The Dictatorship
A deeper look at the talks between US and Russian officials as Trump suggests Ukraine is to blame
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bd65/2bd65e7cdfc139571423483b434b90188e17abd1" alt="A deeper look at the talks between US and Russian officials as Trump suggests Ukraine is to blame"
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) — Top U.S. and Russian officials had their most extensive high-level engagement since Moscow sent troops into Ukraine almost three years ago, meeting for four hours Tuesday before President Donald Trump suggested that Kyiv was to blame for the conflict.
Trump showed little patience for Ukraine’s objections to being excluded from the talks in Saudi Arabia. He said repeatedly that Ukraine’s leaders never should have allowed the conflict to begin, indicating Kyiv should have been willing to make concessions to Russia before it sent troops into Ukraine in 2022.
“Today I heard, ‘Oh, well, we weren’t invited.’ Well, you been there for three years. You should have ended it three years” ago, Trump told reporters at his Florida residence. “You should have never started it. You could have made a deal.”
Such comments and Trump’s goal of mending ties with Moscow may come at a cost to the transatlantic alliance of the U.S. and Europe and significantly damage Washington’s standing with Ukraine as well as with other nations counting on U.S. leadership in NATO and elsewhere for their security and protection.
During former President Joe Biden’s administration, the U.S. and Europe focused on isolating Russia and defending the post-World War II international order.
In Riyadh, the delegations led by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov agreed to set up teams to look into restoring staffing at the U.S. and Russian embassies in Moscow and Washington that have been decimated by a series of tit-for-tat diplomatic expulsions.
The effort is aimed at using those channels to support Ukraine peace negotiations and to explore ways to restart economic and global cooperation. A Russian official pointed to possible joint energy ventures.
Here’s a look at the meeting and what comes next:
Reestablishing tattered diplomatic relations
First on both countries’ list of accomplishments was an agreement to end what has been years of dwindling diplomatic relations that hit a post-Cold War low point after Russian President Vladimir Putin sent troops into Ukraine in February 2022.
The meeting, which came just a week after Trump spoke to Putin by phone, was the first substantive face-to-face discussion between the nations’ top diplomats since former Secretary of State Antony Blinken met Lavrov in Geneva in January 2022 in an unsuccessful bid to prevent the Ukraine conflict.
Lavrov said after Tuesday’s talks that the sides agreed to fast-track the appointment of new ambassadors, adding that senior diplomats from the two countries will meet shortly to discuss specifics related to “lifting artificial barriers to the work of the U.S. and Russian embassies and other missions.”
In reality, the decimation of the U.S. and Russian embassies’ personnel began well before Russian troops rolled into Ukraine in 2022, starting after 2014 Russia’s annexation of Crimea. That was seen as illegal by most of the world during the Obama administration, which ordered several Russian offices in the U.S. to close.
It picked up steam after the 2018 poisoning in Britain of an exiled Russian spy and his daughter, which British authorities blamed on Russia, and which resulted in mass expulsions of diplomats and the closure of numerous consulates in both countries and Europe.
Asked by The Associated Press if the U.S. now considered those cases closed, Rubio declined to say but said it would be impossible to get a Ukraine peace agreement without diplomatic engagement.
“I’m not going to negotiate or talk through every element of the disruptions that exist or have existed in our diplomatic relations, on the mechanics of it,” he said. Bringing an end to the conflict cannot happen “unless we have at least some normalcy in the way our diplomatic missions operate in Moscow and in Washington, D.C.”
Negotiating an end to the conflict in Ukraine
The two sides agreed to set up high-level working groups to begin exploring a negotiated end to the conflict. It was not immediately clear when these teams would first meet, but both said it would be soon.
As to concessions that may need to be made by all sides, Trump’s national security adviser, Mike Waltz, who participated in the talks Tuesday, said the issue of territory and security guarantees would be among the subjects discussed.
Rubio said a high-level team, including experts who know technical details, will begin to engage with the Russian side on “parameters of what an end to this conflict would look like.”
On the key issue of a prospective peacekeeping mission to monitor a potential ceasefire in Ukraine, the top Russian diplomat said Moscow would not accept any troops from NATO members, repeating its assertion that Ukraine’s bid to join the Western military alliance poses a major security issue.
“We explained that the deployment of troops from the countries that are NATO members, even if they are deployed under the EU or national flags, will not change anything and will certainly be unacceptable for us,” Lavrov said.
Exclusion of Ukraine and Europe from the talks
Neither Ukraine nor European nations were invited to Tuesday’s talks in Riyadh, but U.S. officials said there is no intention to exclude them from peace negotiations should they begin in earnest.
“No one is being sidelined here,” Rubio said. “Obviously, there’s going to be engagement and consultation with Ukraine, with our partners in Europe and others. But ultimately, the Russian side will be indispensable to this effort.”
Waltz agreed: “If you’re going to bring both sides together, you have to talk to both sides. … We are absolutely talking to both sides.”
He noted that Trump spoke with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy immediately after speaking with Putin last week and that U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Rubio met Friday with Zelenskyy in Germany.
Still, Zelenskyy was clearly peeved at being omitted from the meeting, postponing plans to visit Saudi Arabia on Wednesday to avoid any linkage of his trip with Tuesday’s U.S.-Russia talks.
And that was before Trump’s comments suggesting Kyiv was at fault in starting the fighting.
“This whole negotiation from the start seems very tilted in Russia’s favor. And it’s even a question whether it should be termed a negotiation or in some sense, a series of American capitulations,” said Nigel Gould-Davies, senior fellow for Eurasia and Russia at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London and a former British ambassador to Belarus.
Possible lifting of US sanctions against Russia
Asked whether the U.S. could lift sanctions against Moscow imposed during the Biden presidency, Rubio noted that “to bring an end to any conflict, there has to be concessions made by all sides” and “we’re not going to predetermine what those are.”
Asked if the U.S. could officially remove Lavrov from its sanctions list, Rubio said that “we’re just not at that level of conversation yet.”
Potential US-Russian cooperation
Kirill Dmitriev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund who joined the Russian delegation in Riyadh, told reporters that Russia and the U.S. should develop joint energy ventures.
“We need joint projects, including in the Arctic and other regions,” he said.
Should the parties succeed in negotiating an end to the Ukraine conflict, Rubio said, it could open “incredible opportunities” to partner with the Russians “on issues that hopefully will be good for the world and also improve our relations in the long term.”
He did not say what those would entail.
___
Isachenkov reported from Moscow. Associated Press Writer Emma Burrows in London and Jonathan J. Cooper in Phoenix contributed to this report.
The Dictatorship
The New York Yankees will now let players wear beards — it’s about time
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00d52/00d528e18a9b586328c85e8a397a0bb553cae934" alt="The New York Yankees will now let players wear beards — it’s about time"
New York Yankees managing general partner Hal Steinbrenner announced Friday that the team’s players and personnel will henceforth be permitted to wear “well-groomed beards.” So ends a silly, archaic tradition that was made up by his father, George Steinbrennershortly after an ownership group he led bought the team in 1973.
The Yankees’ grooming regulations still prohibit long and unkempt hair, facial or otherwise. But as the younger Steinbrenner put it in a statement“It is the appropriate time to move beyond the familiar comfort of our former policy.”
A crucial aspect of the creation of this tradition is that ‘The Boss’ was never much of a baseball guy.
Facial hair has come and gone and come again over a century and a half of baseball, and by the mid-20th century, beards were mostly out of favor. Some teams even formalized their follicle prohibitions. But then came the cultural upheaval of the 1960s and beards and longer hair on men were au courant. By the 1970s, Oakland Athletics owner Charlie Finley was paying his players bonuses for growing mustaches. During the same period, the once-dominant Yankees were in the doldrums, but their young stars like Thurman Munson and Sparky Lyle sported beards and handlebar mustaches. Oscar Gamble had to cut his famously thick afro to play for the Yankees.
Steinbrenner’s arrival put an end to the fun. A crucial aspect of the creation of this tradition is that “The Boss” was never much of a baseball guy. He was a former assistant football coach at Northwestern and Purdue Universities and seemed to assume that the discipline of gridiron coaching applied to professional baseball. He clashed with Yankees manager Billy Martin over many things, but among the silliest was his insistence that Martin and his coaches ride the team bus with the players, simply because that was how it was done in college football.
Although some Yankee haters would derisively characterize them as Wall Street’s teamplenty of Yankees fans are proud to own that image, taking comfort in a buttoned-down, clean-cut, corporate sheen on their favorite ballplayers. But there are also a great many, myself included, who grew up not even realizing we were the white-collar conservatives of baseball.
I was a 1980s and ’90s kid who listened to Phil Rizzuto’s charming ramblings as he called games on Channel 11. We supported teams that typically offered little more than bad vibes and middling results. When lucky enough to trek to Yankee Stadium in the Bronx, we were generally surrounded by slovenly working-class loudmouths in the bleachers, not hedge fund clients only there for the luxury suite lobster and single malt scotch. It was a different time, when guys like Matt Nokes and Steve Balboni were some of the top-producing hitters. The coming Derek Jeter- and Mariano Rivera-led dynasty — and the ostentatious class warfare driven by booming revenues — wasn’t even a gleam in our eye.
A lot of us were not even aware of the Yankees’ grooming policy until 1991, when Steinbrenner ordered beloved first baseman and captain Don Mattingly to be benched and fined for refusing to trim his hair from a stylish-for-its-time mullet length. The humiliation of “Donnie Baseball” — the mild-mannered Indiana native and the only consistently great Yankees star during that miserable fallow period — was as public as it was absurd. The incident even inspired a classic “Simpsons” episode in which Mr. Burns kicked Mattingly off his team of softball ringers for having long sideburns, even after shaving both sides of his head. As the animated Mattingly walks off the field, he mutters“Still like him better than Steinbrenner.”
The Yankees are big on flaunting their “traditions” — with 22 retired numbers, an annual Old-Timers’ Dayand murals commemorating all 27 championship-winning teams around the stadium concourse. But unlike “no names on the back of the uniform” and Bob Sheppard — the stadium’s PA announcer for 56 years — the beard ban was always a contrived tradition, created by an owner imposing his own value system and decreeing it as “the Yankee way.”
Winning and money have a way of making guys forget how much they hate to shave.
While some players have said they’d be reluctant to sign with the Yankees because of the beard ban, they are professionals and money typically talks. Examples abound, but few are more prominent than outfielder Johnny Damonwho spent four successful years as a shaggy sex symbol with the Boston Red Sox, then signed a big free agent contract with the Yankees before the 2006 season, dutifully shaved his beard and cut his hair for four successful years as a “cleans up nicely” member of the Bronx Bombers.
Winning and money have a way of making guys forget how much they hate to shave. But because you can never please everybody, despite the widespread mockery the Yankees’ grooming policies have invited around MLB, news of the policy change left some non-Yankees players lamenting the loss of “tradition.”
I can only speak for myself, but as a dyed-in-the-wool pinstripes fan since birth, watching tightly coiffed, fresh-faced players has never meant a thing to me. I just want the team to win. And if evolving even slightly with the times makes it easier to sign young and increasingly independent-minded players, that’s a victory. Losing the corporate look is no great loss.
Anthony L. Fisher is a senior editor and writer for BLN Daily. He was previously the senior opinion editor for The Daily Beast and a politics columnist for Business Insider.
The Dictatorship
BREAKING: Trump abruptly fires Joint Chiefs Chairman, other top Pentagon leaders
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9948/e99482b94a352cbdf7e78d108fa8b6bfcc3e4678" alt="BREAKING: Trump abruptly fires Joint Chiefs Chairman, other top Pentagon leaders"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4042/f40422bcae241ca545c1c759cd56fb0e4cefaf50" alt=""
-
UP NEXT
Elon Musk is trying to ‘buy off’ my opponent, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate says
07:22
-
‘Intimidation tactics’: MAGA prosecutor targets Dem rep who criticized Elon Musk
07:15
-
‘This is not a game’: Psaki calls out GOP lawmakers for flip-flopping on Russia
11:43
-
‘People are pissed. Not hard to see why’: Protests break out across the country against Trump, Musk
11:14
-
‘I take Musk’s tweets as a compliment’: Former Obama ethics czar on legal fight against Elon Musk
08:03
-
‘They want Eric Adams in a choke collar’: Weissmann on Trump’s leverage over NYC Mayor Adams
06:04
-
‘Outright extortion’: Rep. Goldman on NYC Mayor Adams’ joint Fox appearance with border czar Homan
11:58
-
‘Just a blatant lie’: Sen. Wyden blasts Musk’s claim of ‘read only’ DOGE access to sensitive data
05:56
-
‘Very, very illegal’: Former federal judge reacts to Trump attempts to defy judicial order
10:47
-
Jack Schlossberg: Why Dems Keep Losing the Internet | “The Blueprint with Jen Psaki”
44:12
-
‘Be careful what you sign’: Gov. Moore warns federal employees offered buyouts from DOGE
07:39
-
‘Constitutional crisis’: Sen. Booker reacts to possibility that Elon Musk defy court orders
12:21
-
‘Unprecedented’: Musk team given access to private data of government employees for political purge
07:35
-
Exclusive: Fired federal prosecutor speaks out for first time amid Trump’s purge of DOJ & FBI
09:37
-
‘A very dangerous moment’: Raskin sounds alarm on Trump’s ‘mass purge’ of government officials
07:48
-
‘He was clueless’: Sen. Hassan blasts RFK Jr.’s testimony during confirmation hearing
12:02
-
‘A betrayal of the American people’: Sen. Warren blasts Trump over failure to address food prices
10:08
-
‘Wild goose chase’: Jan. 6 prosecutor who just resigned slams ‘review’ of Jan. 6 prosecutions
07:02
-
‘Everything that’s happening continues to normalize violence’: Gov. Whitmer condemns Trump pardons
12:32
-
‘A nakedly illegal action’: Obama Ethics Czar Norm Eisen blasts Trump inspectors general firing
05:57
-
UP NEXT
Elon Musk is trying to ‘buy off’ my opponent, Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate says
07:22
-
‘Intimidation tactics’: MAGA prosecutor targets Dem rep who criticized Elon Musk
07:15
-
‘This is not a game’: Psaki calls out GOP lawmakers for flip-flopping on Russia
11:43
-
‘People are pissed. Not hard to see why’: Protests break out across the country against Trump, Musk
11:14
-
‘I take Musk’s tweets as a compliment’: Former Obama ethics czar on legal fight against Elon Musk
08:03
-
‘They want Eric Adams in a choke collar’: Weissmann on Trump’s leverage over NYC Mayor Adams
06:04
The Dictatorship
HowSteve Bannon is carnivalizing Nazism
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae7b8/ae7b872c6f99e502047ae437b88659973ef20b33" alt="HowSteve Bannon is carnivalizing Nazism"
At the end of his speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Thursday evening, MAGA activist Steve Bannon shouted “Fight! Fight! Fight!” and straightened his right arm swiftly, holding it at an elevated, roughly 45-degree angle, and then quickly pulled it back down again. After his arm returned to his side, he yelled “Amen.” Any person with the faintest knowledge of Western history would recognize the gesture as a Nazi salute.
Bannon has denied it was supposed to be a Nazi salute. In an interview with NBC News at the conference Thursday, Bannon said“I do that all the time. I wave to my crowd, because it’s all about them.” But if you watch the videono reasonable person would describe the gesture as a wave.
Bannon lacks the plausible deniability about accidental gestures that Musk had at his disposal.
Some media outlets suggested Bannon’s gesture mimicked that of megabillionaire Elon Muskwho carried out what many say resembled a Nazi salute at an inauguration event for President Donald Trump in January. Musk’s gesture triggered a debate about his true intentions. After the forceful extension of his arm — executed with an audible grunt — he did it once more and then said, “My heart goes out to you,” leading some people to believe that it may have been an unintentionally unfortunate-looking attempt to engage the crowd. Musk later deemed the accusations as “dirty tricks” in a post on X. But notably, he also made several Nazi-related puns on his social media platform, leaving some to wonder if perhaps he meant to provoke a polarizing response. “When I see the troll emoji, it’s like looking in the mirror,” he wrote a few days later.
Bannon lacks the plausible deniability about accidental gestures that Musk had at his disposal. Bannon, an influential podcast host and the former chief strategist for Trump during his first term, is a savvy communicator and extremely plugged in to the news cycle. It is safe to assume he knows about what Musk did, which is why some media outlets described Bannon as imitating him. That this happened after Musk’s gesture was widely criticized by many as a Nazi salute feeds the theory that it was a conscious provocation. Moreover, Bannon made no comment akin to “My heart goes out to you” as Musk did, which might have confounded efforts to pin down Bannon’s meaning.
Jordan Bardella, the leader of France’s far-right National Rally party, canceled his appearance at CPAC after Bannon’s speech, citing his condemnation of a speaker who “as a provocation” made “a gesture referring to Nazi ideology.” Bannon told the French newspaper Le Point“If he canceled [the speech] over what the mainstream media said about the speech, he didn’t listen to the speech. … He’s a boy, not a man.” The Holocaust-denying white supremacist Nick Fuentes said in response to the speech: “It was a straight-up Roman salute. It’s getting a little uncomfortable even for me.”
So what is Bannon doing? His gesture serves as a signaling device to attract the most noxious, militant and overtly fascistic elements of the American far right to support the president. In his speech, Bannon addressed his audience as “the tip of the tip of the spear of the populist nationalist movement,” celebrated the release of Jan. 6 prisoners and said, “We want Trump in ’28.” Put it all together and Bannon is inviting extremists to mobilize on behalf of Trump’s authoritarian project on a level previously unseen.
Even if we were to understand Bannon’s gesture as “trolling,” it is still an insidious strategy that carnivalizes Nazism. Even as a winking reference to Musk’s odd, disturbing gesture (whose darkest implications Musk refused to fully repudiate), it still radiates an ease and playfulness toward Nazi iconography. Why choose this specific gesture, a clear reference to the most universally acknowledged symbol of Nazism other than the swastika, as a “joke” to “troll the media” or “own the libs”? It still has the effect of making fascism and white supremacy look less ominous and less taboo, and maybe for some on the right, a little more intriguing than before.
Even as a “joke,” it acts as a path to mainstreaming some of the most heinous ideas that humanity has ever conceived of. It chips away at the cultural and political guardrails our society has developed against autocracy, vigilante racial domination, hatred of “the other.” And this all comes as Trump develops closer ties with Germany’s far-right party, Alternative for Germany, some of whose members have used Nazi slogans.
Bannon’s gesture doesn’t mean he is a Nazi nor does it signify a wholesale defense of Nazi ideals. But it does mean he is willing to play around with the aura and symbology of Nazism to achieve his political goals. At any level of interpretation, Bannon’s gesture is abhorrent, and it speaks volumes about his political movement if he retains power within it.
Zeeshan Aleem is a writer and editor for BLN Daily. Previously, he worked at Vox, HuffPost and Blue Light News, and he has also been published in, among other places, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Nation, and The Intercept. You can sign up for his free politics newsletter here.
-
The Josh Fourrier Show3 months ago
DOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?
-
Economy3 months ago
Fed moves to protect weakening job market with bold rate cut
-
Economy3 months ago
It’s still the economy: What TV ads tell us about each campaign’s closing message
-
Politics3 months ago
How Republicans could foil Harris’ Supreme Court plans if she’s elected
-
Uncategorized3 months ago
Senate Dems balk at Johnson’s spending bill, but wait to release their own plan
-
Politics2 months ago
Trump’s pick to lead USDA hasn’t returned Vilsack’s call
-
Economy3 months ago
Harris dismisses Trump as ‘not serious’ on the economy in BLN interview
-
Politics3 months ago
RFK Jr.’s bid to take himself off swing state ballots may scramble mail-in voting