Connect with us

The Dictatorship

Trump needs to keep my father’s name out of his speeches this month, and every month

Published

on

Trump needs to keep my father’s name out of his speeches this month, and every month

The inauguration of the 47th president of the United States coincided with Martin Luther King Jr. Daythe federal holiday that should prompt us all to reflect on my late father’s legacy of justice, equity and peace. While I noted President Donald Trump’s acknowledgment of my father and his dreamthe address quickly veered away from those ideals. Rather than offering a message of unity, the president outlined a vision focused on undoing much of the progress we have made since the Civil Rights Movement, progress my father tirelessly fought and ultimately sacrificed his life for.

The president outlined a vision focused on undoing much of the progress my father tirelessly fought and ultimately sacrificed his life for.

Since the inauguration, the president’s actions have made clear that that part of his speech was not simply empty rhetoric. Nothing could be further from my father’s dream than planning to lay off all federal employees in diversity, equity and inclusionroles, announcing more repressive immigration policies, promising more ICE raids and overall targeting vulnerable communities. That is not my father’s dream.

The disconnect between the president’s actions and my father’s values serves as a stark reminder that the legacy we leave behind is not just about what we say; it’s more about what we do — and the lasting impact our actions have on the lives of others.

The challenges facing our nation are significant, and the solutions require collaboration, empathy and an unwavering commitment to justice. Scapegoating vulnerable groups or dismantling programs designed to ensure fairness and opportunity runs counter to the values my father championed. It is a reminder that progress is never guaranteed but instead must be defended at every turn.

As we look to the future, I find myself reflecting on what it means to build a legacy. In my book “What Is My Legacy?” which I wrote with my wife, Arndrea Waters King, and our friends Marc Kielburger and Craig Kielburger, I explore the idea that legacy is defined not by wealth or title but by the impact of our daily actions. My father often said, “Everybody can be great, because everybody can serve.” It is through service to others that we create a meaningful legacy.

My parents deeply believed in the power of service to advance justice and foster unity. My mother, Coretta Scott Kingspent years advocating for the establishment of Martin Luther King Jr. Day as a national holiday centered on community service.

Recent crises like the wildfires in Los Angeles remind us of the best of humanity — neighbors helping neighborscommunities uniting in the face of adversity. These moments demonstrate that despite our differences, we can come together when it matters most. In these times of crisis, Americans demonstrate the greatest traits of our nation and its people: empathy, unity and resilience.

But just as my father refused to relent in the face of impossible obstacles, I remain steadfastly optimistic about our future. History teaches us that progress often invites resistance. Every major step forward has faced challenges, from the Emancipation Proclamation to the Voting Rights Act. Yet, my father’s unwavering belief in the power of love, justice and collective action continues to inspire. His dream is not confined to the past; it is a call to action for each of us today.

The decisions we make now will shape the legacy we leave for future generations. I hope our leaders prioritize unity, justice and opportunity for all Americans.

But leadership is not limited to those in positions of power — it is a responsibility we all share. Together, through our actions and commitments, we can realize my father’s dream and ensure his legacy endures.

Martin Luther King, III

Martin Luther King, III, is a global humanitarian, activist, and the elder son of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. He is chairman of the board of the Drum Major Institute, the author of “What is My Legacy?” and cohost of the My Legacy podcast alongside his wife, Arndrea Waters King, Marc Kielburger and Craig Kielburger.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

NEXT: MAGA VOWS TO SILENCE FOES

Published

on

NEXT: MAGA VOWS TO SILENCE FOES

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is escalating threats to crack down on what he describes as the “radical left” following Charlie Kirk’s assassinationstirring fears that his administration is trying to harness outrage over the killing to suppress political opposition.

Without establishing any link to last week’s shooting, the Republican president and members of his administration have discussed classifying some groups as domestic terrorists, ordering racketeering investigations and revoking tax-exempt status for progressive nonprofits. The White House pointed to Indivisible, a progressive activist network, and the Open Society Foundations, founded by George Soros, as potential subjects of scrutiny.

Although administration officials insist that their focus is preventing violence, critics see an extension of Trump’s campaign of retribution against his political enemies and an erosion of free speech rights. Any moves to weaken liberal groups could also shift the political landscape ahead of next year’s midterm elections, which will determine control of Congress and statehouses across the country.

“The radical left has done tremendous damage to the country,” Trump told reporters on Tuesday morning when leaving for a state visit to the United Kingdom. “But we’re fixing it.”

Trump has sometimes made similar threats without following through. But now there’s renewed interest fueled by anger over the killing of Kirk, a conservative activist who was a prominent supporter of Trump and friends with many of his advisers.

More than 100 nonprofit leaders, representing organizations including the Ford Foundation, the Omidyar Network and the MacArthur Foundation, released a joint letter saying “we reject attempts to exploit political violence to mischaracterize our good work or restrict our fundamental freedoms.”

“Attempts to silence speech, criminalize opposing viewpoints, and misrepresent and limit charitable giving undermine our democracy and harm all Americans,” they wrote.

White House blames ‘terrorist networks’

Authorities said they believe the suspect in Kirk’s assassination acted alone, and they charged him with murder on Tuesday.

However, administration officials have repeatedly made sweeping statements about the need for broader investigations and punishments related to Kirk’s death.

Attorney General Pam Bondi blamed “left-wing radicals” for the shooting and said “they will be held accountable.” Stephen Miller, a top policy adviser, said there was an “organized campaign that led to this assassination.”

Miller’s comments came during a conversation with Vice President JD Vance, who was guest-hosting Kirk’s talk show from his ceremonial office in the White House on Monday.

Miller said he was feeling “focused, righteous anger,” and “we are going to channel all of the anger” as they work to “uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks” by using “every resource we have.”

Vance blamed “crazies on the far left” for saying the White House would “go after constitutionally protected speech.” Instead, he said, “We’re going to go after the NGO network that foments, facilitates and engages in violence.”

Asked for examples, the White House pointed to demonstrations where police officers and federal agents have been injured, as well as the distribution of goggles and face masks during protests over immigration enforcement in Los Angeles.

There was also a report that Indivisible offered to reimburse people who gathered at Tesla dealerships to oppose Elon Musk’s leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency. Sometimes cars were later vandalized.

Indivisible’s leadership has said “political violence is a cancer on democracy” and said that their own organization has “been threatened by right-wingers all year.”

Nonprofits brace for impact

Trump’s executive actions have rattled nonprofit groups with attempts to limit their work or freeze federal funding, but more aggressive proposals to revoke tax-exempt status never materialized.

Now the mood has darkened as nonprofits recruit lawyers and bolster the security of their offices and staff.

“It’s a heightened atmosphere in the wake of political violence, and organizations who fear they might be unjustly targeted in its wake are making sure that they are ready,” said Lisa Gilbert, co-president of the government watchdog group Public Citizen.

Trump made retribution against political enemies a cornerstone of his comeback campaign, and he’s mobilized the federal government to reshape law firms, universities and other traditionally independent institutions. He also ordered an investigation into ActBluean online liberal fundraising platform.

Some nonprofits expect the administration to focus on prominent funders like Soros, a liberal billionaire who has been a conservative target for years, to send a chill through the donor community.

Trump recently said Soros should face a racketeering investigation, though he didn’t make any specific allegations. The Open Society Foundations condemned violence and Kirk’s assassination in a statement and said “it is disgraceful to use this tragedy for political ends to dangerously divide Americans and attack the First Amendment.”

Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, wrote on social media that “the murder of Charlie Kirk could have united Americans to confront political violence” but “Trump and his anti-democratic radicals look to be readying a campaign to destroy dissent.”

White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said “it is disingenuous and false for Democrats to say administration actions are about political speech.” She said the goal is to “target those committing criminal acts and hold them accountable.”

Republicans back Trump’s calls for investigations

Trump’s concerns about political violence are noticeably partisan. He described people who rioted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, as “hostages” and “patriots,” and he pardoned 1,500 of them on his first day back in the Oval Office. He also mocked House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi after an attack on her husband.

When Trump condemned Kirk’s killing in a video message last week, he mentioned several examples of “radical left political violence” but ignored attacks on Democrats.

Asked on Monday about the killing of Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman over the summer, Trump said “I’m not familiar” with the case.

“Trump shrugs at right-wing political violence,” said Ezra Levin, the co-executive director of Indivisible, in a newsletter.

Some conservative commentators have cheered on a potential crackdown. Laura Loomer, a conspiracy theorist with a long record of bigoted comments, said “let’s shut the left down.” She also said that she wants Trump “to be the ‘dictator’ the left thinks he is.”

Katie Miller, the wife of Stephen Miller and a former administration spokeswoman, asked Bondi whether there would be “more law enforcement going after these groups” and “putting cuffs on people.”

“We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech,” Bondi said. “And that’s across the aisle.”

Her comments sparked a backlash from across the political spectrum, since even hate speech is generally considered to be protected under the First Amendment. Bondi was more circumspect on social media on Tuesday morning, saying they would focus on “hate speech that crosses the line into threats of violence.”

Trump is getting more support from Republicans in Congress. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and others proposed legislation that would enable the Justice Department to use racketeering laws, originally envisioned to combat organized crime, to prosecute violent protesters and the groups that support them.

Rep. Chip Roy of Texas wants the House to create a special committee to investigate the nonprofit groups, saying “we must follow the money to identify the perpetrators of the coordinated anti-American assaults being carried out against us.”

___

Associated Press writer Bill Barrow in Atlanta contributed to this report.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Japan’s exports to the US continue to fall, hit by Trump’s tariffs

Published

on

Japan’s exports to the US continue to fall, hit by Trump’s tariffs

TOKYO (AP) — Japan’s exports to the United States plummeted 13.8% in August compared to the same month the previous year, marking the fifth straight month of declines, as auto exports were hit by President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

The Finance Ministry data released Wednesday showed the rate of the drop in exports to the U.S. compared to the previous year worsened from a 10.1% slip in July.

U.S. tariffs on Japanese automobiles and auto parts decreased from 27.5%, the amount Trump initially levied, to 15% this week, but that’s still higher than the original 2.5%.

Wednesday’s data reflect the month of August, when the tariffs were higher. Japan’s overall exports were little changed, slipping 0.1%, as exports grew to Europe and the Middle East.

The provisional data for August showed Japan’s imports from the world fell 5.2% from a year ago. Imports from China grew 2.1%, while exports to China fell 0.5%. Imports from the U.S. grew 11.6%.

Exports to the world grew in food, gaining 18%, as well as in ships, growing by nearly 25%. Imports grew in computers, adding nearly 35% on-year, while aircraft rose 21%.

___

Yuri Kageyama is on Threads: https://www.threads.com/@yurikageyama

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

The Fed cuts interest rates by quarter-point after Trump’s pressure campaign

Published

on

The Fed cuts interest rates by quarter-point after Trump’s pressure campaign

The Federal Reserve on Wednesday cut interest rates for the first time this yearwith policymakers opting for an expected quarter-point cut to the Fed’s benchmark rate.

The announcement comes as President Donald Trump has been pushing for rate cuts while attempting to assert more control over the historically independent central bank. He has sought to fire Biden appointee Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, a move that an appeals court temporarily blocked Monday night but could ultimately be resolved soon at the Supreme Court. The Trump administration had argued for kicking her off the board ahead of the Federal Open Market Committee’s two-day meeting that started Tuesday, at which rates and other important matters were discussed.

The Republican-led Senate just this week confirmed a new board governor appointed by Trump, Stephen Miran, who has said he would not resign from his economic adviser position in the Trump White House. Miran replaced Biden appointee Adriana Kugler, who abruptly resigned last month before her term’s expiration in January.

Another”https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20250917a.htm” target=”_blank”>disagreed with Wednesday’s actionas he preferred a larger cut.

The New York Times previously reported that the projected quarter-point rate cut “won’t have a significant effect on consumers’ financial lives, but it may provide a tiny bit of relief for people carrying credit card debt, while savers may see slightly less generous yields.”

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Jordan Rubin

Jordan Rubin is the Deadline: Legal Blog writer. He was a prosecutor for the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan and is the author of “Bizarro,” a book about the secret war on synthetic drugs. Before he joined BLN, he was a legal reporter for Bloomberg Law.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending