Congress

House Ethics shares update on Cory Mills investigation

Published

4 months ago

May 11, 2026

The House Ethics Committee is defending its handling of the ongoing investigation into embattled Rep. Cory Mills, who stands accused of threatening to release a former girlfriend’s nude videos, among other charges.

In a statement Monday, the panel’s bipartisan leadership said that the investigative subcommittee announced in November to oversee the Mills case “has authorized more than 20 subpoenas, collected thousands of documents, and contacted dozens of witnesses.”

“The [subcommittee] expects to receive additional relevant documents and testimony in the coming weeks and will take all necessary steps to conduct a full and thorough investigation,” said chair Michael Guest (R-Miss.) and ranking member Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.) in the statement.

A spokesperson for Mills did not immediately return a request for comment.

The rare public statement from a notoriously secretive committee underscores the extent of the pressure the Ethics panel remains under to aggressively police lawmakers, following a rash of member resignations spurred by allegations of sexual misconduct or other bad behavior.

Guest and DeSaulnier note that the panel’s review of Mills includes looking into a Feb. 2025 incident, during which the Metropolitan Police Department was called to a home in Washington regarding an assault allegedly committed by Mills. Mills has denied wrongdoing in the case, and the woman who was the alleged victim has said no physical altercation took place.

The Ethics investigative subcommittee is also probing a restraining order levied by a Florida judge after a former girlfriend accused Mills of threatening to release her explicit videos. Mills has denied those allegations, too.

“The Committee takes these and the other allegations very seriously and will continue to review them in a manner that ensures due process and prioritizes witness confidentiality and safety,” Guest and DeSaulnier said Monday.

Mills has also been accused of other charges, including stolen valor and involvement in federal contracts while in office. He has said he is cooperating with the Ethics Committee’s probe and has confidence in its ability to adjudicate his case.

Congress

Capitol agenda: GOP does Dallas? Not so much

Published

4 hours ago

September 2, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Republicans gearing up for November elections aren’t exactly flocking to next week’s GOP midterm convention in Dallas, the first held by a major party in more than four decades.

Republicans — ranging from battleground moderates to hard-line conservatives — are opting out of the televised spectacle as the party pushes through a final election sprint where their control of Congress is at stake.

A Blue Light News survey of more than 70 GOP candidates and members revealed most either do not plan to go or are still weighing whether to go.

Those 45 Republicans cited a variety of reasons for their decision: Some said they had prior fundraising or event obligations planned before the convention was scheduled. Others described personal conflicts, like weddings and family events, while some raised qualms about the high fees party officials want attending members to pony up.

Others in tough races are steering clear of the gathering as they face growing hesitation about associating themselves with President Donald Trump, who is set to be a headline speaker along with Vice President JD Vance.

“I just felt I’d be more useful in my district,” Rep. Tom Barrett said in an interview.

Asked if the president’s remarks might cause him problems back home, Barrett said: “I can’t control what the president’s going to say at the convention, but I can control where I’m at, what I’m doing.”

House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said he is not attending because he has a dove-hunting event back home in Oklahoma. Several northeastern members, including Reps. Chris Smith of New Jersey and Andrew Garbarino of New York, said they have commitments in their districts related to the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

Most top House and Senate GOP leaders will be in attendance, including Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune.

Some potential 2028 presidential contenders, including Sen. Ted Cruz, will also be in attendance, as will some Senate Republicans from marquee battleground races including Ohio Sen. Jon Husted. Sen. Bernie Moreno, who is expected to be the next Senate GOP campaign chair, is also planning to attend.

Johnson said he has been “promoting” the event but acknowledged Tuesday some members decided attending is not the best use of their time.

“They’ve got to all make their own individual decision,” Johnson said, adding “it’s critical time right before early voting begins nationwide.”

Some members were more candid in their criticism: One House Republican not attending the convention granted anonymity to speak openly called it “a waste of time” and said event planning has been “a mess.” Another member pointed to the $25,000 fee being charged by party organizers.

“I didn’t want to go anyways. That made it easier,” the member said of the cost.

What else we’re watching:

— JEFFRIES WEIGHS DEFECTOR DISCIPLINE: Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said he is weighing disciplinary action against two Democratic members who Tuesday helped rescue Republicans’ floor agenda for the week. “We haven’t ruled anything in, and we haven’t ruled anything out,” Jeffries told Blue Light News. Later, Jeffries and Democratic leadership in a statement said they were referring moderate Reps. Jared Golden and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez to the caucus’ rules panel. The duo’s support resulted in a 210-208 vote that was enough to prevent GOP hard-liners from freezing floor business for the week.

— LAWMAKERS READY MISCONDUCT BILL: The bipartisan House lawmaker duo writing a bill to better police members accused of sexual misconduct are finalizing a draft and want floor time by the end of the month. “Leadership has been with us every step of the way, and so we’re hoping to time it out for introduction and hopefully floor time in September,” Rep. Kat Cammack said. Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández said they’re conducting their last listening sessions this week and taking staff input before finalizing language. Cammack added they’re also weighing moving the recommendations as a complete package or in two tranches, as some provisions can be addressed with a House rules change while others require Senate action.

Mia McCarthy, Meredith Lee Hill, Jordain Carney, Riley Rogerson and Chris Marquette contributed to this report.

Congress

Republicans aren’t exactly flocking to Trump’s midterm convention

Published

7 hours ago

September 2, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

President Donald Trump has a vision for next week’s GOP convention in Dallas: a televised spectacle putting Republican candidates in front of midterm voters and top party donors just two months before the Election Day — with Trump himself headlining the show.

But a Blue Light News survey of more than 70 GOP candidates and members revealed that most either do not plan to attend or are still weighing whether to go. Dozens more declined to share their plans.

The 45 Republicans cited a variety of reasons for skipping the first midterm convention put on by a major party in more than four decades. Some cited prior obligations such as fundraisers or events in their districts that were planned before the convention was scheduled in June. Others had personal conflicts, like weddings and family events, and still others raised qualms about the five-figure-minimum fees that party officials want attending lawmakers to pony up.

And some Republicans in tough races are steering clear of the gathering — which has come to be called “Trump-a-palooza” in some GOP circles — as they face growing hesitation about associating themselves with the polarizing president so close to the election.

“I just felt I’d be more useful in my district,” said Rep. Tom Barrett, who is facing a tough campaign to keep his central Michigan seat. “I travel a lot for this job and if I can be back home and see my family and do the job back home as well, then that’s sort of what I lean toward doing.”

Several other Republicans in key races targeted by Democrats said they weren’t committing to attend.

“I’m going to be in my district,” Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa) said when asked about his plans, while Rep. Rob Bresnahan (R-Pa.) said, “I’m not sure yet.” Rep. Jeff Hurd (R-Colo.) isn’t planning to go, according to people granted anonymity to describe his decision. And Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) said he instead plans to visit colleges with his daughter.

Trump will be the headline speaker of the two-day convention inside the American Airlines Center, with Vice President JD Vance also set to address Republicans.

Most top House and Senate GOP leaders will be in attendance, including Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune. Some potential 2028 presidential contenders, including Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), will also be in attendance, as will some Senate Republicans from marquee battleground races.

Former Rep. Mike Rogers, who is trying to flip retiring Democratic Sen. Gary Peters’ seat in Michigan, and Sen. Jon Husted, who is working to fend off a challenge from former Sen. Sherrod Brown in Ohio, will both attend, according to their campaigns. Sen. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), who is expected to be the next Senate GOP campaign chair, is also planning to be there.

Johnson said he has been “promoting this everywhere” as an important event for the party but also acknowledged it’s a crucial time for some of his members to spend time in their districts.

“They’ve got to all make their own individual decision … but the people that do come are going to have a great time,” Johnson said in an interview, adding that he expects high attendance during the convention. He acknowledged in a news conference Tuesday, however, that some members will need to be in their districts because “it’s critical time right before early voting begins nationwide.”

With Trump front and center at the convention, some Republicans are privately fretting about slipping presidential approval ratings in their districts amid the ongoing conflict in Iran, a trade war with Canada and rising prices from both. Other moves by the administration, such as a deal tackling beef imports to address affordability, have angered other key GOP constituencies.

One House Republican not attending the convention who was granted anonymity to speak candidly called the event “a waste of time” and said the planning has been “a mess.”

“You shouldn’t be having to rally your base at this point,” the member said. “You should be trying to convince independents. Independents are not attending nor watching the midterm convention.”

RNC national press secretary Natalie Baldassarre said in a statement responding to those claims that “the outreach and enthusiasm to attend, participate, and speak at this historic midterm convention has been incredible.”

“Republicans across the country are rallying behind President Trump’s America First agenda that’s brought lower drug prices, lower taxes, and a secure border, and this convention will provide the momentum needed to expand our majorities in November,” she added.

But even some Republicans who might benefit from campaigning with Trump said the costs members are being asked to pay to attend were getting in the way. Another House Republican granted anonymity to speak candidly pointed to the $25,000 minimum attendee donation suggested by the National Republican Congressional Committee, which is distributing RNC-provided tickets to members.

“I didn’t want to go anyways. That made it easier,” the member said.

According to an NRCC memo obtained by POLITICO, that donation gives a member the right to book one hotel room in the committee’s block as well as two tickets to a welcome reception and the convention itself. Higher tiers of giving up to $100,000 come with access to additional rooms, tickets and events. An NRCC spokesperson declined to comment.

Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) cited the price tag in explaining why he is still “not sure” whether he would attend.

“It’s $25,000, apparently — I just got a bill,” said Burchett.

With the convention being seen inside the party as a key late fundraising opportunity, several GOP lawmakers who intend to be there, including some committee chairs, plan to give much more than $25,000, according to three people familiar with the planning for the event.

But other powerful members are taking a pass, including two of the most senior members of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Ohio Rep. Bob Latta, who chairs the panel’s Energy subcommittee, said he had events back in his district, and Virginia Rep. Morgan Griffith, who chairs the Oversight subpanel, said he preferred to be home campaigning.

“I should be safe,” Griffith said in an interview. “But no member of Congress from the 9th Congressional District of Virginia has left voluntarily since 1952.”

House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said he is not attending because he has a dove-hunting event back home in Oklahoma.

Several northeastern members, including Reps. Chris Smith of New Jersey and Andrew Garbarino of New York, said they have commitments in their districts related to the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

Less surprising are the alternate plans being made by moderate Republicans who are facing tough elections in the fall and don’t necessarily benefit from being associated with the president.

A campaign spokesperson for Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said she will not be in attendance, citing a “long standing practice of not going to conventions while she is in cycle.”

“I’m not a party guy,” said Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) said in an interview Tuesday, explaining why he won’t be in Texas next week. “I believe in ending the two-party system. Get back to our roots as a country.”

Riley Rogerson, Kelsey Brugger, Katherine Tully-McManus and Calen Razor contributed to this report.

Congress

Congress warms to Trump’s Hollywood tax credit effort

Published

7 hours ago

September 2, 2026

Blue Light Newsroom

Donald Trump picked up fresh bipartisan support for a federal film tax credit Tuesday, while an adviser to one of his Hollywood ambassadors told Blue Light News that legislation could come within weeks.

“Something can be introduced this month and as early as within the next couple of weeks,” said Scott Karol, a producer who, along with Jon Voight and his manager, Steven Paul, met with Trump on Monday to discuss the issue.

The legislation is “going to get pushed by Ways and Means,” said Karol, referring to the House committee that handles tax policy. “You are going to see a bipartisan presentation of this.”

On Tuesday, Trump posted on social media for the second consecutive day to tout support for the effort, giving the prospective legislation a name: the Motion Picture, Television and Entertainment Revitalization Act. It comes after a decadeslong exodus of film and TV shoots to countries including Canada and the United Kingdom, which have long offered lucrative incentives that in some cases have become juicier than even the most generous state-level programs.

A bipartisan group of House members from California, which more than doubled the size of its incentive last year to $750 million annually, and Georgia, which has seen blockbuster productions flee across the Atlantic, has also embraced the president’s call for Congress to “immediately” create a federal production tax credit.

The swift and wide-ranging response in support of the tax credit shows momentum for an effort led by an Oscar-winning screen icon whose star crested decades ago and backed by a coalition that includes studios, guilds and some of the president’s most strident critics in Congress. But even with the fresh hope for Hollywood, where industry figures have long dreamed of a federal production incentive, creating a major new tax break would be a tall order in a closely divided Congress.

The film and TV production incentive that is being discussed would include a 20 percent credit for labor both in front of and behind the camera, Karol said. It could also include a mechanism requiring that the vast majority of the work would go to U.S. personnel, according to the two people with knowledge of the legislative effort who were granted anonymity to describe internal deliberations.

“This is going to go through the great grinder that is Congress,” said Karol, who added that the legislation could include “upticks” for projects that shoot in enterprise zones.

Cost concerns

Proponents of the legislation — among them Rep. Laura Friedman (D-Calif.), who has taken a lead role in the effort — have noted that its bipartisan support reflects a reality: several states with sizable production ecosystems are led by Republicans.

“Eighteen months ago, I was fighting to convince my colleagues that the departure of film production from our country was a national problem,” said Friedman, whose Los Angeles-area district includes several entertainment companies, in a statement. “Now the President is asking for the same bill a group of us have been working on. Doors that were closed to us a year ago are open this morning. My job now is to keep the coalition together: the unions, the studios, and members of both parties, and do whatever it takes to get this bill to the floor for a vote and signed into law.”

Republicans from states with flagging film and TV industries, including Georgia and Florida, also expressed support, despite some wariness about helping an industry not known for backing conservative causes — as well as concerns about the cost of doing so.

Rep. Vern Buchanan of Florida, a senior Republican on the Ways and Means Committee who’s not seeking reelection, said that he hoped Trump could sign a film credit into law by the end of 2026.

“Whatever we can do to be supportive is a good thing,” he said.

Rep. Rich McCormick (R-Ga.) told Blue Light News that he was “really not a big fan of federal subsidies because, once again, we’re in 30 percent deficit spending right now.”

“Georgia’s a major film-producing place, and I always want to help Georgia out,” he said. “But I also want to make sure that it makes sense for the American people when it comes to how we pay for it and how much comes back to us in tax money.”

Rep. Buddy Carter, another Georgia Republican, said that entertainment production “has been an economic boon for us.” The state, he said, has benefited from “the investment that’s been made,” citing jobs, tax revenue and tourism.

‘We need a Truth Social post’

Top lawmakers in both parties have discussed passing a bipartisan tax package after the midterm elections. It’s possible, according to the two people with knowledge of the legislative push for the incentive, that a bill to create the credit could be introduced then. But November’s results will influence how much legislating congressional leaders will want to do before the close of the year, leaving the fate of a lame-duck tax bill up in the air.

“We hope when we‘re in the majority that this is something that we can address,” House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) said. “Maybe this is a source of something that we can do between now and then if there‘s bipartisan support.”

During their meeting with the president on Monday, Voight made “an impassioned plea to the president,” said Paul, one of the actor’s advisers.

“Jon, as you can imagine, really has a love for our business. He feels fatherly over it. It hurts him to see what is happening,” said Paul, adding that the actor “has been by our sides” at meetings with Hollywood interests supportive of the legislation, including unions and the Motion Picture Association.

During their meeting, Paul said that an admission he made got the president’s attention. Paul, who also is a producer, told Trump that he was making a new film about Richard Nixon, but said he was “ashamed” to admit he might have to shoot it overseas, owing to incentives available outside the U.S.

“What do you need from me?” Trump replied, according to Karol.

Voight’s advisers told the president, “We need a Truth Social post,” Karol said.

Before long, the president was telling his followers that a federal production incentive could be created “quickly, accurately, efficiently and, importantly, will benefit ALL of America.”

A White House official declined to discuss the meeting but said in a statement, “President Trump is right: American movies should be made in America. The President is Making Hollywood Great Again while creating high paying jobs right here in the United States.”

Karol and Paul — who along with Voight also met on Monday with MPA officials, including CEO Charles Rivkin — acknowledged that there is much work to be done. Asked about McCormick’s reservations over the cost of a potential federal incentive, Karol said “that kind of concern is valid.”

“Having said that, there are a number of industries that receive government support because of their importance for one reason or another,” he said. “This is the greatest American export. American movies need to be made in America and by Americans. This legislation will have an immediate impact in the United States.”