Efforts to pass legislation governing the nation\u2019s $19 billion college sports industry are teetering amid a fierce lobbying fight over media rights and antitrust protections.<\/p>\n

The Protect College Sports Act advanced out of the Senate Commerce Committee<\/u><\/a> on a 19-9 vote last month that pulled in seven Democrats. It was a hopeful moment for advocates of the Senate\u2019s yearslong legislative push to regulate college athletics after the 2021 landmark Supreme Court decision that ultimately led to the NCAA allowing college athletes to profit off of their name, image and likeness.<\/p>\n

But nine people close to the process say Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and ranking member Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) have struggled to secure support among key industry players, including the Big Ten Conference and the Southeastern Conference, and universities are pushing for major changes to the bill before it\u2019s brought to the floor.<\/p>\n

With just a handful of legislative days left before the Senate leaves town for August recess, universities are on the cusp of starting another school year governed by a patchwork of state laws and court rulings that they say is financially unsustainable.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt would be challenging for me to imagine supporting it if the Big Ten Conference and our two member universities in the state aren\u2019t supportive,\u201d Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) said of Cruz\u2019s bill.<\/p>\n

The bill, which lays out guidelines for everything from student athlete pay to negotiating broadcast rights, has languished amid pushback from the Big Ten and the SEC, the nation\u2019s two most powerful college sports conferences. They\u2019re zeroing in on a section allowing conferences to jointly negotiate their media rights, insisting it include explicit language clarifying that such action is voluntary.<\/p>\n

Supporters of that \u201cmedia pooling\u201d provision argue it would bring stability to the industry by distributing streaming revenue more evenly across conferences, helping them absorb costs associated with the new era of paying student athletes outright. But the Big Ten and the SEC, which stand to lose the competitive edge their member schools reap from lucrative TV contracts, worry it would force them to share revenue with rival conferences \u2014 and they\u2019re not the only ones taking issue with the section.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe were unclear why the [media pooling provision] needed to be in this bill,\u201d said Big East Commissioner Val Ackerman, who represents schools that could stand to profit from jointly negotiating media rights. \u201cWe\u2019re not convinced that\u2019s the magic wand.\u201d<\/p>\n

Ackerman said she had not yet seen modeling that proved media pooling would significantly increase revenue, adding that she had \u201call sorts of questions\u201d around the provision that the committee had not answered.<\/p>\n

$\"Sen.$ <\/p>\n

Lawmakers have inched closer to bringing the SEC and the Big Ten on board in recent days, according to people directly engaged on the bill, but a deal remains elusive. Cruz and Cantwell hosted a call Sunday night with several commissioners and Notre Dame Athletic Director Pete Bevacqua alongside Vermont Sen. Peter Welch, one of the bill\u2019s Democratic cosponsors.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor how many conversations we have had with the Cruz and Cantwell team, I would say we’ve made stunningly little progress,\u201d said one lobbyist directly engaged on the bill who was granted anonymity to describe private deliberations.<\/p>\n

But Cruz regularly projects optimism that the bill is nearly ready. Asked if he was concerned about Republican votes for the bill if the two major conferences were not on board, he said no, adding that 70 percent of the committee voted for it.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think we will see something comparable on the floor next week,\u201d he told Blue Light News on Wednesday. \u201cI believe we\u2019re going to pass this bill, and we\u2019re going to see a large bipartisan vote on the floor of the Senate.\u201d<\/p>\n

Cruz has poured renewed energy into the effort to get the bill across the finish line in recent days, penning an op-ed<\/u><\/a> in USA Today and meeting with other lawmakers including House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, according to one person familiar with the matter.<\/p>\n

Two people granted anonymity to share private discussions said Senate Majority Leader John Thune has expressed interest in moving the bill to the floor once it can get 60 votes.<\/p>\n

Thune told reporters last week he thinks it\u2019s unlikely PSCA will pass the Senate before August amid other major priorities on Blue Light News. But on Monday, he struck a slightly different tune, saying talks were \u201csteering in a really good direction.\u201d In a Wednesday interview with Blue Light News, Thune didn’t rule out teeing up the bill for the fall before the August break.<\/p>\n

The Commerce panel has made some concessions to the conferences, including clarifying that schools can\u2019t face litigation for declining to participate in media pooling, according to three people granted anonymity to describe private talks.<\/p>\n

The lawmakers are also offering to provide schools with an additional $20 million pool of funds for retaining student athletes, in addition to $5 million specifically for name, image, likeness promotional opportunities in women\u2019s sports, according to the people.<\/p>\n

But new legislative text sent to the two conferences on Tuesday afternoon lacks several key demands that the SEC and the Big Ten say are critical to winning their support, including a provision clarifying that postseason tournaments and contests would be excluded from media pooling, according to a draft obtained by Blue Light News.<\/p>\n

Complicating things further, the draft includes a blank section called \u201cIGNITE HBCUs Sports and Media Act.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cMajor concessions were made overnight,\u201d a committee aide told Blue Light News on Wednesday. \u201cAt this point, with every passing minute, odds are slimmer that we can move the bill before the August recess. We\u2019ve been working night and day to make the revisions they said they needed, and we need an answer.\u201d<\/p>\n

The SEC has also pressed lawmakers<\/a> on another priority: to insert \u201ccritical amendments\u201d broadening antitrust and preemption language, according to University of Tennessee Chancellor Donde Plowman, who chairs a coalition of presidents and chancellors across the Southeastern Conference. This would shield the NCAA and conferences from certain antitrust lawsuits and block states from setting their own rules governing college athletics and athlete pay.<\/p>\n

But the latest draft of the bill failed to meaningfully change those pieces of the legislation.<\/p>\n

Cruz and Cantwell are also unlikely to win the support of a broad group of southern GOP senators without the backing of the SEC \u2014 a goal they continue to pursue regardless.<\/p>\n

$\"Sen.$ <\/p>\n

Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) said Tuesday she plans to offer an amendment ensuring some of its provisions apply to high school sports. Britt has yet to publicly declare her position on the package amid opposition from Auburn University and The University of Alabama<\/u><\/a>, the largest universities in her home state.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe don\u2019t need to solve one problem in order to then create or leave a gap in another,\u201d Britt said in an interview. \u201cAdditionally, I want to make sure that we still protect people\u2019s ability to allow their programs and conferences to thrive, and I don\u2019t think we’ve hit the mark on that just yet. But I certainly hope we can find a pathway forward.\u201d<\/p>\n

Britt\u2019s fellow GOP senator from Alabama, Tommy Tuberville \u2014 the former head football coach at Auburn, University of Mississippi, Texas Tech and University of Cincinnati \u2014 has been vocal in his opposition to the bill.<\/p>\n

Cruz and Cantwell have touted support for the legislation across two dozen conferences and more than 250 individual universities, plus organizations like the NFL Players Association and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee.<\/p>\n

But many of these same groups are also expressing some qualms with the package\u2019s current form.<\/p>\n

One of those groups is Ackerman\u2019s Big East conference, which consists of 11 universities including Georgetown and Villanova. Ackerman said while Big East ultimately thinks \u201cit\u2019s better to have the bill than not to have the bill,\u201d several crucial sticking points remain.<\/p>\n

That includes the fact that Cruz and Cantwell\u2019s bill doesn\u2019t address whether college athletes can be considered employees with bargaining rights \u2014 an omission Ackerman called \u201cdisappointing.\u201d<\/p>\n

The House\u2019s college sports bill, the SCORE Act, explicitly barred college athletes from attaining employee status. It had the support of many of the industry\u2019s largest conferences, including Big East, but failed to make it across the finish line amid opposition from hard-liners who argued the bill was too favorable to the NCAA.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019re trying to strike the right balance\u201d with the remaining sticking points, said Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt, one of the bill\u2019s GOP cosponsors who has been in many of the recent meetings with Cruz and Cantwell. \u201cThere\u2019s a lot of things going on. But I feel good about it \u2014 we\u2019re trying to build as broad a coalition as possible.\u201d<\/p>\n

Cruz and Cantwell have also touted backing from Louisiana State University, pointing to its board chair Lee Mallett and president Wade Rousse as signatories on a June 1 letter<\/u><\/a> expressing \u201centhusiastic support\u201d for the bill.<\/p>\n

But Mallett and Rousse later said they did not support<\/u><\/a> Cruz and Cantwell\u2019s Senate legislation. Mallett said he meant to support the House\u2019s SCORE Act, not the Senate\u2019s version, and Rousse said he never agreed to have his name signed onto the letter.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile we appreciate all the efforts surrounding the Protect College Sports Act, we believe key issues remain with the legislation and we do not support the bill in its current form,\u201d Rousse and Mallett wrote in a separate letter to the Commerce panel last week. Louisiana Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy shared the letter on social media<\/u><\/a> and said \u201cLSU is right\u201d to oppose the bill.<\/p>\n

Supporters of the Protect College Sports Act applaud its provisions requiring agents to register with states and capping how much they can charge student athletes, along with the sections governing athlete compensation.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe bill is not perfect, but it does address some very vital components in my mind that would improve the health of the college sports ecosystem,\u201d West Coast Conference Commissioner Stu Jackson said in an interview.<\/p>\n

Jackson, whose conference includes Gonzaga University and the University of Portland, said he would like to see the bill include limitations on expansion for larger conferences and a higher salary cap for student athletes, but he said talks with the Commerce panel about the bill had been \u201cvery productive.\u201d<\/p>\n

That\u2019s not a view shared by multiple lobbyists representing college athletics conferences who are directly involved in talks about the bill.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s not honest engagement or negotiation,\u201d said a second lobbyist, granted anonymity to describe private discussions. \u201cIt\u2019s really hard to get to a deal when there\u2019s no trust, and there\u2019s not a lot of trust right now.\u201d<\/p>\n

Jordain Carney contributed to this report.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"