Congress
Johnson to budget holdouts: Remove me if I don’t keep my promises
Speaker Mike Johnson told Republican holdouts on the party’s crucial budget plan in a private meeting Wednesday night that they could oust him from the speakership if he doesn’t follow through with his fiscal promises, according to three people with direct knowledge of the matter who were granted anonymity to discuss it.
Johnson pledged to abide by the House budget instructions, including $1.5 trillion minimum in spending cuts, for the domestic policy megabill that Republicans are now able to pursue on party lines after Thursday’s successful vote.
The “motion to vacate” the speaker comes up often in the House GOP conference. But the speaker’s comments, the people said, acknowledged that fiscal hawks could trigger a vote on his removal as speaker if doesn’t follow through. Several people in the room chuckled after the remark, they said. But hard-liners are planning to hold him to it.
The discussion of his ouster was seen as a concrete expression of how serious he was and displayed his enthusiasm for moving Trump’s agenda forward, according to one of the people. Some of the fiscal hawks saw it as a “blood oath,” according to another person.
A spokesperson for Johnson declined to comment Thursday.
A memorandum signed by Johnson and shared with reporters Thursday by Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina said he is “committed to maintaining linkage between provisions that result in a deficit increase … and provisions that reduce federal spending” and would deliver a “fiscally responsible product.”
Johnson’s fiscal assurance was one of the key factors that got hard-liners on board with the budget framework, which the House approved on a 216-214 vote, the people said. Some hard-liners on Thursday also cited assurances by President Donald Trump and Senate Majority Leader John Thune in swaying them in support of the plan.
Benjamin Guggenheim contributed to this report.
Congress
GOP leaders consider Senate jam plan after House CR vote
House Republican leaders are discussing a plan to pass a seven-week stopgap funding measure Friday then not bring the House back into session until after the Oct. 1 shutdown deadline, according to three people granted anonymity to describe the talks.
No final decision has been made on House scheduling, the people said, but the move would allow the House to “jam” the Senate, giving it no alternative to avoid a shutdown than to pass the GOP-written measure. Democrats there are pushing for a vote on an alternative measure that adds on the minority’s policy priorities.
The Senate, meanwhile, is on track to vote on the House-passed continuing resolution no earlier than next Thursday, with Majority Leader John Thune saying there is “not much sentiment” for allowing votes Friday on the dueling Republican and Democrat stopgaps.
Congress
Major anti-abortion group to brief GOP caucus on expiring Obamacare subsidies
House Republicans have invited a leading anti-abortion group to brief GOP staffers on the looming expiration of Obamacare subsidies, according to an invitation for the event viewed by Blue Light News.
It comes as a growing number of congressional Republicans are calling for an extension before the enhanced Affordable Care Act tax credits expire at the end of the year, fearing political blowback for causing premiums to skyrocket and people to lose their health insurance.
At least some of these lawmakers are members of the conservative Republican Study Committee, which is hosting the meeting with Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America — one of the most prominent organizations promoting anti-abortion candidates for elected office — and the Foundation for Government Accountability, a right-leaning think tank based in Florida.
“The briefing will provide staff with the opportunity to learn more about the Biden-era health insurance COVID credits, the costs associated with the extension of the credits, and how the credits subsidize abortion nationwide,” the invitation says.
Anti-abortion groups have been making the rounds to congressional offices in recent weeks to make the case that the enhanced credits subsidize elective abortion — in breach of long-standing restrictions enacted by Congress, under the so-called Hyde amendment, that prohibit federal funds to be used for the procedure with few exceptions.
Nearly 100 organizations wrote in a letter to members of Congressional leadership in early September that “Democrats wrote the ACA craftily to avoid the Hyde amendment” and that the enhanced tax credits reduce out-of-pocket premiums for individuals in plans that cover abortion.
Democrats counter that the ACA does comply with the Hyde amendment because it requires insurance plans to segregate out premiums for abortion services and all other coverage areas.
The argument from the anti-abortion advocates could become a major sticking point with conservatives, many of whom are already loath to extend the subsidies on grounds they are too expensive, wasteful and subject to fraud.
Congress
Nancy Mace and Cory Mills clash over failed censure vote
GOP Reps. Nancy Mace and Cory Mills are locked in an escalating personal clash over Mace’s failed effort to censure Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar for her response to the killing of activist Charlie Kirk.
Mills was one of four Republicans to join all Democrats and kill Mace’s censure measure, which fell just one vote short of passing Wednesday.
The Floridian cited “First Amendment” issues for his vote, prompting Mace (R-S.C.) to then accuse Mills and the other Republicans of stifling “free speech” by opposing her effort. In an exchange with Mills on X, she also claimed the Florida Republican “threatened” her by text message Wednesday evening.
Mills denied threatening Mace in a brief interview Thursday. He said he reminded her about her previous position on the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, saying: “What would have happened if you shared the video of you condemning President Trump over J6 for free speech?”
“And so, if reminding someone of their own remarks is a threat, well, then that means everyone threatens each other every day to remind someone, ‘Hey, you voted for this, and you did this and you voted for this,’” Mills said.
“This is typical, I’m sorry, but like, I respect Nancy, I like Nancy, I’ve always supported Nancy,” he continued. “But she’s upset that she didn’t get one thing passed because she has some back-and-forth with Ilhan that has nothing to do with me.”
Mills did personally benefit from his vote to table the Omar censure: Democrats pulled back on a retaliatory effort to censure Mills over ethics and domestic abuse allegations that he has denied.
Mills said he would “be fine” with Democrats pushing ahead on their effort to censure him.
Mace said after the Wednesday vote that the GOP opposition was “really gross” and “very disappointing.” A reporter also overheard her telling a colleague that she had sent the four Republicans’ names to President Donald Trump.
-
Uncategorized10 months ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
The Josh Fourrier Show10 months ago
DOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?
-
Politics7 months ago
Former ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
Politics10 months ago
What 7 political experts will be watching at Tuesday’s debate
-
The Dictatorship7 months ago
Pete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Politics10 months ago
How Republicans could foil Harris’ Supreme Court plans if she’s elected
-
The Dictatorship7 months ago
Luigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
Economy10 months ago
Fed moves to protect weakening job market with bold rate cut