Connect with us

Congress

Adam Schiff and Kash Patel get into a shouting match

Published

on

The yearslong feud between longtime political rivals Adam Schiff and Kash Patel reached a fever pitch Tuesday afternoon, complete with a shouting match that briefly derailed an ongoing Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

The confrontation occurred when Schiff, a Democratic senator from California, questioned Patel, the FBI director, about the Justice Department’s decision to move Ghislaine Maxwell — an associate of the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — to a lower security prison facility.

Schiff asked Patel whether he believed the American people were “stupid” enough to believe his answer that the Bureau of Prisons independently made the decision to move Maxwell, rather than it being a politically-motivated move by the White House.

“What I am doing is protecting this country … and combating the weaponization of intelligence by the likes of you,” Patel said, interrupting Schiff. “We have countlessly proven you to be a liar in Russiangate, in January 6. You are the biggest fraud to ever sit in the United States Senate.”

Patel went on to call him “a political buffoon at best.”

The animosity between the two men dates back, at least, to Schiff’s time as chair of the House Intelligence Committee, where he led the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Patel, then a House Intelligence staffer, was tasked with working to discredit the probe.

Five years later, Schiff served on a select committee to investigate the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol; Patel, meanwhile, was an advocate for many of the incarcerated rioters.

Years later, in the lead-up to Patel’s confirmation to lead the FBI, Senate Judiciary Democrats pointed to the fact that Patel reposted a meme on social media that featured the likeness of Patel taking a chainsaw to Schiff’s head. Another photo shared by Democrats showed an image of Patel appearing to hold an object with Schiff’s face beside a catapult.

More recently, Patel has accused Schiff of moving to leak incriminating information about President Donald Trump while Intelligence Committee chair. Schiff, through a spokesperson, has denied the claims.

As the shouting on Tuesday continued, Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Judiciary panel, pleaded with chair Chuck Grassley to take control of the situation. Grassley pounded his gavel repeatedly, saying, “Both of you be quiet.”

It was perhaps the most heated moment of the questioning on Tuesday, during which Patel was pressed on his handling of the Epstein matter and the investigation into the assassination of conservative political commentator Charlie Kirk, among other topics.

But it was not the first explosive exchange of the day. Patel also tangled with Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who told the FBI director, “I think you’re not gonna be around long” — a suggestion Trump would eventually turn on him.

That comment set off a similar shouting match in which Patel called Booker “an embarrassment to your country” and Booker shouted back, “I’m not afraid of you.”

In a social media post after the conclusion of the hearing, Schiff contended that Patel went before lawmakers to “save his job” and argued he was “performing for an audience of one.” The White House, meanwhile, congratulated Patel for going after “Pencil Neck” — the president’s nickname for Schiff.

Patel will go before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Congress

House committee posts new Epstein documents

Published

on

The GOP-led House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a new set of materials Tuesday as part of its investigation into the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, including a transcript from an interview with former Trump attorney general William Barr.

It’s the latest tranche of documents to be posted publicly by the panel in recent weeks, as members of Congress continue to pummel the Justice Department for not putting out information faster.

Barr, during his closed-door testimony with committee members in August, said, among other things, he understood potential reasons why some of the Epstein documents and materials have not yet been made public.

“[T]he general principle is, if you have enough evidence to charge someone, you put that evidence out through the process, but you don’t just open your files,” Barr told lawmakers, according to the transcript. “So I understand why there is reluctance to do it. And, as I say, the Attorney General has to make a balance.”

The committee also publicly released letters from former attorneys general Alberto Gonzales, who served in the President George W. Bush administration, and Jeff Sessions, who served in the Trump administration before Barr. Both men were handed subpoenas for depositions as part of the panel’s investigation, but both wrote they had no memory of information related to the Epstein case that was relevant to share.

Oversight Committee chair James Comer on Tuesday disclosed his requestthat the Epstein estate turn over unredacted copies of the materials it sent over to lawmakers, including cash ledgers, message logs, calendars and flight logs. Congressional staff have already viewed these unredacted materials but only in a meeting with Epstein’s attorneys in New York City; they do not currently have the files in their position.

A second set of materials from the Epstein estate was also released publicly, including two new pagesfrom the so-called birthday book that was put together as a gift for Epstein’s 50th birthday. One is a page labeled “Contents” that lists some contributors to the book, including former President Bill Clinton and attorney Alan Dershowitz; the other is a letter from Coco Brown or “Degenerate II.”

“(so many girls, so little time)? And you there Jeffrey, always grinning like the mysterious mischievous lad you are,” wrote Brown, who is listed as one of Epstein’s friends. “I remember it all with a smile. Though with a melancholy smile to think that you are at mid-century a mere boy, (Though we vampires are supposed to age slowly) ((if at all)).”

The materials’ release comes as FBI Director Kash Patel defends the administration’s handling of the Epstein case in two hearings on Blue Light News this week. He faced tough questioning from lawmakers of both parties during a Senate hearing on Tuesday, and Patel is scheduled to go before House lawmakers on Wednesday.

Continue Reading

Congress

Senate Democrats to propose alternative to GOP stopgap

Published

on

Senate Democrats are preparing to offer an alternative stopgap spending bill that would avert an Oct. 1 government shutdown as they dig in against the Republican majority.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) told reporters as he left a caucus lunch Tuesday that Democrats will offer a short-term spending bill that includes health care language as well as restrictions on President Donald Trump’s ability to rescind funding previously approved by Congress.

“We think we’re going to have … an alternative that American people will like a whole lot better,” Kaine said.

Another person granted anonymity to disclose private discussions confirmed the Democrats’ plan, adding that the proposal could be released as soon as Tuesday evening.

The idea of formally offering an alternative bill came up during the closed-door lunch and comes after top Democratic leaders have pushed for bipartisan negotiations without outlining what specific policy proposals they are seeking in return for their support for a weeks-long spending bill.

House Republicans rolled out a continuing resolution Tuesday that funds the government through Nov. 21, tacking on $30 million for lawmaker security and another $58 million in security assistance requested by the White House for the Supreme Court and executive branch.

But Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries immediately panned the bill in a joint statement and vowed to oppose it, citing its lack of health care provisions.

Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), who is line to be the No. 2 Senate Democrat starting in 2027, also said Tuesday he would be a “no” after helping advance a previous GOP-written stopgap in March.

He noted to reporters that Trump has said Republicans don’t have to “deal with the Democrats” on spending.

“Godspeed,” Schatz said.

Republicans will need at least seven Democrats to help advance their funding bill — and likely more, with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) saying Tuesday that he will not support it. Only one Democrat so far, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, has publicly indicated he will vote for it.

Democrats appear increasingly confident Trump will be blamed for any potential shutdown after he said during a Friday Fox News interview that he doesn’t need Democratic votes. They also believe the political climate has moved in their favor since the March funding fight, based on their ability to recruit top Senate candidates and brewing divisions among Republicans over Trump’s efforts to circumvent Congress on spending cuts.

“It’s much different now,” Schumer told reporters. “The Republicans are in a much weaker position now than they were then.”

Senate Majority Leader John Thune opened the door Tuesday to meeting with Schumer but said that the New York Democrat hadn’t called him or come to his office.

Schumer brushed off those comments, noting that he and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries have sent two letters to Thune and Speaker Mike Johnson requesting a meeting.

“Give me a break,” Schumer said. “We have asked to meet with Thune and Johnson for over six weeks.”

Continue Reading

Congress

House again votes to surrender tariff powers to Trump

Published

on

House Republicans voted in near lockstep Tuesday to again cede congressional power over tariffs to President Donald Trump.

A measure that effectively blocks challenges to Trump’s sweeping global tariff declarations through March 2026 was adopted on a 213-211 vote. The vote was gaveled down only after GOP whips had a drawn-out struggle on the floor with a band of Republicans who initially opposed the legislation before flipping to yes. The vote was held open for more than a half-hour as they worked to bring the members back on board.

Three Republicans — Reps. Kevin Kiley of California, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Victoria Spartz of Indiana — ended up joining Democrats to oppose the measure, a “rule” which also teed up several D.C.-related criminal justice bills for debate.

“I think this is a misuse of what rules are for, and I think it’s bad for the representative process,” Kiley said of the tariff provisions.

Continue Reading

Trending