Connect with us

The Dictatorship

The selfishness at the heart of this Trump-centric wellness subculture

Published

on

The selfishness at the heart of this Trump-centric wellness subculture

The Make America Healthy Againor MAHA, movement is a potent and growing Trump-centric subculture. MAHA influencers, politicians and followers argue that Americans have been made sick by corporate greed — which is as close to a unifying principle as MAHA can be said to hold.

According to MAHApharmaceutical, agricultural and food industry giants have poisoned us with red food dye, seed oils, processed food and microplastics. And currently, the movement is obsessed with promoting so-called raw milk, incorrectly claiming that unpasteurized milk provides health benefits, including immunity to E. coli and salmonella. In fact, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Preventionthose who consume unpasteurized milk are 840 times more likely to contract a foodborne illness than those who drink pasteurized milk.

The most insidious aspect of MAHA is arguably its most defining feature: anti-vaccine rhetoric. On message boards, subreddits, livestreams and podcasts, many MAHA commentators disseminated anti-vaccine disinformation and false conspiracy theories throughout the Covid-19 pandemic.

The most insidious aspect of MAHA is arguably its most defining feature: anti-vaccine rhetoric.

It was during the Covid pandemic, too, that the leading face of MAHA emerged: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who, before leaving the party and becoming an independent, challenged President Joe Biden for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination. On the campaign trail, Kennedy pushed several MAGA conspiracy theories and promised to end the Food and Drug Administration’s “aggressive suppression of … ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamins, clean foods, sunshine, exercise, nutraceuticals and anything else that advances human health and can’t be patented by Pharma.” This is now gospel to the MAHA movement.

A study by the Center for Countering Digital Hate cited Kennedy as one of 12 “anti-vaxxers who play leading roles in spreading digital misinformation about Covid vaccines,” especially when it comes to spreading falsehoods that childhood vaccines cause autism. Now, President-elect Donald Trump has tapped him to serve as secretary of health and human services.

What makes MAHA’s grievances particularly complicated — and fascinating — is that they’re not entirely wrong. Autoimmune disordersADHDanxietychildhood obesity and chronic fatigue — just some of the health problems the movement cites — are all on the rise. The problem is the unholy marriage between conspiracy and reality. Take, for example, how the increased ADHD and anxiety diagnoses can be attributed, at least in part, to a greater understanding of mental health issues and an easing stigma around mental health.

Last month, New York magazine mapped several prominent MAHA disciples’ — including influencers and even one conservative food journalist — journey from health conscious to full-throated embrace of wellness conservatism. Some came from the traditionally liberal, 1970s natural food movement. Many women found their way to MAHA disillusioned and frustrated after doctors dismissed their genuine health concerns. Still others came to MAHA from the growing anti-vaccine movement, which has been around for decades but went into hyperdrive during the pandemic. Regardless of their origin, the Covid-19 pandemic crystallized their beliefs and created something of a shared worldview or philosophy.

Much of MAHA indoctrination happens, unsurprisingly, online. Take MAHA influencer Alex Clark. Clark’s hugely successful podcast, “Culture Apothecary,” explores many of the key tenets that make up contemporary MAHA conservatism: the dangers of hormonal birth control and vaccines, the ills of feminism, Christianity — including a strident anti-abortion sentiment — and the damaging effect of food on women’s fertility.

A lot of what Clark espouses is easily refutable, but nutritional science and many aspects of women’s health fall in a different category: They’re both understudied. Moreover, doctors often treat women with less care than men for similar ailments. For example, a study publishedby the Journal of Neurotrauma found that women are treated less aggressively for traumatic brain injury, a leading cause of mortality and disability. And that is just one example.

Much of MAHA indoctrination happens, unsurprisingly, online.

Clark, also the face of Turning Point USA’s Young Women’s Leadership Summit, is a master at tapping into these painful, gray areas by capitalizing on fear and genuine lived experiences and creating something of a community around it. Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk noted in a statement to The Washington Post, “MAHA is a movement that transcends party, but it does skew female.” Clark is one of thousands of similar-minded influencers on Spotify, Instagram and TikTok.

Addressing the growing conspiracy theory culture in the U.S., Naomi Klein argued in her book“Doppelganger: A Trip Into the Mirror World,” that “conspiracy culture often gets the facts wrong but the feelings right.” There is no question that there is a health crisis, mental and physical, in this country. But MAHA’s “solutions” are not the answer. Their “facts” are wrong — a healthy populace actually needs vaccines and pasteurized milk — but the feeling may be closer to right.

At first MAHA might seem like a strange MAGA coterie. Trump is, after all, famously sedentary with an affinity for fast-food burgers and dessert stations. It makes sense, though, when you consider what is at the heart of both the MAHA and MAGA movements: individualism.

MAHA — from the movement’s mistrust of childhood vaccines to its influencers’ exhortations to “do your own research” — shows just how far American culture has gone to undervalue true community. My family, my needs, my children and my beliefs — the movement insists — are more important than anyone else’s — and the so-called elites telling us we have a responsibility to the community to vaccinate our kids are engaging in tyranny.

In the MAHA mind, it’s all about you — science and the public good be damned.

Hannah Holland

Hannah Holland is a producer for BLN’s “Velshi” and editor for the “Velshi Banned Book Club.” She writes for BLN Daily.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

House Ethics panel confirms misconduct investigation against Rep. Chuck Edwards

Published

on

House Ethics panel confirms misconduct investigation against Rep. Chuck Edwards

The House Ethics Committee announced Thursday that they are investigating whether Republican Rep. Chuck Edwards engaged in sexual misconduct or helped create a hostile workplace environment.

The bipartisan committee said in a statement that it is reviewing allegations that Edwards, 65, “may have created or fostered a hostile work environment and engaged in sexual harassment in violation of the Code of Official Conduct or any other applicable standard of conduct.”

The committee noted that opening and publicly acknowledging the investigation “does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred,” and said no further comments would be made, except as allowed under committee rules.

The investigation comes weeks after Axios first reportedon April 30 that the House Ethics Committee was investigating Edwards, though the outlet did not initially provide details about the allegations. CNN later reported the investigation involves allegations of sexual harassment. NOTUS also reporterd Edwards allegedly maintained a long-term affair with a former aide who is said to have left the office earlier this year.

Days later, Axios reportedthat they reviewed a handwritten letter Edwards gave to a departing female aide that expressed unusually personal and emotional language. Axios also cited sources who allege Edwards gave the aide personal gifts, including jewelry, and later spent time with her after she left his office, including a trip to Las Vegas.

House rules prohibit members of Congress from having sexual relationships with staffers under their supervision.

Edwards has represented North Carolina’s 11th Congressional District since 2023 and is currently seeking reelection. He has been married since 1980.

He said in a statement that he plans to comply with the investigation and “is confident the investigation will expose the facts, not politically motivated fiction.”

During an interview with BLN on Tuesday, Edwards denied any wrongdoing.

“I think you’re gonna find that when Ethics completes their investigation that the facts will have caught up with all the gossip and the rumor,” he said.

Scrutiny over workplace conduct on Capitol Hill has intensified in recent months following the resignations of three lawmakers facing ethics investigations.

Democrat Eric Swalwell of California resignedfrom the House in April after facing multiple allegations of sexual misconduct, including claims from several women, though he denied wrongdoing. Tony Gonzales, a Republican from Texas, also resigned from the House the same week after admitting to an affair with a staff member — conduct that prompted a House Ethics probe and potential expulsion proceedings. Days later, Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick stepped down just before an expected expulsion vote following findings by the House Ethics Committee that she committed numerous violations tied to the misuse of federal funds.

Cases involving alleged misconduct by lawmakers have also increased pressure on congressional leadership to respond swiftly and transparently.

In April, the ethics panel urgedstaff and members to come forward with more reports of workplace misconduct, emphasizing that stronger enforcement depends on greater transparency and accountability.

Ebony Davis is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked at BLN as a campaign reporter covering elections and politics.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Trump insists U.S.-China relations are in a good place as he wraps up Beijing trip

Published

on

Trump insists U.S.-China relations are in a good place as he wraps up Beijing trip

BEIJING (AP) — As President Donald Trumpwraps up his whirlwind visit to Chinaon Friday, he’s insistent that relations between the world’s two biggest powers are good and getting better despite deep differences on Iran, Taiwan and more.

Trump started his last day in Beijing by insisting in a social media post that Chinese leader Xi Jinping had “congratulated me on so many tremendous successes” and had been referring only to his predecessor, former U.S. President Joe Biden, when he “very elegantly referred to the United States as perhaps being a declining nation.”

But Trump’s rosy outlook on the U.S.-China relationship collides with some difficult truths about the thorniest issues between the two superpowers.

Beijing has shown little public interest in U.S. entreaties to get more involved in solving the conflict in Iraneven though Trump said in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity that Xi had in their conversations offered to help. And the White House believes China can still do more to stem the flow of Chinese-made precursor chemicalsinto Mexico used to make illicit fentanyl that has wreaked havoc on many U.S. communities.

Xi, meanwhile, warned Trump during private talks that their differences on the self-ruled island of Taiwan, if handled poorly, could hurtle the world’s dominant powerstoward “clashes and even conflicts,” according to Chinese government officials.

Trump and Xi are set to have more time together at Xi’s official residence in Beijing on Friday before the U.S. leader makes the long journey back to Washington.

Taiwan remains the most important issue for China

Xi’s sharp language on Taiwan loomed large over Thursday’s talks, even as Trump sought to play up the notion that the U.S. and China share a “special relationship.”

But Secretary of State Marco Rubio told NBC News that U.S. policy toward Taiwan was “unchanged” and cautioned that it would be “a terrible mistake” for China to try to take Taiwan by force. He also framed Xi’s comments as standard practice.

“They always raise it on their side. We always make clear our position, and we move on to the other topics,” said Rubio, who was among senior aides to join Trump for the talks.

China in recent weeks has sought to put more focus on its view that Taiwan sits at the “core” of its interests and is key to ensuring a stable relationship with the U.S.

Trump has demanded Taiwan increase defense spending, and in December, the White House announced an $11 billion weapons package for Taiwanthe largest ever to the island democracy.

But the U.S. has yet to begin fulfilling the arms sales, and Trump had said he expected to discuss the matter with Xi in Beijing. He’s also groused that Taiwan “stole” America’s semiconductor business and called on Taiwan to paythe U.S. for protection.

All the while, Trump has, with the threat of hefty tariffs and Biden-era incentives, prodded Taipei to agree to massive investmentsin U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and to purchase billions of dollars’ worthof U.S. liquefied natural gas and crude oil. The attitude toward Taiwan has raised questions about whether Trump might be open to dialing back support for the island democracy.

Ma Chun-wei, an expert in China-Taiwan relations at Taiwan’s Tamkang University, said the elevated defense relationship between Washington and Taipei has caused China to toughen its rhetoric over Taiwan.

“For Xi Jinping, he must show that the Taiwan issue is in China’s hands. He must demonstrate this image, or else he would be criticized,” Ma said.

China wants the Strait of Hormuz opened

Iran was on the agenda when Trump sat down with Xi on Thursday for their two-hour meeting in the Great Hall of the People.

The leaders agreed that the Strait of Hormuz— effectively closed since the start of the Iran conflict — needs to be reopened to support global energy demands, Trump told Fox News in an interview. About 20% of the world’s oil flowed through the strait before the war started on Feb. 28.

Trump said in the interview that Xi privately offered assistance on resolving the war, though it was unclear what that would mean, given China’s strategic partnership with Iran.

“He’d like to see the Hormuz Strait open,” Trump said. “He said if I can be of any help whatsoever, I would like to help.”

The president also said Xi was also opposed to any implementation of tolls on vessels crossing the strait and expressed interest in China potentially purchasing more U.S. oil to reduce Chinese dependence on Gulf oil in the future.

Trump earlier this week had downplayedthe importance of talks with Xi on the 11-week-old Iran war that has led to surging energy prices and threatens to plunge the global economy into recession if the conflict does not conclude soon.

“We have a lot of things to discuss. I wouldn’t say Iran is one of them, to be honest with you, because we have Iran very much under control,” Trump told reporters Tuesday shortly before flying to Beijing.

But before Air Force One could land in Beijing, Rubio said administration officials would make the case to the Chinese officials about why they should be invested in prodding Iran to come to terms to end the war.

“Economies are melting down because of this crisis,” Rubio offered aboard the presidential plane as he flew with Trump to Beijing. That dynamic, the secretary added in an interview Wednesday with Fox News’ Sean Hannity, will result in consumers “buying less Chinese product.”

“So it’s in their interest to resolve this,” Rubio said.

Indeed, the Chinese, who have been critical of the U.S. and Israeli bombardment of Iran, hold unique leverage as Iran’s biggest trading partner. The Chinese government has managed to weather the economic damage caused by the war with the help of its strategic oil reserves, but that backstop is not limitless. Economists say the Iran conflict could still have a big impact on China’s export-driven economy.

Will Trump announce any major business deals?

The White House, ahead of the visit, insisted that Trump wouldn’t be making the trip without an eye toward securing results before he leaves, suggesting there could be announcements coming on trade.

Those could still come, with the U.S. side hoping to nail down Chinese commitments to buy U.S. soybeans and beef. Trump told Fox News that Xi had indicated a commitment for China to buy 200 Boeing jets from the U.S.

The leaders on Thursday discussed increasing U.S. agricultural purchases by the Chinese and opportunities for both sides to expand investment into each other’s markets, according to the White House. Trump administration officials also want to work toward establishing a Board of Trade with China to address commercial differences between the countries.

Chinese Premier Li Qiang stressed the need for friendship and cooperation in U.S.-China ties as he spoke with U.S. business titans, including Tesla’s Elon MuskApple’s Tim Cook and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huangwho were part of Trump’s delegation in Beijing.

“China and the United States have been able to maintain frank and smooth dialogue and communication and actively safeguard a stable and healthy bilateral relationship” despite international turbulence, Li said.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

CIA director meets with top Cuban officials amid threats of U.S. intervention

Published

on

CIA director meets with top Cuban officials amid threats of U.S. intervention

CIA Director John Ratcliffe traveled to Cuba on Thursday to meet with top Cuban officials, a CIA official told MS NOW.

Ratcliffe, the highest-ranking U.S. official to travel to Havana since President Donald Trump returned to office, met with Raulito Rodriguez Castro, the grandson of former leader Raúl Castro; Minister of Interior Lazaro Alvarez Casas; and the head of Cuba’s intelligence services.

The meeting comes amid heightened tensions between the two countries, including Trump’s threats of military action and sweeping U.S. sanctions that have placed additional strain on Cuba’s struggling economy.

According to the CIA official, Ratcliffe was sent to personally deliver Trump’s message that the U.S. is prepared to seriously engage on economic and security issues, but only if Cuba makes fundamental changes.

It is unclear what specific changes the Trump administration is seeking.

During the meeting, Ratcliffe and Cuban officials discussed intelligence cooperation, economic stability and security issues, according to the official. The discussions took place against the backdrop of the Trump administration’s position that Cuba can no longer be a safe haven for U.S. adversaries in the Western Hemisphere.

Trump administration officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump himself, have repeatedly criticized the communist government and threatened foreign intervention.

The CIA official said Ratcliffe emphasized that Trump prefers dialogue, while also warning the administration would enforce redlines. According to the official, Ratcliffe told Cuban leaders that they must decide whether to seize this moment with the U.S. or continue down an unsustainable path that only leads to deeper isolation and instability.

In addition to the U.S. energy blockade driven by Trump’s threats to impose tariffs on countries that provide oil to Cuba, the U.S. expanded sanctions on Cuba on May 1 to include Cuban companies, institutions and officials, threatening to freeze their U.S.-based assets. The administration’s moves against Cuba further hamper the country already burdened by broader, long-standing restrictions imposed since the 1960s following the revolution.

In recent months, Cuba has suffered nationwide blackouts, plunging nearly 10 million people into darkness and disrupting access to food and water. The New York Times reported in March that the blackouts severely affected hospitals, causing deaths that would otherwise be preventable. Cuba has run out of oil and diesel as of Wednesday, Cuban Energy Minister Vicente de la O Levy said.

The U.S. has offered Cuba $100 million in “direct humanitarian assistance” to be distributed in coordination with the Catholic Church and other groups, the State Department announced Wednesday.

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez, who denounced the most recent sanctions as “collective punishment,” cautiously welcomed the offer.

“We expect it would be free from political maneuvers or any attempt to take advantage of the shortages and hardships of a people under harassment,” Rodriguez wrote on X.

“The best assistance that the US government could offer to the noble Cuban people in this or any other moment would be to de-escalate the measures of the energy, economic, commercial and financial blockade, which has been tightened like never before during the last few months and severely affects all sectors of the Cuban economy and society.”

Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW, with a focus on how global events and foreign policy shape U.S. politics. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.

David Rohde is the senior national security reporter for MS NOW and a two-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting. Previously he was the senior executive editor for national security and law for NBC News.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending