Congress
New CR date under discussion, Johnson says
Speaker Mike Johnson said Monday that GOP leaders are discussing ways to deal with the rapidly approaching Nov. 21 expiration date of the continuing resolution that passed the House last month and is now stalled in in the Senate.
Republican leaders are privately eyeing another stopgap into early 2026, as POLITICO has reported, which would be part of any deal to reopen the government.
“We’re very mindful of the calendar. We’re very frustrated by that,” Johnson said at a news conference, adding that GOP leaders would meet soon to discuss options.
Republicans have ramped up conversations about a new expiration date over the past week. GOP leaders in both the House and Senate are now eyeing sometime between Jan. 21 and March for the expiration of any deal to reopen the government.
Senators are discussing a deal that could involved moving a package of funding bills alongside a new stopgap that would reopen government, along with a vote for Democrats on extending expiring health insurance subsidies. Those talks continued over the weekend, and while lawmakers feel they’re making progress, GOP leaders have made clear that they will not allow any full-year funding bills to advance without securing a deal to reopen the government first.
The House voted Wednesday by unanimous consent to hold billionaire investor Leon Black in contempt of Congress after he refused to comply with two congressional subpoenas sought by the Oversight Committee as part of its investigation into the late Jeffrey Epstein.
The matter is now in the hands of the Justice Department, which will determine whether to ultimately bring charges against Black. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
It marks the first time a witness has been held in contempt over the course of the Oversight panel’s yearlong probe into Epstein and the web of powerful people who enabled his abuse for years before his conviction on sex trafficking charges.
“This vote is an important step towards justice and accountability,” said the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Robert Garcia of California. “Leon Black has continued to defy two congressional subpoenas and we need to know why he gave Jeffrey Epstein $180 million dollars. We will continue to center the survivors in our fight to hold those responsible for these horrific crimes. We are just getting started.”
Black, according to the Oversight Committee, had a close personal relationship with Epstein for years as well as financial connections, with Black paying Epstein over $158 million. He was brought in for a transcribed interview with the panel members in June but refused to turn over certain nondisclosure agreements he entered into with women tied back to Epstein, resulting in subpoenas to compel their release.
Black has refused to comply with the demand, instead choosing to sue the Oversight Committee on allegations the leaders overstepped their authority in making their demands. It did not stop the committee from moving forward with contempt proceedings, voting Tuesday to recommend the full House take action.
“As a result of his extensive dealings with Epstein, Mr. Black possesses firsthand information regarding the activities of Epstein and [Ghislaine] Maxwell and their efforts to establish relationships and curry favor with influential individuals while engaged in sex trafficking,” the panel said in its contempt resolution.
Susan Estrich and Aaron Cutler, Black’s attorneys, in a statement called the action against Black “politically motivated and completely retaliatory by a Chairman who is focused solely on himself and his own political ambitions without any regard for the truth and the law.”
“We intend to pursue our litigation challenging this action and will hold the Committee and Chairman [James] Comer [R-Ky.] accountable in the courts,” the lawyers added.
Comer, in a statement, said, “no one is above the law. Leon Black defied two subpoenas, and the U.S. House of Representatives acted swiftly to find him in contempt of Congress. We will continue to seek transparency for the American people and justice for survivors in our investigation of the federal government’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein and [co-conspirator] Ghislaine Maxwell criminal cases.”
The top Democrat on the House education committee is potentially facing a second challenge to his leadership amid broader frustrations over the caucus’ longstanding deference to seniority.
Rep. Bobby Scott already set out to defend his record on the House Education and Workforce Committee last week after Rep. Jahana Hayes (D-Conn.) launched a formal bid for his spot on the panel. Now, one of the Virginia Democrat’s allies, Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.), says she is “not ruling anything out” about making her own run.
“I want the best leadership for the committee. I’ve been on the committee for a long time and [am] just exploring all the options,” Bonamici, who has served on the panel since 2013, said in an interview. “It’s a really important committee. I care about it a lot. It’s important for our future.”
The race for Scott’s position — and potentially the committee gavel, if Democrats flip the chamber in the midterms — is the latest example of the angst within the caucus about leadership opportunities. It also reflects the interest Democrats have in ramping up oversight of the Trump administration and its efforts to dismantle the Education Department, scrutiny that sparked Hayes’ run against Scott, who is 26 years older.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters Monday that he has spoken with both Scott and Hayes but declined to say more.
Scott, who is 79 and has served as the House education committee’s top Democrat since 2015, often delegates the more attention-grabbing aspects of ranking member to others, particularly former teachers serving on the panel.
When House Democrats marched to Education Department headquarters demanding to meet with agency leaders early last year, Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.) took the lead. And Bonamici led a resolution to impeach Education Secretary Linda McMahon earlier this year with the support of other committee members and House lawmakers — a resolution where Scott isn’t a co-sponsor.
“Ranking member Scott has his role as the ranking member, but I think it’s up to Congresswoman Bonamici, myself and others to build support,” Takano said in an interview earlier this summer, when asked if Scott should support the effort to impeach McMahon.
Scott doesn’t seem worried and repeatedly said he would let his work speak for itself. He also used a Dear Colleague letter to dissuade any concerns about his leadership style and demeanor.
“While I have no qualms about sharing the spotlight with my colleagues, I want to be clear that my colleagues should not confuse my humility with an inability to deliver results,” Scottwrote in a letter to colleagues declaring his candidacy to continue leading Democrats on the committee.
Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz is still optimistic that his twice-delayed markup on artificial intelligence legislation will happen before the midterms — and that the centerpiece bill will be a yet-to-be-finalized bipartisan measure to stave off catastrophic risks posed by the evolving technology.
“It’s still my hope to have an AI markup this session,” the Texas Republican told reporters Wednesday.
Cruz added that senators are “actively negotiating through provisions” in a proposal from Majority Leader John Thune and Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota to establish guardrails for the most powerful models.
“My hope is that we will get bipartisan agreement and be able to move the bill,” he continued. “We’re not there yet, but we’re making progress.”
He declined to elaborate on sticking points.
Cruz had been eyeing July for an AI markup but he postponed it by a week, only to then postpone it again and proceed with consideration of only bills related to kids’ online safety. But Cruz is facing new pressure after AI safety researchers and CEOs from the leading labs have over the past week warned that humans are at risk of extinction if the technological advancements remain unchecked.
The Senate is due to recess at the end of the month until after the November elections, however, so time is running out for action. One Senate Commerce Committee Republican, granted anonymity to speak candidly, expressed doubt on the panel holding a markup before the break, noting that the Thune-Klobuchar bill isn’t yet finalized.
Earlier in the day Wednesday, Thune told reporters that he was unsure that the Commerce Committee markup would happen this month, noting other committee activity is possible.
“Well, I don’t know if the markup does, but I think there are going to be a number of formats where folks are going to sit down and sort of hack out what our role ought to be and what the real threat looks like, how serious it is and all that,” he said of the ongoing debate over how involved Congress should be in regulating the AI industry.
Thune also said it “remains to be seen” if senators would receive an AI briefing of some kind in the coming days. “I think there are going to be a number of things done at the committee level.”
Sens. John Curtis (R-Utah) and Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), both members of the Commerce Committee, on Wednesday issued a statement calling for “immediate public hearings” on AI.
Senators are discussing avenues for action on AI the same day House Speaker Mike Johnson announced he was sending lawmakers home a day early for the pre-midterms recess — after already canceling the last scheduled two weeks of session.
A key House Republican working on AI legislation, Rep. Jay Obernolte of California, is now looking to November for a hearing and markup on his bipartisan AI safety bill with Rep. Lori Trahan(D-Mass.), as House Energy and Commerce Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.) seemed to throw cold water on the idea the bill could move this year during the Blue Light News Decoded summit earlier in the day.
“Yeah, we’ll see,” Obernolte said in response. “[Guthrie] was noncommittal, as he ought to be, but he certainly didn’t say that it wasn’t going to be this year.”
Jordain Carney and Mia McCarthy contributed to this report.
- Jay Jacobs gets his first-ever challenger for state Dem chair
- ‘The US can’t lose’: Pentagon plows ahead on AI despite warnings
- House votes to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress
- GOP’s gas tax holiday push falters in House
- Bonamici ‘exploring’ bid for Scott’s education leadership
- Ted Cruz: ‘It’s still my hope’ to have an AI markup this month
- Cassidy grills surgeon general pick on vaccines
- Democrat targets Trump’s push for publicly-sited AI data centers
- Leader of House Epstein investigation rolls out bill to protect victims of sexual assault
- Ted Lieu, No. 4 Democrat, calls for committee vote on bipartisan AI bill
-
Politics2 years agoFormer ‘Squad’ members launching ‘Bowman and Bush’ YouTube show
-
Uncategorized2 years ago
Bob Good to step down as Freedom Caucus chair this week
-
Politics2 years agoFormer Kentucky AG Daniel Cameron launches Senate bid
-
The Josh Fourrier Show2 years agoDOOMSDAY: Trump won, now what?
-
The Dictatorship2 years agoLuigi Mangione acknowledges public support in first official statement since arrest
-
The Dictatorship2 years agoPete Hegseth’s tenure at the Pentagon goes from bad to worse
-
Politics2 years agoBlue Light News’s Editorial Director Ryan Hutchins speaks at Blue Light News’s 2025 Governors Summit
-
The Dictatorship1 year agoMike Johnson sums up the GOP’s arrogant position on military occupation with two words