana, which I won, BIG, three times, will be voting Bill Cassidy OUT OF OFFICE in the upcoming Republican Primary!” the president wrote on his social media platform late last week.

* And in California’s gubernatorial race, Republican Steve Hilton, widely seen as his party’s top contender, appeared on MS NOW and was asked whether he accepts the fact that Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election. He refused to answerdespite multiple attempts to solicit a straight answer.

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending