Congress

Democratic opposition mounts to GOP stopgap funding measure

Published

9 hours ago

July 21, 2026

House Democrats are making clear they’re in no mood to back a Republican-led bill punting a government funding fight to after the midterms — potentially dooming the GOP effort.

Leaving their weekly caucus meeting Tuesday morning, Democrats blasted Republicans for seeking to circumvent the bipartisan appropriations process by scheduling a vote for Tuesday evening on a stopgap funding measure that would extend federal spending levels until Dec. 4.

“It’s an abdication of responsibility to the country at a critical time,” Rep. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio, a senior Democratic appropriator, said in an interview.

“If you want our support, you should want to negotiate with us in good faith,” Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) agreed.

And while Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York did not announce plans for Democratic leadership to whip against the continuing resolution, he expressed strong opposition to the plan at a leadership meeting Monday, according to four people granted anonymity to discuss the private conversation.

Multiple lawmakers left their caucus meeting Tuesday under the impression that Democratic leaders were firmly in the “no” camp — a break from precedent where Democrats have traditionally supported “clean” stopgap funding bills.

The No. 3 House Democrat, Rep. Pete Aguilar of California, said at a news conference following the meeting that “I’ll be voting ‘no.’ And if any members ask, I would encourage them to do the same.”

If Democrats unite in voting against the measure, it’s not clear whether Republicans will be able to make up for the shortfall, as many fiscal hawks are never inclined to vote for continuing resolutions. Aguilar, however, also underscored at his news conference that this was not “a serious proposal,” with Senate Republicans unlikely to take up the House measure.

“It’s kind of a Trojan horse scenario here,” Rep. Glenn Ivey of Maryland, another Democratic appropriator, said of the Republican bill in an interview after the caucus meeting.

The top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, outlined her opposition in the Tuesday morning members’ meeting, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss the private conversations.

She is seeking explicit language that prohibits funding for Customs and Border Protection and is also circulating a fact sheet laying out her issues with the legislation.

Congress

GOP border bill clears hurdle despite Democratic push to add guardrails on ICE and DHS

Published

13 minutes ago

July 22, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee blocked efforts from Democrats to add immigration enforcement guardrails to a marquee border bill, as the Department of Homeland Security faces new scrutiny after immigration officers shot and killed two people this month.

Fifteen Republicans and Rep. Kevin Kiley of California, an independent who continues to caucus with Republicans, voted to advance the Permanent Trump Secure Border Act, a sweeping immigration bill championed by some of the most conservative members of the House Republican conference.

Republicans hailed the bill — a similar version of which advanced in the House in 2023 but failed to clear the Democratic-controlled Senate — as a way to achieve lasting border security beyond the lifespan of this presidential administration.

“We must ensure that border security is not a byproduct of whoever is elected to the presidency,” said Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), the main sponsor of the legislation.

All Democrats present voted against advancing the legislation, arguing the bill would codify what they described in the debate as “cruel” policies from the Trump administration. And their efforts to modify controversial provisions were roundly defeated by Republicans.

Among the proposed amendments were ones mandating that immigration officers use body cameras when they apprehend unauthorized immigrants, requiring the government provide parole status to the parents of active duty military personnel, reservists and veterans and ensuring that the government provide legal counsel to children who came to the United States by themselves. None of them made it into the final bill.

“What we’re trying to say through these amendments to try to fix this sloppy seconds bill is have some oversight,” Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Calif.) said during the debate. “You should be demanding oversight over your dollars misused to create inhumane conditions.”

One of the most notable amendments was one that would have required immigration officers to use body cameras in the field. The amendment, presented by Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), would have also banned officers from wearing masks.

Calls for the use of body cameras have grown after Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers shot and killed two people in Texas and Maine earlier in July. In both shootings, officers were not wearing cameras, despite a pledge in February 2026 from then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem that immigration officers would receive them.

During the proceedings, Republicans rejected a first version of the amendment on the grounds it was not “germane” to the debate, prompting Raskin to immediately offer what he argued was a more narrow version. They then argued the second one was not needed because there is already widespread support for body cameras and that the masking provision risked doxxing immigration officers.

Democrats, meanwhile, argued — unsuccessfully — that ICE officers should have to follow the same standards as state and local law enforcement agencies.

Still, even as Republicans notch a temporary win, the bill advancing could be a pyrrhic victory. Even though the legislation is a cause celebre for some more hardline members of the Republican conference, the bill, which would impose strict guidelines for asylum and entry to the United States and impose widespread verification requirements on U.S. companies, is seen as too aggressive by some moderate Republicans in Congress, making its passage through the full House difficult.

And the legislation would almost assuredly fail to achieve the needed 60 votes in the Senate to reach the president’s desk.

Congress

Cornyn threatens to block Trump’s ambassadors over AIDS prevention funding

Published

3 hours ago

July 21, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) is threatening to sink the ambassador nominations of two high-profile allies of President Donald Trump unless the White House commits to distributing AIDS funding in Africa.

A spokesperson for Cornyn, a member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told Blue Light News on Tuesday that he wouldn’t vote to advance Kari Lake or Doug Mastriano, Trump’s picks for ambassador to Jamaica and Slovakia, respectively, unless he receives firm reassurance that the administration will release funds set aside for the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the HIV and AIDS program credited with saving millions of lives in poor countries.

Both nominations are expected to face a vote in the committee on Wednesday. But without assurance on PEPFAR funding from the Trump administration, Cornyn could singlehandedly block the two nominations if they otherwise receive party-line backing, as Republicans hold 12 seats on the committee to Democrats’ 10.

It’s the second time in less than a week that the four-term senator has bucked the White House in the wake of his Senate primary loss to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in May. Cornyn suffered a lopsided defeat that came after the president endorsed Paxton — to the chagrin of Senate GOP leadership.

He also clashed with Todd Blanche, Trump’s pick for attorney general, over the White House “anti-weaponization” fund during a senate confirmation hearing last week.

Asked about leveraging his vote in recent weeks to move the White House towards his preferred policies, Cornyn told Blue Light News, “It’s kind of fun.”

Semafor was the first to report Cornyn’s ultimatum on the nominees. The White House and the State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Lake and Mastriano both lost races for governor in 2022, in Arizona and Pennsylvania, respectively. They both took down more moderate Republicans in their respective primaries and earned the president’s favor by embracing his rhetoric regarding the 2020 election.

Lake subsequently ran for Senate in 2024, losing to Sen. Ruben Gallego even though Trump won Arizona that year by more than five points.

Cornyn is the latest Republican whose career Trump has effectively ended who’s since decided to turn the screws on the White House in recent months.

Cornyn and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) — both members of the Senate Judiciary Committee — have been in talks with the White House over what it would take for them to support advancing Blanche’s attorney general nomination to a full floor vote.

And Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), who lost his Republican primary to Trump-endorsed Rep. Julia Letlow in June, will play a major role in deciding the fate of Erica Schwartz, the administration’s nominee for director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The two shared a tense exchange during her confirmation hearing last week.

Since Trump returned to office, Republicans have consistently pushed for cuts to the AIDS-prevention program created during the George W. Bush administration. The State Department cut over 100 contracts grants from PEPFAR last year as part of the efforts to curb government spending led by Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency, drawing criticism from Democratic lawmakers and even some Republican senators, who blocked $400 million allocated for PEPFAR from being clawed back in the White House’s $9 billion rescission package last year.

Last month, the State Department decided to begin winding down PEPFAR programming in South Africa to comply with Trump’s executive order directing U.S. agencies to stop the funding unless the African country took steps to prevent discrimination against its white Afrikaner minority.

Chris Marquette contributed to this report.

Congress

Rep. Cleo Fields announces he will not seek reelection

Published

4 hours ago

July 21, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Rep. Cleo Fields (D-La.) has announced he will not seek reelection, choosing instead to run for state Senate in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling gutting the Voting Rights Act.

In a statement late Tuesday afternoon, Fields said he came to the decision after “a great deal of prayer and reflection.”

“I feel my calling to serve the people is better put to use back home than here in D.C., and I intend to answer that call,” said Fields, whose majority-Black district encompasses parts of Shreveport, Baton Rouge and Lafayette.

Fields’ announcement comes after the Louisiana state legislature in May passed a new map that eliminated his district following the Supreme Court’s Louisiana v. Callais decision, which ruled that the state’s second majority-Black district was an illegal racial gerrymander.

Fields condemned the Supreme Court’s April decision as “a grave setback to voting rights” as he pointed out that “minority candidates are rarely, if ever, elected from districts where they are not the majority, underscoring why fair districting remains essential to ensuring equal representation.”

The National Republican Congressional Committee on Monday identified Fields’ seat as one of its 2026 targets, adding to a list of more than 30 districts the committee has set its sights on.

The Callais ruling was not the first time Fields’ district, which he was first elected to represent in 1992 at the age of 29, was ruled unconstitutional; his district, then the 4th congressional district, was first found to be a racial gerrymander in 1996. That three-judge panel then implemented a new map which included just one majority Black district, after which Fields was elected to the Louisiana Senate. He didn’t return to Congress again until after his election in 2024.

Fields will now seek to fill the seat of state Sen. Larry Selders (D), who died on July 7.